The Richest Fed Chair in History, Blocked by an Absurd Political Farce

marsbit2026-04-15 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-04-15 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The nomination of Kevin Warsh, a former Federal Reserve governor with a personal wealth estimated between $131 million and $209 million, to become the next Fed Chair is stalled by a political standoff. Republican Senator Thom Tillis vows to block the confirmation in the Senate Banking Committee to protest a Justice Department investigation into current Chair Jerome Powell over misleading testimony about a $2.5 billion building renovation. Powell claims the probe is political retaliation for not cutting rates faster. With Powell's term ending on May 15, he has stated he will remain as acting chair if Warsh is not confirmed, creating an unprecedented leadership crisis. Warsh's extensive financial disclosures reveal significant investments, including in crypto entities like Polymarket, Solana, and Bitcoin Lightning Network firms, though he has pledged to divest if confirmed. His potential leadership is seen as favorable for crypto and rate cuts, unlike Powell's cautious stance. The outcome hinges on whether the DOJ investigation is resolved in the next 30 days, a period critical for global markets and crypto regulation.

Written by: Xiaobing, Deep Tide TechFlow

Introduction: With a net worth exceeding $200 million and an investment in Polymarket, Kevin Warsh is just 30 days and one crucial vote away from leading the Federal Reserve.

Next Monday, April 21, at 10 AM, Washington D.C.

Kevin Warsh will sit in the hearing room of the Senate Banking Committee, facing questioning. If all goes smoothly, he will become the first Fed Chair in history to have publicly invested in Polymarket, Solana, and a Bitcoin Lightning Network startup.

But things will not go smoothly.

Because in this hearing room, one of the 13 Republican committee members has already publicly declared: no matter what Warsh says, he will vote no. This person is Thom Tillis, the Republican Senator from North Carolina.

His reason for opposition has nothing to do with Warsh himself. He opposes because the Department of Justice is still investigating the current Fed Chair, Jerome Powell.

The cause of this investigation is the renovation cost of a building.

The $2.5 Billion Renovation Case: A Precision Strike Against the Fed's Independence

The story begins in 2025.

The renovation project for the Federal Reserve headquarters building severely exceeded its budget, ultimately costing around $2.5 billion. Powell had testified about this before the Senate Banking Committee. Washington D.C. Federal Prosecutor Jeanine Pirro subsequently initiated a criminal investigation, issuing a grand jury subpoena to the Fed, on the grounds that Powell may have made misleading statements during his congressional testimony.

Powell's reaction was unusually fierce. He publicly stated that the true purpose of this investigation was not the cost overrun, but retaliation from Trump for his refusal to cut interest rates faster.

Tillis sided with Powell. This Republican senator, who is set to retire in 2027 and faces no re-election pressure, made a resounding statement: "There is no room for compromise in protecting the Federal Reserve's independence from political interference or legal intimidation."

His stance is clear: until the DOJ concludes its investigation into Powell, he will not vote to approve any Fed nominees, including Warsh.

The Republicans hold only a slim 13-to-11 seat majority on the Senate Banking Committee. Losing Tillis's vote, coupled with near-certain unanimous opposition from Democrats, means Warsh's nomination cannot pass at the committee level.

On the other end of the investigation, Prosecutor Pirro is not backing down. Federal Judge James Boasberg has already dismissed her subpoena, stating bluntly in his ruling that "the government has not submitted any evidence of fraud," and that the primary purpose of the investigation appears to be to pressure Powell. Pirro announced she would appeal and publicly dismissed Tillis's obstruction as "white noise."

"I don't know, and I don't care. I'm following the legal channels, I don't care what they say."

A three-way stalemate. Warsh is caught in the middle.

After May 15th, Who Sits in the Fed Chair's Seat?

Powell's term as Chair expires on May 15th. This is a hard deadline.

But his term as a Fed Governor doesn't end until January 2028. This means that even after his chairmanship ends, he will legally remain a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors.

Powell has made it clear: if Warsh is not confirmed by May 15th, he will continue to lead the Fed as "Acting Chair." New York Fed President John Williams publicly supported this stance, saying the Federal Open Market Committee can "operate as usual" without a separate vote.

This creates an unprecedented situation: Trump has nominated a new Chair, but the old Chair refuses to leave, with both sides simultaneously claiming the right to sit in that chair.

The White House clearly does not want to see this scenario. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said last week to reporters: "We want Warsh in place as soon as possible." National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett was more optimistic, saying he is "highly confident" Warsh will be in place before Powell's term ends. Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott predicted that "the DOJ will conclude its investigation in the coming weeks, and Tillis will ultimately vote yes."

But these are hopes, not facts. The fact is: from the April 21st hearing to May 15th, there are only 24 days. In these 24 days, the hearing, committee vote, and full Senate vote must be completed. Normally, this process takes weeks to months.

And what Tillis said to CNN today leaves no room for ambiguity: "I won't spend five minutes asking Warsh about his qualifications, because he is qualified. I will spend five minutes talking about that sham investigation, and until it's over, I will vote no."

$192 Million in 69 Pages: The Wealth Map of the Next Fed Chair

As the political battle intensified, Warsh submitted a 69-page OGE 278e financial disclosure form on April 14th. This document is not only a necessary prerequisite for the confirmation process but also a mirror, reflecting what kind of person this potential next Fed Chair truly is.

First, the scale. Warsh's personally named assets are approximately between $131 million and $209 million. His wife, Jane Lauder (a member of the Estée Lauder founding family, Forbes estimates her net worth at around $1.9 billion), has additional assets worth hundreds of millions. If confirmed, he would become the wealthiest Fed Chair in history, far surpassing the previously deemed "richest Fed Chair" Powell (assets estimated between $19.7 million and $75 million). Core holdings include two investments in Juggernaut Fund LP, each over $50 million, related to the legendary hedge fund manager Stanley Druckenmiller's Duquesne Family Office. Warsh received $10.2 million in consulting fees from Duquesne, $1.55 million from GoldenTree Asset Management, $750,000 from Cerberus Capital, and $750,000 from Brevan Howard—all institutions with deep involvement in crypto and macro trading.

Then comes the more intriguing part: through DCM Investments 10 LLC and the AVF series of funds, Warsh holds equity in a string of crypto and blockchain companies. Ethereum L2 network Blast, decentralized prediction market Polymarket, Bitcoin Lightning Network payment company Flashnet, Ethereum development platform Tenderly, DeFi investment platform SkyLink, blockchain social networks Arena and DeSo, crypto-focused investment firm Polychain. He has also previously invested in Bitwise, which manages a spot Bitcoin ETF.

Under OGE rules, these unvalued positions mean each is worth less than $1,000. The volume is tiny. But the signal is powerful.

This is not someone who passively bought a bit of a Bitcoin spot ETF in a brokerage account. His holdings actively span the entire crypto ecosystem, from L1 to L2, from DeFi to prediction markets, from payment infrastructure to developer tools, systematically positioning in over a dozen cutting-edge projects. Every sector he has touched is precisely the area most directly influenced by the Fed's regulatory and monetary policy decisions.

Warsh has pledged to divest all assets that could pose a conflict of interest upon confirmation. OGE certifying official Heather Jones confirmed that after completing the divestitures, he will comply with the requirements of the Ethics in Government Act.

But the issue is not whether he will sell these positions. The issue is: what does it mean for someone with such a deep understanding of crypto infrastructure to sit in the Fed Chair's seat?

Two Paths, Two Worlds

The market now faces a classic binary game.

Path A: Pirro withdraws the investigation, Tillis switches to a yes vote, Warsh takes office in mid-May.

This is the scenario the White House is betting on. Scott Bessent publicly said "let the new Chair Warsh lead the next rate-cutting cycle," hinting that Warsh might quickly push for rate cuts upon taking office. Although historically a hawk (he warned about inflation risks even during the 2008 financial recession), recent signals show Warsh leaning towards supporting rate cuts. For the crypto market, a Fed Chair who simultaneously understands the crypto ecosystem and favors looser liquidity is the most favorable combination imaginable.

Path B: Pirro insists on appealing, Tillis doesn't budge, Powell continues to lead as Acting Chair.

This is a scenario full of uncertainty. Powell has clearly stated he will not leave the Fed Board before the investigation concludes. If he continues to chair FOMC meetings and set interest rate policy in an acting capacity, Trump will face a Fed Chair who is "nominally departed but effectively still in power." This constitutional-level debate about Fed independence could be decided in the Supreme Court, which has yet to rule on whether Trump has the authority to fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook.

For the market, Path B means persistent uncertainty. The direction of monetary policy will depend on the outcome of a legal tug-of-war, and the timeline for that legal battle is unpredictable.

What Does This Have to Do with Bitcoin? Everything.

On the surface, this is a Washington drama about Fed personnel. But for those in the crypto market, every variable points directly to asset prices.

Interest Rate Path. Warsh taking office implies升温的降息预期 (warming rate cut expectations). Bessent is already publicly urging "let Warsh lead the next cycle." Rate cuts are a definite positive for risk assets. If Powell continues acting, he will likely maintain a "pause" stance given inflation risks from the US-Iran war, potentially delaying cuts until the second half of the year or later.

Regulatory Signals. A Fed Chair who has invested in Polymarket, Tenderly, and Polychain, versus a Jerome Powell who once publicly said "if I were the government, I'd shut down cryptocurrency," have vastly different impacts on the crypto regulatory environment. Warsh has called Bitcoin a "good cop for policy," believing its price can tell policymakers when they are right and when they are wrong. This cognitive framework suggests he is unlikely to support hostile regulation of the crypto industry.

Stablecoin Legislation. Warsh's confirmation timeline highly overlaps with the window for stablecoin legislation advancing in Congress. A pro-crypto Fed Chair could significantly accelerate this process.

At next Monday's hearing, Tillis will likely spend his five minutes of questioning not asking Warsh a single question about monetary policy, but using all the time to lambast Pirro's investigation. This scene itself will become a headline for global financial media.

The real suspense is not in the hearing room. It lies in: Will Pirro withdraw the investigation before May 15th? What is Tillis's bottom line? If neither gives in, will Trump directly intervene with the DOJ?

There are 30 days left until Powell's term expires. Who sits in the Fed Chair's seat 30 days from now will redefine the rules of the game for the global capital markets in the second half of 2026.

For the crypto market, the weight of these 30 days may be heavier than that of any FOMC meeting.

İlgili Sorular

QWho is Kevin Warsh and what is his significance in the context of the Federal Reserve?

AKevin Warsh is a nominee for the position of Federal Reserve Chair, known for his extensive wealth (estimated between $131 million to $209 million) and investments in crypto and blockchain companies like Polymarket, Solana, and Bitcoin Lightning Network startups. If confirmed, he would be the first Fed Chair with such公开 investments.

QWhy is Thom Tillis opposing Kevin Warsh's nomination to the Federal Reserve?

AThom Tillis, a Republican senator, opposes Warsh's nomination because he insists on protecting the Federal Reserve's independence from political interference. He refuses to vote for any Fed nominee until the Justice Department's investigation into current Chair Jerome Powell over the Fed headquarters renovation cost overrun is concluded.

QWhat is the controversy surrounding Jerome Powell and the Justice Department?

AThe Justice Department, led by prosecutor Jeanine Pirro, is investigating Jerome Powell for potentially misleading Congress about the $2.5 billion cost overrun in the Fed headquarters renovation. Powell claims the investigation is retaliation from Trump for not cutting interest rates faster.

QWhat happens if Kevin Warsh is not confirmed by May 15th, when Powell's term expires?

AIf Warsh is not confirmed by May 15th, Jerome Powell has stated he will continue as 'Acting Chair' of the Federal Reserve, leveraging his ongoing role as a Fed governor until 2028. This could lead to a unprecedented situation with both Powell and Warsh claiming authority.

QHow might Kevin Warsh's potential leadership impact cryptocurrency markets and policy?

AWarsh's leadership could positively impact crypto markets due to his inclination towards rate cuts and deep understanding of crypto infrastructure. He has referred to Bitcoin as a 'good cop for policy,' suggesting a more favorable regulatory approach compared to Powell, who has expressed hostility towards cryptocurrencies.

İlgili Okumalar

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbit53 dk önce

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbit53 dk önce

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbit1 saat önce

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbit1 saat önce

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbit1 saat önce

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

marsbit1 saat önce

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619): Market Insights & Analysis This weekly digest curates in-depth analysis often lost in the information flow, focusing on key insights across macro trends, investment, and technology. **Macro & Geopolitics:** With the Strait of Hormuz reopening and military conflict shifting to negotiation, markets are pivoting from "war shock" to "supply restoration." Trades include shorting crude risk premiums, longing airlines/tourism, Asian energy importers, and bond duration, while shorting inflation expectations. LNG, fertilizer, and chemical chains are also being repriced. **Investment & VC:** Ray Dalio advises against betting on concentrated AI giants dominating indices, advocating for diversified portfolios of high-quality, low-correlation assets instead. Analysis covers the 4-year crypto cycle, predicting the core surviving product by 2029 will be asset trading markets. Current BTC metrics suggest a potential bottoming zone, presenting a patient accumulation window. SpaceX's high-profile IPO at a $2.1T valuation faces scrutiny over fundamentals, with key watchpoints being its likely inclusion in the Nasdaq index and Q2 earnings. Concerns are raised about potential "gamma squeeze" and systemic risks if its narrative-driven valuation gets amplified by passive index funds. Robinhood (HOOD) is noted for breaking its high correlation with crypto, bolstered by its stock trading and new underwriting business. **Web3 & AI:** A warning highlights ~$1.8T in off-balance-sheet AI infrastructure commitments (purchase commitments, leases) as a potential systemic risk if AI monetization lags. AI models are being used for World Cup predictions, adding a new layer for betting markets. A cost breakdown of a $20 AI subscription reveals the supply chain from model companies to cloud, GPUs, and power. **Prediction Markets:** The emergence of prediction market "concept stocks" is noted, with Robinhood developing its own platform, Rothera, signaling a shift from market competition to a "channel war" for user access. **CeFi & DeFi:** The SpaceX IPO tested perpetual contract mechanisms for pre-IPO assets, highlighting challenges in handling corporate actions like stock splits on-chain. The de-pegging of STRC (Strategy's preferred share) to ~$89 reflects market concerns over MicroStrategy's capital structure and BTC-backed leverage model. BlackRock's covered-call Bitcoin ETF (BITA) offers yield but caps upside, appealing to yield-seeking institutions. **Ethereum:** An opinion piece argues Ethereum's core strength is its vast developer community and composability, solidifying its role as the default operating system for the financial internet. **Weekly Hot Topics:** Include the US-Iran deal reopening the Strait of Hormuz, Fed's hawkish hold, Anthropic restricting model access, SpaceX acquiring Cursor, and a humorous stock surge for "Liuliumei" due to its "LLM" ticker.

marsbit1 saat önce

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

marsbit1 saat önce

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

In this letter to entrepreneurs, Alliance reflects on the success of Cursor's $60 billion sale to Elon Musk, using it as a case study to counter the misconception that opportunities in crowded fields like AI or crypto are exhausted. The piece argues that great companies like Cursor, Stripe, Figma, and Shopify are not built by geniuses with perfect ideas, but by founders who start with a non-consensus belief about the future and build for years before that future becomes obvious to everyone. They identify long-term shifts, find overlooked entry points, and execute relentlessly. The framework for success involves: 1. **Identifying your place in the technology cycle**: Early-stage opportunities focus on making new tech usable for power users (e.g., Coinbase, Cursor). Later-stage opportunities involve finding the "yin" to an existing "yang"—the blind spots of first-generation players (e.g., Stripe vs. PayPal, Figma vs. Adobe). 2. **Cultivating unique insights**: Immerse yourself deeply in the market. Use every product, talk to users, and build an audience. Insights will emerge naturally from deep engagement. 3. **Finding a "hair-on-fire" problem**: Look for a 10x improvement or a severe, urgent pain point. The strongest signal is people already building clumsy workarounds. 4. **Building a focused MVP**: Don't just add features because you can. Ask why users would abandon their current tool for yours. The best startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction. 5. **Winning a distribution channel**: Distribution is often the moat. Before product-market fit, achieve channel-market fit. Find where your customers are and build an engine to reach them, even through unscalable, manual efforts initially. 6. **Persistence**: The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Success stories like Cursor, Airbnb, and Nvidia involved years of grinding, rejection, and perseverance when the path forward seemed unclear. The conclusion is that there is no secret. Most people fail to consistently execute these steps over the long term. The few who do build the companies that define the next era. The world is yours to create.

链捕手1 saat önce

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

链捕手1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片