Polymarket Acquires Brahma to Strengthen DeFi Infrastructure

TheNewsCrypto2026-03-19 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-19 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Polymarket, the largest prediction market, has acquired DeFi infrastructure provider Brahma. The Brahma team will focus on enhancing Polymarket's product suite, aiming to reduce friction in wallet creation, deposits, and token redemptions. The acquisition is expected to bring more liquidity to niche prediction markets on Polymarket. Brahma’s three main products—Strategy Vaults, Brahma Accounts, and Swype.fun—will be discontinued over the next 30 days. This move is part of Polymarket’s continued expansion despite broader crypto market challenges. The company recently announced partnerships with Palantir and TWG AI for an AI-powered sports integrity platform and acquired Dome and Lunch in February. Financial terms of the Brahma acquisition were not disclosed.

The largest prediction market, Polymarket, has publicised that it is acquiring Brahma, a crypto startup offering decentralised finance (DeFi) infrastructure. As per the announcement on March 18, Brahma mentioned that as part of this transition, our team will commit itself to evolving Polymarket’s stack and product suite.

Brahma was rolled out in 2021, and till now it has processed more than $1 billion in volume and may be used by Polymarket to suppress friction around wallet creation, deposits, and token redemptions.

The possession could also draw more liquidity to niche, low-volume prediction markets on Polymarket. The founder and the chief executive officer of Polymarket, Shayne Coplan, mentioned that creating trustworthy infrastructure over blockchain networks and traditional financial rails is hard and there are no shortcuts.

He further went on to add that the Brahma team has signified it can design, function and scale complex products for sophisticated users. Financial details of the possession were not revealed at the time.

The Products of Brahma

In the last four years, Brahma has made three main products: Strategy Vaults for automated DeFi strategies, Brahma Accounts, smart accounts for DeFi users; and Swype.fun, a Visa card associated with DeFi positions for real-world spending.

The company mentioned that each product will be terminated over the upcoming 30 days as the acquisition proceeds. Polymarket has swiftly grown to a listed $20 billion valuation at the time of rapid growth in prediction markets.

Polymarket has carried on to invest in expansion regardless of a wider crypto market slip and an increase in interest in AI. The firm publicised on March 10 that it was collaborating with Palantir Technologies and TWG AI to create an AI-powered sports integrity platform.

It also acquired Y Combinator-supported Dome in February, which offers developer tools for prediction markets, and Lunch, a boutique company specialising in recruiting and assembling teams for tech startups.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Crypto Prices Retreat, Asian Markets Move the Same Way

TagsDeFiPolymarketprediction market

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the main purpose of Polymarket's acquisition of Brahma?

APolymarket is acquiring Brahma to strengthen its DeFi infrastructure, specifically to evolve its stack and product suite, and to reduce friction around wallet creation, deposits, and token redemptions.

QHow much transaction volume has Brahma processed since its launch in 2021?

ABrahma has processed more than $1 billion in volume since it was launched in 2021.

QWhat are the three main products developed by Brahma in the last four years?

ABrahma's three main products are Strategy Vaults for automated DeFi strategies, Brahma Accounts (smart accounts for DeFi users), and Swype.fun, a Visa card linked to DeFi positions for real-world spending.

QWhat was the valuation of Polymarket at the time of the article, and what market trend contributed to this?

APolymarket had grown to a listed $20 billion valuation at the time, driven by rapid growth in prediction markets.

QBesides Brahma, what other companies has Polymarket recently acquired?

AIn February, Polymarket also acquired Dome, which offers developer tools for prediction markets, and Lunch, a boutique company specializing in recruiting and assembling teams for tech startups.

İlgili Okumalar

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbit1 saat önce

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbit1 saat önce

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手1 saat önce

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手1 saat önce

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbit2 saat önce

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbit2 saat önce

AI Bubble Is Bursting

The AI Bubble is Bursting: A Necessary Purge on the Path to Ubiquitous Intelligence Market volatility has reignited debates about an AI bubble, with figures like Ray Dalio pointing to high valuations. However, this parallels the dot-com bubble, which, despite its crash, laid the physical infrastructure for today's internet era. The current AI investment frenzy, with tech giants planning trillions in infrastructure spending far outstripping current AI application revenues, appears similarly imbalanced. This 'bubble' is seen as an inevitable phase for a disruptive technology, paying the "innovation tax." Critically, AI inference costs have plummeted over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence nearly free at the margin. This hasn't reduced spending but has instead unlocked massive new demand, as seen in enterprise AI cloud expenditure tripling. This follows the Jevons Paradox: efficiency gains lead to greater total consumption. The market is now entering a cleansing phase, weeding out speculative ventures lacking real moats. The deeper shift is a move from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to value creation in operational expenditure (OpEx) through AI applications that solve real industry problems. While infrastructure valuations are high, rapid earnings growth from widespread AI adoption across sectors—from manufacturing and finance to law and healthcare—may digest these valuations over time. Ultimately, this creative destruction will leave behind robust infrastructure and optimized models, cheaply powering an AI-augmented future for all industries, much as the internet became indispensable after its own bubble burst. The core productive potential remains undiminished.

链捕手2 saat önce

AI Bubble Is Bursting

链捕手2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片