Polymarket Faces New Roadblock As Dutch Regulator Bans Prediction Activity — Details

bitcoinist2026-02-22 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-22 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Polymarket's Dutch operations, under the entity Adventure One, have been ordered to cease all activities by the Netherlands Gambling Authority (Ksa) for offering unlicensed prediction markets, which the regulator classifies as illegal gambling. The platform faces potential fines of up to $840,000 per week for non-compliance. This action is the latest regulatory challenge for Polymarket, creating a conflict between US federal approval and state-level scrutiny. The news coincides with a recent parliamentary proposal in the Netherlands to introduce a controversial 36% tax on unrealized gains from cryptocurrencies and other investments, a move critics warn could drive investors out of the country.

According to recent reports, the Dutch arm of the prediction markets platform Polymarket has been asked to cease its activities in the Netherlands. This order comes as the latest regulatory blow dealt to the prediction market platform in recent weeks.

Dutch Regulator Threatens Polymarket With $840,000 Fine

In a notice dated Tuesday, February 17, the Netherlands Gambling Authority ordered Polymarket’s Dutch arm, Adventure One, to “cease its activities immediately” or risk incurring up to $840,000 in fines per week. According to the Dutch regulator, Adventure One offered illegal bets, including on the local elections, to residents without a license.

While prediction markets do not particularly fall into the traditional gambling category, the Netherlands Gambling Authority has classified them as betting. The regulator revealed that it contacted Polymarket about its activities on the Dutch market, but have seen no corrective action or response from the prediction markets company.

Netherlands Gambling Authority’s director of licensing and supervision, Ella Seijsener, said in the notice:

Prediction markets are on the rise, including in the Netherlands. These types of companies offer bets that are not permitted in our market under any circumstances, not even by license holders. Besides the social risks of these kinds of predictions (for example, the potential influence on elections), we conclude that this constitutes illegal gambling. Anyone without a Ksa license has no business in our market. This also applies to these new gambling platforms.

This restriction in the Netherlands marks the latest stumbling block for Polymarket in terms of regulation over the past few months. Despite receiving approvals from the United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), individual state authorities have placed significant scrutiny on the activities of prediction market platforms.

This has led to an issue of jurisdiction, as the CFTC chair criticized the state-level scrutiny which undermines their federal authority over prediction markets.

Dutch Unrealized Gains Tax On Crypto Rolls On

This crackdown on prediction markets comes just a week after the Dutch House of Representatives advanced a proposal to introduce a 36% capital gains tax on most liquid investments, including cryptocurrencies. This controversial bill, if passed, would see profits made from interest-bearing financial instruments, equity investments, cryptocurrencies, and savings accounts be subject to tax, whether realized or not.

The proposal of this capital gains tax led to interesting reactions, with several crypto analysts noting that the legislation will drive investors out of the Netherlands. “To be honest, the fact that there’s the unrealized gains tax for Bitcoin in the Netherlands is the dumbest thing I’ve seen in a long time. The amount of people willing to flee the country is going to be bananas,” analyst Michaël van de Poppe said on X.

The price of BTC on the daily timeframe | Source: BTCUSDT chart on TradingView

İlgili Sorular

QWhat action did the Dutch Gambling Authority take against Polymarket's Dutch arm, Adventure One?

AThe Dutch Gambling Authority ordered Adventure One to cease its activities immediately or face fines of up to $840,000 per week.

QWhat was the primary reason given by the Dutch regulator for banning Polymarket's activities?

AThe regulator classified Polymarket's prediction markets as illegal gambling, stating they offered bets that are not permitted in the Dutch market without a license, including on events like local elections.

QHow did the director of licensing, Ella Seijsener, justify the crackdown on prediction markets?

AElla Seijsener stated that prediction markets offer illegal bets, pose social risks such as potential influence on elections, and constitute illegal gambling that requires a license to operate in the Netherlands.

QWhat recent tax proposal in the Netherlands has also impacted the crypto space?

AThe Dutch House of Representatives advanced a proposal to introduce a 36% capital gains tax on most liquid investments, including cryptocurrencies, taxing both realized and unrealized gains.

QWhat concern did crypto analyst Michaël van de Poppe raise about the proposed Dutch tax on unrealized crypto gains?

AMichaël van de Poppe called the tax 'the dumbest thing I’ve seen in a long time' and predicted that it would cause a significant number of people to flee the country.

İlgili Okumalar

BIS Project Agorá settles $1 million in tokenized cross-border payment trials

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) has announced the completion of initial real-value trials for Project Agorá, a tokenized cross-border payment system. The trials involved 28 central and commercial banks settling approximately $1 million (800,000 Swiss francs) across 17 different transaction scenarios. The system successfully used tokenized central bank reserves and commercial bank deposits to process payments in six major currencies, with average settlement times of around 80 seconds. Participants included major central banks such as the Bank of England and Bank of Japan, alongside global commercial institutions like JPMorgan Chase and Citi. Launched in 2024, Project Agorá aims to explore how tokenization can improve wholesale cross-border payments, with this phase marking a key milestone. The BIS confirmed testing will continue as the project develops.

cointelegraph4 dk önce

BIS Project Agorá settles $1 million in tokenized cross-border payment trials

cointelegraph4 dk önce

Critical Day in the Cryptocurrency Market: Sharp 10.5 Billion Dollar Surge in Bitcoin and Ethereum Option Prices! What Do Investors Expect?

Critical Day in Crypto Market: A massive $10.5 billion in Bitcoin and Ethereum options are expiring, shifting investor focus amidst Bitcoin's struggle near $64,000. Data from Deribit shows approximately $9.69B in Bitcoin options and $830M in Ethereum options set to expire. The put/call ratios are 0.28 for BTC and 0.63 for ETH, indicating overall bullish sentiment, though investors appear more cautious on Ethereum. Analysts note that while these expiries are significant, macroeconomic events and broader market sentiment remain key pricing drivers.

cryptonews.ru19 dk önce

Critical Day in the Cryptocurrency Market: Sharp 10.5 Billion Dollar Surge in Bitcoin and Ethereum Option Prices! What Do Investors Expect?

cryptonews.ru19 dk önce

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

**Title: Analyzing AI's Impact on Economic Growth and Productivity** This article examines three contrasting views on AI's influence on economic growth and productivity. **The Optimistic View** posits that AI, especially through automating R&D ("recursive self-improvement"), could dramatically accelerate growth, even triggering a technological "singularity" with explosive, potentially infinite, economic expansion. **The Moderate/Mainstream View** acknowledges AI's productivity benefits but emphasizes significant real-world constraints that could limit its impact. These include: limited cost savings per task, structural ceilings on which jobs and industries are "exposed" to AI, adoption bottlenecks (e.g., compute, energy, regulatory hurdles), and the "weak link" effect where non-automatable tasks cap overall gains. Consequently, the realized AI dividend may be far lower than optimistic projections, with estimates typically ranging from 0.1% to 1.3% annual productivity growth. **The Pessimistic View** stems from two strands. The first aligns with the moderate view but applies extremely conservative assumptions about task exposure and efficiency gains, yielding minimal projected impact. The second introduces a demand-side critique: if AI primarily replaces rather than augments labor, it could depress labor's share of income, weaken consumer demand, and create a "demand trap" that ultimately stifles growth, unless offset by redistribution policies. **The authors' assessment** is nuanced: * **Short-term (1-2 years):** AI will support growth primarily through investment spending, not significant productivity gains. * **Medium-term (3-5 years):** Three potential paths emerge based on AI demand and bottleneck severity: 1. **"Optimistic Path":** High demand, few bottlenecks. Rapid productivity gains but risk of major job displacement and social conflict without redistribution. 2. **"Moderate Path" (most likely):** High demand but significant, surmountable bottlenecks. Leads to moderate productivity gains, financial market volatility (K-shaped returns), and sectoral job losses. 3. **"Pessimistic Path":** Low demand or severe bottlenecks. Minimal productivity and growth impact, triggering financial market corrections but allowing a smoother societal transition with less labor disruption. * **Long-term:** AI holds potential for a major productivity revolution and prosperity. The conclusion stresses that no path is smooth. Technologically "optimistic" outcomes could be socially detrimental, while "pessimistic" technological diffusion might be more socially stable. Policymakers must monitor developments and prepare balanced responses to manage economic, financial, and social sustainability.

marsbit28 dk önce

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

marsbit28 dk önce

IRS Fraud Alert: Fake Letters Target Crypto Holders in Data-Stealing Scam

The IRS Criminal Investigation unit has warned cryptocurrency holders of a sophisticated phishing scam involving fake paper letters that mimic official IRS correspondence. These letters, which include official formatting and a deadline, instruct recipients to enroll in a non-existent "Digital Asset Compliance Portal." A QR code inside the letter directs victims to a spoofed IRS website designed to steal personal information and, in some cases, trick them into directly transferring cryptocurrency to scammers. The scam exploits the fact that the IRS has legitimately sent compliance letters regarding digital assets since 2019, making such mail seem plausible. The agency clarifies it never uses QR codes in official letters, never asks for digital asset transfers as part of compliance, and does not operate a digital asset enrollment portal. Legitimate notices can be verified via IRS.gov. If you receive such a letter, do not scan the QR code, call any listed numbers, or enter personal information on any linked site. Verify your account status only through official IRS tools. This scam undermines trust in genuine IRS communications during a period of increased crypto enforcement.

TheNewsCrypto32 dk önce

IRS Fraud Alert: Fake Letters Target Crypto Holders in Data-Stealing Scam

TheNewsCrypto32 dk önce

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War The article argues that the contemporary geopolitical and economic rivalry between the US and China represents a "New Cold War," but one fundamentally fought through technology and financial markets, not physical barriers or conventional trade. Historically, US dominance was secured through financial systems. The Soviet Union, reliant on the rigid "Transferable Ruble," was ultimately undermined by its dependency on the US dollar for oil trade. Later, Japan's semiconductor challenge was countered not just by tariffs (e.g., Plaza Accord, 301 investigations) but by binding it to US Treasury bonds. China presents a more complex, "embedded" challenger. While it holds vast dollar reserves and US debt like Japan, its industrial base is stronger and more diversified than the Soviet Union's. Surviving the initial 2018 trade war phase, the conflict has evolved into a "tech-financial war." The core battlefield is now the stock market. US tech stocks (AI, semiconductors) are treated as sovereign assets, buoyed by bipartisan national will. China is pushing to strengthen its own financial markets to convert industrial strength into financial power and fund its tech ambitions. Companies like ChangXin (semiconductors), Moonshot AI, and DJI compete not just for market share but as financial proxies for their respective systems. The new paradigm is moving from globally efficient monopolies (Apple, Google) towards companies that achieve monopolistic profits within their respective geopolitical spheres. This competition over "pricing power" and financial valuation in segmented markets defines the current era, making the stock market the primary arena for this tech-centric struggle.

marsbit38 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot