OnlyFans in Talks to Sell 60% Stake in Deal Valued at Up to $5.5 Billion

TheNewsCrypto2026-01-31 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-31 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

According to The Wall Street Journal, OnlyFans is in discussions to sell a 60% stake to U.S. private equity firm Architect Capital. The potential deal could value the subscription platform between $3.5 billion and $5.5 billion, including debt. Majority owner Leo Radvinsky, who acquired the company in 2018, has previously explored a full sale. Architect Capital, known for investing in businesses with regulatory challenges, aims to improve payment systems for creators and plans to take OnlyFans public by 2028. The report also notes that OnlyFans' parent company, Fenix International, previously invested significantly in Ethereum, sustaining substantial losses during the 2022 crypto market downturn.

According to the report by The Wall Street Journal, OnlyFans, a London-based subscription platform is reportedly talking to the Architect Capital, a U.S. private Equity firm, to sell its 60% stake. If the deal goes through, then it could value OnlyFans at $3.5 billion or $5.5 billion, including debt.

OnlyFans Ownership

OnlyFans is owned by Leo Radvinsky, who bought the company in 2018. He currently holds the majority stake, and over the last two years, he has taken nearly $1 billion in dividends. In 2025, he reportedly explored selling the entire company for around $8 billion. Despite all this, OnlyFans continues to generate around $1.6 billion in annual net revenue.

Architect Capital is interested in buying the stakes because it is known for investing in businesses that face regulatory challenges. The firm aims to improve the payment systems for creators and support underbanked users on OnlyFans. Architect Capital also says that it is taking OnlyFans public by 2028 through IPO.

OnlyFans History in Crypto Investment

OnlyFans’ parent company, Fenix International, has invested about $19.9 million in Ethereum between 2021 and 2022. By November 2022, the company had recorded an $8.45 million loss during the crypto crash and reduced the value of its ETH holdings to $11.4 million. But there is no confirmation on whether Fenis sold the ETH, and it also explored Ethereum-based NFTs, which shows continuous interest in blockchain.

If the Deal is completed, then there will be a major shift in OnlyFans ownership after years of private control. Right now OnlyFans remains one of the most profitable subscription platforms globally.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Ethereum Foundation Enters Period of Mild Austerity, Says Vitalik Buterin

İlgili Sorular

QWhat percentage of OnlyFans is being sold in the potential deal with Architect Capital?

AOnlyFans is in talks to sell a 60% stake to Architect Capital.

QWho is the current majority owner of OnlyFans and when did they acquire the company?

ALeo Radvinsky is the current majority owner of OnlyFans, having acquired the company in 2018.

QWhat is the estimated valuation range for OnlyFans in this potential deal?

AThe deal could value OnlyFans at between $3.5 billion and $5.5 billion, including debt.

QWhat was the financial outcome of OnlyFans' parent company's investment in Ethereum?

AFenix International invested $19.9 million in Ethereum and recorded an $8.45 million loss during the crypto crash, reducing the value of its ETH holdings to $11.4 million by November 2022.

QWhat is Architect Capital's stated goal for OnlyFans' payment systems and future plans?

AArchitect Capital aims to improve payment systems for creators, support underbanked users, and plans to take OnlyFans public via an IPO by 2028.

İlgili Okumalar

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

"The article explores the 'VVV' concept as the new AI-focused narrative within the Base ecosystem, centered around the token $VVV of the privacy-focused, uncensored generative AI platform Venice, led by crypto veteran Erik Voorhees. Venice has seen significant growth in 2026, with its API users surging, partly attributed to exposure from OpenClaw. The platform now boasts over 2 million total users and 55,000 paid subscribers. Correspondingly, the $VVV token price has risen over 9x this year. Key to its performance are tokenomics designed for value accrual: reduced annual emissions, subscription revenue used for buyback-and-burn, and a unique staking mechanism. Staking $VVV yields $sVVV, which can be used to mint $DIEM tokens. Each staked $DIEM provides a daily $1 credit for using Venice's API services, creating tangible utility. The article also highlights other tokens associated with the 'VVV' narrative. $POD, the token of distributed AI network Dolphin (which co-developed Venice's default AI model), saw a massive price surge. $cyb3rwr3n, a project for a Venice credit auction market, gained attention due to perceived connections to Venice's team despite official denials. Finally, $SR of robotics platform STRIKEROBOT.AI rose after announcing a partnership with Venice for robot vision-language model development. Overall, the 'VVV' ecosystem combines AI platform growth, deflationary tokenomics, and innovative utility mechanisms, driving significant investor interest and price action in related tokens."

marsbit10 dk önce

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

marsbit10 dk önce

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbit1 saat önce

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbit1 saat önce

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

The pre-IPO token market has been rocked by strong statements from Anthropic and OpenAI. Both AI giants have updated official warnings, declaring that any sale or transfer of their company shares without explicit board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized on their corporate records. This directly targets Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the common legal structure used by pre-IPO token platforms. These platforms typically use an SPV to acquire shares from employees or early investors, then issue blockchain-based tokens representing a claim on the SPV's economic benefits. Anthropic and OpenAI's position means that if an SPV's share purchase lacked authorization, the underlying asset could be deemed worthless, nullifying the token's value. Anthropic explicitly warned that any third party selling its shares—via direct sales, forwards, or tokens—is likely fraudulent or offering a valueless investment. The crackdown highlights risks in the popular SPV model, including complex multi-layered "Russian doll" SPV structures that obscure legal ownership, add fees, and concentrate risk. If one layer is invalidated, the entire chain could collapse. Following the announcements, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). In contrast, purely speculative pre-IPO prediction contracts remained stable, as they involve no actual share ownership. The move is seen as a corrective measure amid a market frenzy where some pre-IPO token valuations (e.g., Anthropic's token hitting a $1.4 trillion implied valuation) far exceeded recent official funding rounds. Opinions are split: some believe this undermines the core logic of pre-IPO token trading if top companies reject SPVs, while others argue buyers always assumed this legal risk when accessing unofficial channels. The statements serve as a stark warning and a potential catalyst for market de-leveraging and clearer boundaries.

Odaily星球日报1 saat önce

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

Odaily星球日报1 saat önce

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

"AI Membership: The Hidden Cost Pushing Workers Toward 'Poverty'" The widespread corporate push for AI adoption is creating a hidden financial burden for employees. Companies, from giants like Alibaba to small firms, are mandating AI use, often tying token consumption to KPIs, but frequently refuse to cover the costs. Workers are forced to pay for subscriptions out of pocket to stay competitive and avoid being replaced. Front-end developer Long Shen spends up to 2000 RMB monthly on tools like Cursor and ChatGPT Plus, seeing it as a necessary 3% salary investment to handle 90% of his coding tasks. While it boosted his performance and led to promotions, he now faces idle time at work, pretending to be busy. Designer Peng Peng navigates strict company firewalls by using personal devices and accounts for AI image generation tools like Midjourney, spending hundreds monthly without reimbursement, while her boss demands faster, more numerous revisions. The pressure creates workplace anxiety and suspicion. Programmer Li Huahua, after a friend's experience of raised KPIs following AI success, fears being branded a "traitor" for using it yet worries about falling behind if she doesn't. The dynamic allows management to demand results without understanding the tools or covering expenses, treating employees like AI "agents." While some, like entrepreneur Jin Tu, find high value in paid AI, building entire systems and winning competitions, for most, it's a trap. Free tools like Kimi and Doubao are introducing fees, closing off alternatives. The initial efficiency gains individual advantage, but as AI becomes ubiquitous, the personal edge disappears, workloads increase, and a cycle of dependency begins. Workers like Long Shen realize they cannot maintain AI-generated code without AI, making stopping harder than continuing to pay. The tool promising liberation is instead becoming a compulsory, costly chain in the modern workplace.

marsbit2 saat önce

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

marsbit2 saat önce

Strategy Says Its Software Business Is Quietly Powering Its Bitcoin Machine

Strategy CEO Phong Le emphasizes that the company's legacy software business is integral to its Bitcoin Treasury Company model, creating unique operational, financial, and cultural synergies. He argues that the software division, which recently reported its strongest quarter in a decade with 12% revenue growth and 27% margin expansion, funds Bitcoin-related expenses and provides a critical institutional foundation. This includes a 35-year operating history, public company infrastructure, and extensive compliance standards that most digital asset firms lack. Conversely, Le states the Bitcoin strategy has energized employees and engaged customers. Looking ahead, Strategy is leveraging its "Mosaic" AI data platform to automate internal systems and drive its software evolution, aiming for more autonomous and adaptive operations.

bitcoinist2 saat önce

Strategy Says Its Software Business Is Quietly Powering Its Bitcoin Machine

bitcoinist2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures