"Stock Market Maestro" Trump Lifts Up the Entire Quantum Computing Sector

Odaily星球日报2026-05-27 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-05-27 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

U.S. President Trump's administration, adopting an "active investor" approach, has announced $2 billion in funding for nine quantum computing companies in exchange for minority, non-controlling equity stakes. The funding, sourced from the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act, targets firms like IBM, GlobalFoundries, D-Wave, Rigetti, and several private companies to advance various quantum modalities and overcome key engineering hurdles. This move mirrors the administration's earlier strategic investments, such as the highly profitable stake in Intel, and shifts from pure subsidies to an equity-for-funding model under the same legislation. The announcement triggered significant stock gains for the quantum sector. The strategy is part of a broader "America First" industrial policy aimed at securing U.S. technological leadership, reducing foreign dependencies, and providing credibility and policy support alongside capital. The administration indicates continued openness to similar investments across semiconductors, critical minerals, defense, and other strategic sectors.

Original|Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Author|Wenser(@wenser 2010 )

Last August, driven by Trump, the U.S. government converted funds through the "Chips Act," directly purchasing nearly 10% of Intel's newly issued shares (approximately 433.3 million shares) at $20.47 per share. At that time, it was worth less than $9 billion; by early May, less than a year later, as Intel's stock price hit a record high, the total value of these shares had reached $54.1 billion, appreciating by over $45 billion in just seven months.

Mentioning this, Trump couldn't hide his pride and posted: "I made America $45 billion in the last 8 months."

As a capital maestro who doesn't hesitate to "move the stock market by posting," Trump exerts an extraordinary influence on the rise and fall of U.S. stocks. Recently, he has started his performance again—providing a total of $2 billion in funding to 9 quantum computing companies through the U.S. Department of Commerce in exchange for equity. Odaily Planet Daily will provide a brief analysis in this article.

U.S. Government Acts Again, Investing $2 Billion in Quantum Computing

On May 21, the Trump administration announced it would provide a total of $2 billion in funding to 9 quantum computing companies through the U.S. Department of Commerce, in exchange for partial equity. The specific allocation plan is as follows:

  • $1 billion will be granted to IBM (IBM) for the operation and development of its independent subsidiary, Anderon;
  • $375 million is allocated to chip manufacturer GlobalFoundries (GFS);
  • Publicly listed companies D-Wave (QBTS), Infleqtion (INFQ), Rigetti (RGTI) each receive $100 million;
  • Private companies Atom Computing, PsiQuantum, Quantinuum (an independent subsidiary of Honeywell-HON) each receive $100 million;
  • Startup Diraq is expected to receive $38 million.

According to official documents, this is part of the Trump administration's "active investor" industrial policy, with funding sourced from the R&D allocation of the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act. The Commerce Department emphasized that this is a "portfolio" strategy, covering two quantum wafer foundries and 7 quantum computing companies. It targets various quantum modalities including neutral atom, silicon spin, superconducting, photonic, and trapped ion, addressing key engineering bottlenecks such as device reproducibility, error rates, optical complexity, and cryogenic system integration.

On the day the news was released, the U.S. stock quantum computing sector surged sharply at the market open. Among them, D-Wave Quantum rose 16%, Rigetti Computing rose 14%, Infleqtion's stock rose 25%, Quantum Computing rose 9%, and IonQ rose 3.1%.

It's worth mentioning that among these companies receiving funds, only GlobalFoundries Inc. (GFS) revealed that the equity swap ratio is about 1%. For other companies, whether public or private, it's a minority non-controlling equity stake, and the specific ratios have not been disclosed. Final ratios await formal agreement signing and SEC filing disclosure.

Capital Operations Under the "America First" Strategy

Looking closely at this "investment for equity" operation, it remains an action by the Trump administration under the "America First" strategy.

Previously, U.S. government investments in Intel (INTC), the only fully integrated U.S. rare earth producer MP Materials (MP), Trilogy Metals (TMQ), Lithium Americas (LAC), U.S. Steel, and others were also strategic moves to maintain the advantage of the domestic semiconductor industry chain.

Especially the nearly $9 billion investment in Intel, the Trump administration explicitly stated that this move was to support domestic advanced semiconductor manufacturing in the U.S. and reduce reliance on TSMC. Therefore, the U.S. government's related holdings are passive, with no board seats, and no participation in the company's daily operations or management. They largely follow board votes on most matters.

However, the U.S. government's "equity investment" is not just financial support; it also includes credit endorsement and multi-faceted policy support (such as export licenses, tariff protection). Previously, Intel received strong support from U.S. Commerce Secretary Loutnik after obtaining the government investment. Over the past year, he has repeatedly met with Apple CEO Tim Cook, Tesla CEO Elon Musk, and NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang, persuading them to cooperate with Intel. With Apple joining, Intel has now established relevant collaborations with all three companies mentioned above.

Shift in Operational Approach Under the CHIPS and Science Act: From Grants to Equity Swaps

The $2 billion in funding for quantum computing-related companies comes from the CHIPS and Science Act, a landmark bipartisan bill introduced by the U.S. government in 2022, officially named the "CHIPS and Science Act of 2022." The total authorized funding of the act is approximately $280 billion over 10 years, for supporting semiconductor industry development and basic science and technology R&D. Its main purpose is to revitalize U.S. semiconductor manufacturing, strengthen scientific research and innovation capabilities, and address competition from other countries in high-tech fields through large-scale investment.

But different from the grant or pure subsidy model during the Biden administration, the Trump administration's operational model is the aforementioned "active investor" model—switching to funding in exchange for minority non-controlling equity stakes. As of May this year, the act has attracted over $645 billion in private investment in semiconductor manufacturing, with over 140 projects and the creation of 525,000 new jobs.

It must be said, while personally calling shots and moving stocks like Dell (DELL), Micron (MU), and Palantir (PLTR), Trump is also promoting U.S. stock market prosperity in the name of U.S. government departments, which is why he repeatedly boasts, "The stock market highs are mainly because of me."

Additionally, it's worth noting that a previous investment announcement from the U.S. Department of Commerce stated, "The CHIPS Research and Development Office continues to solicit proposals from eligible applicants for research, prototyping, and commercial solutions for microelectronics technology in the United States. Eligible applicants should submit applications via Notice 2025-NIST-CHIPS-CRDO-01 on the www.grants.gov website." In other words, the U.S. government's "investment door" remains open. For more information and funding announcements, please refer to official sources.

Of course, the U.S. government invests in a wide range of company fields, also involving critical minerals like electricity and rare earths, new energy sources like lithium batteries, medical supplies, and communication infrastructure. Examples include Westinghouse Electric, Lithium Americas, Trilogy Metals, USA Rare Earth, Vulcan Elements, XLight, L3 Harris Technologies, etc.

Furthermore, U.S. Commerce Secretary Loutnik once revealed to the media that the current administration might take equity stakes in major defense contractors like Lockheed Martin (LMT).

In summary, the various publicly listed companies, critical mineral/rare earth/battery material supply chains, nuclear/small modular reactor (SMR) and advanced nuclear fuel, and other quantum computing targets mentioned above may become the focus of continued investment by the Trump administration in the second half of the year.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat specific action did the Trump administration take to support the quantum computing sector, and how much funding was announced?

AOn May 21, the Trump administration announced that it would provide a total of $2 billion in funding to 9 quantum computing companies through the U.S. Department of Commerce, in exchange for partial equity stakes in those companies.

QWhich publicly listed quantum computing companies received $100 million each from the funding announced by the U.S. Department of Commerce?

AThe publicly listed quantum computing companies that each received $100 million are D-Wave Quantum (QBTS), Infleqtion (INFQ), and Rigetti Computing (RGTI).

QWhat is the source of the $2 billion funding for the quantum computing companies, and how does this Trump-era approach differ from the previous administration's policy?

AThe $2 billion funding comes from the research and development appropriations of the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act. Unlike the Biden administration's approach of grants or pure subsidies, the Trump administration's model is that of an 'active investor,' providing funding in exchange for minority, non-controlling equity stakes.

QAccording to the article, what was a key strategic reason behind the U.S. government's investment in Intel, and what terms govern its stake?

AA key strategic reason for the U.S. government's investment in Intel was to support advanced domestic semiconductor manufacturing and reduce dependence on TSMC. The government's stake is passive, meaning it holds no board seats, does not participate in daily operations, and generally follows the board's votes on most matters.

QWhat broader areas or sectors, beyond quantum computing, does the article suggest the U.S. government under Trump has invested in or may invest in?

ABeyond quantum computing, the article suggests the U.S. government has invested or may invest in areas including critical minerals/rare earths, battery materials, nuclear energy/Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), advanced nuclear fuel, electrical infrastructure, medical supplies, communications infrastructure, and major defense contractors like Lockheed Martin.

İlgili Okumalar

The Shutdown of Claude Mythos Revealed the True Cost of Renting AI to Me

The sudden shutdown of Claude Mythos this week starkly highlights a critical, often overlooked risk for founders: when your core capability relies entirely on someone else's platform, your fate is not in your own hands. The key question becomes: who truly owns the intelligence your product depends on? For years, the debate around open-source models focused on cost. Now, the evidence is clear: fine-tuned open-source models can achieve frontier-level quality for specific, mission-critical tasks at a fraction of the cost. However, the deeper issue is control. Relying on a third-party API is like renting; it works until the landlord changes the rules, raises the rent, or asks you to leave—as Mythos experienced. The lesson is not to stop using frontier models—they are incredible infrastructure. The goal is ownership. Ownership means starting with a powerful open-source model and shaping it around what makes your company unique: your data, workflows, domain expertise, and definition of "good." Over time, the model becomes less generic and more reflective of your business, creating durable value. The optimistic conclusion is that AI's future doesn't hinge on one superior model. There is no single frontier. The frontier includes proprietary models, models fine-tuned on company-specific knowledge, specialized models for narrow problems, and intelligent routers orchestrating model ensembles. The most interesting development is not models getting smarter, but intelligence becoming increasingly customizable. The winning companies will be those that transform intelligence into a unique, owned asset. Looking ahead, the vision is not one model dominating all, but many teams owning the part of the frontier that matters most to them.

marsbit23 dk önce

The Shutdown of Claude Mythos Revealed the True Cost of Renting AI to Me

marsbit23 dk önce

Tiger Research: U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve - Should the Market Be Happy or Disappointed?

Tiger Research analyzes the evolution of U.S. legislative efforts regarding a strategic Bitcoin reserve, concluding the market impact is limited in the short term but potentially positive long-term. The core event was a March 2025 executive order by former President Trump, which designated confiscated Bitcoin as a strategic reserve and promised not to sell existing holdings (approx. 190k BTC). As it contained no mandate to purchase new Bitcoin, the market reacted negatively, with prices dropping 5.7%. Legislative history shows a significant retreat from initial ambitions. The 2024 "BITCOIN Act" proposed mandatory purchases of 1 million BTC over five years. Reintroduced in 2025, it stalled due to high fiscal costs, concerns over dollar hegemony, and opposition from the Treasury Secretary. The current frontrunner, the 2026 "American Retirement and Monetary Advancement (ARMA) Act," is a compromise. It lacks any purchase requirement, instead focusing on consolidating existing government-held Bitcoin and legally prohibiting its sale for at least 20 years. While ARMA has higher passage odds due to bipartisan support and no purchase mandate, its immediate market effect is neutral. It eliminates potential government selling pressure but creates no new demand. The long-term significance is that formally establishing Bitcoin as a national reserve asset in law could later reignite debates on mandatory purchases. Therefore, the path to a government buyer is longer than initially priced by the market, but the directional narrative remains intact.

marsbit26 dk önce

Tiger Research: U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve - Should the Market Be Happy or Disappointed?

marsbit26 dk önce

US Stock Market Trend (June 16): SpaceX Rises 42% in Two Days, New Fed Chairman Takes Office Today

**U.S. Stocks Trend (June 16): SpaceX Soars 42% in Two Days, New Fed Chair Takes Office Today** Markets surged on Monday following former President Trump's social media announcement of a completed U.S.-Iran deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, pending a June 19 signing. The news triggered a broad risk-on rally: oil prices crashed, tech stocks soared, bond yields fell, and defensive sectors lagged. **Market Performance:** The Nasdaq jumped 3.07%, led by semiconductor stocks like Micron (+9.2%). The S&P 500 gained 1.65%, and the Dow rose 0.92% to a record high. However, the Russell 2000 small-cap index underperformed (+0.72%). SpaceX continued its hot streak, rising another 5% pre-market after disclosures of large buys by an Australian billionaire and Cathie Wood's ARK. Boeing also rallied on the transportation optimism. Conversely, energy stocks like Chevron fell over 3% on the oil price plunge, with other defensive sectors also selling off. The day's action showed a clear rotation of funds from energy/defensive plays into AI and tech narratives. **Macro & Outlook:** The VIX fear index fell 8.37%. Treasury yields declined, and WTI crude dropped over 5%. Attention now shifts to a packed schedule: the Bank of Japan is widely expected to hike rates to 1.0% on Tuesday. The Fed's June meeting concludes Wednesday, marking new Chair Wash's debut. While rates are expected to hold, his tone on stubborn inflation and the "dot plot" will be crucial for gauging the 2024 rate path. The formal Iran deal signing is set for Friday. **Trend Perspective:** While the peace deal is a genuine positive, Monday's explosive rally may have gotten ahead of itself, pricing in a swift resolution to inflation concerns. The shortened trading week faces a triple test: BoJ tightening, the Fed's policy stance, and deal implementation details. Tech and semiconductors, which led the surge, remain vulnerable to any disappointment from these key events. The real price discovery begins with the central banks' communications this week.

marsbit47 dk önce

US Stock Market Trend (June 16): SpaceX Rises 42% in Two Days, New Fed Chairman Takes Office Today

marsbit47 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片