# Debate İlgili Makaleler

Bitcoin’s ‘True Value’ Is $0, Says Under Fire Financial Times Columnist, Claims Altcoins Destroy Its Scarcity

A Financial Times columnist, Jemima Kelly, has sparked controversy by claiming Bitcoin's "true value is zero," arguing it lacks intrinsic worth and that its scarcity is undermined by the unlimited supply of alternative cryptocurrencies. She contends Bitcoin's value relies solely on belief and is propped up by influential holders promoting new narratives, such as AI adoption, to sustain interest. Her comments, made during a CNBC appearance, drew significant backlash from Bitcoin advocates who argue its market price, global utility, and sustained demand demonstrate clear value. Despite the criticism, institutional exposure to crypto continues growing, with Goldman Sachs reporting over $2 billion in spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF holdings and expanding into XRP and Solana ETFs. Meanwhile, Russian banks are beginning to offer crypto-collateralized loans, signaling further institutional integration.

ccn.com02/12 08:16

Before Musk Gave Him $1 Million, He Made $600,000 by Launching Coins

On February 4th, X awarded user @beaverd $1 million for winning an article competition with a piece criticizing Deloitte. Beaver, a well-known meme coin trader, was later accused by Bubblemaps of being a "serial rugger" who allegedly made $600,000 by deploying and manipulating the price of a token called $SIAS on pump.fun, which rapidly rose to a $6 million market cap before crashing to zero. Bubblemaps claimed Beaver used multiple wallets to snipe and profit from the token. In response, Beaver gave a defiant reply, garnering significant support from parts of the crypto community. Supporters argued that since he did not promote the token on his social media, his actions weren’t fraudulent—just a high-risk bet that others lost. Some even criticized Bubblemaps’ own token $BMT as a worse offender. Beaver is also known for Somaliscan, a data site tracking U.S. government spending and exposing corruption, which earned him admiration, particularly among right-leaning audiences. The incident reignites the ongoing debate in crypto over whether launching and manipulating tokens without promotion constitutes unethical behavior or simply reflects the risky nature of meme coin trading.

marsbit02/12 03:55

Crypto Clarity Act: No Deal in White House Yield Meeting

A White House meeting on the Clarity Act, focused on the contentious issue of stablecoin rewards, ended without a deal. Banking groups pushed for a near-total ban on offering any form of reward to stablecoin holders, arguing such payments could destabilize traditional banking and reduce lending. Crypto advocates sought broader definitions for "permissible activities" that would allow rewards. Despite the lack of a compromise, participants from both sides described the talks as productive and a shift toward serious problem-solving. The White House urged stakeholders to reach an agreement by March 1, with further discussions expected soon.

bitcoinist02/11 10:26

Peter Schiff slams Saylor’s Bitcoin bet: ‘$10K over market price’

Michael Saylor's company, MicroStrategy, purchased an additional 1,142 Bitcoin for $90 million in February 2026, at an average price of $78,815 per coin, raising its total holdings to 714,644 BTC. This move occurred amid a significant market downturn, with Bitcoin's price falling to around $69,000. Saylor views the price drop as a long-term buying opportunity. However, prominent Bitcoin critic Peter Schiff strongly criticized the purchase, noting the company paid nearly $10,000 above the market price, increasing its average cost and overall risk. He warned that MicroStrategy's heavy reliance on Bitcoin is risky and could lead to bankruptcy. Despite a short-term stock price increase, the company's shares have fallen over 260% in six months, highlighting the ongoing tension between long-term institutional strategy and short-term market pressures.

ambcrypto02/10 16:02

The Battle for the Fed's Payment Gateway: Who Will Prevail?

The debate over access to the U.S. Federal Reserve's payment system is intensifying. Traditional banking groups—including the Bank Policy Institute, Clearing House Association, and Financial Services Forum—are opposing direct access for crypto and fintech firms, advocating instead for a mandatory 12-month waiting period to ensure operational safety, particularly for stablecoin issuers. They argue that new entrants lack sufficient regulatory oversight and pose risks such as bank runs. On the other side, fintech and crypto companies are pushing for "skinny accounts" that would allow them to bypass traditional banks and connect directly to the Fed’s payment infrastructure. Critics like Circle and Anchorage argue the proposed accounts are too restrictive, with limitations on transaction volumes and no access to key systems like FedACH. The conflict reflects broader tensions over financial innovation, regulatory authority, and competition for control over core payment infrastructure. With the White House seeking a resolution, the outcome could reshape access to the U.S. financial system.

marsbit02/10 03:44

Coinglass Report Highlights Discrepancies Across Perp DEXs, Raising Debate

Coinglass's recent analysis of perpetual decentralized exchanges (DEXs) like Hyperliquid, Aster, and Lighter has sparked debate due to significant discrepancies in reported metrics. Hyperliquid showed $3.76B in trading volume, $4.05B in open interest (OI), and $122.96M in liquidations, indicating consistent and real market activity. In contrast, Aster and Lighter reported high volumes ($2.76B and $1.81B) but significantly lower OI ($927M and $731M) and minimal liquidations ($7.2M and $3.34M). Coinglass suggests these disparities may indicate artificial volume inflation from airdrop farming, self-trading, or reporting issues, rather than genuine trading. The report concludes that Hyperliquid’s metrics align more closely with healthy market behavior, while Aster and Lighter’s volume quality requires further validation. The analysis prompted community debate, with some accusing Coinglass of bias, though the firm maintains its findings are data-driven and unbiased.

TheNewsCrypto02/09 12:41

Kyle Criticizes Hyperliquid Four Days After Leaving, Arthur Hayes Responds with a $100,000 Bet

In the midst of a market downturn, Hyperliquid ($HYPE) has nearly doubled in value since January, drawing both praise and criticism. Kyle Samani, the recently departed co-founder of Multicoin Capital, publicly criticized the project, calling it representative of crypto's classic problems: founders "fleeing their home country," facilitating crime, being closed-source, and permissioned. Arthur Hayes, BitMEX co-founder, responded not by addressing the criticisms but by proposing a $100,000 bet: that HYPE would outperform any large-cap crypto of Kyle’s choosing from February 10th to July 31st. Kyle did not accept the wager, aligning with his earlier, since-deleted tweet expressing that crypto is "not as interesting as many thought." The article dissects Kyle's critiques, noting that Hyperliquid's operational structure (offshore entity, U.S. user ban) is standard industry practice. It suggests his harsh tone may stem from a personal desire to distance himself from the industry post-departure, contrasting with his former firm, Multicoin, which was revealed to have built a significant $46 million position in HYPE around the time of his exit. The exchange highlights a classic crypto divide: those who have left the "table" often critique from an ethical standpoint ("should"), while those still invested argue primarily with price action ("will it pump"). The discussion quickly devolved into personal attacks about wealth and portfolio performance, underscoring how deeply entrenched financial interests are in shaping narratives within the space.

marsbit02/09 04:53

Schiff vs. Saylor heats up again: Is Strategy’s Bitcoin bet finally cracking?

The long-running debate between gold advocate Peter Schiff and Bitcoin supporter Michael Saylor has reignited as Bitcoin struggles to gain momentum. Schiff criticized Saylor's company, MicroStrategy, for its massive $54 billion Bitcoin investment, which is sitting on an unrealized loss of about 3% with BTC trading near its average purchase price of $76,000. He dismissed Bitcoin as a risky and unproductive asset, predicting greater losses ahead. However, the community defended Saylor, arguing that judging the investment cycle mid-drawdown is misleading and that current market pressures reflect broader economic conditions rather than a flaw in Bitcoin. Despite recent setbacks, including a $900 million unrealized loss and declining stock price, MicroStrategy remains the world's largest corporate Bitcoin holder with over 713,500 BTC. The debate underscores the polarized views on Bitcoin's role as a long-term inflation hedge versus a speculative risk.

ambcrypto02/05 00:02

Bitcoin Quantum Panic Flares As Nic Carter And Developer Matt Corallo Clash

bitcoinist02/04 21:02

Inside the White House Crypto Meeting: Two-Hour Debate Between Banking and Crypto Giants, What Were They Arguing About?

The White House recently hosted a two-hour meeting with key figures from both the banking and cryptocurrency sectors to address a major regulatory dispute hindering the progress of the proposed *CLARITY Act*. The central debate focused on whether stablecoin issuers and third parties should be permitted to offer yields or rewards on stablecoin holdings. Banking groups, including the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, advocated for restrictions on such rewards, citing concerns over financial stability and competition. In contrast, crypto industry representatives—from companies like Coinbase, Ripple, Fidelity, and PayPal—argued that such limitations would unfairly favor traditional financial institutions and stifle innovation. Participants from both sectors engaged in what was described as a balanced and fact-based discussion. While the meeting was seen as a positive step toward resolving the issue, it remains uncertain whether the Senate will advance the legislation. The outcome could significantly shape the future regulatory landscape for stablecoins and digital assets in the U.S.

marsbit02/03 12:45