Survival Guide for Crypto KOLs

marsbit2026-06-18 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-06-18 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The article titled "A Survival Guide for Crypto KOLs" discusses the recent ban on "InfoFi" or "post-to-earn" applications (e.g., Kaito, Cookie) on X (formerly Twitter), which effectively ended the era of easy monetization through engagement farming. It attributes this move to X's desire to reclaim platform control over user attention and ad inventory, noting that the incentive structure had degraded content quality and user experience. The piece outlines both the benefits—like a cleaner feed and a focus on genuine content—and the drawbacks, including immediate economic losses for creators and exposed platform risk. It then provides an updated guide for crypto content creators, emphasizing a shift from quantity to quality. Key recommendations include: 1) Doubling down on high-signal, original content (e.g., deep-dive threads, data-driven analysis). 2) Diversifying platforms (e.g., Substack, YouTube) to mitigate dependency on X. 3) Pursuing direct monetization through brand deals, newsletters, and paid communities. 4) Aligning with professional crypto marketing agencies for distribution. 5) Prioritizing reputation, offline networking, and evergreen content. The conclusion frames the ban as a painful but necessary reset for Crypto Twitter, pushing the ecosystem towards more sustainable and professional content creation models where genuine creators can thrive with less noise.

Source: @Eli5defi

Compiled and Edited by: BitpushNews

(Note: The article was compiled from January 16, 2026. Some data may have changed.)

If you woke up today and found your timeline unusually quiet (or chaotic, depending on that mysterious algorithm), it’s not your imagination.

The "InfoFi" ban is officially in effect. X (formerly Twitter) has revoked API access for the "post-to-earn" apps we all knew (and some loved to hate), including Kaito, Cookie, Wallchain, Xet, and others.

Well, "easy mode" is over. The harvest period has ended.

We need to talk about Goodhart's Law: "When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure." We turned "replies" into a target, and in doing so, we turned the timeline into a Turing test where everyone failed.

But now what?

Why Did the Bubble Burst?

Let's be honest: the "attention economy" is suffering from hyperinflation. Apps like Kaito, Cookie, and Wallchain attempted to financialize attention.

In theory, it incentivized activity. In practice, it created a perverse incentive structure where "engagement" became decoupled from "value."

We weren't building communities; we were conducting a distributed, human-powered DDoS attack on the notification bar.

X finally realized that if they let third-party apps consume X users' dopamine, they would lose control over ad inventory and, more importantly, over genuine interaction and content on X. This is a battle for platform sovereignty.

The Upside (Why This is Good for Real Creators)

  • A cleaner timeline and better UX: No more endless AI-generated junk, "gm" farms, or bot replies clogging every post's replies. Real conversations can breathe again.
  • Quality over quantity: Projects and creators who relied on paid spam now have to focus on real value. This levels the playing field for authentic voices (less noise = higher visibility for thoughtful content).
  • Forcing Web3 marketing to mature: The "post-to-earn" model was a short-term hack that made quick money but burned communities and damaged long-term trust. This pushes us towards more sustainable models.
  • Community relief: Many OGs and seasoned users are celebrating (ZachXBT called it a "fact-based decision," and even some creators see it as a reset for Crypto Twitter).

The Downside (The Painful Reality)

  • Immediate economic hit: Tokens like $KAITO, $COOKIE, and related NFTs plummeted 15-20%+ overnight. Many creators (especially in emerging markets) lost a tangible source of income as leaderboard rewards or campaigns stopped abruptly with no compensation in sight.
  • Disrupting growth strategies: Web3 projects loved using InfoFi for cheap, viral marketing. Without automated farming, promotion just got harder. Crypto topic reach might drop further.
  • Platform risk exposure: X can change the rules overnight (again). It's a reminder we're building on rented land. One policy update, and your entire strategy crumbles.
  • Short-term chaos: Projects are shutting down features, campaigns are on pause, and some creators are mourning the "gold rush" era that paid their rent for daily posting.

What We Need to Do from Now On

X's InfoFi ban has stirred the pot, but it's paving the way for a more structured, professional path for Web3 content creation. I see it as a nudge towards genuine project/agency partnerships and tight-knit creator communities.

Many creators are already pivoting in this direction, agencies are gearing up to fill the gap, building curated networks, and creator collectives are emerging as new hubs for deals and collaboration.

Here is the complete, updated playbook, with detailed steps for each point:

1. Double Down on High-Quality, High-Signal Content

Focus on deep analysis, threads, visual content, and genuine insights (this is what got me here in the first place). If the content is human-made and valuable, X will still reward quality interactions.

Detailed Steps:

  • Audit your last 30 days of posts: Keep only those with engagement rates >5% or meaningful replies; delete or archive the rest.
  • Plan 3-5 premium posts per week: (e.g., 10-tweet threads / long-form posts / articles with charts, simple analogies, or breakdowns).
  • Use data tools: Use @Dune, @DefiLlama, @getmoni_io, @nansen_ai, etc., for original insights, not machine-generated AI summaries.
  • Engage with replies: Thoughtfully respond to every high-quality comment within 24 hours to build genuine dialogue.
  • Subscribe to quality research: Subscribe to outlets like @fourpillarsFP, @shoalresearch, @oak_res_EN, @delphi_digital, etc. Full list here: [https://x.com/i/lists/1956904918348190144)
  • Track performance: Use X Analytics to see which format (threads vs. polls vs. video) generates the most bookmarks/shares.

2. Diversify Platforms

Detailed Steps:

  • Set up 1-2 new platforms: (e.g., Substack + YouTube); sync your best X content there.
  • Cross-post strategically: When sharing a post on X, include a link back to X.
  • Build a flagship channel: For example, start a weekly YouTube/TikTok series (like "DeFi in 5 Minutes") and promote it everywhere.
  • Grow Telegram/Discord: Create a free channel/group for exclusive updates and to connect with your audience.

3. Pivot to Direct, Sustainable Monetization

Open up DMs for genuine brand/marketing deals (this is where many projects will turn). Build your own audience flywheel: an email list, a personal site, or a paid community.

Detailed Steps:

  • Set up tools: Create a Linktree and use Beehiiv or Substack to build an email list. You can try offering a freebie (like a "DeFi Starter Guide" PDF) as an opt-in. Find what works for you.
  • Pitch yourself or offer free exposure: Reach out to projects proactively.
  • Track revenue: Use a simple spreadsheet to log deals, subscriptions, and payouts monthly.

4. Join Marketing Agencies

The ban killed permissionless reward spam, so brands/projects will rely more on trusted agencies for distribution. Top crypto/Web3 marketing agencies have already built out or expanded creator arms. Even Kaito seems to be heading down this path with Kaito Studio.

Some top agencies I've worked with (in no particular order):

@TailoredWeb3, @radarblock, @GREEND0TS, @PinkBrains_io, @apcollective, @funhouse_la, @yaptradeDAO, @JELabs2024, @growgami, @LunarStrategy, @surgence_io

Detailed Steps:

  • Build your media kit: Aggregate data (follower count, avg. engagement rate, niche focus), 3-5 best threads, past collaborations, and rates.
  • Research agencies: Visit their websites, check their creator recruitment announcements, see if they have ongoing campaigns, and pitch yourself.

5. Prioritize Reputation and Relationships

Attend in-person events, collaborate with like-minded creators, and create evergreen value that compounds (not daily spam).

Detailed Steps:

  • Attend 1-2 events per quarter: Aim for conferences like Devcon, Token2049, or regional meetups (check Eventbrite or CryptoEvents).
  • Collaborate weekly: Reach out to 3 creators of similar size for joint threads, guest spots, or shoutouts.
  • Build a "warm list": Maintain a Notion doc with 50+ contacts (creators, founders, community managers) and note how you help each other.
  • Focus on evergreen content: Repurpose top threads into Notion pages, PDFs, or permanent blog posts.
  • Be altruistic first: Offer free value (e.g., tagging helpful people, sharing their work) to build goodwill.
  • Disclosure ON: If you take a paid deal, ensure you clearly disclose it. This ensures accountability and keeps your audience fully informed.

Conclusion

The crypto space moves fast. There may be new, similar InfoFi-like models on friendlier platforms in the future. But the lesson is clear: never bet your farm on a centralized platform's incentive mechanics.

It's painful in the short term, but long term? This might be the best thing to happen to Crypto Twitter. Less noise, more signal, and the real creators will win.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat was the main reason behind X's decision to revoke API access for 'post-to-earn' applications like Kaito and Cookie?

AX revoked API access to regain platform sovereignty. These third-party apps were consuming user attention and interaction data, which undermined X's control over its advertising inventory and the quality of genuine engagement on its platform.

QAccording to the article, what is one significant long-term benefit of the InfoFi ban for genuine content creators?

AOne significant long-term benefit is a fairer competitive environment. By eliminating automated engagement farming and low-quality spam, the ban allows for higher-quality, thoughtful content from genuine creators to gain better visibility.

QWhat immediate economic impact did the InfoFi ban have on creators and related tokens?

AThe ban caused an immediate economic shock. Tokens like $KAITO and $COOKIE, along with related NFTs, crashed by 15-20% overnight. Many creators, especially in emerging markets, lost a direct source of income from leaderboard rewards and campaigns.

QWhat are two specific strategies the article suggests for creators to diversify their presence beyond X (formerly Twitter)?

ATwo strategies are: 1) Setting up 1-2 new platforms like Substack or YouTube and syncing best content there. 2) Building a flagship channel, such as launching a weekly YouTube/TikTok series and promoting it across all platforms.

QHow does the article suggest creators should approach monetization after the ban on 'post-to-earn' models?

ACreators should shift to direct and sustainable monetization. This includes being open to direct brand/marketing deals, building their own audience flywheel (e.g., email lists, personal websites, paid communities), and clearly disclosing any paid promotions for accountability.

İlgili Okumalar

Football Draw Harvests Whales: Extreme Profit-Loss Divergence on Polymarket's World Cup

A bettor known as "fishalive" made a stunning profit of nearly $9 million on the Polymarket prediction platform by correctly wagering against favorites during the 2026 FIFA World Cup group stage. The account, registered just before the tournament, risked roughly $400,000 on two contracts for a Spain vs. Cape Verde match: one that Spain would *not* win, and another on a Cape Verde +2.5 goal handicap. The resulting 0-0 draw triggered both payouts. This single event, with a total market volume of $64 million, highlighted extreme profit-and-loss divergence. Other traders, like "betoor619" and "leeeeroyjenkins," lost millions by betting heavily on favorites Spain and Belgium to win outright—contracts that become worthless in a draw. The article explains that while markets heavily favored strong teams, the "team to win" contracts are binary and do not account for the common outcome of a draw. This creates high-risk, low-reward scenarios for favorite backers, while asymmetric profits flow to those betting on underdogs or against outright wins. The transparency of Polymarket's on-chain ledger publicly documents these massive wins and losses, driving mainstream media coverage. As the tournament progresses, the author suggests traders may shift towards hedging strategies that account for draws. The piece also notes growing regulatory scrutiny in the US and Europe, questioning whether such large-scale, anonymous sports prediction markets should be regulated as gambling or financial derivatives.

Foresight News24 dk önce

Football Draw Harvests Whales: Extreme Profit-Loss Divergence on Polymarket's World Cup

Foresight News24 dk önce

ChatGPT Loses Half Its Market: From Monopoly to Shared Market in Three and a Half Years

In a landmark shift three and a half years after its debut, ChatGPT's global market share in the AI assistant market has fallen below 50% for the first time, dropping to 46.4% as of May 2026. This signals the end of its initial dominance, with the market now diversifying among competitors like Gemini (27.7%) and Claude (10.3%). The report from Sensor Tower indicates the AI assistant landscape has matured from a phase of awe and experimentation into one of product comparison, ecosystem integration, and monetization. Users are increasingly pragmatic, readily switching between assistants based on specific use cases, brand trust, and value propositions. The industry is moving past the "free lunch" era, with users demonstrating a willingness to pay for premium features, driving significant in-app expenditure. Major players are adopting varied monetization strategies: Claude boasts a high subscription conversion rate, while ChatGPT is increasingly testing ads and shopping integrations to complement its subscription revenue. However, this growth comes with immense costs, as exemplified by OpenAI's soaring cash burn for model training and infrastructure. While ChatGPT remains the largest single player, its declining share symbolizes a broader normalization of AI. The technology is no longer a novelty but an integral, scrutinized part of daily digital life, judged on practical utility, price, and seamless integration. The battle has shifted from proving AI's potential to competing in a crowded field where no single product holds a permanent monopoly.

marsbit34 dk önce

ChatGPT Loses Half Its Market: From Monopoly to Shared Market in Three and a Half Years

marsbit34 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片