SEC Chairman confirms U.S. crypto bill nears finish line: Details

ambcrypto2026-01-20 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-20 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The long-standing tension between Washington and the crypto industry is easing as SEC Chairman Paul Atkins confirms the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 is ready for presidential review. The SEC and CFTC are now cooperating to align regulations, ending years of conflict. The bill clearly divides oversight: the CFTC will regulate decentralized digital commodities like Bitcoin, while the SEC handles investment-style tokens. A "maturity clause" allows tokens to transition from SEC to CFTC oversight once their networks become sufficiently decentralized. This regulatory clarity could unlock institutional adoption and real-world asset tokenization, potentially ending crypto’s regulatory winter and fostering innovation. Despite recent market pressures, the bill represents a significant step toward legal certainty.

The long-standing tension between Washington and the crypto industry is beginning to ease.

Recently, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins confirmed that the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 is ready to be presented to the U. S. President.

More importantly, he revealed that the SEC and the CFTC are no longer fighting over control and are instead working together to align their rules.

Why hasn’t the crypto market reacted?

However, this comes at a time when crypto prices are under pressure.

As per data from CoinMarketCap, the total market value has fallen to $3.08 trillion, at press time, down by 1.92% in the past 24 hours. However, this drop is mainly because of Donald Trump’s tariff shock.

This sudden shift in global economies raised fears about tighter global liquidity, pushing investors away from riskier assets like Bitcoin [BTC] and altcoins.

The fight is over

That being said, for years, crypto projects were stuck between the SEC and the CFTC, unsure which rules applied to them. However, this new bill is different as it clearly divides responsibility.

Once passed, the CFTC would oversee digital commodities, such as Bitcoin and other decentralized assets. Meanwhile, the SEC would regulate investment-style tokens, especially during early fundraising stages.

Additionally, the bill is also designed to introduce a key idea called the “maturity clause.”

Once a blockchain network becomes decentralized and stable enough, its token could move out of SEC oversight and fall under the CFTC instead.

This could stop the endless cycle of enforcement actions that have hurt crypto innovation in the U.S.

More than trading

Needless to say, this bill isn’t just about crypto exchanges. It also lays the groundwork for tokenizing real-world assets.

With clear legal rules, things like bonds, funds, and stablecoins could be issued and traded on blockchains. This makes it easier for traditional finance firms to move on-chain.

Remarking on Atkins’s remarks, an X user said,

“If market structure is finally being clarified, that’s a big unlock. Clear rules don’t slow innovation, they let real infrastructure scale.”

Echoing similar sentiments, another X user added,

“Things are about to get parabolic.”

What changed?

Under former SEC Chair Gary Gensler, the crypto industry often navigated a regulatory tightrope. With President Trump back in office, however, the tone in Washington has shifted.

While Gensler’s departure has clearly opened the door to greater cooperation, the path to full regulatory clarity remains uneven.

As Bitwise CEO Hunter Horsley recently noted, while progress is being made, significant clarity gaps remain.

Still, regardless of what lies ahead, this reform has been overdue for years, and it now finally appears within reach.

Ergo, one X user responded best to Atkins’s remarks when he said,

“This is huge clarity has been missing for years.”


Final Thoughts

  • Regulatory alignment between the SEC and CFTC ends years of jurisdictional uncertainty and enforcement-first policy.
  • If lawmakers bridge the remaining gaps, 2026 could mark the end of crypto’s regulatory winter and the start of institutional spring.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the name of the crypto bill that is nearing the finish line, as confirmed by the SEC Chairman?

AThe Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025.

QAccording to the article, which two regulatory bodies have stopped fighting and are now working together to align their rules?

AThe SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission).

QHow does the new bill propose to divide regulatory oversight between the SEC and CFTC?

AThe CFTC would oversee digital commodities like Bitcoin, while the SEC would regulate investment-style tokens, especially during early fundraising stages.

QWhat is the 'maturity clause' introduced in the bill?

AIt is a clause that allows a token to move out of SEC oversight and fall under the CFTC once its blockchain network becomes decentralized and stable enough.

QWhat event, unrelated to the bill, does the article cite as the main reason for the recent drop in crypto market value?

ADonald Trump's tariff shock, which raised fears about tighter global liquidity.

İlgili Okumalar

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbit40 dk önce

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbit40 dk önce

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

The pre-IPO token market has been rocked by strong statements from Anthropic and OpenAI. Both AI giants have updated official warnings, declaring that any sale or transfer of their company shares without explicit board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized on their corporate records. This directly targets Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the common legal structure used by pre-IPO token platforms. These platforms typically use an SPV to acquire shares from employees or early investors, then issue blockchain-based tokens representing a claim on the SPV's economic benefits. Anthropic and OpenAI's position means that if an SPV's share purchase lacked authorization, the underlying asset could be deemed worthless, nullifying the token's value. Anthropic explicitly warned that any third party selling its shares—via direct sales, forwards, or tokens—is likely fraudulent or offering a valueless investment. The crackdown highlights risks in the popular SPV model, including complex multi-layered "Russian doll" SPV structures that obscure legal ownership, add fees, and concentrate risk. If one layer is invalidated, the entire chain could collapse. Following the announcements, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). In contrast, purely speculative pre-IPO prediction contracts remained stable, as they involve no actual share ownership. The move is seen as a corrective measure amid a market frenzy where some pre-IPO token valuations (e.g., Anthropic's token hitting a $1.4 trillion implied valuation) far exceeded recent official funding rounds. Opinions are split: some believe this undermines the core logic of pre-IPO token trading if top companies reject SPVs, while others argue buyers always assumed this legal risk when accessing unofficial channels. The statements serve as a stark warning and a potential catalyst for market de-leveraging and clearer boundaries.

Odaily星球日报44 dk önce

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

Odaily星球日报44 dk önce

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

"AI Membership: The Hidden Cost Pushing Workers Toward 'Poverty'" The widespread corporate push for AI adoption is creating a hidden financial burden for employees. Companies, from giants like Alibaba to small firms, are mandating AI use, often tying token consumption to KPIs, but frequently refuse to cover the costs. Workers are forced to pay for subscriptions out of pocket to stay competitive and avoid being replaced. Front-end developer Long Shen spends up to 2000 RMB monthly on tools like Cursor and ChatGPT Plus, seeing it as a necessary 3% salary investment to handle 90% of his coding tasks. While it boosted his performance and led to promotions, he now faces idle time at work, pretending to be busy. Designer Peng Peng navigates strict company firewalls by using personal devices and accounts for AI image generation tools like Midjourney, spending hundreds monthly without reimbursement, while her boss demands faster, more numerous revisions. The pressure creates workplace anxiety and suspicion. Programmer Li Huahua, after a friend's experience of raised KPIs following AI success, fears being branded a "traitor" for using it yet worries about falling behind if she doesn't. The dynamic allows management to demand results without understanding the tools or covering expenses, treating employees like AI "agents." While some, like entrepreneur Jin Tu, find high value in paid AI, building entire systems and winning competitions, for most, it's a trap. Free tools like Kimi and Doubao are introducing fees, closing off alternatives. The initial efficiency gains individual advantage, but as AI becomes ubiquitous, the personal edge disappears, workloads increase, and a cycle of dependency begins. Workers like Long Shen realize they cannot maintain AI-generated code without AI, making stopping harder than continuing to pay. The tool promising liberation is instead becoming a compulsory, costly chain in the modern workplace.

marsbit1 saat önce

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

marsbit1 saat önce

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

"SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire and Its Heirs" explores the unconventional succession narrative within SK Group, South Korea's second-largest conglomerate, following SK Hynix's dramatic market rise. Unlike traditional chaebol scripts prioritizing the eldest son, ownership, and political marriages, Chairman Choi Tae-won's three children from his first marriage are charting distinct paths. The eldest daughter, Choi Yun-jeong, is considered the most visible candidate. With a background in biology, consulting, and a PhD, she holds executive roles at SK Bioscience and SK Inc.'s growth strategy unit, focusing on biopharma and new businesses. Her marriage is to an AI infrastructure entrepreneur, not a traditional chaebol heir. The second daughter, Choi Min-jeong, took a unique route by voluntarily serving as a South Korean naval officer, including a tour in the Gulf of Aden. She later worked on policy and strategy for SK Hynix in Washington D.C. before co-founding an AI-driven healthcare startup in San Francisco. She married a former U.S. Marine Corps officer, connecting the family to U.S. defense and policy networks. The son, Choi In-geun, who has Type 1 diabetes, followed a more classic preparatory path with a physics degree and a stint at SK E&S but left to join McKinsey's Seoul office. He remains publicly silent and holds no SK shares, defying the traditional "crown prince" archetype. Their paths unfold against the backdrop of their parents' high-profile, contentious divorce and a record-setting asset division lawsuit. The article argues that as SK Hynix becomes a geopolitical asset in the AI era, the conventional rules of chaebol inheritance are changing. The heirs are being groomed not simply to take over, but to navigate a complex global landscape defined by AI, biotech, geopolitics, and policy, forging legitimacy through their own expertise and networks rather than birth order alone.

marsbit1 saat önce

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片