# OTC İlgili Makaleler

HTX Haber Merkezi, kripto endüstrisindeki piyasa trendleri, proje güncellemeleri, teknoloji gelişmeleri ve düzenleyici politikaları kapsayan "OTC" hakkında en son makaleleri ve derinlemesine analizleri sunmaktadır.

This Time It's Really Different—Detailed Analysis of the Eight Departments' 'Notice on Further Preventing and Disposing of Virtual Currency and Related Risks'

Summary of the "Notice on Further Preventing and Disposing of Risks Related to Virtual Currency" Jointly Issued by Eight Departments On February 6, 2026, eight Chinese regulatory bodies, including the People's Bank of China and the Ministry of Public Security, jointly issued a significant notice (referred to as the "2.6 Notice") targeting risks associated with virtual currencies. This notice marks a pivotal shift in China's regulatory approach, as it explicitly revokes previous key documents, including the 2021 notice (commonly known as the "924 Notice"), which is unprecedented in the history of virtual currency regulation in China. Key changes and implications include: 1. **Broader Regulatory Scope:** Unlike the previous 924 Notice, which focused on "trading and speculation risks," the 2.6 Notice addresses "virtual currency and related risks" more broadly. 2. **New Stance on Stablecoins:** A major breakthrough is the explicit statement that stablecoins pegged to fiat currency are "de facto performing some functions of legal tender." This raises significant concerns, particularly for OTC (over-the-counter) trading platforms, as it could potentially be interpreted as engaging in illegal foreign exchange activities, which carries severe penalties including confiscation of illegal gains and fines up to five times the amount involved. 3. **Strict Prohibition on RWA:** The notice firmly prohibits any Real World Asset (RWA) tokenization activities within China. Domestic entities are completely barred from such activities. Furthermore, foreign companies and individuals are prohibited from providing RWA services to domestic entities. However, a potential avenue is suggested for domestic financial institutions to engage in RWA services *overseas*, subject to specific requirements and supervision under the principle of "same business, same risks, same rules." 4. **Enhanced Enforcement Mechanisms:** The notice outlines a robust, multi-layered enforcement framework ("8+3" – eight central departments plus local internet, procuratorate, and judicial authorities). It emphasizes coordinated central-local efforts, strengthened risk monitoring using advanced technology and data sharing, and a stringent crackdown on illegal activities. This includes a continued ban on virtual currency "mining," severe penalties for crimes like fraud, money laundering, illegal operations, pyramid schemes, and illegal fundraising involving virtual currencies, and mandates for judicial handling of crimes. 5. **Extraterritorial Application:** The notice asserts jurisdiction over domestic entities operating related businesses overseas. They are prohibited from issuing virtual currencies, even outside China. Domestic financial institutions' overseas subsidiaries must comply with specific requirements if providing RWA services abroad. 6. **Legal Responsibility:** A new section explicitly outlining legal liabilities has been added, underscoring the seriousness of the regulatory stance. In summary, the "2.6 Notice" represents a significant hardening of China's position on virtual currencies. It expands regulatory scope, introduces harsh new interpretations (especially concerning stablecoins and OTC trading), completely forbids RWA domestically, and establishes a powerful, technology-driven enforcement regime to prevent and处置 (dispose of) associated risks, potentially reshaping the industry landscape.

比推02/07 01:02

This Time It's Really Different—Detailed Analysis of the Eight Departments' 'Notice on Further Preventing and Disposing of Virtual Currency and Related Risks'

比推02/07 01:02

When Notices Become Law: What Does the Draft Network Crime Prevention Law Mean for the Crypto World?

The draft "Cyber Crime Prevention Law" released by Chinese authorities on January 31, 2026, marks a significant shift from previous regulatory notices to formal legislation, fundamentally altering the legal landscape for cryptocurrency activities in China. Unlike earlier policies focused on financial risks, this law adopts a criminal governance approach, specifically targeting three core areas: OTC transactions, technical development, and public node operations. Key provisions include Article 26, which redefines "knowledge" in OTC trading, making it easier to prosecute those involved in transferring illicit funds using virtual currencies. Articles 19 and 31 extend liability to those providing technical support, such as developers or promoters, with Article 2 asserting extraterritorial jurisdiction over overseas entities serving Chinese users. Additionally, Article 40 requires blockchain nodes to monitor and block illegal activities, challenging the feasibility of permissionless networks. Legal experts note that while penalties may start with fines, severe cases could lead to criminal charges. The law reflects a broader trend from administrative bans to criminal regulation, emphasizing compliance through strict KYC, AML controls, and geo-blocking for Chinese users. For the crypto industry, this law establishes compliance as a critical survival threshold rather than an optional measure.

marsbit02/03 11:54

When Notices Become Law: What Does the Draft Network Crime Prevention Law Mean for the Crypto World?

marsbit02/03 11:54

The Gray Business of 'Cash for Crypto': How Part-Time Jobs Become Money Laundering Channels for Black Market

This article exposes a growing gray market scheme in China, particularly in Guangdong and Shenzhen, where seemingly legitimate part-time jobs are being used as a front for money laundering operations. Criminals recruit often highly educated but risk-unaware young people through platforms like Xianyu, offering "cash for crypto" or "offline crypto exchange" gigs. The task involves receiving RMB in one's personal bank account, converting it to Hong Kong dollars, and then purchasing stablecoins like USDT at designated Hong Kong OTC crypto shops to transfer to specified wallets. Lawyers Deng Xiaoyu and Huang Wenjing from Mankun Law Firm explain that participants unknowingly become a key "human courier" link in money laundering chains, moving illicit funds from crimes like telecom fraud. Once the funds are identified as illegal, participants face frozen bank and social payment accounts, severe disruption to their lives, and potential criminal charges for offenses like money laundering or assisting information network crimes. The OTC shops in Hong Kong are targeted due to regulatory gaps, the anonymity of cash transactions, and the complex financial environment that helps obscure fund trails. The article warns the public to avoid any兼职 (part-time work) involving handling money, account operations, or crypto exchanges for others, as these are almost certainly illicit. Key red flags include being asked to provide personal bank cards, withdraw cash, convert cash to crypto, or being assured the activity is "legal in Hong Kong." The core advice is to reject any offer that uses an individual as a "funds channel."

比推01/27 06:44

The Gray Business of 'Cash for Crypto': How Part-Time Jobs Become Money Laundering Channels for Black Market

比推01/27 06:44

活动图片