Survey: Over the Past Year, 79% of American Prediction Market Users Incurred Losses

cryptonews.ru2026-08-13 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-08-13 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

According to a survey by BadCredit, 15% of 1,000 polled Americans actively use prediction market platforms like Kalshi, Polymarket, or PredictIt. Among these users, nearly 79% reported financial losses over the past year: 27% of them incurred losses exceeding $500, and 9% lost more than $1,000. Only 21% stated they did not lose money during this period. Losses were most common among those trading with borrowed funds. The study found that 51% of prediction market traders funded their contracts using credit cards or consumer loans, with 88% of this group reporting losses, compared to 69% of users who did not use loans. Of the active platform users, nearly 53% stated they aimed to increase their income through this method. 27% participated out of curiosity, 10% were influenced by social media content, and 7% joined on friends' recommendations. Despite these user losses, the platforms themselves are growing. The combined trading volume on Kalshi, Polymarket, and Polymarket US reached $50.59 billion in July, a 7.8% increase from June. This growth occurs alongside ongoing legal challenges in various U.S. states.

According to BadCredit, 15% of the 1,000 surveyed Americans actively use prediction platforms such as Kalshi, Polymarket, or PredictIt. Meanwhile, nearly 79% of them reported losses over the past year: 27% of those reported losses exceeding $500, and 9% lost over $1,000. Only 21% stated that they did not lose any funds during this period.

Losses were most frequently reported by those who placed bets using borrowed money. According to the research, 51% of prediction market traders paid for contracts using credit cards and consumer loans. 88% of them reported losing money, compared to 69% of users who did not take out loans.

Among those who actively used prediction platforms, nearly 53% stated they wanted to increase their income this way. 27% joined out of curiosity, 10% were influenced by social media content, and 7% joined on the recommendation of friends.

Amid the growing popularity of prediction markets, their performance metrics are also rising. For instance, the total trading volume on Kalshi, Polymarket, and Polymarket US reached $50.59 billion in July, marking a 7.8% increase compared to June. All of this is happening against the backdrop of ongoing legal proceedings in various US states, which are regularly covered by the Happy Coin News editorial team.

end-content

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the survey, what percentage of active American prediction market users reported financial losses in the past year?

AAccording to the survey, 79% of active American prediction market users reported financial losses in the past year.

QWhat was a key factor linked to a higher rate of losses among traders on prediction platforms?

AA key factor was the use of borrowed money. 88% of users who paid for contracts using credit cards or consumer loans reported losses, compared to 69% of users who did not use loans.

QWhat were the primary motivations cited by users for participating in prediction markets?

AThe primary motivations were: 53% to increase their income, 27% out of curiosity, 10% influenced by social media content, and 7% based on friends' recommendations.

QHow did the total trading volume on platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket change in July?

AThe total trading volume on Kalshi, Polymarket, and Polymarket US reached $50.59 billion in July, representing a 7.8% increase compared to June.

QWhat are the names of the prediction market platforms mentioned in the article?

AThe platforms mentioned in the article are Kalshi, Polymarket, and PredictIt.

İlgili Okumalar

Left Hand PYUSD, Right Hand Open USD: PayPal's Stablecoin Risk "Hedging"

PayPal recently released its Q2 2024 earnings, reporting revenue of $8.68 billion and a Total Payment Volume of $486.4 billion, both exceeding market expectations. However, GAAP profit margins declined year-over-year, with the company attributing an $81 million net loss partly to strategic investments and crypto assets. The report highlighted the strategic role of its PYUSD stablecoin, now positioned as a "major enabler" for the PayPal World platform and integrated into a newly formed "Payment Services & Crypto" business unit. PayPal aims to launch more merchant products powered by PYUSD and AI-driven "agentic payments," focusing on mainstream consumer and business use cases. Despite this strategic push and expansion to over 70 markets and nine blockchains, PYUSD's circulating supply has contracted significantly. After peaking around $4.2 billion in March 2024, its supply fell approximately 31% to roughly $2.7 billion by the end of Q2, indicating a gap between its broad integration narrative and actual sustained user demand post-incentives. The competitive landscape is evolving with the announcement of Open USD, a consortium-backed stablecoin project with over 140 partners including Visa, Mastercard, and Stripe. Unlike PYUSD's single-issuer model, Open USD proposes a shared revenue and governance model among its participants. Notably, PayPal itself is a signatory to the Open USD initiative, suggesting a hedging strategy where it continues developing PYUSD while securing a potential stake in an alternative industry-standard model. PayPal's challenge is to convert PYUSD's established distribution network into organic, subsidy-independent usage. If unsuccessful, its current supply level may represent a peak, especially as competition intensifies from established giants like USDC and new structural paradigms like Open USD.

Odaily星球日报21 dk önce

Left Hand PYUSD, Right Hand Open USD: PayPal's Stablecoin Risk "Hedging"

Odaily星球日报21 dk önce

Cryptocurrency Companies Urge AI Labs to 'Arm' Bitcoin Defenders with the Most Powerful Models

Over thirty Bitcoin and cryptocurrency companies have called on leading AI labs to provide open-source developers with early access to the most powerful cybersecurity models. In an open letter organized by the Bitcoin Policy Institute, signatories including Coinbase, Block, BitGo, Blockstream, ARK Invest, and Foundry argue that developers of critical financial infrastructure like Bitcoin Core are at a disadvantage, using less capable AI tools than potential attackers. They contend that the safety restrictions of public AI models can hinder legitimate vulnerability research. The letter requests that AI labs establish trusted access programs offering early model access, sufficient computing resources for audits, secure environments for private code analysis, and inclusion for small teams and independent developers. The signatories warn that the Bitcoin network secures over $1 trillion in assets, and infrastructure vulnerabilities pose significant risks. They cite recent incidents like the exploitation of a critical vulnerability in BTCPay Server and a major attack on Coldcard wallets, where a configuration error led to the theft of approximately 1,719 BTC ($111 million). The call comes amid a series of high-value crypto infrastructure attacks in 2026, including multimillion-dollar losses from protocols like Ostium, AFX, Summer.fi, and Bonzo Lend due to logic flaws and oracle manipulation. The companies believe advanced AI could strengthen defenses by analyzing large codebases, detecting atypical exploit scenarios, and helping developers identify issues before malicious actors can exploit them.

cryptonews.ru1 saat önce

Cryptocurrency Companies Urge AI Labs to 'Arm' Bitcoin Defenders with the Most Powerful Models

cryptonews.ru1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片