The Art of Speculation: When Coin Launches Become a Mind-Reading Game Centered on Leaders' Social Dynamics

比推2026-01-08 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-08 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The article "The Art of Reading Between the Lines: When Coin Listings Become a Game of Guessing Leaders' Social Cues" critiques the culture of speculation and sycophancy in the cryptocurrency space, particularly around Binance’s listing process. It draws a parallel to a Shandong dining custom where the fish head is pointed toward the guest of honor as a sign of respect—a tacit social rule that requires intuition rather than explicit instruction. The piece centers on a recent event where He Yi, Binance’s co-founder, posted a cryptic New Year’s tweet saying “我踏马来了” (roughly: “Here the f*ck I come”). Shortly after, a community-created meme token with the same name was listed on Binance Alpha, despite He Yi’s earlier statements against favoritism and “insider coins.” The author argues that this reflects a deeper cultural issue: the shift from merit-based innovation to a system where success depends on interpreting the subtle hints of influential figures. Unlike traditional industries where technical skill or product quality drive progress, the crypto industry often prioritizes access to information, relationships, and the ability to please key decision-makers. The piece suggests that this “Shandong mindset”—where insiders learn to “read the room” rather than challenge or create—undermines transparency and rewards those who excel at flattery rather than genuine contribution. While He Yi may not have directly endorsed the token, the very fact that her social media activity can t...

Author: Kuli, Shenchao TechFlow

Original Title: Where the Fish Head Faces He Yi: Crypto Has Its Shandong-Style Politics Too


There's a rule at Shandong banquets: when the fish is served, the head must face the seat of honor.

Whoever it faces is the main guest and must drink first. This isn't written down anywhere, but everyone in Shandong knows it. No one teaches you; you just learn it.

Recently, someone drew a picture called "Crypto Shandong-Style Politics." A group of people sit around a table eating fish, with He Yi in the seat of honor, flanked by KOLs, the listing team, and social media editors.

Caption: For a Binance listing, the fish head must face He Yi.

On January 1st, He Yi posted a New Year's tweet. Riding a white horse by the seaside, caption in four characters:

我踏马来了 (Wǒ tà mǎ lái le - I've f*cking arrived).

A fine New Year's greeting. "Tà mǎ" (踏马), the Year of the Horse, with a bit of playful homophonic wordplay.

Today, Binance Alpha listed a new token called "我踏马来了" (I've F*cking Arrived). It was community-made, with no direct connection to He Yi.

But look at this chain: First Sister tweets, the community creates a token, Alpha lists it.

No one needs to give any orders in the middle.

Last year, Binance was hounded by accusations of "BFF coins," alleging shady listing practices and利益输送 (interest conveyance/corruption). He Yi responded several times, saying they were reflecting, adjusting, and even created Alpha as a screening pool.

In December, she also tweeted saying, don't try to find angles in our official tweets about various Memes; we won't pay attention to this kind of thing anymore.

28 days later, her New Year's tweet became a new token on Alpha.

What was the problem with BFF coins? It was about backdoor deals, favoritism,利益输送 (interest conveyance/corruption).

These require evidence, a paper trail, a specific "BFF."

But "I've F*cking Arrived" doesn't need any of that.

No backdoor, no favoritism, no利益输送. First Sister posted a picture, and the people below just started moving on their own.

This perhaps touches on the essence of Shandong-style politics: the leader doesn't need to speak; you have to figure it out yourself.

Someone in the community commented that Alpha is now just a tool for currying favor, its purpose is to make First Sister happy.

Crude wording, but it describes a certain atmosphere.

When a platform's direction starts revolving around someone's social media activity, when "which coin to list" becomes "guess what she likes," rules cease to matter.

What matters is揣摩 (speculation/reading intentions).

Some put it more harshly: If you want to know if an industry has a future, ask one question—In this industry, do people who are good at flattery succeed more easily than people who are good at doing the work?

If the answer is "yes," then this industry is on the decline.

In crypto, this trick really works. And the most successful ones, everyone knows which direction the flattery should be aimed.

The core resources in the AI circle are technology and products; you have to deliver. Jensen Huang won't allocate you GPUs just because you call him daddy every day.

The core resources in the crypto circle are listing power, traffic, and who knows the news first. These things aren't in the code; they're in people's hands.

Things in people's hands must be obtained through human methods.

The more Shandong-style politics prevails, the more it relies on connections and information asymmetry, not innovation and technology.

He Yi might not even know about this. A small MEME worth a few million market cap isn't enough to bother the Co-CEO.

But that's precisely the problem.

She doesn't need to know. The fish head will turn by itself.

This is really much more efficient than BFF coins.

BFF coins at least required a BFF. Shandong-style politics only requires an atmosphere.

And those who see through this set of rules and implement them thoroughly are, in a way, also talented.

After all, in this society, people laugh at the poor, not the prostitute. (笑贫不笑娼 - A saying criticizing societal values that scorn poverty but overlook the means of acquiring wealth).


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

BitPush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

BitPush TG Channel: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7601064

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the core argument of the article 'The Art of Speculation: When Coin Listings Become a Mind-Reading Game Around a Leader's Social Media'?

AThe article argues that in the crypto space, especially around Binance, the process of token listings has shifted from being based on innovation and technology to a culture of揣摩 (speculation/guessing) where community members and projects try to interpret the social media posts of leaders like He Yi to gain favor, rather than relying on formal rules or merit.

QWhat is 'Shandong Study' (山东学) as described in the article, and how does it relate to Binance's token listing process?

A'Shandong Study' is a metaphor derived from a Shandong dining custom where the fish head is pointed towards the guest of honor. In the context of Binance, it symbolizes a culture where participants automatically align their actions (like creating and listing tokens) to please or anticipate the preferences of leader He Yi, without any explicit instruction, mimicking the unspoken rule of the dining tradition.

QHow does the article contrast the 'Shandong Study' phenomenon with the previous '闺蜜币' (close-friend coin) controversy at Binance?

AThe '闺蜜币' controversy involved allegations of explicit favoritism, backdoor deals, and利益输送 (benefit transfer) through personal connections. In contrast, the 'Shandong Study' phenomenon requires no direct orders or concrete relationships; it operates through an implicit atmosphere where community members spontaneously act to please the leader based on social media cues, making it more efficient and less traceable than the 'close-friend coin' issue.

QAccording to the article, what does the success of the meme token '我踏马来了' (I'm Coming on Horseback) demonstrate about the current state of the crypto industry?

AThe success of '我踏马来了'—a token created and listed on Binance Alpha simply because it was inspired by He Yi's tweet—demonstrates that in the crypto industry, success can be driven by揣摩 (speculating on) and catering to the preferences of influential leaders rather than technological innovation or product merit, indicating a reliance on人际关系 (relationships) and information asymmetry.

QWhat critical question does the article suggest asking to determine if an industry has a future, and what is the implied answer for the crypto space based on the examples given?

AThe article suggests asking: 'In this industry, do people who are good at flattery succeed more easily than those who are good at doing actual work?' The implied answer for the crypto space is 'yes,' as the examples show that tokens gaining traction through揣摩 (speculation) and alignment with leaders' social media are successful, suggesting the industry may be declining if this culture persists.

İlgili Okumalar

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

Japan's cabinet has introduced the 2026 Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform, shifting its primary fiscal target. The new framework moves away from the traditional annual primary balance goal and instead prioritizes a stable reduction of the debt-to-GDP ratio. This change is tied to a strategy of increased "responsible proactive fiscal" spending, aiming to boost long-term growth through investments in strategic sectors like AI, semiconductors, energy, and robotics. The government estimates total public and private investment in 62 key technologies could exceed 370 trillion yen by 2040. The market reaction has been mixed and cautious. While equity markets may respond to policy signals, bond markets are focused on fiscal credibility. Concerns center on whether the weakening of the clear primary balance anchor could lead to looser fiscal discipline. If investors doubt that these strategic investments will generate sufficient productivity gains, tax revenue, and nominal growth to outpace rising interest costs, they may demand higher yields on Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs). Recent volatility in the yen and JGB yields, with the 10-year yield briefly reaching 2.9%, reflects this skepticism. The success of this new framework hinges on two factors: whether Japan can achieve a nominal growth rate consistently higher than its long-term interest rates, and whether future budgets demonstrate disciplined control over bond issuance. The government's narrative is that strategic investment is essential to break Japan's cycle of low growth, aging, and labor shortages. However, the bond market will continuously assess the credibility of this plan, pricing the risk that it may represent fiscal expansion rather than a viable growth strategy.

marsbit3 dk önce

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

marsbit3 dk önce

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit34 dk önce

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit34 dk önce

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit53 dk önce

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit53 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片