Sales Director Consulted with DeepSeek, Lost Job and 5 Million Rubles

cryptonews.ru2026-07-27 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-07-27 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Babuskinsky District Court of Moscow upheld the lawful dismissal of Ekaterina Remizova, sales director at GK Energoprof, for disclosing trade secrets. The employee was found to have forwarded company documents, including tender participation details and colleagues' salary data, to her personal email. Furthermore, she uploaded confidential reports with sales statistics, financial metrics, and cash flow data from the company's internal PowerBI resources into the external AI service DeepSeek. The court ruled that uploading such protected information into the DeepSeek AI system itself constitutes disclosure. An additional ground for dismissal was her disclosure of strategic company plans to a supplier, after which the counterparty ceased communication. The employer also cited systematic failure to meet sales targets. Following her dismissal, Remizova sued, demanding the termination be declared illegal, changed to "by mutual agreement," and seeking a contractual "golden parachute" of 5 million rubles. The court rejected the 5 million ruble claim, as such payment was only stipulated for mutual agreement or redundancy. While one disciplinary penalty was deemed unjustified, ordering the company to pay 10,000 rubles in moral compensation, the court largely sided with the employer, refusing to recognize the dismissal as unlawful. The case highlights risks associated with using external AI services. A security expert noted that DeepSeek's "Share" function creates links that can be in...

Babushkinsky District Court of Moscow has recognized the dismissal of Ekaterina Remizova, the sales director of the company "GK Energoprof," for disclosing trade secrets as lawful. The employee was forwarding official documents to her personal email and uploading them to the DeepSeek neural network. This is reported by RAPSI and RIA Novosti.

Remizova worked at the company from April 18, 2025, with a salary of over 800,000 rubles per month. In September 2025, she was already subject to disciplinary action, which was followed by dismissal for disclosing a secret protected by law.

What the Employee Was Charged With

The employer established that Remizova was sending documents regarding participation in a tender and a file with colleagues' salary data to her personal email address. She also used her personal address as a hidden copy (BCC) when forwarding corporate correspondence. In addition, she was extracting protected information from the company's internal resource—including PowerBI reports with statistics on deals, incoming funds, and financial indicators of departments—to the third-party service DeepSeek, developed by the Chinese company of the same name.

The court emphasized that the mere act of uploading trade secrets or confidential information into the Deepseek AI system already constitutes disclosure of such information.

An additional reason for dismissal was the disclosure of the company's strategic plans to the supplier "Sibtorgservis": Remizova informed them of the intention to launch the "Energogranum" brand on the market and establish direct supplies of generators from China, after which the counterparty ceased communication. The employer also cited systematic failure to meet sales targets.

The Demand for a "Golden Parachute" and the Outcome of the Proceedings

After her dismissal, Remizova filed a lawsuit demanding that the order be declared unlawful, the grounds for dismissal be changed to "by mutual agreement," and the "golden parachute" provided for in an additional agreement, amounting to 5 million rubles, be recovered. The company did not admit the claim. During the proceedings, the defendant offered a settlement agreement with a payment of over 400,000 rubles—half of the salary—but the plaintiff refused it.

The court stated that Remizova had no production necessity to extract information from the employer's protected media, send it to an uncontrolled external address, or post it on the third-party resource DeepSeek. These actions were classified as a gross violation of labor duties.

Outcomes of the case:

  • The demand for payment of the 5 million ruble "golden parachute" was rejected, as this payment is provided only upon termination of the contract by mutual agreement or staff reduction;
  • One of the disciplinary penalties was deemed unfounded; the company was ordered to pay 10,000 rubles in moral damages compensation;
  • The remainder of the claim, including the request to declare the dismissal unlawful, was denied.

The court's decision on case No. 02-1545/2026 has not yet entered into legal force and can be appealed.

AI Opinion

From the perspective of machine data analysis, the Remizova case reflects only a part of a broader problem: the DeepSeek service allows data leakage not only through closed file uploads but also through its own Share function. Information security specialist David Konitzny discovered that the Google search engine freely indexes dialogues from the directory chat.deepseek.com/share/, and they can be found with a simple query: site:chat.deepseek.com/share/. The system's warning that the link can be opened by "anyone who has it" says nothing about possible indexing by search engines—and it is in this gap between the expectation of privacy and the technical design of the service that an additional risk lies for companies whose employees use such tools.

It turns out that even without malicious intent, a temporary link can turn into a permanent digital trail with fragments of code, work tasks, and financial data. How common is the practice of accidental disclosure of corporate information through such "temporary" links in other neural network services?

İlgili Sorular

QWhat were the main reasons for Ekaterina Remizova's dismissal according to the court?

AThe court found the dismissal lawful for disclosing trade secrets. The main reasons were: 1) Sending tender participation documents and colleagues' salary data to her personal email. 2) Using her personal email as a hidden copy (BCC) in corporate correspondence. 3) Uploading protected company information, including PowerBI reports on deals and financial data, to the external AI service DeepSeek.

QWhy was Ekaterina Remizova's claim for a 5 million ruble 'golden parachute' rejected by the court?

AThe court rejected the claim for the 5 million ruble 'golden parachute' because, according to her additional agreement, this payment was only provided for in cases of termination by mutual agreement or staff reduction. Her dismissal was classified as a gross violation of labor duties for disclosing trade secrets, which did not qualify for the 'golden parachute' payment.

QAccording to the article, what additional risk is highlighted regarding data security when using services like DeepSeek?

AThe article highlights that data leakage can occur not just through private file uploads but also via DeepSeek's 'Share' function. Security expert David Konitzny found that Google can freely index conversations from the 'chat.deepseek.com/share/' directory, making them discoverable via a simple site search. The system's warning that 'anyone with the link' can access it does not mention potential indexing by search engines, creating a gap between privacy expectations and the service's technical functionality. This risks exposing corporate information like code, tasks, or financial data through these 'temporary' links.

QWhat was the outcome of the court case regarding the disciplinary actions taken against Remizova?

AThe court's ruling was mixed: 1) It rejected Remizova's main claims to have her dismissal declared illegal and to receive the 5 million ruble 'golden parachute'. 2) It found one of the disciplinary actions against her to be unjustified and ordered the company to pay her 10,000 rubles in moral damages compensation. 3) In all other aspects of her lawsuit, including the legality of the dismissal, her claims were denied.

QWhat information did Remizova disclose to the supplier 'SibTorgService' that became an additional ground for her dismissal?

AShe disclosed the company's strategic plans to the supplier 'SibTorgService', specifically informing them about the intention to launch the 'Energygranum' brand on the market and to establish direct supplies of generators from China. Following this disclosure, the counterparty ceased communication. This act of revealing confidential strategic plans was cited as an additional ground for her dismissal.

İlgili Okumalar

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: Losses Mount Due to Vulnerable Seed Generation A critical vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets has led to a continued wave of fund thefts. According to Galaxy Research, the total stolen has reached 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $88.6 million) from 4,585 addresses, a significant increase from the initial 594.5 BTC reported on July 30, 2026. Most of the stolen funds remain on the attackers' addresses. The issue is not with the current firmware, which Coinkite has updated, but with seed phrases generated on vulnerable devices between March 2021 and the release of fixed firmware versions. Due to a programmer error, devices switched from using a hardware random number generator to the software-based Yasmarang generator, which was initialized with publicly accessible data like the chip's serial number. This made the seed phrases predictable through offline brute-force attacks, meaning wallets remain at risk until funds are moved to a new wallet generated with the patched firmware. Affected devices include Mk2/Mk3 with firmware 4.0.1–4.1.9 (and up to 5.0.3), Mk4/Mk5 up to version 5.6.0, and Q models up to 1.5.0Q. The only exceptions are seeds created with a high-entropy method like at least 50 independent dice rolls or a strong unique BIP-39 passphrase. All other owners must generate a new seed on the fixed firmware and transfer their assets. A case highlighting the human impact involves a 39-year-old long-term investor who lost 2 BTC (approx. $130,000) in minutes. He had accumulated the Bitcoin over eight years through physical labor, viewing it as a financial lifeline and a retirement plan in a country suffering from hyperinflation. His story underscores that even conservative "buy and hold in cold storage" strategies can be compromised by such underlying technical flaws. From a technical perspective, this incident echoes historical failures where weak random number generators undermined cryptographic security, challenging the assumption that offline storage is automatically foolproof.

cryptonews.ru3 saat önce

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

cryptonews.ru3 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片