Rare Annualized Rate of 400%: Is TradeXYZ Handing Out Money to Oil Bulls?

marsbit2026-04-10 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-04-10 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Amidst volatile oil markets due to geopolitical tensions, Trade.xyz’s WTIOIL-USDC perpetual contract exhibited an unusually negative annualized funding rate of -300% to -400%. This meant long positions received approximately 1% of their position value daily from shorts. The anomaly stemmed from the structure of WTI futures curves in extreme backwardation, where near-month (May) contracts traded at a significant premium to far-month (June) contracts. Trade.xyz’s oracle gradually shifts price weighting from near-month to far-month over five trading days during rollover. Anticipating this decline, traders heavily shorted the perpetual, driving the funding rate deeply negative. Three strategies were discussed: 1. Shorting Trade.xyz’s contract while going long on CME’s far-month futures—initially profitable but later eroded by high funding costs. 2. Shorting far-month futures and longing Trade.xyz’s near-month contract before rollover, which gained traction as arbitrage opportunities emerged. 3. Betting against funding rates via Boros, a rate-trading platform, though limited by low leverage and high slippage. The situation highlights how DeFi traders are adapting to traditional futures mechanics and advanced instruments like rate markets, reflecting the evolving infrastructure of crypto-native trading platforms.

Amid the uncertain situation of the Iran war, the crude oil market is experiencing significant volatility.

At the same time, a rare phenomenon has appeared on Trade.xyz's WTIOIL-USDC crude oil perpetual contract: the annualized funding rate has stabilized between -300% and -400%. This means that any trader willing to go long at this moment can receive profits equivalent to 1% of their principal daily from the shorts.

The market doesn't give away money for no reason. To understand this反常的 negative funding rate, we need to start with the basics of futures trading.

Rollover

Crude oil futures are a series of contracts arranged by delivery month. Contracts for May delivery, June delivery, July delivery, each with its own price. When the front month is about to expire, the market must switch from the old contract to the new contract; this action is called rollover.

Under normal circumstances, back-month contracts imply that oil merchants will store the oil for several additional months, incurring extra storage costs. Therefore, the delivery price should logically be higher. The market phenomenon where future contracts are more expensive than the near month is called Contango. Conversely, the situation where the near month is more expensive than the far month is called backwardation. This usually occurs when there is a current shortage, and everyone wants to get the oil immediately.

During this rollover period for Trade.xyz's crude oil, the crude oil futures market was in this near-high, far-low structure.

From late March to early April 2026, the WTI crude oil curve was in an extreme state of backwardation. As shown in the chart above, the price of the May contract (front month) remained consistently higher than the June contract (back month), with the spread widening to over $14 at one point.

The WTIOIL-USDC perpetual contract on Trade.xyz has its oracle pegged to this front-month May contract.

But we won't be trading this May contract forever. It must be rolled over to the next June contract. So how is the rollover accomplished?

According to the Tradexyz documentation, the oracle will take 5 trading days to gradually shift the price weighting from 100% front-month contract to 100% back-month contract.

Against the backdrop of "backwardation," this means the oracle price on Tradexyz will drop from the front-month price to the back-month price over 5 trading days.

Market participants familiar with this mechanism have a clear expectation of the contract price after the rollover. Everyone knows it will fall, so they naturally rush to short. Shorts accumulate, the funding rate turns negative, and shorts start paying longs.

From an arbitrage-free principle perspective, this is normal. The spread between the front and back month gives short sellers a profit. The funding rate will reduce this profit. The larger the spread, the higher the negative funding rate the market charges.

Once the negative funding rate reaches a certain level, this seemingly obvious arbitrage opportunity will be eroded. The cost for short sellers will completely cover the profit.

Strategies

How to make money in such a market context? Here are three common strategies.

1. Short the crude oil contract on Tradexyz at the current price, while simultaneously going long the back-month contract on CME.

This seems like a risk-neutral strategy to stably earn the spread, but it fails to consider several factors.

Suppose you short Trade.xyz's WTI contract at $95.352 on April 8th, while going long the June futures contract at $87.75, each with a notional principal of $10,000. If both sides eventually converge, you could theoretically get a spread of $7.60, about $797 in profit. But on April 8th, the daily funding rate for the short position was already 1.42%. Based on the remaining 6 days until rollover completion, the funding fee would cost $851. At this point, the net profit is only -$53. This doesn't even include transaction fees and slippage.

Abraxas capital implemented this strategy starting on March 19th, after the last rollover was completed. Their Brent crude oil position on tradexyz accounted for 20% of the open interest in that market and yielded huge profits early on when the funding rate remained relatively neutral. However, as more arbitrageurs flooded in, the funding fee has devoured 80% of their arbitrage profits.

The massive position also means they find it difficult to exit and are forced to pay passively.

2. Short the back-month futures contract, go long the xyz front-month contract, and close the position before the rollover begins.

This trade is almost the counterparty to Strategy 1, betting that the market is over-arbitraged. After April 1st, this strategy could indeed yield profits.

3. Short the funding rate for the xyz contract on Boros before the rollover begins.

Boros is a market developed by the Pendle team specifically for trading rates (funding rates). In Boros's crude oil contract market, what is traded is the market's expectation of the funding rate for Trade.xyz's crude oil contract over the coming period. If users believe the negative funding rate will deepen further, they can short the market's funding rate contract.

However, limited by slippage costs, position limits, transaction fees, and extremely low capital efficiency (only supporting 0.2x leverage), this trade also struggles to achieve the ideal high returns.

Conclusion

The rise of RWA trading platforms like Trade.xyz is forcing a group of "crypto traders" to become "futures traders." DeFi players are also starting to learn the CME rollover calendar, calculate front-back month spreads, and make decisions based on the funding rate curve on Boros.

Trading platforms are continuously iterating, and market participants are also adapting to new infrastructure.

Trend Kriptolar

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the annualized funding rate for the WTIOIL-USDC perpetual contract on Trade.xyz, and what does it imply for traders?

AThe annualized funding rate for the WTIOIL-USDC perpetual contract on Trade.xyz is between -300% and -400%. This means that traders who take a long position at this time can receive a profit equivalent to approximately 1% of their principal daily, paid by the short sellers.

QWhat market structure is causing the extreme negative funding rate on Trade.xyz's crude oil perpetual contract?

AThe extreme negative funding rate is caused by a market structure called backwardation, where the near-month futures contract (May) is trading at a higher price than the far-month contract (June). This creates an expectation that the price will drop during the rollover period, leading to a surge in short positions and negative funding rates.

QHow does the rollover mechanism work for the WTIOIL-USDC perpetual contract on Trade.xyz?

AAccording to Trade.xyz's documentation, the oracle takes five trading days to gradually shift the price weighting from 100% of the near-month contract to 100% of the far-month contract. During this rollover period in a backwardated market, the oracle price is expected to drop from the higher near-month price to the lower far-month price.

QWhat was one of the strategies mentioned for profiting in this market, and what was its drawback?

AOne strategy was to short the crude oil contract on Trade.xyz while simultaneously going long on the far-month futures contract on CME. The drawback is that the high negative funding rate can consume most of the potential profits from the price difference. For example, a calculation showed that funding fees could cost $851 over six days, nearly erasing the $797 theoretical gain from the price spread, not including transaction costs and slippage.

QWhat is Boros, and how can it be used to trade in this context?

ABoros is a market developed by the Pendle team专门 for trading rates (funding rates). On Boros's crude oil contract market, traders can speculate on the expected funding rate for Trade.xyz's crude oil contract. If a trader believes the negative funding rate will deepen, they can short the funding rate合约 on Boros. However, this strategy is limited by slippage, position caps, trading fees, and low capital efficiency (only supporting 0.2x leverage).

İlgili Okumalar

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbit7 saat önce

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbit7 saat önce

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手7 saat önce

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手7 saat önce

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit9 saat önce

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit9 saat önce

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手11 saat önce

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手11 saat önce

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit12 saat önce

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit12 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures

Popüler Makaleler

WAR Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! WAR (WAR) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında WAR (WAR) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: WAR (WAR) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınWAR (WAR) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: WAR (WAR) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında WAR (WAR) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

258 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2024.12.11Güncellenme 2026.06.02

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların WAR (WAR) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.