Securitize announces ‘real’ tokenized stocks, touts DeFi integration

cointelegraph2025-12-17 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-12-17 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Securitize has announced plans to launch what it claims will be the first compliant, on-chain trading experience for tokenized public stocks, representing real share ownership rather than synthetic exposure. The product, expected in Q1 2026, will use tokens issued directly on the issuer’s cap table and recorded onchain. Trading will occur through a DeFi-style swap interface, enabling real-time transactions even outside traditional market hours. The company criticized existing tokenized stock offerings for lacking true ownership, compliance, and proper KYC/AML controls, often relying on offshore structures. In contrast, Securitize emphasizes regulatory compliance, whitelisted wallets, and its role as an SEC-registered transfer agent to ensure tokens represent legally recognized shares. Beyond faster settlement, the firm highlights programmability—enabling integration with DeFi and smart contracts while maintaining investor protections—as a key upgrade to traditional finance.

Securitize, a company focused on tokenizing securities, said Tuesday it plans to launch what it calls the first compliant, onchain trading experience for public stocks that are issued as tokens representing real share ownership.

According to the announcement, Securitize’s stock product is expected to launch in the first quarter of 2026. The company said the offering is designed to avoid structures that mirror stock prices without conveying ownership, and instead, the tokens “are real, regulated shares: issued onchain, recorded directly on the issuer’s cap table.”

It also said trading will be presented in a “swap-style” interface familiar to users of decentralized finance, or decentralized finance (DeFi).

Securitize argued that natively tokenized public stocks, in which tokens represent actual stock ownership, were held onchain but mostly traded through traditional offchain processes. Its pitch is that buyers and sellers will be able to trade “fully on-chain” in real time, including during hours when traditional markets are closed.

*Securitize’s tokenized stock trading user interface. Source:* *Securitize*

Related: Binance hints at stock perps in push to join global tokenized equities race

A compliant tokenized stock ecosystem

Securitize criticized the recent wave of tokenized stock products, claiming they “offer exposure, not ownership.” The company said some products rely on special-purpose vehicles or offshore structures that can add counterparty risk or create pricing mismatches.

It also criticized tokenized stock products, which it said “are not even compliant, since they are issued as permissionless assets without Know Your Customer (KYC) or Anti-Money Laundering (AML) controls.

Still, the company notes that traditional stock infrastructure is antiquated and needs disintermediation and rebuilding, with investors rarely holding “shares in their own name, settlement takes at least a day.”

“If tokenization is going to matter at public-market scale, it must deliver ownership, real securities and maintain investor protections.“

Securitize said its approach is built around regulated securities and compliance requirements, including controls that limit transfers to approved, or whitelisted, wallets.

Related: Ondo wins Liechtenstein approval to offer tokenized stocks in Europe

Regulated shares make their way to DeFi

Securitize said it will act as the transfer agent for the shares, describing itself as registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. Transfer agents maintain shareholder records and process changes in ownership. By pairing that role with blockchain-based issuance, the company said the tokens would be legally recognized shares rather than a proxy claim.

Securitize downplayed faster settlement as the main selling point, saying the larger opportunity is programmability, or the ability for tokenized securities to interact with smart contracts and onchain financial applications.

It further argued that this programmability allows tokenized securities to be integrated with DeFi platforms “without compromising compliance or user protections.”

“This is not about replacing traditional finance. It’s about upgrading it,“ Securitize said.

İlgili Okumalar

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

The author, Alex Xu, explains his decision to significantly reduce his Bitcoin holdings (from full to ~30% of his portfolio) during the current bull cycle, citing a lowered long-term outlook for BTC's price appreciation in the next cycle. He outlines six key reasons for this reduced expectation: 1. **Diminished Growth Drivers:** The narrative of exponential user adoption has largely played out with institutional ETF adoption. The next major growth phase—adoption by sovereign national reserves or central banks—seems unlikely in the near future. 2. **Personal Opportunity Cost:** More attractive investment opportunities have emerged in other assets, such as undervalued companies. 3. **Industry-Wide Contraction:** The broader crypto industry is struggling, with most Web3 business models (SocialFi, GameFi, DePIN) failing. This overall萧条 (depression) reduces the fundamental demand and consensus for Bitcoin. 4. **Strain on Major Buyer:** MicroStrategy, a major corporate buyer of BTC, faces rising financing expenses for its debt, which could slow its purchasing rate and create significant marginal pressure on the market. 5. **Increased Competition from Gold:** The emergence of "tokenized gold" has closed the functional gap (portability, divisibility) between physical gold and Bitcoin, offering a strong competitor in the non-sovereign store-of-value space. 6. **Security Budget Concerns:** The block reward halving continues to exacerbate the long-standing issue of funding Bitcoin's network security, with new fee source explorations like Ordinals and L2s largely failing. The author's decision to hold a significant (though reduced) position reflects a cautious, not bearish, outlook. He remains open to increasing his exposure if the fundamental reasons for his skepticism change or if new positive catalysts emerge.

marsbit14 dk önce

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

marsbit14 dk önce

Prediction Markets Cannot Exist Without Insider Trading, But Insider Trading Is Killing Them

Prediction markets face a fundamental contradiction: they rely on insider trading to generate accurate prices, yet this same activity erodes public trust and threatens their survival. Recent scandals, such as a U.S. special forces member making $400,000 on Polymarket using classified information about a raid, highlight the severity of the issue. While platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi market themselves as venues where "everyone is an expert" and encourage informed trading, they also enforce policies against illegal insider trading. The core dilemma is that these markets depend on informed insiders for price efficiency but require uninformed retail participants to provide liquidity. If insider trading is too rampant, retail traders leave, perceiving the market as unfair. If restrictions are too strict, valuable information flow dries up, reducing the market’s predictive utility. The challenge is finding a balance that maintains both accuracy and perceived fairness—a task complicated by regulatory pressures and recurring scandals.

marsbit19 dk önce

Prediction Markets Cannot Exist Without Insider Trading, But Insider Trading Is Killing Them

marsbit19 dk önce

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

Iran has announced a comprehensive plan to assert control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil shipping chokepoint. The proposed measures include requiring all vessels to obtain Iranian permission for passage, imposing fees for security, environmental protection, and navigation management—preferably paid in Iranian rials—and absolutely banning Israeli ships. Vessels from countries deemed hostile by Iran’s top security bodies may also be barred. Analysts suggest Iran’s motives are multifaceted: increasing pressure on the U.S. and Israel by leveraging control over oil transit to influence global prices and inflation; creating a new revenue stream, potentially exceeding $7.7 billion annually, to counter Western sanctions and support postwar reconstruction; and using transit permissions as bargaining chips in future negotiations, notably with the U.S. However, the plan faces significant practical and diplomatic challenges. Enforcing comprehensive interception and fee collection in the busy waterway, patrolled by international military forces, would be difficult. The U.S. has already countering with a blockade of Iranian ports and threats to intercept any ship paying fees, potentially strangling Iran’s oil exports and fee revenue. Broad international opposition, led by European and Gulf states, and legal controversies further complicate implementation. The proposal may ultimately serve more as a negotiating tactic than a feasible policy, with its execution remaining highly uncertain.

marsbit1 saat önce

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

marsbit1 saat önce

Vertically Integrated Capital Aggregators: How Does Web3 Build an Impregnable Moat?

"Vertical Integration Capital Aggregators: How Web3 Builds Unbreachable Moats" explores how leading Web3 protocols create competitive advantages by vertically integrating multiple ecosystem components. Unlike Web2 aggregators that focus on user demand or supplier commoditization, successful Web3 entities like Hyperliquid aggregate capital, liquidity, users, and distribution into a unified financial ecosystem. This integration allows for efficient capital deployment—Hyperliquid generates $0.30 in fees per $1 of TVL annually, compared to Aave's $0.05—while creating a defensible moat that is difficult to replicate across six simultaneous fronts. However, this model comes with risks: DeFi loses $0.50 to hacks for every $1 earned, pushing protocols toward partial centralization and closed systems for security and scalability. The token serves as a shared incentive layer, aligning stakeholders and driving value through mechanisms like buybacks. The article concludes that vertical integration, not capital itself, is the true moat, and that the industry is evolving toward pragmatic, partially centralized models to ensure economic growth and sustainability.

marsbit1 saat önce

Vertically Integrated Capital Aggregators: How Does Web3 Build an Impregnable Moat?

marsbit1 saat önce

Falsely Accused by AI and Jailed for 160 Days: American Woman Steps into the Execution Zone

Summary: Angela Lipps, a woman from Tennessee, was wrongfully imprisoned for 160 days after a facial recognition AI incorrectly identified her as a suspect in a bank fraud case in North Dakota. Despite her insistence that she had never been to the state, she was arrested in July 2025 and held without bail. She spent 108 days in a local jail before being transferred to North Dakota in October, where she was eventually cleared after her lawyer provided bank records proving she was buying pizza in Tennessee at the time of the crime. Her ordeal highlights a growing issue with AI-driven law enforcement errors. Similar cases include Robert Williams, detained for 30 hours in 2020, and Chris Gatlin, jailed for 17 months based on flawed AI matches. Systems like Clearview AI, used by over 3,000 U.S. law enforcement agencies, often rely on low-quality images and can produce inaccurate results. Human oversight failures exacerbate the problem, as officers sometimes skip verification steps, leading to wrongful arrests. While AI has improved policing efficiency, its errors have serious consequences, emphasizing the need for stricter regulations and human accountability in its use.

marsbit2 saat önce

Falsely Accused by AI and Jailed for 160 Days: American Woman Steps into the Execution Zone

marsbit2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures