Reshuffling the Discourse Power of U.S. Innovative Finance: Who Has Secured a Seat at the CFTC Table?

marsbit2026-02-15 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-15 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has announced the members of its newly formed Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC), signaling a strategic shift toward proactive engagement with financial innovation. Replacing the former Technical Advisory Committee, the IAC includes 35 representatives from major crypto exchanges (Coinbase, Kraken), DeFi and infrastructure leaders (Uniswap, Solana, Chainlink), top VCs (a16z, Paradigm), prediction markets (Polymarket, Kalshi), traditional financial institutions (Nasdaq, CME, ICE), and academics. Chaired by CFTC’s Michael S. Selig, the committee will advise on emerging technologies—including AI and blockchain—and their impact on derivatives and commodity markets. The move reflects a shift from reactive regulation to collaborative governance, integrating diverse industry voices into the rulemaking process. Key implications include legitimization of prediction markets, formal recognition of DeFi and public chains, and enhanced advantages for compliant crypto platforms. The IAC aims to help design adaptive regulations that foster responsible innovation while maintaining market integrity.

Original Title: "Who Is at the CFTC Table? A Redistribution of Discourse Power in U.S. Innovative Finance"

Written by: KarenZ, Foresight News

On February 12, 2026, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) officially released Announcement No. 9182-26, announcing the list of members for the Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC).

If you think this is just a routine list of "external advisors" for a regulatory agency, you are sorely mistaken.

This list, which brings together traditional financial giants, leading platforms in the crypto industry, DeFi infrastructure providers, top venture capital institutions, and academic representatives, is not merely the formation of an industry advisory group. Instead, it is a critical step in the implementation of the collaborative framework for innovative financial market supervision established by the CFTC under the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

The Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC), spearheaded by CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig and evolved from the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), sends a clear signal from its establishment purpose to its final lineup: U.S. regulators are actively embracing crypto and fintech innovation, shifting from "passive regulation" to "collaborative governance."

Star-Studded Lineup: A Full House from Exchanges and DeFi to Traditional Finance

Unlike previous instances where regulatory agencies invited one or two crypto representatives for "window dressing," this CFTC IAC committee list can be described as an "all-star lineup," encompassing 35 members from traditional financial giants, crypto trading platforms, DeFi protocols, blockchain infrastructure providers, investment institutions, academic representatives, and more.

1、CEX

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong
Kraken Co-CEO Arjun Sethi
Gemini CEO Tyler Winklevoss
Crypto.com CEO Kris Marszalek
Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev
Blockchain.com CEO Peter Smith
Bullish CEO Tom Farley
Bitnomial CEO Luke Hoersten

2、Prediction Markets

Polymarket CEO Shayne Coplan
Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour
FanDuel President Christian Genetski
DraftKings CEO Jason Robins

3、DeFi and Public Chain Infrastructure

Uniswap Labs CEO Hayden Adams
Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse
Solana Labs CEO Anatoly Yakovenko
Chainlink Labs CEO Sergey Nazarov
Etherealize CEO (Ethereum promotion and product startup) Vivek Raman

4、Top Crypto VCs

a16z crypto Managing Partner Chris Dixon
Paradigm Managing Partner Alana Palmedo
Framework Ventures Co-Founder Vance Spencer

5、Digital Asset Custody, Asset Management

Anchorage Digital CEO Nathan McCauley
Grayscale CEO Peter Mintzberg

6、Traditional Finance, Clearing, and Trading Institutions

Option Clearing Corporation CEO Andrej Bolkovic
Rothera Markets (Derivatives Exchange and Clearinghouse) CEO Thomas Chippas
Cboe Global Markets CEO Craig Donohue
CME Group CEO Terry Duffy
Nasdaq CEO Adena Friedman
Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation President & CEO Frank LaSalla
International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) CEO Scott D. O’Malia
London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) CEO David Schwimmer
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) CEO Jeff Sprecher
DRW (Trading Firm) CEO Don Wilson

7、Academic and Compliance Representatives

Professor Harry Crane, Professor Carla Reyes

8、Others

Futures Industry Association (FIA) CEO Walt Lukken

The CFTC explicitly stated that the core responsibility of the IAC is to provide professional advice on cutting-edge innovations in the derivatives and commodities markets, with a focus on how technologies like AI and blockchain are reshaping the markets, helping to formulate "adaptive rules" and maintain the effectiveness of financial regulation.

Regulatory Logic: Top-Level Collaboration

The IAC is not a temporary body but a long-term design by the CFTC for the golden age of the U.S. financial market, providing professional advice on technological innovation in financial markets.

According to CFTC Announcement No. 9167-26 issued on January 12, 2026, Michael S. Selig had already defined the IAC's positioning a month prior:

Establishment Background: Replacing the former Technical Advisory Committee: This name change is not mere wordplay. Under Michael S. Selig's leadership, the CFTC clearly recognizes that merely discussing blockchain or AI technology is outdated; what is needed now is discussion about the entirely new financial business models catalyzed by these technologies.
Core Work: The IAC focuses on areas where finance and technology intersect (such as blockchain, digital assets, AI, etc.), balancing perspectives from the financial industry, regulatory agencies, fintech providers, academic institutions, and others to help the CFTC understand the impact of technological innovation and guide the application of new technologies in financial markets. It serves only in an advisory, suggestion-making capacity and has no actual decision-making power.
Operational Details: The CFTC provides support, with an annual operating cost of approximately $170,000; members work without remuneration. Additionally, the CFTC will appoint a designated federal officer to oversee all matters including meetings, compliance, training, etc. The committee will meet at least once a year, and subcommittees can meet as needed.

This means the past situation of "long-distance dialogue" between the industry and regulators is broken. DeFi representatives, CEXs, traditional exchanges, clearinghouses, and VCs are now "sitting at the same table." The CFTC can directly obtain the most frontline market insights and advice, preventing rulemaking from becoming detached from reality.

What Does This Mean for Web3?

The finalization of the IAC list has at least the following clear implications for the crypto industry:

1. The "Legitimization" Coronation of Prediction Markets

On the IAC list, the inclusion of Polymarket CEO Shayne Coplan and Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour is particularly eye-catching.

After the prolonged tug-of-war with regulators over whether "election prediction" constitutes gambling, the CFTC's move is equivalent to recognizing prediction markets' financial status as "event contracts." More interestingly, the list also includes the presidents of DraftKings and FanDuel—this signifies that the boundaries between sports betting, financial derivatives, and on-chain prediction markets are blurring.

This shift is particularly evident in the regulation of prediction markets. In February 2026, the CFTC announced the withdrawal of the proposed "Event Contracts" rule released in 2024. At that time, CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig stated bluntly: "The 2024 event contract-related proposal reflected the previous administration's hasty regulation seeking a comprehensive ban on political contracts ahead of the 2024 presidential election." The CFTC will advance new rulemaking based on a rational interpretation of the Commodity Exchange Act that aligns with Congressional intent and promotes responsible innovation in derivatives markets.

2. DeFi and Public Chains Gain an Official "Formal Seat"

The selection of Uniswap, Solana, Chainlink, and Etherealize CEO Vivek Raman (an Ethereum promotion and product startup), among other DeFi and public chain projects or related startups, is not only recognition of DeFi's infrastructural role but also signifies that the CFTC is beginning to acknowledge, from the technical foundation, that code is market structure. Debates about "whether DeFi frontends need licenses" may shift towards the more pragmatic question of "how to make the protocol layer compliant."

3. Further Solidification of "Compliance Dividends" for Leading Platforms

The entry of institutions like Coinbase, Kraken, and Gemini, which have long focused on U.S. compliance, into the core advisory layer means that future CFTC rulemaking will be more aligned with the operational logic of these platforms. The competitive advantage of compliant players will continue to grow.

These platforms, through their deep engagement with regulators, will gain significant advantages in license acquisition and business innovation. The Matthew effect in the industry will intensify further, which will also pressure smaller platforms to accelerate their compliance efforts, driving the overall compliance upgrade of the crypto industry.

Summary

The CFTC's core regulatory areas are derivatives and commodities markets. Innovative areas like crypto derivatives, digital asset futures, blockchain clearing and settlement, and prediction markets are becoming core development directions within this domain.

The establishment of the IAC represents a regulatory paradigm upgrade driven by the CFTC, shifting towards "proactive rule design in the early stages of innovation" and "adaptive regulation based on market realities."

The core of this upgrade is essentially a renewed understanding of the symbiotic relationship between regulation and innovation: financial technology innovation is not the opposite of regulation but a core driver of financial market modernization. The core role of regulation is not to hinder innovation but to define its boundaries, prevent risks, and allow innovation to realize its value within a compliant framework.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the significance of the CFTC's Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC) and its new membership list?

AThe CFTC's IAC membership list signifies a major shift in U.S. regulatory approach, moving from 'passive regulation' to 'collaborative governance.' It is a key step in building a collaborative framework for regulating innovative financial markets, actively embracing crypto and fintech innovation. The committee's role is to provide expert advice on frontier innovations in derivatives and commodity markets, focusing on technologies like AI and blockchain.

QWhich major sectors and companies are represented in the CFTC's IAC membership?

AThe IAC membership is a 'all-star lineup' covering major sectors including Centralized Exchanges (CEXs) like Coinbase and Kraken, Prediction Markets like Polymarket, DeFi and public chain infrastructure like Uniswap and Solana, top crypto VCs like a16z crypto, digital asset custodians and managers like Grayscale, traditional financial and clearing institutions like Nasdaq and CME Group, and academic representatives.

QHow does the formation of the IAC impact the prediction market and DeFi sectors specifically?

AFor prediction markets, the inclusion of CEOs from Polymarket and Kalshi is seen as a legitimization, acknowledging their status as 'event contracts' and blurring the lines with sports betting and financial derivatives. For DeFi, the inclusion of projects like Uniswap and Solana represents official recognition of their infrastructure status, shifting regulatory debate from 'whether DeFi front-ends need licenses' to 'how to make the protocol layer compliant'.

QWhat are the stated core responsibilities and operational details of the IAC?

AThe IAC's core responsibility is to provide professional advice on frontier innovations in derivatives and commodity markets, focusing on how technologies like AI and blockchain are restructuring markets, and to help formulate 'adaptive rules' to maintain effective financial regulation. It operates with support from the CFTC at an annual cost of about $170,000, members serve without pay, and it is required to meet at least once a year, with subcommittees meeting as needed.

QWhat broader shift in regulatory philosophy does the establishment of the IAC represent according to the article?

AThe establishment of the IAC represents a paradigm shift in regulatory philosophy towards 'proactive rule design in the early stages of innovation' and 'adaptive regulation based on market reality.' It reflects a renewed understanding that financial innovation is not the opposite of regulation but a core driver of financial market modernization, and the role of regulation is to set boundaries and prevent risks, allowing innovation to create value within a compliant framework.

İlgili Okumalar

How Likely is it for TradeXYZ to Go Solo from Hyperliquid?

The article analyzes the possibility of TradeXYZ, a dominant project on Hyperliquid's HIP-3 real-world asset (RWA) perpetual contracts market, splitting off to build its own independent trading platform. With TradeXYZ commanding over 90% of HIP-3 volume and over 35% of Hyperliquid's total open interest, its leverage and influence are significant. The primary motive for a split is seen as capturing the underlying protocol fees, of which TradeXYZ currently receives only half. However, several factors strongly discourage such a move. First, replicating Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure would be challenging and could degrade TradeXYZ's product quality. Second, Hyperliquid serves as a crucial distribution channel, with most users accessing TradeXYZ's liquidity through its frontend. Third, the close, trusting relationship between the founders of both projects makes a hostile "betrayal" unlikely. The conclusion is that a split would likely result in a lose-lose scenario. Hyperliquid would lose its main growth narrative and see its valuation impacted, while TradeXYZ would face immense technical hurdles, lose its primary user channel, and damage its reputation. Instead of a full separation, the more probable path is for TradeXYZ to negotiate better terms while deepening integration, focusing on enhancing its own brand and user ownership.

marsbit14 dk önce

How Likely is it for TradeXYZ to Go Solo from Hyperliquid?

marsbit14 dk önce

"Teletubbies" Robot Cleaning Service, $30/Hour, Pure·Manual·Intelligence

Anthropomorphic "Teletubby" robot offers cleaning services in San Francisco at $30/hour, but it's entirely remote-controlled. The robot, created by startup Tau Robotics, can perform household tasks like washing hands, mopping floors, and taking out trash. While the initial demo videos appear impressive and are notably shown at normal speed (unlike many sped-up robot demos), the company reveals the actions are performed via human teleoperation, not autonomous AI. Tau Robotics, founded in 2024, argues this "cheat" is a strategic way to bridge the current capability gap, ensure task completion, and collect real-world home data to eventually train autonomous systems. Their service features three robot models: Chelsea for kitchens/bathrooms, Elon for regular tidying with memory, and Tony for deep cleaning. Priced at $30 per hour, it's cheaper than average human cleaners in the US. The article discusses the broader challenge of deploying humanoid robots in homes, comparing Tau's approach to others like China's Ziliang and the US's 1X Neo, which also use teleoperation. A key reason for choosing a humanoid form is to make remote control more intuitive for human operators. The piece also notes the potential "emotional value" of having a humanoid servant. The service is currently invite-only in San Francisco.

marsbit28 dk önce

"Teletubbies" Robot Cleaning Service, $30/Hour, Pure·Manual·Intelligence

marsbit28 dk önce

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

AI is reshaping the labor market's value proposition. The traditional four-year college degree is losing its appeal as a guaranteed career path, while skilled blue-collar trades like electricians, welders, and plumbers are experiencing historic demand and wage premiums. This shift is driven by dual pressures: AI's displacement of certain white-collar roles and a booming need for physical infrastructure and data center construction. Data confirms the trend. In the U.S., vocational school revenue surged, and a significant portion of recent layoffs are AI-related. Surveys show a majority of Gen Z adults plan to pursue blue-collar work, citing better job security against AI automation. Vocational education interest has exploded recently. Experts cite a psychological shift as younger generations seek tangible, AI-resistant careers and avoid high student debt. In many cases, salaries for skilled trades now match or exceed those requiring a bachelor's degree. In South Korea, semiconductor vocational high schools boast near-total employment, with graduates securing high-paying roles at companies like Samsung. The shortage is structural, exacerbated by a retiring baby boomer workforce and massive infrastructure projects. Companies like JPMorgan Chase, Meta, and Lowe's are investing heavily in training programs. However, overcoming historical stigma and a "perception gap" around trade careers remains a key challenge to closing the talent gap.

marsbit1 saat önce

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

marsbit1 saat önce

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

Qualcomm reported its Q3 FY2026 results (ending June 2026), with revenue of $9.95B, down 4% YoY but above expectations. Gross margin declined to 53.1%, pressured by rising costs across manufacturing and memory. Key business segments showed mixed performance: Handset revenue fell 19.6% YoY to $5.09B, dragged by an 11% decline in non-Apple Android shipments and weaker high-end mix. Conversely, Automotive revenue surged 61% to $1.59B, and IoT grew 9% to $1.83B. Core operating profit dropped 41% YoY due to margin compression and higher expenses. Management's Q4 FY2026 guidance projects revenue of $9.7B-$10.5B, in line with consensus, but Non-GAAP EPS guidance of $2.05-$2.25 fell short of expectations. Amidst persistent weakness in its core handset market, Qualcomm is pursuing growth in AI, focusing on Edge AI (smartphones, PCs, automotive) and Data Center AI. Its data center strategy includes four pillars: AI accelerators (e.g., AI200), commercial CPUs (Dragonfly C1000), custom silicon, and connectivity solutions. While these initiatives initially boosted its stock, concerns over AI capital expenditure sustainability have since erased those gains. The company targets $5B in data center revenue for FY2027 and $15B for FY2029. The report concludes that with the traditional handset business still under pressure, the data center opportunity is currently viewed as a longer-term option, and a more conservative valuation based on core operations may be warranted until AI contributions materialize.

marsbit1 saat önce

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

marsbit1 saat önce

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

At the 2026 YC Startup School, Jeff Dean outlined his vision for AI's next phase, shifting focus from simply scaling models to building intelligent, autonomous systems. He believes AI's progress is no longer just about creating smarter models, but about integrating them into systems capable of long-term, iterative work, automated experimentation, and continuous learning. This evolution moves the competition from "who has the bigger model" to "who can best organize intelligence." Dean suggests AI capabilities are now comparable to a junior engineer, enabling the automation of complex workflows. However, the true challenge and opportunity lie in managing these AI "workers" at scale. He emphasizes the importance of **context engineering**—structuring tools, memory, and feedback loops—over raw model power. For startups, this means building deep expertise in niche domains where general models currently fail (near 0-1% success rates), leveraging proprietary data, specialized tools, and domain-specific evaluators. A recurring theme is re-examining fundamental constraints. Dean's past work, like moving Google's search index to memory or creating the TPU, stemmed from questioning outdated assumptions about hardware and cost. He sees similar inflection points today, particularly in **specialized inference hardware** to drastically reduce latency and energy consumption for real-time Agent operation. Notably, he points out that in modern AI systems, the dominant cost is often not computation but **data movement**. Reliable, long-running Agents require robust system design, borrowing concepts from distributed computing like checkpointing, state management, and parallel exploration to handle failures and maintain progress over days or weeks. As AI automates execution, the scarcest human skills will shift to **defining clear specifications**, **judging what problems are worth solving** (taste), and designing effective feedback loops. Ultimately, Dean's framework prioritizes understanding the problem deeply, identifying the true bottlenecks, and systematically building closed-loop systems where AI can not only perform tasks but also improve AI itself.

marsbit1 saat önce

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot