South Dakota revives Bitcoin reserve plan with 10% allocation cap – Details

ambcrypto2026-01-28 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-28 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

South Dakota Representative Logan Manhart has revived a legislative effort, House Bill 1155, to allow the state to allocate up to 10% of its revenues into Bitcoin. The bill includes strict security measures for storing private keys and represents a cautious, incremental approach to treating Bitcoin as a legitimate public asset. This move aligns with a growing trend among states like Texas, Arizona, and New Hampshire, which are pursuing their own digital asset strategies amid delays in federal action. The proposal underscores a shift toward state-level adoption as a long-term inflation hedge, reflecting the broader bullish market sentiment around Bitcoin.

While Washington dangles the promise of a federal strategic reserve, South Dakota is tired of waiting.

Representative Logan Manhart (R) has officially revived a legislative push that could fundamentally alter the state’s balance sheet.

On the 27th of January, Manhart introduced House Bill 1155, an ambitious measure that would empower the State Investment Council to allocate up to 10% of state revenues directly into Bitcoin.

South Dakota’s second Bitcoin Reserve attempt

The move is more than just a second attempt at a stalled 2025 proposal.

If passed, HB 1155 would not just allow South Dakota to hold Bitcoin [BTC] but also require strict security rules, with private keys stored across multiple, geographically separate data centers under direct government control.

By limiting the allocation to 10%, the state is taking a cautious, step-by-step approach.

The goal is to gradually treat Bitcoin as a legitimate public asset, similar to what Texas and Arizona are already doing. Thus, reintroducing HB 1155 shows that South Dakota’s view of digital assets is evolving.

Other states and their Bitcoin Reserve plans

South Dakota isn’t the only state that’s tired of waiting around for Washington, as several other states are also moving in the same direction.

New Hampshire already allows up to 5% of certain state funds to be invested in digital assets, while Texas and Arizona have passed laws to include Bitcoin in state reserves.

Florida is also considering a similar bill aimed at using digital assets as an inflation hedge.

However, at the federal level, creating a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve is still a key goal for the current administration.

Patrick Witt, Director of the White House Crypto Council, has already acknowledged that legal complications have slowed progress.

As a result, the federal plan currently depends mainly on Bitcoin seized by the Department of Justice, rather than new purchases.

What’s more?

This came at a time when BTC was trading around $89,199 at press time as per CoinMarketCap, with the Bitcoin crypto sentiment standing bullish at 81%.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin Dominance also stood at 59.55% as per TradingView, reflecting continued investor preference for the asset.

All this put together showed that the market entered 2026 with a focus on fundamentals. And with this bill, South Dakota is choosing to act rather than wait.

Final Thoughts

Rather than chasing price, South Dakota is legislating infrastructure for long-term exposure.
HB 1155 reflects a broader trend of states testing Bitcoin before federal execution materializes.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the main purpose of House Bill 1155 introduced in South Dakota?

AHouse Bill 1155 is an ambitious measure that would empower the State Investment Council to allocate up to 10% of state revenues directly into Bitcoin, treating it as a legitimate public asset.

QHow does South Dakota's proposed Bitcoin allocation compare to the approach of other states like New Hampshire?

ASouth Dakota's bill allows for an allocation of up to 10% of state revenues, which is a higher cap than New Hampshire, which allows up to 5% of certain state funds to be invested in digital assets.

QWhat security measures are mandated for Bitcoin holdings under the proposed South Dakota bill?

AThe bill requires strict security rules, with private keys stored across multiple, geographically separate data centers under direct government control.

QWhat is the current status of the federal government's plan for a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve according to the article?

AThe federal plan for a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve has been slowed by legal complications and currently depends mainly on Bitcoin seized by the Department of Justice, rather than new purchases.

QWhat broader trend does the reintroduction of HB 1155 represent among U.S. states?

AHB 1155 reflects a broader trend of states like Texas, Arizona, and Florida testing Bitcoin integration and creating infrastructure for long-term exposure before a federal execution materializes.

İlgili Okumalar

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinist7 dk önce

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinist7 dk önce

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit1 saat önce

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit1 saat önce

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit1 saat önce

marsbit1 saat önce

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit1 saat önce

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit1 saat önce

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit1 saat önce

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures