Tether Urged To Transfer $344M In Frozen USDT To Terror Victims

bitcoinist2026-05-16 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-05-16 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

A US federal court in Manhattan is being asked to order Tether to transfer $344 million in frozen USDT to victims of Iran-linked terrorist attacks. The plaintiffs, including a Jerusalem family affected by a 1997 Hamas bombing, hold unpaid court judgments against Iran. They target two Tron blockchain wallets, frozen earlier this year by the US Treasury's OFAC as linked to Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. Their lawsuit argues that because Tether, as a centralized issuer, can freeze wallets, it can also be compelled by court order to move the equivalent funds to satisfy the judgments. This case could set a significant legal precedent for centralized stablecoin issuers and is part of a broader legal campaign targeting frozen crypto assets linked to sanctioned entities.

A Jerusalem family that lost relatives in a 1997 Hamas suicide bombing is among the plaintiffs pushing a US federal court to order Tether to hand over hundreds of millions in frozen digital currency.

The case, filed in Manhattan, could set a significant legal precedent for how courts treat centralized stablecoin issuers.

A Decades-Old Debt

The plaintiffs are survivors and family members of victims from Iran-linked terrorist attacks. They hold court judgments against Iran that were awarded years ago — judgments that have never been paid.

Now they are targeting a pile of frozen cryptocurrency as a way to collect what they are owed.

Attorney Charles Gerstein filed the lawsuit Thursday in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Filing against Tether submitted by Attorney Charles Gerstein.

His clients say they have a legal claim to two Tron blockchain wallet addresses holding roughly 344 million USDT. Those wallets were frozen earlier this year by the US Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, which identified them as linked to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

The plaintiffs are not asking Tether to simply release those specific wallets. According to reports, they want a court order directing Tether to transfer an equivalent amount of USDT to their legal team’s wallet address.

Why Tether Can Be Compelled

Unlike Bitcoin or Ethereum, USDT is controlled by a central company. Tether can freeze wallets, block transactions, and move funds when ordered to do so. That centralized structure is at the heart of Gerstein’s legal argument.

Because a prior order already froze the wallets — something only possible because Tether has direct operational control — he contends the company can also be ordered to move the funds.

BTCUSD trading at $78,115 on the 24-hour chart: TradingView

The ownership question, he argues, is already largely settled: OFAC has already declared the wallets to be IRGC-controlled assets, which clears a path for seizure under US terrorism statutes.

Broader Legal Campaign

This is not Gerstein’s only case of this kind. Based on reports, he has filed similar actions involving North Korea-linked cyber operations against the Arbitrum platform. He is also handling a separate case involving Railgun DAO, a privacy-focused crypto protocol.

The Manhattan filing is part of what appears to be a coordinated legal push to test whether courts can compel crypto platforms with centralized control to act on frozen assets held in sanctioned wallets.

Featured image from CEPA, chart from TradingView

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the plaintiffs' primary demand to Tether in this case?

AThe plaintiffs are asking the US federal court to order Tether to transfer approximately $344 million worth of frozen USDT (an equivalent amount to the funds in two sanctioned wallet addresses) to a wallet address controlled by their legal team.

QWhat is the legal basis for Attorney Charles Gerstein's argument that Tether can be compelled to move the funds?

AThe argument hinges on Tether's centralized control over USDT. Gerstein contends that because Tether can and has frozen the specific wallets (as ordered by OFAC), demonstrating direct operational control, the company can similarly be ordered by a court to move the funds.

QWhat entity froze the Tron blockchain wallets containing the 344 million USDT, and why were they frozen?

AThe wallets were frozen earlier this year by the US Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), which identified them as assets linked to Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

QWho are the plaintiffs in this lawsuit against Tether?

AThe plaintiffs are survivors and family members of victims from Iran-linked terrorist attacks, including a Jerusalem family that lost relatives in a 1997 Hamas suicide bombing. They hold unpaid court judgments against Iran.

QWhat potential legal significance does this case hold beyond the immediate dispute?

AThe case could set a significant legal precedent for how US courts treat centralized stablecoin issuers, testing whether courts can compel such platforms to act on frozen assets held in wallets linked to sanctioned entities under terrorism statutes.

İlgili Okumalar

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

The article analyzes the concept of "real-world asset" (RWA) tokenization, arguing that while tokenizing assets on-chain is a useful step, it is far from transformative on its own. The author compares it to placing a barcode on a shipping container—it enables identification but does not build the necessary market infrastructure. The core argument is that true value emerges not from tokenization, but from integrating these tokens into DeFi systems where they can be valued, financed, hedged, traded, and liquidated under stress. Key challenges identified include: 1. **Multiple Time Clocks**: A fundamental tension exists between blockchain's 24/7 settlement and the slower, business-hour-dependent processes of traditional markets, custody, and redemption. This "duration mismatch" can create dangerous liquidity gaps during crises. 2. **Liquidity Misconceptions**: True liquidity is not measured by Total Value Locked (TVL) or trading pairs, but by the ability to exit a position within a required timeframe at an acceptable price. It requires analyzing multiple exit paths and stress-testing scenarios. 3. **Leverage and Risk**: Leverage unlocks economic utility (e.g., using tokenized assets as collateral) but also introduces fragility. Risk models must account for more than asset volatility, incorporating factors like legal enforceability, oracle freshness, and market structure. Paradoxically, a "safer" asset like tokenized Treasury bonds could require a higher collateral discount than ETH due to slower, less-proven liquidation mechanisms. 4. **A Risk Graph**: RWA risk should be modeled as a network of interconnected dependencies (e.g., issuers, custodians, oracles, stablecoin pools), not a single score. Failures can propagate through this graph, turning operational issues into systemic liquidity crises. The article states that tokenized government bonds are merely an entry point, while more complex frontiers like computing power and energy assets present greater challenges and opportunities. It also examines the interplay and risks between tokenized stocks and perpetual futures contracts. The conclusion is that the future lies not in "tokenizing everything," but in building robust market layers where tokenized rights become resilient financial primitives within a programmable capital system. The token is just the barcode; the market is the machine.

marsbit12 dk önce

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

marsbit12 dk önce

The End of Mathematics: 40 Top Mathematicians Gather at Secret OpenAI Meeting

In August 2026, OpenAI hosted a closed-door summit with approximately 40 leading mathematicians, including recent Fields Medalist Jacob Tsimerman and OpenAI researcher Sébastien Bubeck. The meeting, spurred by a series of recent AI breakthroughs in mathematics, grappled with the potential existential threat AI poses to the field. The backdrop includes several high-profile AI achievements: OpenAI models disproving long-standing conjectures like the unit distance problem, generating 10 new mathematical discoveries, and Anthropic's Claude aiding in constructing complex multidimensional objects. These results often bypass traditional academic pipelines, appearing directly on social media. The mathematical community is divided. Over 3000 researchers signed the "Leiden Statement," advocating for responsible AI use and verification. Others resist AI entirely to preserve human-centric mathematics. A key concern is AI's current inability to *explain* proofs, particularly the difficult steps, which is central to mathematical understanding. At the summit, Bubeck outlined four potential futures: mathematics becoming like collaborative software engineering, a compute-driven field like physics, a curatorial exercise where humans interpret AI output, or a mass transition of mathematicians into AI safety. While emphasizing that "mathematics only makes sense when mathematicians learn from it," no consensus was reached. The event highlights a profound moment of reflection. As AI demonstrates increasing competence in solving complex problems, mathematicians are forced to question their future role and the very meaning of their discipline.

marsbit16 dk önce

The End of Mathematics: 40 Top Mathematicians Gather at Secret OpenAI Meeting

marsbit16 dk önce

Anthropic's New Models 'Catch the Gossip', The Strongest Fable 5 Unexpectedly Falls Flat

Anthropic has been discovered working on two new, previously unknown models codenamed "Marshmallow" (claude-marshmallow-eap) and "Melon" (claude-melon-eap), with early tests showing Marshmallow potentially surpassing Claude Opus 5 in conversational naturalness. Their emergence coincides with surprising new data revealing that Anthropic's flagship Fable 5 model, released two months ago as its strongest and most expensive offering, is being largely ignored by the enterprise market. According to spending data from Ramp tracking over 70,000 US companies, Fable 5 accounts for only about 11% of total token spending on Anthropic's models. This pales in comparison to OpenAI's flagship GPT-5.6 Sol, which commands roughly 25% of token spending in the same period. The tepid adoption is largely attributed to Fable 5's extremely high cost—double that of Opus 4.8 and ten times that of Haiku 4.5—without delivering proportionally superior performance for most business applications. Compounding the issue, the later-released Claude Opus 5, priced at half the cost of Fable 5, has achieved comparable or even better results in key benchmarks like programming and knowledge work, quickly surpassing Fable 5 in enterprise spending share. Furthermore, the rapid rise of powerful, low-cost open-source models—whose token usage share surged from 11% in April to 62% in August while costing less than 4% of enterprise AI budgets—applies additional pressure. Analysts suggest the sudden appearance of Marshmallow and Melon may be an urgent move by Anthropic to address this gap in its lineup. The goal is to offer models that are not only powerful but also cost-effective enough for businesses to adopt widely and sustainably, moving beyond a flagship that serves more as a showcase than a workhorse.

marsbit17 dk önce

Anthropic's New Models 'Catch the Gossip', The Strongest Fable 5 Unexpectedly Falls Flat

marsbit17 dk önce

Github's 10k-Star Agent Platform 'Instant' Acquired by OpenAI, Entire Team Joins, Hailed as 'AI-Era Firebase'

OpenAI has acquired the entire team of Instant, a YC S22 startup known as the "Firebase for the AI era." Instant's core product provides backend infrastructure—including databases, authentication, real-time sync, and offline caching—specifically designed for AI Agents. The acquisition aims to solve a critical weakness in current AI Agents: their lack of persistent memory and state management, which hinders reliable, multi-agent collaboration and long-running workflows. Instant, founded by ex-Facebook and Airbnb engineers, had gained significant traction with over 10,000 GitHub stars, 17,000 developers, and 400,000 apps built on its platform. This move is part of OpenAI's broader 2026 strategy to aggressively acquire developer infrastructure companies. By integrating tools like Instant, OpenAI is evolving from a model provider into a comprehensive AI platform, aiming to create a fully integrated ecosystem for building and deploying AI applications.

marsbit25 dk önce

Github's 10k-Star Agent Platform 'Instant' Acquired by OpenAI, Entire Team Joins, Hailed as 'AI-Era Firebase'

marsbit25 dk önce

Three Months After the Passing of Little Dog Rosie, Her Medical Records Transformed into an AI Healthcare Company

Three months after the passing of his dog Rosie, AI entrepreneur Paul S. Conyngham secured $4 million in seed funding from Founders Fund for his new startup, Gamgee. The company aims to industrialize the experimental, AI-assisted process he pioneered to create a personalized mRNA cancer vaccine for Rosie, who suffered from mast cell tumors. With no formal biology background, Conyngham used AI tools like ChatGPT and AlphaFold to analyze Rosie's tumor DNA, identify target neoantigens, and design a custom mRNA vaccine sequence. Laboratory partners at UNSW produced the vaccine. Initial treatment showed tumor reduction, but Rosie's cancer later recurred and she was euthanized. Gamgee's goal is to streamline this "N-of-1" approach into a repeatable service for canine cancer patients, handling sequencing, vaccine design, production, and delivery. Clinical trials are planned in Australia in collaboration with research institutions. The company also eyes a longer-term vision of establishing personalized, mRNA-based medicine across species. The story highlights the broader challenge in personalized cancer treatment: compressing the entire timeline from design and regulatory approval to manufacturing and administration to match the patient's prognosis. While AI can accelerate target discovery, the remaining logistical and regulatory hurdles are significant. The article concludes by emphasizing that, for now, consulting qualified veterinary oncologists remains the responsible path for pet owners.

marsbit26 dk önce

Three Months After the Passing of Little Dog Rosie, Her Medical Records Transformed into an AI Healthcare Company

marsbit26 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot