Story Protocol Delays Token Unlock to August as Team Focuses on Long-Term Growth

TheNewsCrypto2026-02-09 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-09 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Story Protocol, a project focused on tokenizing media and creative content, has delayed its first major token unlock by six months to August. According to co-founder S.Y. Lee, the move prevents insiders from selling tokens and gives the project more time to build real usage before new supply enters the market. Lee addressed investor concerns over the network’s current lack of fee revenue, explaining that Story is not a typical trading platform. Instead, it aims to generate revenue through business licensing agreements, particularly with AI companies, by providing legally compliant data such as voice, video, and human-made content. The decision to postpone the token unlock is intended to avoid selling pressure and allow more time to develop data markets and attract AI firms. Lee cited Worldcoin’s similar strategy as a positive precedent.

S.Y. Lee, co-founder of Story Protocol, says that the project needs time to build real usage and has decided to delay its first major token unlock by six months in August. By delaying this release, the insiders will not be able to sell their tokens. According to Lee, this delay helps to project more time to grow real usage before the new supply reaches the markets.

Investors’ Concern and Lee’s Reply

Data from DeFiLlama shows that in September 2025, Story generated over $43,000 per day in fees, and right now the number is zero. This makes investors worry and raises concerns that the network is actually making money.

Lee argues that people are focusing on the wrong measurement. He says that Story is not like the other trading platforms, which generate profits from the transaction fees. Instead, the project is designed to record who owns the data and define how it can be used, while setting rules for future payments. Lee says that most of the money is expected to come from the business licensing agreements, especially with the AI companies.

Story is now concentrating on tokenized media and creative content. This includes collecting real human-made data that AI firms need, voice and video recordings, and other materials that are difficult to copy legally from the internet. Lee believes that demand for this type of data will grow in the upcoming years.

Large token releases often create selling pressures, and by postponing the unlock, Story reduces the risk of sudden selling and keeps supply lower. Lee said that if the founders think of the quick gains, they would prefer a shorter lock period. Lee mentioned how Worldcoin previously extended lockups for the insiders. This move gave the project more time to build, and the market responded positively. This lockup extension gives Story extra time to prove it can attract AI firms and build useful data markets.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Crypto Fear and Greed Index Drops to Extreme Fear at 9

TagsCryptocurrencyStory

İlgili Sorular

QWhy did Story Protocol decide to delay its token unlock?

AStory Protocol delayed its first major token unlock by six months to August to allow more time to build real usage and grow before new supply reaches the markets, preventing insiders from selling their tokens prematurely.

QWhat concern did investors raise about Story Protocol's revenue?

AInvestors were concerned because data from DeFiLlama showed that Story generated over $43,000 per day in fees in September 2025, but currently generates zero fees, raising questions about the network's ability to make money.

QHow does Story Protocol plan to generate revenue according to co-founder S.Y. Lee?

AAccording to S.Y. Lee, Story Protocol is designed to record data ownership and define usage rules for future payments, with most revenue expected to come from business licensing agreements, especially with AI companies, rather than transaction fees.

QWhat type of data is Story Protocol focusing on collecting?

AStory Protocol is concentrating on tokenized media and creative content, including real human-made data needed by AI firms, voice and video recordings, and other materials that are difficult to copy legally from the internet.

QWhat positive example did Lee mention regarding token lockup extensions?

ALee mentioned that Worldcoin previously extended lockups for insiders, which gave the project more time to build and resulted in a positive market response, similar to Story's current strategy.

İlgili Okumalar

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit26 dk önce

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit26 dk önce

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit45 dk önce

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit45 dk önce

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit54 dk önce

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit54 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片