The Door to Offshore Stablecoins Quietly Closes Amid the Vision of RMB Internationalization

比推2026-02-12 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-12 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

China's recent regulatory crackdown has effectively closed the door on offshore issuance of yuan-pegged stablecoins, dealing a significant blow to Hong Kong’s ambitions to become a digital asset hub. The new rules, announced on February 7, explicitly prohibit domestic institutions from issuing digital tokens overseas without approval, citing concerns over monetary sovereignty. This move dashes earlier market expectations of a policy thaw in China’s stance toward digital assets, particularly after PBOC Governor Pan Gongsheng’s earlier comments about the yuan challenging dollar dominance. Industry observers note that the tightening was foreshadowed as early as August 2024, when Chinese authorities began restricting stablecoin-related research and promotional events. The latest policy removes any ambiguity around private yuan stablecoin issuance and reinforces capital control priorities. As a result, firms that had planned to apply for stablecoin licenses in Hong Kong—including Ant Group and JD.com—are now expected to focus solely on Hong Kong dollar-pegged stablecoins, if they proceed at all. Market data reflects the dampening effect: open interest in Bitcoin perpetual futures has fallen roughly 50% since October, and investors have withdrawn approximately $3.3 billion from U.S. Ethereum ETFs since last fall. The regulatory shift underscores the fundamental tension between China’s capital controls and the borderless nature of crypto innovation, forcing industry players to con...

Author: Suvashree Ghosh, Bloomberg

Compiled by: Saoirse, Foresight News


Editor's Note: Recently, the global cryptocurrency market has continued to slump, and China has once again tightened regulations on cryptocurrencies and stablecoins, explicitly prohibiting the issuance of RMB-pegged stablecoins overseas without approval, directly impacting the progress of Hong Kong's digital asset hub construction. This article focuses on the market reaction and industry impact after the policy implementation, revealing the core contradiction between capital controls and crypto innovation. Against the backdrop of intensified industry reshuffling and accelerated capital withdrawal, the crypto sector is returning to pragmatic development. The regulatory boundaries and future direction are worth continuous attention.

November 26, 2025, a cryptocurrency exchange storefront in Hong Kong. Photo: Lam Yik/Bloomberg

Setback in the Digital Realm

Last year, an increasing number of crypto industry commentators believed that China's stance on the digital asset sector might be softening.

After People's Bank of China Governor Pan Gongsheng proposed the vision that the RMB has the potential to challenge the dominance of the US dollar, market talk of a "policy thaw" kept emerging.

But on February 7th, all these expectations came to an abrupt halt.

Amid the latest round of cryptocurrency crash, China tightened regulations on cryptocurrencies and the tokenization of physical assets, prohibiting domestic institutions from issuing digital tokens overseas and banning the issuance of RMB-pegged stablecoins abroad without approval. Officials stated this move was to prevent monetary sovereignty risks.

Angela Ang, Head of APAC Policy and Strategic Partnerships at blockchain intelligence firm TRM Labs, said: "China's attitude towards stablecoins has been tentative at best and has cooled significantly in recent months."

She stated that the central bank's latest announcement "completely dashes any hope for the launch of an offshore RMB stablecoin in the short term — certainly not in Hong Kong, and most likely not elsewhere either."

For Hong Kong and its years-long goal of building a digital asset hub, this is a major setback.

In June last year, Hong Kong's Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, Christopher Hui, had said that, subject to regulatory requirements, the possibility of pegging Hong Kong stablecoins to the RMB was not ruled out. It is now widely believed that he will shut this door completely.

Surge in USD Stablecoin Supply During Trump Administration

Source: Artemis Analytics

As Angela Ang mentioned, signals of this regulatory tightening had already emerged.

As early as last August, China had required local securities firms and related institutions to stop publishing stablecoin research reports and hosting related promotional seminars to curb overheated market sentiment.

Patrick Tan, General Counsel at blockchain intelligence firm ChainArgos, said last week's policy announcement "removes the uncertainty hanging over the market regarding the private issuance of RMB stablecoins. Issuers now know exactly where the red lines are."

Entities applying for licenses can only focus on issuing stablecoins pegged to the Hong Kong dollar.

Bloomberg News previously reported that up to 50 companies in Hong Kong planned to apply for stablecoin licenses last year, including tech giants Ant Group and JD.com. But according to an October report by the Financial Times, these companies were forced to suspend their stablecoin plans after intervention from Beijing.

Ant Group and JD.com did not respond to requests for comment.

As of this Tuesday, Hong Kong had issued licenses to 11 cryptocurrency exchanges, while approving 62 companies to conduct digital asset trading for clients. The list includes China-backed institutions such as CMB International Securities Limited, Guotai Junan Securities (Hong Kong) Limited, and Tinful Futures Limited.

But industry players worry that without access to the RMB, the entire setup might be in vain.

"The issue was never about Hong Kong's regulatory framework, but always about whether China would tolerate RMB-denominated instruments circulating outside its control," Patrick Tan said, adding, "Capital controls and stablecoin liberalization are fundamentally incompatible."

Market Data Continues to Weaken

Bitcoin Perpetual Futures Open Interest Continues to Decline

Source: Coinglass

Bitcoin perpetual futures open interest has failed to rebound since starting to decline last October, highlighting the lack of confidence supporting this rally. Data from Coinglass shows it has fallen by about 50% from the October high.

Capital Outflow: $3.3 Billion

Data compiled by Bloomberg Intelligence shows that investors have withdrawn approximately $3.3 billion from US Ethereum ETFs since the crash in early October, with over $500 million withdrawn this year. Data shows that Ethereum ETF assets have fallen below $13 billion, the lowest level since last July.

Industry Perspectives

"The market is consolidating around what actually works. Even well-funded crypto-native VCs are pivoting heavily into fintech, stablecoin businesses, and prediction markets; it's hard to get attention for anything else."

— Santiago Roel Santos, Founder and CEO of crypto private equity firm Inversion

Venture capital funds in the crypto industry are shifting their focus to better-performing areas, such as stablecoin infrastructure, on-chain prediction markets, and expanding into related adjacent fields.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

BitPush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

BitPush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7611508

İlgili Sorular

QWhat was the key regulatory change announced by China regarding stablecoins on February 7th?

AChina tightened regulations on cryptocurrencies and tokenization of real-world assets, prohibiting domestic institutions from issuing digital tokens overseas and banning the issuance of RMB-pegged stablecoins abroad without approval to prevent monetary sovereignty risks.

QHow did Angela Ang from TRM Labs describe China's attitude towards stablecoins and the possibility of offshore RMB stablecoins?

AAngela Ang stated that China's attitude towards stablecoins was tentative at best and had cooled in recent months, and the announcement completely dashed any hopes of launching offshore RMB stablecoins in the near future, especially in Hong Kong and likely elsewhere.

QWhat impact did the new regulations have on Hong Kong's ambitions to become a digital asset hub?

AThe new regulations were a significant setback for Hong Kong's goal of becoming a digital asset hub, as they effectively closed the door on the possibility of issuing RMB-pegged stablecoins, forcing companies to focus only on Hong Kong dollar-pegged stablecoins.

QAccording to Patrick Tan from ChainArgos, what is the fundamental conflict between capital controls and stablecoin liberalization?

APatrick Tan stated that capital controls and stablecoin liberalization are fundamentally incompatible, as the issue was never about Hong Kong's regulatory framework but whether China would tolerate RMB-denominated instruments circulating outside its control.

QWhat trend did Santiago Roel Santos, CEO of Inversion, observe in crypto venture capital investments?

ASantiago Roel Santos noted that crypto-native venture capital firms are consolidating around areas that actually work, such as stablecoin infrastructure and on-chain prediction markets, and are expanding into adjacent areas, while other sectors struggle to attract attention.

İlgili Okumalar

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbit11 saat önce

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbit11 saat önce

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbit13 saat önce

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbit13 saat önce

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbit13 saat önce

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbit13 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片