OpenAI Restarts Robotics Business After Six Years, Short-term Bets on Assistive Robots

marsbit2026-06-02 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-06-02 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

On June 1st, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman announced the company's entry into the physical robotics arena, launching a new "OpenAI Robotics" team. The strategy has short and long-term goals: developing robots to assist technical workers with infrastructure in the near term, and envisioning personal robots for everyone eventually. This marks a return to robotics for OpenAI, which had a team from 2016-2019 before disbanding it to focus on large language models like GPT, leading to ChatGPT. The revival stems from the rapid progress of an internal "Worldsim" research project, now led by Sora co-creator Aditya Ramesh, and a shift in strategy following the end of a partnership with humanoid robotics firm Figure AI in early 2025 due to technical disagreements. OpenAI's approach leverages its leading AI models and "world model" capabilities, aiming to build the "brain" first before the physical body. The move also serves to present a new growth narrative—embodied AI and expansion into the physical world—ahead of its planned 2026 IPO, potentially helping to address investor concerns over its significant ongoing losses.

On June 1, a recruitment post shared by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman on social media officially announced the company's entry into the physical robotics track. Altman stated that the company is forming a new team named "OpenAI Robotics" and is publicly recruiting full-stack hardware, operations, systems, and machine learning engineers. The goal is to "co-program and build robots that are truly useful to society."

According to Altman's explanation, OpenAI's robotics strategy has both short-term and long-term goals. In the short term, OpenAI focuses on developing robots that can assist technical workers in building future infrastructure. In the long run, the company envisions a future where every person can own a personal robot capable of fulfilling various needs.

Altman revealed that the move into robotics is based on the rapid development of an internal OpenAI research project called "Worldsim." This project evolved over the past year into OpenAI Robotics, led by the company's Research Vice President, Aditya Ramesh, a core developer of the text-to-image model DALL·E and the video generation model Sora. The project's foundation lies in the deep integration and co-design of robotics hardware research and machine learning research.

OpenAI's return to the robotics field is, in fact, a "comeback." As early as the company's founding days, robotics technology was a crucial direction in its exploration of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Between 2016 and 2019, OpenAI successively launched the reinforcement learning benchmark environment OpenAI Gym, the open-source robot simulation platform Roboschool, and successfully developed a dexterous robotic hand named Dactyl.

In 2019, OpenAI, using reinforcement learning and "Automatic Domain Randomization" (ADR) technology, trained an AI system that enabled a humanoid robotic hand to successfully solve a Rubik's Cube. This research proved the feasibility of the technical path of training in a simulation environment and then transferring the capabilities to a real robot. However, due to the scarcity of robotics training data and slow iteration at that time, contrasted with the vast and easily accessible text and image data on the internet, OpenAI made a strategic decision around 2020: to disband the robotics team and concentrate resources on the development of large language models represented by the GPT series. This decision ultimately led to the creation of ChatGPT.

In the following years, OpenAI ignited the global large model boom with its ChatGPT series of products, becoming the world's highest-valued AI unicorn. According to multiple media reports, OpenAI secretly submitted a draft IPO prospectus on May 22, planning to go public as early as September 2026. In its latest round of financing completed in March of this year, OpenAI's valuation reached $852 billion. Institutions like Deutsche Bank predict its listing valuation could exceed $1 trillion, with a fundraising scale potentially reaching $60 billion, potentially making it one of the largest tech IPOs in U.S. public market history.

Nevertheless, OpenAI also faces significant pressure from substantial losses. The company is projected to incur a full-year loss of approximately $14 billion in 2026, with cash burn expected to further expand. It might not achieve cash flow break-even until 2030 at the earliest. Its gross margin is only about 33%, with the high inference costs of AI models being the primary reason for eroding profits.

During the years after disbanding its in-house robotics team, OpenAI did not completely abandon the robotics track. Instead, it adopted a "multi-point investment" strategy through its venture fund, successively investing in several robotics startups, including the Norwegian humanoid robot company 1X Technologies, the American humanoid robot star company Figure AI, and Physical Intelligence.

The most notable collaboration was with Figure AI in February 2024. At that time, OpenAI not only participated in Figure AI's $675 million Series B funding round but also announced the development of a dedicated multimodal AI model for Figure's humanoid robots. Just 13 days after the partnership was announced, the Figure 01 humanoid robot equipped with the OpenAI model demonstrated fluent natural language interaction, object recognition, and autonomous operation capabilities.

However, this collaboration lasted less than a year. In February 2025, Figure AI founder Brett Adcock officially announced the termination of the partnership with OpenAI, opting to independently develop an end-to-end robot AI model. The primary reason for the breakdown was a divergence in technical approaches. Figure believed that general-purpose large models could not adapt to the hardware requirements of robots; it was essential to create a vertically integrated end-to-end model. This also prompted OpenAI, after a six-year hiatus, to choose to "revive" its robotics team, personally entering the field and upgrading robotics from an "investment" to an "internal strategic business."

Simultaneously, this is also OpenAI's move to outline a new growth narrative for the capital market ahead of its IPO. It aims to show investors a grand vision of transitioning from pure software to a software-hardware combination and expanding from the virtual world to the physical world. The company hopes to use the "embodied intelligence" story to hedge against market concerns about the sustainability of its business model and its massive losses.

OpenAI's advantage in entering the robotics field lies in its globally leading AI large model capabilities, particularly its "world model" for understanding and simulating the physical world. Its technical path may differ from many companies starting with hardware platforms, instead following a logic of "first build the brain, then grow the body." This means first enabling the AI to understand physical laws through a powerful world model, then infusing that capability into physical robots. If successful, this software- and algorithm-defined hardware approach could reshape the R&D model of the robotics industry.

This article is from "Jiemian News," author: Li Kefeng

İlgili Sorular

QWhy is OpenAI restarting its robotics business after six years?

AOpenAI is restarting its robotics business primarily due to the rapid development of its internal 'Worldsim' research project, which evolved into 'OpenAI Robotics'. Additionally, a strategic partnership breakdown with Figure AI over technical disagreements on AI model integration for robots prompted the company to bring robotics back as an in-house strategic business, moving beyond mere investment.

QWhat are the short-term and long-term goals for OpenAI's new robotics strategy?

AOpenAI's short-term goal is to develop robots capable of assisting technical workers in building future infrastructure. Its long-term vision is to create personal robots for everyone that can fulfill various needs.

QWhat was the outcome and significance of OpenAI's Dactyl robotic hand research in 2019?

AIn 2019, OpenAI successfully trained an AI system to solve a Rubik's Cube using a Dactyl robotic hand. This research demonstrated the feasibility of training AI in simulation and transferring that capability to a real-world robot, proving a key technical pathway.

QHow did OpenAI's collaboration with Figure AI in 2024 proceed and end?

AIn February 2024, OpenAI invested in Figure AI's funding round and developed a multimodal AI model for its humanoid robot. The integrated robot demonstrated impressive capabilities within 13 days. However, the partnership ended in February 2025 when Figure AI decided to build its own end-to-end AI model, citing that general-purpose large models couldn't adequately meet specific robot hardware requirements.

QWhat is OpenAI's potential approach to developing robots, according to the article?

AOpenAI's potential approach is described as 'building the brain first, then the body.' This means focusing first on developing a powerful 'world model' AI that understands physical laws, and then instilling that capability into physical robots. This software and algorithm-first approach could potentially reshape robotics R&D.

İlgili Okumalar

"Water Scarcity": The Hidden Fatal Flaw of AI Infrastructure

“Water Scarcity: The Hidden Vulnerability of AI Infrastructure” In June 2026, SpaceX revised its IPO prospectus to highlight a core resource constraint alongside power and processors: water. This move signals a pivotal shift where water scarcity has transformed from an operational cost to a major, uncontrollable investment risk, directly threatening AI data center expansion. The scale of the problem is immense. U.S. data centers consumed an estimated 17 billion gallons of water for direct cooling in 2023, with indirect water use for power generation exceeding 211 billion gallons. Giants like Google alone use billions of gallons annually, with single sites consuming volumes equivalent to a medium-sized city. This water is largely “consumptive,” evaporated into the atmosphere and lost. This massive demand is colliding with scarcity. Tech companies are building “water tigers” in arid regions, sparking community protests in places like Mexico and Arizona, where data centers can legally use millions of gallons daily—enough for tens of thousands of residents. These conflicts are not about illegality, but about a mismatch between historic water allocation frameworks and new, colossal demand. The consequences are real. Community opposition, largely centered on water, has reportedly stalled or canceled $64 billion in U.S. data center projects over two years. Simultaneously, investors are pressuring companies for greater water footprint transparency, viewing it as a financial risk, not just an ESG metric. Technological solutions like air or liquid cooling involve trade-offs between water and electricity use, with final choices dictated by local constraints. The irony is stark: while industry leaders envision AI as a utility “like water,” its physical infrastructure is straining real-world water supplies. The race for AI supremacy may ultimately be governed not by the fastest chip, but by the slowest water meter.

marsbit21 dk önce

"Water Scarcity": The Hidden Fatal Flaw of AI Infrastructure

marsbit21 dk önce

Global Card Issuance Enters a Compliance-Driven Era: WasabiCard is Building the Next-Generation Payment Infrastructure

Global card issuance is entering a compliance-driven era, with WasabiCard building next-generation payment infrastructure. The platform asserts that as stablecoins increasingly enter cross-border payments, corporate settlements, and global commerce, the industry is shifting focus from "availability" and "growth-driven" models to long-term, compliant operation under global frameworks. Competition will center on sustainable compliance and global infrastructure capabilities. Stablecoins are evolving from on-chain assets into key payment tools in global business, with card issuance acting as critical infrastructure connecting digital assets to traditional payment networks like Visa and Mastercard. This expansion has revealed structural issues, including cross-regional issuance, BIN resource management, and insufficient AML and risk controls. In response, the industry is moving away from reliance on "grey efficiency" towards prioritizing compliance, risk management, and long-term operational stability. WasabiCard outlines its strategy: collaborating with licensed principals and local partners for localized operations, building robust KYC/AML systems, strictly separating commercial and consumer BIN usage, and enhancing global issuance, payment, and cross-border fund flow infrastructure. The goal is to build stable, scalable payment infrastructure amid evolving global regulations, shifting industry competition from scale to infrastructure capability. As stablecoins integrate further with global commerce, payment infrastructure will become a fundamental, embedded component of internet business. WasabiCard will continue to develop capabilities in global card issuance, stablecoin payments, cross-border fund flows, and API-driven financial workflows.

marsbit32 dk önce

Global Card Issuance Enters a Compliance-Driven Era: WasabiCard is Building the Next-Generation Payment Infrastructure

marsbit32 dk önce

Zhou Hang: How Much Is SpaceX Really Worth?

**Zhou Hang: How Much is SpaceX Really Worth?** SpaceX, arguably one of the greatest industrial companies of the past 50 years, is reportedly targeting a staggering $1.75 trillion valuation in its potential IPO. However, the author argues this figure is inflated by approximately $1.25 trillion when assessed through standard financial metrics. The analysis begins by acknowledging SpaceX's undeniable success: drastically reducing launch costs, achieving near-monopoly in commercial launches, and building the strategic Starlink network. Its achievement surpasses even Tesla's, given it disrupted a state-monopolized industry. Despite this greatness, a $1.75 trillion valuation places SpaceX above the combined market cap of Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, RTX, and General Dynamics. Projecting optimistic 2030 revenues of $50-80 billion and applying generous tech-sector multiples yields a "reasonable" valuation range of $500 billion to $1.2 trillion. The $1.25 trillion gap is attributed to three non-financial premiums: 1. **Long-term vision premium** for future Starship-enabled markets (e.g., space-based computing). 2. **Sovereign asset/strategic premium**, as SpaceX is deeply integrated into U.S. national security. 3. **Retail narrative/Musk cult premium**, driven by a heroic story and personal following. Post-IPO, three scenarios are outlined: valuation solidifying (25% probability), sideways volatility as narrative outpaces reality (50%), or a re-rating down to $800B-$1.2T if execution falters or Musk-related risks emerge (25%). The probability-weighted expected value is $1.3-1.5 trillion, suggesting negative expected returns for those buying at the IPO price. The conclusion advises investors to separate the company's excellence from its stock price. Buying at the IPO likely prices in excessive optimism. A more prudent strategy would be to wait for key milestones (e.g., Starship V3 stability) or a significant price correction before investing, or to treat an early purchase as a long-term, high-conviction hold with limited position size, not a short-term bet.

链捕手36 dk önce

Zhou Hang: How Much Is SpaceX Really Worth?

链捕手36 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片