The Ambitions of Kalshi, MTS, and a16z

marsbit2026-06-07 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-06-07 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

"Kalshi, MTS, and a16z's Ambition" explores prediction markets as a focal point for investors in 2025. The article traces their intellectual evolution from Hayek's ideas on distributed knowledge to Robin Hanson's logarithmic market scoring rule (LMSR), which incentivizes truth-telling. Venture firm Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) invested in prediction market platform Kalshi, valuing it at $220 billion. a16z argues these markets offer "presence"—a way for individuals to actively engage with and influence world events through financial bets, countering modern detachment. This transforms participants into "super observers" and grants the platform authority in defining event truth and importance. The piece positions prediction markets as a key component of a16z's envisioned "new media" empire. This strategy involves rapid, high-intensity content across platforms to "take over the timeline." Media company MTS exemplifies this with its constant news livestreams. Ultimately, Kalshi's value lies in its "reality distortion field"—the power to shape perception through the credibility of real-money markets, making it a potent tool within a16z's broader media and influence architecture.

Authors: Matou, Big Screwing

Prediction markets might be the only area in 2025 that can simultaneously excite the distinguished dollar fund investors, crypto natives, and media practitioners.

There are many reasons to be bullish on it, such as the regulatory arbitrage between state and federal betting laws in the US, the massive transaction fees brought by the extreme extrapolation of 0DTE, and the convergence of the content industry with light betting, and so on.

But today, we won't talk about these. Let's change direction and discuss the spirit behind prediction markets and how this spirit aligns with a16z, which champions the banner of "New Media," becoming one of the most crucial pieces in its new media empire.

The Spiritual Chronology of Prediction Markets

The product of a prediction market is simple (at least on the surface): it turns the object of a binary option bet into any event or information. However, the underlying spiritual core has evolved through several eras.

The earliest discussions about prediction markets actually come from Hayek. In his view, knowledge is unevenly distributed, and the market, as a coordination mechanism, mobilizes information from every corner of society. From vendors to experts, different people's judgments about the future converge into a price on the order book within the prediction market.

This discussion is the most ancient, but also the most frequently cited today. When you see marketing posts talking about "probability aggregation markets," "truth machines," etc., they all stem from Hayek's The Use of Knowledge in Society, published nearly a hundred years ago.

The torch was then passed to Robin Hanson after Hayek. The man still surfs Twitter with high intensity, debating with crypto natives. His main contribution lies in designing a mechanism called the Logarithmic Market Scoring Rule (LMSR), which makes it more beneficial for those who know the truth to tell it. This design basically established the paradigm for current prediction market design.

With such an incentive mechanism in place, information holders in various corners are motivated to contribute their information and participate in the market. Extrapolating further, it seems such markets could also be used for public governance. Opening a market for every future issue, letting people vote with real money, the future scenario would then be constructed in the changing odds on the order book. This utopia is called Futarchy, formed from "future" and the suffix "-archy" meaning governance.

Seminal Work: A Logarithmic Market Scoring Rule for Modular Information Aggregation

The above belongs to the official history, the kind you'd cover in a timeline lecture in a university microeconomics class. However, I believe that metaphysical discussions about prediction markets after this point are largely meaningless until a16z set its sights on this field.

Presence and New Media

a16z came into contact with the prediction market company Kalshi in 2024, then invested in its $5 billion round in August 2025 (the discount, if any, is currently unknown). Kalshi's valuation has now reached a staggering $22 billion, hailed as the fastest-growing company outside of AI (in terms of valuation).

After establishing its position, a16z activated its media machine, writing a series of long articles about why Kalshi is one of the most important companies of our time. Frankly, while the exchange and casino business is enticing, due to potential compliance pressures and moral risks, it never commands high PE multiples in the market. Clearly, a16z's vision extends beyond this.

So, where exactly does Kalshi, or the entire prediction market sector, hold its importance? a16z's answer is "Presence."

At our current juncture, human contact with the world is actually separated by a thin layer of plastic film—somewhat like only being able to browse the front end of a webpage while knowing nothing about its back-end construction. You can consume the front-end's audiovisual experience, narratives, and even "real feelings," but you cannot change or be present.

Not to mention, clearly in the not-too-distant future, even the transformation of the real world will be gradually outsourced to agents. So, what role do humans have in the historical process? It seems we're only left to bury our heads in light-colored sheets and cry after eating and drinking.

However, prediction markets offer a way to intervene, called prediction. It requires you to place bets with real money, then, like buying a ticket to enter a stadium, participate and observe the fluctuation of probabilities throughout the process, willingly bearing theta decay, and even screenshotting the prediction market probabilities, forwarding them in all group chats, loudly declaring your position and the viewpoint behind it.

This feeling is profoundly anti-cynical. In an instant, the infinite distances, the countless people, the selection of the cardinal, the depth of snow in New York, the rise and fall of crude oil within five minutes, and even whether Jesus will return in 2026, all become relevant to you. The uncertainty and powerlessness of postmodernity collapse under your potent predictions. You are no longer a gambler; you are an esteemed super-observer, a prophet of your tribe, a calm bystander of history.

When enough people start using, discussing, and relying on this medium, the authority of the market itself begins to rise. Kalshi will grant the ultimate interpretative power over an event's: 1. Authenticity 2. Significance. This is undoubtedly a key component in the new media empire envisioned by a16z.

One chart explaining the assassination of Charlie Kirk

Case Study: MTS

Finally, let's talk about this new media as defined by a16z. From the first-generation In-house Media championed by a16z and YC, to the second-generation VCs emerging from media like 20VC and Not Boring Capital, to the final stage where media like TBPN are acquired by companies and institutions, media power has been constantly shifting and decentralizing. The battleground for public opinion has also moved from blogs and TV programs to Twitter and podcasts.

Talking about VCs also needing to do content, build brands, and help founders with distribution is already old news in 2026. The new media a16z talks about is a full-spectrum project, covering upstream narrative setting, midstream product financing and promotion, to downstream customer acquisition—all within its scope, and at a pace far beyond what traditional media and agencies can comprehend.

What previously might have taken 3-6 months to plan, the new media will execute within weeks: founder podcasts, short video clips, AI-generated launch videos, newsletters about the company's spirit and development plans, etc., releasing information with extremely high intensity in an extremely short time. They call this "taking over the timeline."

Perhaps with all the noise from various self-media and AI-generated information, we just have to be even noisier. And our noise is more important than yours.

MTS (full name "Monitoring The Situation") embodies this philosophy, conducting 24/7 live news coverage on Twitter, putting a series of political figures, tech founders, and key figures in hot news stories on mic, then slicing and disseminating the content. They claim to only report on the most important thing happening in the world right now, until the next more important thing happens.

MTS Interviewing Robinhood

Looking back at Kalshi now, everything clicks. Relying solely on volume and a16z's endorsement, media like MTS can certainly survive, but their influence beyond a16z's light cone remains limited, more akin to a fraternity media or campus club publication. But prediction markets are different; the trading volume and positions are real money, seemingly possessing a certain detached, third-party coldness and persuasiveness.

Imagine, if you were a staunch MAGA supporter, seeing on Kalshi that the market for a Republican victory in the midterm elections had reached tens of billions in trading volume, but the price for the YES option for victory had dropped to $0.1, wouldn't you have a moment of doubt—do the Capitol Hill elites already know the result? Has the fair information market already given a picture of the future?

This is perhaps the core reason Kalshi is worth $22 billion. This kind of reality distortion field is not often seen in human history being obtained by a private company.

TBPN New Media Landscape

References:

[1] Alex Danco, “Prediction: the successor to postmodernism,” Andreessen Horowitz, October 10, 2025.

[2] Alex Danco, “Prediction Path Screenshots: A New Kind of Meme,” Andreessen Horowitz, October 10, 2025.

[3] F. A. Hayek, “The Use of Knowledge in Society,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 519–530, 1945.

[4] Erik Torenberg, Ben Horowitz, and Marc Andreessen, “a16z’s New Media Playbook,” Andreessen Horowitz Podcast, February 27, 2026.

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the article, what is the core reason why Kalshi is valued at $22 billion?

AThe core reason is that Kalshi possesses a 'reality-distorting force field' or significant influence. As a prediction market, its trading volumes and positions, backed by real money, grant it an authoritative, independent, and persuasive quality. It can shape perceptions of event authenticity and importance, effectively giving a private company a rare level of influence over how reality is interpreted and understood.

QWhat concept does a16z propose as the key value proposition of prediction markets, beyond just being a gambling platform?

Aa16z proposes 'presence' or 'a sense of being present' as the key value proposition. Prediction markets offer a way for individuals to actively engage with and influence world events through prediction and financial stake. This counters postmodern feelings of detachment and powerlessness, transforming users from passive observers into active 'super observers' and 'prophets' who participate in shaping the narrative of history.

QHow does the article describe the evolution of the 'spiritual core' or theoretical foundation of prediction markets?

AThe article describes a spiritual chronology: 1) **Friedrich Hayek**: Viewed markets as mechanisms for aggregating distributed, fragmented knowledge across society. 2) **Robin Hanson**: Designed the Logarithmic Market Scoring Rule (LMSR), creating incentives for truth-telling and establishing the modern design paradigm for prediction markets. He also theorized 'Futarchy,' a governance system based on prediction markets. 3) **a16z Era**: Shifted the discussion from abstract theory to practical application, emphasizing prediction markets as a new media form that provides 'presence' and narrative authority.

QWhat is MTS, and how does it exemplify a16z's vision of 'New Media'?

AMTS (Monitoring The Situation) is a media company that practices 24/7 live news broadcasting on platforms like Twitter, featuring interviews with key figures. It exemplifies a16z's 'New Media' vision through its extreme speed and intensity in information dissemination—a strategy called 'taking over the timeline.' It rapidly produces content across formats (podcasts, video clips, newsletters) to dominate the narrative, asserting that its coverage is more important and louder than the noise of other media.

QWhat role does the article suggest prediction markets like Kalshi play within a16z's envisioned 'New Media Empire'?

AWithin a16z's 'New Media Empire,' prediction markets like Kalshi serve as a crucial component that provides authoritative, objective-seeming validation. While media outlets like MTS generate noise and narrative, Kalshi offers the perceived 'cold, hard truth' of market-based probabilities backed by real money. This combination allows a16z to influence both the narrative (through media) and the perceived factual basis of reality (through prediction markets), creating a powerful system for shaping public perception and discourse.

İlgili Okumalar

Securitize's First Post-IPO Financial Report Bombshell: Is the 'Compliant Tokenization' Narrative Failing to Sell?

Securitize, a tokenization platform, released its first earnings report since going public in July 2026, revealing disappointing Q2 results. Revenue fell 5% year-over-year to $14.43 million, missing estimates, while the net loss widened significantly to $21.68 million. Despite achieving record tokenized assets under management of $4.3 billion and a 147% surge in platform trading volume, overall assets under administration declined by 20%. The company's stock (SECZ) dropped over 20% in after-hours trading following the report. The article highlights a key concern: Securitize's revenue declined despite substantial trading growth, suggesting either compressed fees or an unclear business model. While Securitize maintains its focus on regulatory compliance—securing key partnerships with entities like Computershare and NYSE, and obtaining an SEC investment advisor registration—its tangible progress in the new tokenized stock business has been slow. Apart from tokenizing its own stock (SECZ) upon listing, it has not launched other tokenized equities. Analysts note that SECZ's high on-chain market capitalization is misleading, as it resulted from a one-time distribution to shareholders rather than organic investor demand. The market's patience is waning as investors prioritize real business metrics like market share and user adoption over the "compliant tokenization" narrative. Securitize's market value has fallen 36% from its debut, reflecting growing concerns over its shrinking revenue and the delayed execution of its tokenized stock initiatives.

Odaily星球日报9 dk önce

Securitize's First Post-IPO Financial Report Bombshell: Is the 'Compliant Tokenization' Narrative Failing to Sell?

Odaily星球日报9 dk önce

Why Every Investor Needs to Pay Attention to the Federal Reserve

Why Every Investor Should Follow the Federal Reserve Key developments on August 12, 2026, demonstrate how crucial the Fed is. Following the CPI report that matched expectations, markets instantly repriced stocks, bonds, and currencies, adjusting the probability of a September Fed rate hike. The Federal Reserve controls the federal funds rate, the anchor for all borrowing costs. Its "dual mandate" is to maintain stable prices and maximum employment. The current policy rate is 3.50%-3.75% after a series of cuts from 2024-2025. Understanding Fed actions is vital for your portfolio: - **Rate Hikes:** Slow the economy to fight inflation. They pressure growth/tech stocks (due to higher discount rates) and lower bond prices but can initially benefit banks. - **Rate Cuts:** Stimulate the economy. They typically boost growth stocks and bond prices while lowering borrowing costs for consumers and businesses. - **Holding Steady:** Still impactful. Current restrictive policy, with positive real interest rates, continues to weigh on the economy. Market-moving signals now come more from economic data than official guidance. A key change is new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh, who has reduced forward guidance, making each data release (CPI, PCE, jobs reports, GDP) more critical for predicting Fed moves. In this environment, investors should track key reports, compare data to market expectations, and understand what is already "priced in." The focus now is on the September 15-16 FOMC meeting. The August CPI (due Sep 11) and jobs report (Sep 5) will be decisive. Ultimately, interest rates are a powerful, continuous force on all assets. Learning to interpret the data that drives Fed policy is an essential skill for navigating today's markets.

marsbit13 dk önce

Why Every Investor Needs to Pay Attention to the Federal Reserve

marsbit13 dk önce

MicroStrategy Sells BTC Without a Price Drop, Is STRC's Rebound Truly Good News?

The cryptocurrency market is currently experiencing extreme quiet, with BTC weekly trading volume at its lowest since 2023 and implied volatility hitting bottom. Liquidity is thin, as evidenced by a muted price reaction to CPI data. The market's primary issue is a lack of active participants, not just news. Options data shows traders are pricing in higher short-term downside risks. Market makers' gamma positioning suggests a critical support zone between $61,000 and $60,000; a break below could accelerate a downturn. Two developments are being interpreted bullishly: MicroStrategy (MSTR) selling a small portion of its BTC without causing a price crash, and the rebound of its preferred shares (STRC) from lows near $73 to over $95. However, an alternative bearish interpretation exists. The low liquidity means large entities cannot exit sizable positions easily. A STRK recovery towards $100 could provide the buying pressure these sellers need to finally offload BTC, making the apparent利好 (positive news) actually improve selling conditions. STRC faces a structural ceiling at $100 because MSTR has signaled it will issue new shares around that price, capping upside and inviting short sellers. While recent buybacks boosted the price, they haven't solved this core problem. If STRK cannot sustainably break $100, concerns will grow about MSTR needing to sell BTC for funding. Finally, the Bitfinex Long positions indicator, which typically moves inversely to BTC price, has become ineffective and flat-lined near multi-year lows, offering no directional signal. Large traders are not accumulating on dips as they once did.

marsbit14 dk önce

MicroStrategy Sells BTC Without a Price Drop, Is STRC's Rebound Truly Good News?

marsbit14 dk önce

Silicon Valley Tech Giants No Longer Need Ethicists

Silicon Valley tech giants are once again sidelining ethicists. Chloé Bakalar, OpenAI's dedicated AI Ethics Lead, left the company in July, a departure emblematic of a broader trend where ethics teams are being disbanded or marginalized in the race for AI dominance. Bakalar's career highlights the tensions between ethical governance and commercial speed. She first made her mark at Meta (formerly Facebook), where she pioneered "embedded ethics," developing tools like checklists to translate abstract principles like fairness and transparency into concrete engineering steps. Her framework aimed to embed ethical considerations throughout a product’s lifecycle—from initial design and data handling to user interaction and deployment. However, this approach faced significant internal resistance. At Meta, her Responsible AI team was eventually disbanded as the company prioritized rapid development, especially in the generative AI race with OpenAI. Bakalar then joined OpenAI in 2025, hoping to influence cutting-edge model development directly. Yet, as the company's sole dedicated ethicist, she reportedly struggled with limited influence and resources amidst intense commercial pressures, leading to her departure after roughly a year. Her exit is not isolated. Similar patterns have emerged across Silicon Valley, with ethics and safety teams at Twitter (post-Musk acquisition) and OpenAI's own "superalignment" team being dissolved. These departures reveal five core, unresolved tensions: 1) the fatal conflict between commercialization speed and ethical caution; 2) the role mismatch where ethicists have prestige but little real decision-making power; 3) the dilution of responsibility when ethics is decentralized as "everyone's job"; 4) the inevitable "translation loss" when complex philosophical values are reduced to quantifiable engineering metrics; and 5) the fundamental clash between academic independence and corporate secrecy. Bakalar’s trajectory suggests that embedding meaningful ethical oversight within hyper-competitive tech companies is profoundly difficult. Lasting change may require external regulatory pressure, like the EU's AI Act, or a fundamental reimagining of the ethicist's role from an internal auditor to a cross-disciplinary builder with genuine authority.

marsbit43 dk önce

Silicon Valley Tech Giants No Longer Need Ethicists

marsbit43 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片