Psy Protocol Achieves 521,000 TPS on a Live Proof-of-Work Network, Offers $100,000 Bounty to Anyone Who Can Prove the Results Invalid

marsbit2026-02-14 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-14 tarihinde güncellendi

Hong Kong | February 11, 2026 — Psy Protocol today announced that it has achieved 521,000 transactions per second (TPS) on a live, on-chain verifiable Proof-of-Work (PoW) network. The team stated that this result, achieved without sacrificing decentralization, security, or privacy, surpasses all publicly benchmarked performances of mainstream Proof-of-Stake (PoS) and Proof-of-Work chains to date.

The stress test was conducted on thousands of Google Cloud instances to simulate a high-concurrency, internet-scale operating environment. Every transaction in the benchmark is backed by cryptographic proof, and the complete dataset has been published for independent verification.

To demonstrate confidence in the results, Psy Protocol has publicly posted a $100,000 (US$100,000) bounty, to be awarded to any individual or team that can invalidate this throughput result based on the published proof materials.

"This is not a devnet demo, nor a theoretical projection," said Carter Feldman, Founder and CEO of Psy Protocol. "Every single result is verifiable. If we are wrong, the math will show it—and we will pay $100,000 to the person who shows it."

Why 521,000 TPS Matters Now

High-throughput benchmarks are not uncommon in the crypto industry. Psy Protocol believes this result is structurally significant because of the use-case context it addresses.

Blockchains were originally designed around human transaction patterns: sporadically occurring activities, manual approvals, and low concurrency. However, this model is becoming increasingly mismatched as millions of autonomous AI agents transact, collaborate, and settle at machine speeds continuously in the future.

When networks designed for human-scale usage encounter sustained machine-grade demand, the result is often network congestion, soaring fees, and cascading bottlenecks. Psy Protocol views 521,000 TPS as the "baseline" infrastructure required for a machine-native economy, not a performance ceiling.

How the Architecture Works

Most blockchains require every node to re-execute every transaction, a design that imposes a hard architectural ceiling on throughput. Psy Protocol removes this bottleneck through four synergistic design choices:

  • Parallel State Architecture (PARTH): Each user operates in isolated state partitions. This eliminates global state contention, allowing thousands of state transitions to be processed simultaneously without conflict.
  • Client-Side Proof Generation: Transaction execution and proof generation are performed on the user's device, with sensitive data always remaining under the user's control. Miners are only responsible for verifying and aggregating proofs, not re-executing transactions, thus eliminating redundant computation across the entire network.
  • Recursive Zero-Knowledge Proofs: Individual transaction proofs are recursively folded into a single succinct proof per block. As transaction volume grows, verification costs grow logarithmically rather than linearly, meaning massive throughput increases do not require proportional increases in resources.
  • Horizontal Scaling via Realms: The network scales by adding parallel processing domains ("Realms") and proof aggregation capacity. Throughput increases linearly with added infrastructure, rather than being limited by a fixed architectural cap.

Psy Protocol states that 521,000 TPS reflects the result in the current test configuration; higher throughput is achievable by scaling parallel proof generation capacity.

Verification: Open Data, Verifiable on Consumer Hardware

Because verification relies on succinct recursive proofs rather than full re-execution, Psy Protocol states that any combined proof from the benchmark can be independently verified on consumer-grade hardware—including limited-performance devices like a Raspberry Pi.

The complete test methodology, ZK circuit data, and combined proofs have all been open-sourced and are available at:

https://st8.psy.xyz/explorer

Applications Feasible at This Scale

With sustained throughput exceeding 500,000 TPS, the following new types of on-chain activity become feasible:

  • High-frequency micropayments between autonomous agents
  • Continuous clearing markets with real-time settlement replacing discrete batch settlement
  • High-density coordination among large-scale AI agent swarms operating without human intervention
  • Keyless agent execution via programmable signature circuits, eliminating reliance on human-controlled private keys or third-party custody

About Psy Protocol

Psy Protocol is building a Proof-of-Work smart contract platform for the "agentic internet." Its architecture combines the security and decentralization benefits of Proof-of-Work with the throughput and fee efficiency historically associated with Proof-of-Stake systems. Psy employs a "Proof-of-Useful-Work (PoUW)" consensus model, where miners perform cryptographically productive work—namely, aggregating and verifying zero-knowledge proofs—rather than arbitrary hash puzzle computations.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the TPS (Transactions Per Second) achieved by Psy Protocol in a real-world Proof-of-Work network, and what is the bounty offered for disproving this result?

APsy Protocol achieved 521,000 TPS in a real-world, verifiable Proof-of-Work network. They have offered a $100,000 bounty to anyone who can prove this result is invalid based on the published cryptographic proofs.

QAccording to the article, why is achieving 521,000 TPS particularly significant in the current context of blockchain technology?

AIt is significant because it addresses the future need for a 'machine-native economy.' Traditional blockchains designed for sporadic human transactions are inadequate for the continuous, high-speed transactions of millions of autonomous AI agents. This result represents a baseline for the infrastructure required to support such activity without congestion or high fees.

QName two of the four key architectural designs that Psy Protocol uses to remove the throughput bottleneck found in most blockchains.

ATwo of the four designs are: 1. Parallel State Architecture (PARTH), which isolates state partitions to eliminate global state contention, and 2. Client-side proof generation, where users execute transactions and generate proofs on their own devices, so miners only verify and aggregate proofs instead of re-executing transactions.

QHow can the results of Psy Protocol's benchmark test be independently verified, and what kind of hardware is sufficient for this verification?

AThe results can be independently verified using the complete test methodology, ZK circuit data, and composite proofs that have been open-sourced. This verification can be performed on consumer-grade hardware, including limited devices like a Raspberry Pi, because it relies on verifying succinct recursive proofs rather than fully re-executing all transactions.

QWhat type of consensus model does Psy Protocol use, and what useful work do the miners perform instead of solving arbitrary hash puzzles?

APsy Protocol uses a Proof-of-Useful-Work (PoUW) consensus model. Instead of performing arbitrary hash calculations, miners perform cryptographically productive work by aggregating and verifying zero-knowledge proofs.

İlgili Okumalar

Trend in US Stocks: A Post Triggers a 930-Point Rebound, Tonight Belongs to SpaceX

On Thursday (June 11, U.S. Eastern Time), Wall Street staged a textbook V-shaped reversal. The Dow Jones surged 929.97 points (+1.86%) to close above 50,000, while the Nasdaq and S&P 500 rose 2.54% and 1.75%, respectively. The rally occurred despite the hottest PPI report in years, with May data showing a 6.5% year-on-year surge, the highest since 2022. The market ignored the inflation data, focusing instead on reports that former President Trump called off a planned strike on Iran, hinting at a potential multi-party peace agreement draft. This sparked a sharp drop in oil prices, fueling hopes that inflation may have peaked. Sector rotations were stark: previously battered AI hardware and cyclical stocks led the gains, while defensive sectors that hit record highs the prior day were sold off. Chip stocks like Micron and Intel saw sharp rebounds. In contrast, software giant Oracle plunged nearly 10% despite beating earnings, with concerns over cloud revenue and cash flow. Adobe also fell after hours despite raising guidance, as its CFO announced departure. The rally's sustainability is questioned, driven largely by social media posts about unconfirmed geopolitical developments. Inflation risks remain, with pipeline pressures still high. Meanwhile, the market's risk appetite faces a major test with SpaceX's historic IPO. Priced at $135 per share, it aims to raise ~$75 billion with a $1.75 trillion valuation, becoming the largest U.S. IPO ever. It will join the Nasdaq 100 in 15 days, triggering massive index fund buying. However, critics cite extreme valuation (88x sales) and market liquidity concerns.

marsbit21 dk önce

Trend in US Stocks: A Post Triggers a 930-Point Rebound, Tonight Belongs to SpaceX

marsbit21 dk önce

The Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Mega IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare? The capital market in 2026 is witnessing a highly anticipated wave of tech IPOs, centered on SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic. Collectively valued at over $3.5 trillion, their potential listing represents one of the largest such waves in recent years. This raises concerns about market liquidity, valuation bubbles, and potential capital outflows from other assets like crypto. SpaceX's valuation narrative has shifted from rocket launches to becoming a global infrastructure play via its Starlink satellite network, which now drives most revenue. Despite ongoing losses, investors focus on its long-term growth potential. OpenAI and Anthropic represent the core productivity engines of generative AI. Their public listings would offer the first direct investment opportunity in large foundation model companies, potentially triggering a repricing within the AI sector. Market fears of a massive "capital drain" from these IPOs are likely overstated. Historical precedents like Alibaba and Saudi Aramco show that mega-listings primarily cause capital reallocation, not destruction, within the vast equities market. Systemic risk is rarely triggered by IPOs alone. For stock markets, short-term volatility and sector repricing are expected, especially for AI concept stocks. Long-term, these listings could reinforce the tech sector's importance. For crypto, direct competition for speculative capital exists, particularly affecting AI-themed tokens. However, crypto's trajectory remains more tied to its own cycles, macro liquidity, and Bitcoin ETF flows rather than a single IPO event. The real risk lies not in the listings themselves but in the sky-high growth expectations embedded in these valuations. If future revenue, profitability, or commercialization progress disappoints, significant valuation resets could follow, impacting high-growth tech stocks. Ultimately, the market's direction hinges on macroeconomic conditions and whether these companies can deliver on their ambitious promises.

链捕手37 dk önce

The Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

链捕手37 dk önce

Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

Title: Trillion-Dollar Valuations at Stake: Super IPOs of SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic – Tech Boom or Crypto Nightmare? TL;DR: A wave of mega-tech IPOs is approaching, featuring SpaceX (targeting a $1.75 trillion valuation), OpenAI (~$852B), and Anthropic (~$965B), with a combined potential valuation exceeding $3.5 trillion. This tests the market's pricing of innovation and sparks debate on liquidity impact. * **SpaceX**'s valuation is now driven more by its Starlink global communications infrastructure than its core rocket business. * **OpenAI & Anthropic** offer the first major public investment opportunities in foundational AI models, potentially repricing the entire AI sector. * Concerns about a market-wide "liquidity drain" are likely overblown; history shows large IPOs mainly cause fund reallocation, not disappearance, and rarely trigger systemic risk. * Crypto markets, especially some AI-themed tokens, may face short-term fund competition, but their long-term trajectory depends more on macro liquidity, regulation, and Bitcoin cycles. * The real risk lies not in the IPOs themselves, but in whether these companies can justify their sky-high valuations with future revenue growth and profitability. Unmet expectations could lead to significant repricing pressure. Ultimately, these IPOs represent a massive market pricing of next-gen tech infrastructure, not a prelude to a market crash. The broader market direction will be determined by macro conditions, corporate earnings, and risk appetite.

marsbit37 dk önce

Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

marsbit37 dk önce

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

On June 11, Anthropic apologized not for a model failure, but for a lack of transparency. Its new Claude Fable 5 model was found to be secretly rerouting requests from users engaged in advanced AI model development to a weaker version, Opus 4.8, without any notification. The company's response—promising future notifications for such "downgrades"—was met with user skepticism. The article argues the core issue isn't technical but commercial: Anthropic's "safety" measures are primarily a business strategy. A key feature, the "intelligent safety classifier," marketed as user protection, is described as a tool for "competitive defense" to protect Anthropic's market lead by limiting rivals' research capabilities. This covert mechanism was designed for low "false positives," precisely targeting AI researchers. Anthropic's model involves a calculated three-step process: publishing alarming security research to amplify public anxiety, offering its Fable 5 model with a "safety classifier" as a premium-priced solution, and cashing in through a planned high-value IPO. This contrasts with OpenAI's more direct "tool-and-traffic" approach. The apology, merely changing a secret downgrade to a visible one, is seen as a business "patch" rather than a principled shift. The incident risks damaging Anthropic's "safest AI" reputation among the developer community, which underpins its valuation and appeal to government and corporate clients. Ultimately, the article concludes that for Anthropic, safety is a business, and the apology is merely customer service for that business.

marsbit1 saat önce

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片