# Fees İlgili Makaleler

HTX Haber Merkezi, kripto endüstrisindeki piyasa trendleri, proje güncellemeleri, teknoloji gelişmeleri ve düzenleyici politikaları kapsayan "Fees" hakkında en son makaleleri ve derinlemesine analizleri sunmaktadır.

Interpreting Polymarket's Major Updates Last Night: Expanded Fees, Self-Regulation, and New Incentives

Polymarket, a prediction market platform, announced a series of major updates focused on self-regulation, fee expansion, and new incentive mechanisms. Key updates include enhanced market integrity rules explicitly prohibiting insider trading, market manipulation, and trading by entities capable of influencing event results. This aims to increase transparency and build regulatory trust. A new dynamic fee structure will be implemented starting March 30, 2026, expanding beyond Crypto and Sports to include Finance, Politics, Economics, Culture, and Weather. Fees peak when contract prices are near 50% probability. The platform also opened its referral program to all users with over $10k in trading volume, offering a 30% fee rebate for direct referrals and 10% for secondary ones. Additionally, a market maker rebate program was launched, redistributing a portion of taker fees to liquidity providers daily in USDC, with rebate rates varying by market. While the community anticipated a token airdrop, the announced updates are seen as long-term operational improvements, with overall positive sentiment.

Odaily星球日报Dün 02:07

Interpreting Polymarket's Major Updates Last Night: Expanded Fees, Self-Regulation, and New Incentives

Odaily星球日报Dün 02:07

The 4 Truths and Fee Traps Behind Polymarket's LP Market Making Incentives

Polymarket, a prediction market platform, has recently shifted its focus to incentivizing liquidity providers (LPs) to address its core issue of low liquidity. While most markets remain free, it now charges a taker fee on specific markets like crypto price movements and select sports events. This fee, highest near 50% probability, funds new LP reward programs. There are two primary reward systems: one pays LPs when their limit orders are executed (maker rewards), and another rewards simply for placing orders within a set spread to provide liquidity, even if they don't get filled. A third mechanism allows anyone to sponsor additional incentives for specific markets. A positive view argues this structure values genuine liquidity over mere trading volume, making fees earned and rewards received a potential key, anti-sybil metric for a future POLY token airdrop. It rewards users who improve market depth and stability. A contrasting, negative view claims the LP program is a "trap." Critics argue that professional market makers avoid it due to insider trading risks and that most LPs are actually losing money due to hidden "LP wear and tear" (impermanent loss), only participating based on speculation of a valuable airdrop. They warn that if Polymarket expands fees to fund these unsustainable rewards, it could lose its competitive edge of zero fees and better odds compared to traditional sportsbooks. Proposed solutions include a fixed fee only on profits, using a native POLY pool for liquidity, or charging for premium products like parlays instead of core markets.

marsbit03/22 04:10

The 4 Truths and Fee Traps Behind Polymarket's LP Market Making Incentives

marsbit03/22 04:10

The 4 Truths Behind Polymarket's LP Market-Making Incentives and the Fee Trap

Polymarket, a prediction market platform, has recently shifted its incentive structure towards rewarding Liquidity Providers (LPs) to solve its core problem of low market depth. While most markets remain free, it now charges a taker fee on specific markets (all Crypto markets, NCAAB basketball, and Serie A football) to fund new LP reward programs. The fee is calculated on a symmetric curve, highest near 50% probability. The platform has introduced two main incentive systems: one rewards LPs whose limit orders are executed (Maker Incentives), and another rewards LPs simply for providing resting liquidity, even if orders aren't filled (Liquidity Incentives). A third system allows anyone to sponsor additional rewards for specific markets. A key argument is that the fees paid and rewards earned could be a strong anti-sybil metric for a potential POLY token airdrop, valuing genuine liquidity provision over mere trading volume. However, a counter viewpoint argues the LP program is a potential trap. Critics claim that the displayed ROI for LPs is misleading as it doesn't account for "LP wear and tear"—losses from filled orders that can't be easily exited. They state professional market makers avoid it due to insider trading risks and that the model of subsidizing liquidity with massive daily rewards is unsustainable. The concern is that widespread fee implementation could erase Polymarket's competitive edge over traditional betting platforms. Proposed solutions include a fixed fee on profits only, using a POLY token for native liquidity, and charging for premium products like parlays instead of core markets.

Odaily星球日报03/22 04:08

The 4 Truths Behind Polymarket's LP Market-Making Incentives and the Fee Trap

Odaily星球日报03/22 04:08

Wisdom Tree + Glassnode: Reframing Blockchains as Economic Systems

The digital asset ecosystem is increasingly viewed as an emerging financial system with its own infrastructure and economic structure. This report, a collaboration between Wisdom Tree and Glassnode, reframes blockchain networks as multi-layered economic systems that mirror traditional markets in function and incentives. Key insights include the use of transaction fees as a direct measure of blockchain health, the economic models of security (energy-backed for Bitcoin, capital-backed for Ethereum), and the industrialization of mining. Systemically important crypto exchanges and custodians now link on-chain activity to traditional capital markets, facilitating institutional adoption. Stablecoins serve as the core settlement and liquidity layer, while DeFi and tokenization extend financial functions on-chain with growing integration into traditional finance. The full analysis provides a data-driven framework for evaluating digital assets beyond price, using observable on-chain metrics and macroeconomic benchmarks.

insights.glassnode03/17 14:29

Wisdom Tree + Glassnode: Reframing Blockchains as Economic Systems

insights.glassnode03/17 14:29

Lowest Fee + Strongest Endorsement: BlackRock's Ethereum Staking ETF's 'Dimensional Reduction Strike'

BlackRock launched the iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHB) on Nasdaq on March 12, 2026, its third crypto ETF. ETHB provides investors with Ethereum price exposure and staking rewards, differentiating it from non-staking ETH ETFs. It gathered $15.5 million in volume on its first day and $76 million on the second, with assets under management growing from $1 billion to approximately $1.7 billion. While not the first U.S. Ethereum staking ETF, ETHB is the most significant due to BlackRock’s scale and influence. It operates under the 1933 Securities Act, following a full regulatory approval process, unlike earlier products like REX-Osprey’s ESK (using a 1940 Act workaround) and Grayscale’s ETHE (an upgraded existing trust). ETHB’s management fee is 0.25% (0.12% promotional rate), lower than ETHE’s 2.50%, making it more attractive to institutional investors. The ETF stakes 70–95% of its ETH holdings via Coinbase, which shares 18% of staking rewards with sponsors and service providers. After fees, investors net an estimated 1.35%–2.05% annual yield from staking, based on current network rewards of 2.78%. ETHB offers a compliant, simplified way for traditional investors to gain staking-derived returns without direct blockchain involvement.

marsbit03/17 07:31

Lowest Fee + Strongest Endorsement: BlackRock's Ethereum Staking ETF's 'Dimensional Reduction Strike'

marsbit03/17 07:31

In Just 70 Days, Polymarket Easily Rakes in Tens of Millions in Fees

Polymarket, a prediction market platform, has generated over $11.2 million in fees in just 70 days since introducing transaction fees on January 6. Initially applied only to "15-minute crypto up/down" markets, the fee structure charges more when odds are near 50% (up to 1.56%) and less when they approach 0% or 100%. By March 6, fees were expanded to all crypto-related markets. Conservative estimates now project annualized revenue of around $58.4 million. However, weekly fee income has shown consistent growth—rising from $560,000 to $1.84 million in recent weeks—driven by both increased trading volume and the expansion of fee-eligible markets. If fees were extended to all markets, current trading activity suggests Polymarket could achieve approximately $360 million in annual revenue. The platform has also distributed $13.41 million in liquidity provider subsidies, which are likely to be offset by fee revenue this month. Polymarket’s revenue potential hinges on continued trading volume growth and further expansion of fee-based markets, positioning it as a highly profitable model within the crypto industry.

marsbit03/16 10:39

In Just 70 Days, Polymarket Easily Rakes in Tens of Millions in Fees

marsbit03/16 10:39

In Just 70 Days, Polymarket Easily Rakes in Tens of Millions in Fees

Polymarket, a prediction market platform, has generated over $11.2 million in fees in just 70 days since introducing transaction fees on January 6. Initially applied only to "15-minute crypto up/down" markets, the fee structure charges more when odds are near 50% (up to 1.56%) and less when they approach 0% or 100%. By March 6, fees were expanded to all crypto-related markets, which now drive most of the revenue. Weekly fee income has shown consistent growth, reaching $1.84 million in a recent week. If current trading volume and structure continue, Polymarket’s annualized revenue is estimated at $58.4 million under a conservative model. A more aggressive projection—assuming fees are applied to all markets—could yield up to $360 million per year. The platform has also distributed $13.41 million in liquidity provider incentives, which March revenue is on track to cover entirely. Polymarket’s revenue potential hinges on two factors: continued growth in trading volume and further expansion of fee-based markets. The platform has effectively proven the profitability of the prediction market model, positioning it as a highly efficient revenue generator in the crypto ecosystem.

Odaily星球日报03/16 10:38

In Just 70 Days, Polymarket Easily Rakes in Tens of Millions in Fees

Odaily星球日报03/16 10:38

How Much Money Has Kalshi Actually Made? Deconstructing the Prediction Market Business Behind 200 Million Trades

In this analysis of Kalshi, a leading prediction market platform, the author examines its business model, transaction data, and regulatory landscape. By accessing Kalshi’s public API, the study reveals that the platform has processed over 203 million transactions with a total volume exceeding $41.7 billion. More than 82% of this volume comes from sports betting, positioning Kalshi as a de facto sports gambling platform accessible to users as young as 18. The platform operates a central limit order book (CLOB) where users trade binary contracts that settle at either $1 (if the event occurs) or $0 (if it does not). Kalshi generates revenue through a variable fee structure: Takers pay a fee based on the formula 0.07 × C × P × (1-P), where C is the number of contracts and P is the price, while Makers pay a quarter of that rate. Total fee income amounts to $545.6 million. Kalshi ecosystem includes markets, events, and series, with major volumes driven by events like the 2024 U.S. presidential election and Super Bowl outcomes. The platform’s fee model is compared to traditional sportsbooks, highlighting how its variable structure adapts to implied probability. Regulatory oversight falls under the CFTC, though enforcement remains limited, creating a grey area that allows Kalshi to operate with fewer restrictions than conventional gambling platforms. The analysis also touches on market结算 practices, liquidity incentives, and the broader context of prediction markets, including competitors like Polymarket and regulatory cases such as PredictIt’s legal battle with the CFTC.

marsbit03/13 04:30

How Much Money Has Kalshi Actually Made? Deconstructing the Prediction Market Business Behind 200 Million Trades

marsbit03/13 04:30

Bitcoin Supply Crosses 20 Million Milestone: How Long Will The Final 1 Million Take?

Bitcoin has reached a major milestone with 20 million BTC now mined, leaving only 1 million left to be issued out of its fixed 21 million supply cap. This marks over 95% of all Bitcoin in circulation, achieved after 6,267 days (approximately 17 years). The remaining coins will be mined at a progressively slower rate due to periodic "Halvings," which reduce block rewards. The final Bitcoin is projected to be mined around the year 2140—about 114 years from now. After that, miners will rely solely on transaction fees. Currently, Bitcoin is trading around $70,800.

bitcoinist03/11 03:02

Bitcoin Supply Crosses 20 Million Milestone: How Long Will The Final 1 Million Take?

bitcoinist03/11 03:02

Ethereum Under Pressure As Researchers Issue Critical Report

Culper Research has taken a short position on Ethereum, issuing a critical report that questions the network's long-term health. The report argues that the Fusaka Upgrade significantly expanded blockspace, causing transaction fees to drop by nearly 90%, which in turn weakens validator economics and staking rewards. It also alleges that recent transaction growth and new wallet creation are largely driven by spam and address-poisoning attacks rather than genuine adoption, with dusting-related activity accounting for 22.5% of all ETH transactions. Additionally, competition from Solana and reports of Vitalik Buterin selling 19,000 ETH have added to bearish sentiment. Despite these concerns, some commentators note that Ethereum’s design allows for future protocol changes to address economic issues.

bitcoinist03/08 03:33

Ethereum Under Pressure As Researchers Issue Critical Report

bitcoinist03/08 03:33

活动图片

Indepth Research

Market Analysis