QNT jumps 12% as volume triples — Can Quant bulls defend THIS floor?

ambcrypto2026-01-18 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-18 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Quant (QNT) surged 12.33% over 36 hours, with its daily trading volume tripling. The rally occurred as Bitcoin defended a key support level near $94.5k, potentially opening upward momentum toward $100k and creating room for altcoin gains. On the weekly chart, QNT maintains a bullish structure, having set a higher low at $58.60 in 2025 and defended the 78.6% Fibonacci retracement level at $75 since November. The recent 8% weekly gain suggests a possible long-term reversal. However, risks remain due to Bitcoin’s bearish weekly structure and key resistance zones at $101k and $108k. Traders may consider long positions given QNT’s bullish 4-hour structure and negative exchange netflow indicating accumulation. Key invalidation level is a close below $72.5, with profit targets at $90 and $110. Long-term holders should remain cautious due to potential Bitcoin-driven downside and neutral-to-fearful market sentiment. Overall, the rebound from a major Fibonacci level is encouraging, but the broader market outlook suggests elevated risk for QNT investors.

Quant [QNT] has rallied 12.33% in the past 36 hours, and its daily trading volume has tripled since Friday, the 16th of January. The strong gains and high volume came while BTC defended the $94.5k local support zone, which had been a resistance in December and until recently.

Bitcoin has scope for advancing toward $100k, which gives altcoins some room to make gains.

The long-term trend of QNT is bullish

The weekly chart showed that Quant [QNT] has a bullish structure on the weekly. The rally in November 2024 broke the previous high at $149.6. In 2025, the weekly chart showed QNT set a higher low at $58.60.

In recent months, it has retraced to the 78.6% Fibonacci retracement level at $75. The bulls have defended this support zone well since November.

The past week saw an 8.03% move higher for QNT, which could be an early sign of a long-term reversal.

The end of the retracement phase for Quant will give investors an opportunity, but it comes with risks. Bitcoin [BTC] itself has a bearish weekly structure, and the $101k and $108k were supply zones that could reject BTC bulls.

The bearish case for Quant investors

Long-term holders should be wary of the risks of a deeper price drop due to Bitcoin movements and the wider market sentiment, which was neutral to fearful at the time of writing. The timing of a long-term purchase was not ideal.

Traders’ call to action- Potential for a trade setup

The 4-hour structure was bullish, and there is reason for traders to go long. Capital rotation into altcoins is a possibility in the coming weeks, and Quant holders could make profits.

A 4-hour session close below $72.5 would invalidate this idea. The $90 and $110 were the sizeable supply zones overhead that bulls can look to take profits at.

QNT Exchange Netflow was negative over the past three days, indicative of accumulation.

Final Thoughts

  • The Quant rebound from the key long-term Fibonacci retracement level was an encouraging sign.
  • The longer-term Bitcoin and altcoin market outlook showed that QNT investors could be taking a risky step.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the recent price performance of Quant (QNT) and its trading volume?

AQuant (QNT) has rallied 12.33% in the past 36 hours, and its daily trading volume has tripled since Friday, January 16th.

QWhat key support level have the QNT bulls been defending on the weekly chart?

AThe bulls have been defending the 78.6% Fibonacci retracement level at $75, which has acted as a key support zone since November.

QWhat is the primary risk for long-term QNT investors mentioned in the article?

AThe primary risk is the potential for a deeper price drop due to Bitcoin's movements and the wider market sentiment, which was described as neutral to fearful.

QWhat price level on the 4-hour chart would invalidate the bullish trading idea presented?

AA 4-hour session close below $72.5 would invalidate the bullish trading idea.

QWhat does the negative QNT Exchange Netflow over the past three days indicate?

AThe negative Netflow is indicative of accumulation, meaning more tokens are being withdrawn from exchanges than deposited.

İlgili Okumalar

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit5 dk önce

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit5 dk önce

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit20 dk önce

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit20 dk önce

United Stables Crosses $1B As Chainlink Data Feeds Secure U Token Collateral

United Stables' U token has surpassed $1 billion in market capitalization, with Chainlink Data Feeds providing the critical pricing and collateral data infrastructure across its deployment chains. This milestone highlights that robust oracle infrastructure is essential for stablecoin credibility, as DeFi protocols require reliable data for integration. Chainlink's role is foundational, enabling automated collateral auditing and pricing verification, which helps make the U token safer for the broader market to evaluate and use. While this strengthens Chainlink's position in the stablecoin infrastructure narrative, it does not directly guarantee increased fees or value for LINK token holders. The growth of U indicates both widening competition in the stablecoin sector and the increasing dependence of scalable stablecoins on dependable external data services.

bitcoinist1 saat önce

United Stables Crosses $1B As Chainlink Data Feeds Secure U Token Collateral

bitcoinist1 saat önce

BonkDAO Treasury Drain Shows Solana Governance Risk Is Real

The BonkDAO treasury suffered an approximately $20 million drain due to a malicious governance proposal passed through the Realms platform on Solana. This incident highlights governance as a critical attack surface for DAOs, distinct from smart contract exploits. The attack leveraged the DAO's own voting mechanics to move funds, demonstrating that flawed governance design—such as weak proposal rules or voter weight calculations—can be exploited even when the underlying blockchain functions correctly. The event serves as a warning for Solana DAOs to rigorously review and strengthen their governance safeguards, including quorum thresholds, timelocks, and execution permissions. While damaging to community trust, especially for the prominent BONK meme ecosystem, the issue is not a failure of the Solana base layer but a widespread application-level risk common across blockchain ecosystems.

bitcoinist1 saat önce

BonkDAO Treasury Drain Shows Solana Governance Risk Is Real

bitcoinist1 saat önce

Midnight Token Falls After $13M Wanchain Bridge Exploit

Midnight's NIGHT token plummeted roughly 30% following a $13.2 million exploit on a Wanchain cross-chain bridge. The attacker drained 515 million NIGHT tokens by exploiting a signature reuse flaw in the bridge's infrastructure, not the core Cardano or Midnight networks. This incident highlights the persistent vulnerability of cross-chain bridges, which are critical for asset transfers but introduce complex security risks. While the underlying blockchains remained secure, the token's price suffered due to liquidity disruption and lost market confidence. The response from Wanchain, including pausing the affected bridge and providing clear communication on recovery efforts, will be crucial for stabilizing the situation. The event serves as a reminder for traders to factor in bridge-related risks when evaluating tokens reliant on cross-chain liquidity.

bitcoinist2 saat önce

Midnight Token Falls After $13M Wanchain Bridge Exploit

bitcoinist2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片