Tether Ramps Up Wallet Freezes, Blocking Over $500M In USDT

bitcoinist2026-05-10 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-05-10 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Tether has significantly increased its wallet freezing activity, blocking over $514 million in USDT across 370 addresses on the Tron and Ethereum networks in just the past 30 days. Data from BlockSec shows the vast majority of these freezes (328 addresses, $506 million) occurred on Tron. The pace is accelerating, with the 2025 annual total of $1.26 billion across 4,163 addresses at risk of being surpassed this year. Once frozen, wallets are rarely reinstated, and more than half of the associated funds are typically permanently destroyed. A growing portion of these enforcement actions are coordinated with law enforcement. Recent examples include freezing $344 million linked to suspected sanctions evasion with Iran and $61 million tied to "pig butchering" scams. Cumulatively from 2023-2025, Tether has frozen roughly $3.3 billion across 7,268 addresses, far exceeding actions by competitors like Circle. This surge has sparked broader debate within crypto about the power issuers and projects hold to freeze or recover funds, highlighting how compliance and central controls remain integral behind the scenes of decentralized ecosystems.

Once frozen, a Tether-blacklisted wallet almost never comes back. Only 3.6% of addresses placed on the blocklist in 2025 were later removed, according to BlockSec data.

More than half of the funds tied to those wallets were permanently destroyed using the contracts’ “destroyBlackFunds” function — a detail that underscores just how final these enforcement actions tend to be.

Freezes Surge Across Tron And Ethereum

In the past 30 days alone, Tether froze over $514 million in USDT across 370 addresses on the Ethereum and Tron networks.

BlockSec’s USDT Freeze Tracker shows 328 of those addresses were on Tron, with about $506 million locked there. Ethereum accounted for 42 addresses and $8.73 million. The gap between the two networks points to Tron as the main front in Tether’s enforcement push.

Source: BlockSec

The pace is picking up. All of 2025 saw Tether blacklist 4,163 addresses and freeze a combined $1.26 billion. At the current rate, that annual total could be surpassed well before December.

A broader study covering 2023 through 2025 put the cumulative figure at roughly $3.3 billion across 7,268 addresses — far ahead of rival stablecoin issuer Circle over the same period.

Law Enforcement Plays A Growing Role

Some of the largest recent freezes were tied directly to government investigations. In April, Tether coordinated with the US Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control to lock more than $344 million in USDT across two Tron addresses.

Bitcoin is currently trading at $80,349. Chart: TradingView

Officials said those wallets were linked to suspected sanctions evasion involving Iran. Months earlier, in February, Tether assisted authorities in seizing over $61 million connected to pig butchering scams — a form of fraud where victims are manipulated into sending large sums under false pretenses.

Tether had previously disclosed that it froze around $4.2 billion in tokens over three years due to links with illicit activity, with $3.5 billion of that amount locked since 2023 as law enforcement agencies stepped up crypto-related investigations.

Broader Questions Around Freeze Powers

The surge in blacklisting has sparked debate beyond stablecoins. Some decentralized finance projects have used upgradeable contracts and admin controls to halt or recover funds after major exploits, raising questions about who holds those powers and when they should be used.

For stablecoins like USDT, issuers retain direct control over minting and burning. Data shows these freeze mechanisms are now a routine part of fraud, sanctions, and scam investigations — used not occasionally, but consistently and at scale.

Featured image from Halo, chart from TradingView

İlgili Sorular

QWhat percentage of Tether-blacklisted wallets in 2025 were later removed, and what happens to the funds?

AOnly 3.6% of Tether-blacklisted addresses in 2025 were later removed. More than half of the funds tied to those wallets were permanently destroyed using the 'destroyBlackFunds' contract function.

QHow much USDT did Tether freeze in the past 30 days, and which blockchain network was most impacted?

AIn the past 30 days, Tether froze over $514 million in USDT across 370 addresses. The Tron network was the most impacted, with 328 addresses and about $506 million frozen, compared to 42 addresses and $8.73 million on Ethereum.

QWhat was the cumulative amount of USDT frozen by Tether from 2023 through 2025, and how does it compare to its rival Circle?

AFrom 2023 through 2025, Tether froze roughly $3.3 billion in USDT across 7,268 addresses. This amount is far ahead of what its rival stablecoin issuer, Circle, froze over the same period.

QWhat were two notable law enforcement-related Tether freezes mentioned in the article?

ATwo notable law enforcement-related freezes were: 1) In April, Tether coordinated with the U.S. Treasury's OFAC to freeze over $344 million in USDT linked to suspected sanctions evasion involving Iran. 2) In February, Tether assisted in seizing over $61 million connected to pig butchering scams.

QWhat broader debate has the surge in Tether blacklisting sparked, according to the article?

AThe surge in Tether blacklisting has sparked a broader debate about who holds freeze powers and when they should be used, extending beyond stablecoins to decentralized finance projects that use upgradeable contracts and admin controls to halt or recover funds after major exploits.

İlgili Okumalar

Catholic And Law Enforcement Groups Warn CLARITY Act Could Weaken Crypto Crime Safeguards

A coalition of Catholic leaders, law enforcement groups, and anti-trafficking advocates warns that the CLARITY Act could weaken safeguards against crypto-enabled crime. Their criticism focuses on provisions that would protect developers of non-custodial software (like wallets and DeFi protocols) from being regulated as money transmitters. This highlights a core regulatory dilemma: distinguishing neutral software from financial intermediation. Crypto advocates argue such developers should not be treated like exchanges, while critics fear broad exemptions could hinder the tracking of illicit finance, including human trafficking and sanctions evasion. The bill aims to create clearer market-structure rules, but this opposition shows the debate extends beyond investor protection to law enforcement concerns. The pushback means supporters may need to address these issues, potentially leading to amendments or stricter requirements. For the crypto industry, clearer rules could spur U.S. investment, but the bill faces a tougher political path if framed as weakening crime-fighting tools.

bitcoinist3 saat önce

Catholic And Law Enforcement Groups Warn CLARITY Act Could Weaken Crypto Crime Safeguards

bitcoinist3 saat önce

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit7 saat önce

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit7 saat önce

South Korea Targets 40 Unregistered Crypto Operators in Regulatory Crackdown

South Korea's Financial Intelligence Unit has referred around 40 unregistered virtual asset service providers to the police as part of a regulatory crackdown. Under local law, all crypto exchanges must obtain ISMS certification and FIU registration before operating, yet only 28 entities are currently registered. The FIU identified methods used by offshore platforms to attract Korean users, including advertising on local messaging apps and using private money changers to convert stablecoins. Officials stressed that unregistered platforms are not protected by Korean law. This action aligns with South Korea's push for stricter global crypto compliance through FATF measures. FIU Director Lee Hyung-joo recently urged FATF members to remove transaction thresholds for the "Travel Rule," as South Korea plans to mandate identity checks for all crypto transactions starting in August, expanding from the current 1 million won (≈$730) minimum. Regulatory enforcement has intensified in 2026, with authorities pursuing criminal cases against market manipulation schemes and enhancing cooperation with financial institutions to curb cross-border illegal transactions.

TheNewsCrypto8 saat önce

South Korea Targets 40 Unregistered Crypto Operators in Regulatory Crackdown

TheNewsCrypto8 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片