Polymarket Acquires Brahma to Strengthen DeFi Infrastructure

TheNewsCrypto2026-03-19 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-19 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Polymarket, the largest prediction market, has acquired DeFi infrastructure provider Brahma. The Brahma team will focus on enhancing Polymarket's product suite, aiming to reduce friction in wallet creation, deposits, and token redemptions. The acquisition is expected to bring more liquidity to niche prediction markets on Polymarket. Brahma’s three main products—Strategy Vaults, Brahma Accounts, and Swype.fun—will be discontinued over the next 30 days. This move is part of Polymarket’s continued expansion despite broader crypto market challenges. The company recently announced partnerships with Palantir and TWG AI for an AI-powered sports integrity platform and acquired Dome and Lunch in February. Financial terms of the Brahma acquisition were not disclosed.

The largest prediction market, Polymarket, has publicised that it is acquiring Brahma, a crypto startup offering decentralised finance (DeFi) infrastructure. As per the announcement on March 18, Brahma mentioned that as part of this transition, our team will commit itself to evolving Polymarket’s stack and product suite.

Brahma was rolled out in 2021, and till now it has processed more than $1 billion in volume and may be used by Polymarket to suppress friction around wallet creation, deposits, and token redemptions.

The possession could also draw more liquidity to niche, low-volume prediction markets on Polymarket. The founder and the chief executive officer of Polymarket, Shayne Coplan, mentioned that creating trustworthy infrastructure over blockchain networks and traditional financial rails is hard and there are no shortcuts.

He further went on to add that the Brahma team has signified it can design, function and scale complex products for sophisticated users. Financial details of the possession were not revealed at the time.

The Products of Brahma

In the last four years, Brahma has made three main products: Strategy Vaults for automated DeFi strategies, Brahma Accounts, smart accounts for DeFi users; and Swype.fun, a Visa card associated with DeFi positions for real-world spending.

The company mentioned that each product will be terminated over the upcoming 30 days as the acquisition proceeds. Polymarket has swiftly grown to a listed $20 billion valuation at the time of rapid growth in prediction markets.

Polymarket has carried on to invest in expansion regardless of a wider crypto market slip and an increase in interest in AI. The firm publicised on March 10 that it was collaborating with Palantir Technologies and TWG AI to create an AI-powered sports integrity platform.

It also acquired Y Combinator-supported Dome in February, which offers developer tools for prediction markets, and Lunch, a boutique company specialising in recruiting and assembling teams for tech startups.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Crypto Prices Retreat, Asian Markets Move the Same Way

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the main purpose of Polymarket's acquisition of Brahma?

APolymarket is acquiring Brahma to strengthen its DeFi infrastructure, specifically to evolve its stack and product suite, and to reduce friction around wallet creation, deposits, and token redemptions.

QHow much transaction volume has Brahma processed since its launch in 2021?

ABrahma has processed more than $1 billion in volume since it was launched in 2021.

QWhat are the three main products developed by Brahma in the last four years?

ABrahma's three main products are Strategy Vaults for automated DeFi strategies, Brahma Accounts (smart accounts for DeFi users), and Swype.fun, a Visa card linked to DeFi positions for real-world spending.

QWhat was the valuation of Polymarket at the time of the article, and what market trend contributed to this?

APolymarket had grown to a listed $20 billion valuation at the time, driven by rapid growth in prediction markets.

QBesides Brahma, what other companies has Polymarket recently acquired?

AIn February, Polymarket also acquired Dome, which offers developer tools for prediction markets, and Lunch, a boutique company specializing in recruiting and assembling teams for tech startups.

İlgili Okumalar

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit8 dk önce

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit8 dk önce

Analyst Reveals Accumulation Level For Dogecoin Before It Rallies To $2

A crypto analyst, Crypto Patel, predicts that Dogecoin (DOGE) could rally to $2, despite currently trading below $0.10. The analyst identifies a key accumulation zone between $0.07 and $0.09, where DOGE has repeatedly tested support without breaking down. Based on a bi-weekly chart using Elliott Wave theory, DOGE is in a Wave 4 consolidation phase within a descending channel. A bounce from this support is expected to trigger a Wave 5 rally, projecting a 2,767% surge toward $2. Price targets are set sequentially at $0.50, $1, and $2, with a stop-loss below $0.048. For a bullish trend reversal, DOGE must break above the $0.10 resistance level, which was recently rejected in April. Analysts emphasize that market conditions and a confirmed higher high are critical for the projected uptrend.

bitcoinist28 dk önce

Analyst Reveals Accumulation Level For Dogecoin Before It Rallies To $2

bitcoinist28 dk önce

Weekly Editor's Picks (0418-0424)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0418-0424) provides in-depth analysis on key developments across macro trends, crypto markets, and policy. Key topics include the oil market nearing a physical supply crisis due to shipping disruptions, even if the Strait of Hormuz reopens. In crypto, reports cover global consumer crypto adoption, a data-driven strategy for trading volatile altcoins, and the state of VC funding. Prediction markets like Polymarket are analyzed not as pure event-guessing games but as systems where understanding legalistic rules creates an edge. Major DeFi protocol Aave is criticized for poor crisis management amid a $300M exploit, while the controversial structure of World Liberty Financial is examined. Other highlights include policy updates like the CLARITY Act, Ethereum’s, airdrop opportunities, and weekly recaps of major incidents like the Kelp DAO hack and SpaceX's AI disclosures.

marsbit42 dk önce

Telegram Founder Claims French Officials Sold Crypto Data, Linked To 41 Kidnaps

Telegram founder Pavel Durov has accused French officials of selling crypto owners’ data to criminals, linking it to a sharp rise in kidnappings. France has seen 41 crypto-related kidnappings this year, part of a growing international trend known as “wrench attacks.” Durov criticized French policies requiring identity data and access to private messages, arguing that increased data flow leads to more leaks and victims. The incidents, which began in late 2024, have escalated significantly in 2026, now accounting for over half of all organized kidnappings tracked by French intelligence. In response, the government plans a broader crackdown, including a dedicated police unit, improved international coordination, and a new prevention platform for threat alerts and security guidance.

bitcoinist57 dk önce

Telegram Founder Claims French Officials Sold Crypto Data, Linked To 41 Kidnaps

bitcoinist57 dk önce

First Day Review of "Musk's WeChat" XChat: Even Worse Than Expected

Elon Musk's much-anticipated "WeChat-like" app, XChat, has officially launched after multiple delays. The initial review reveals a product that falls short of expectations, offering an experience largely similar to X Platform's (formerly Twitter) direct messages, despite being marketed as an encrypted communication tool. Key observations from the first-day test include: 1. The app's promoted "end-to-end encryption" and its claimed relation to Bitcoin's architecture were criticized by experts as a superficial attempt to capitalize on crypto buzz, with no real technical connection. 2. Musk's vision of an ad-free "secure communication system" is technically met, but only because the app is currently extremely basic, featuring only a single chat interface. 3. A promised anti-screenshot feature appears inconsistent; it works in X Platform group chats but fails within the XChat app itself, where screenshots still capture avatars. 4. The app supports 45 languages and has a 16+ age rating, indicating a broader tolerance for content compared to WeChat's 13+ rating. 5. A puzzling login process requires users to verify the email associated with their X account. 6. The touted encryption" feels minimal in practice, with its presence only indicated by a simple "Encrypted - Yes" label on messages. 7. Disappearing message timers for groups can be set from 5 minutes to 4 weeks, with the timer starting upon being read by a user. 8. Group invite links are shared with X Platform groups. 9. Group size limits are planned to be increased, aiming for 1000 members, a move that has drawn user criticism. 10. The app offers 8 different colored icons, and its chat bubbles are notably similar to WeChat's. Message deletion options mimic Telegram's. Crucially, many pre-announced features like importing X contacts, integrating Grok AI, X Money payments, and Cashtags are not yet available. The initial release is seen as a bare-bones and underwhelming first step.

Odaily星球日报1 saat önce

First Day Review of "Musk's WeChat" XChat: Even Worse Than Expected

Odaily星球日报1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures