Only xxx Can Save the Crypto World? Let 'Lobster' Play Prediction Markets

比推2026-03-17 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-17 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

This article discusses recent hot topics in the crypto community, as shared by influencers on X (formerly Twitter). Key points include: - Debate around an AI arbitrage bot allegedly earning $98K on Polymarket using Claude. Skeptics point to potential survivorship bias, liquidity constraints, and the rapid decay of alpha once strategies are public. - A resource sharing over 11,000 high-quality image generation prompts for Nano Banana Pro. - Commentary on Venus Protocol, highlighting its vulnerability to repeated exploits, with a linked analysis of how to profit from a recent attack. - A controversial opinion piece by influencer @BTCdayu arguing that only Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) can "save crypto." The author claims that despite SBF's crimes and 25-year sentence, his genius is needed to address current industry crises: VC-backed altcoins scamming users, Bitcoin miners pivoting to AI, broken tokenomics, and a lack of new narratives. SBF's background at Jane Street, his innovative FTX trading system, and his early bets on AI (like Anthropic) are cited as reasons he could drive integration between AI and crypto, potentially pushing BTC to $1 million. This sparked heated discussion, with replies noting the improbability of a pardon, SBF's likely shift to AI, and that this nostalgia reflects a bygone era of "capital, narrative, and runaway imagination." The article concludes with links to the news outlet's social channels. All content is presented as personal opinion and not invest...

Dear readers, hello~

What were the crypto KOLs talking about in the past 24 hours?

Note: The following content is compiled from the X platform and represents personal opinions, not the stance of this platform, and does not constitute investment advice.

AI Arbitrage Bot: Real or Fake?

Popular Replies:

  • Someone claimed to have made $98K using Claude on Polymarket. I verified: the money is real, the story is fabricated.

  • If the little lobster wants to do 5-minute market detection, the detection frequency should be at least at the ms level, right? Then the consumption of tokens could make someone a "millionaire in debt."

  • 86 times sounds scary, but there are a few issues: 1) Sample bias? Losing bots don't tweet. 2) How much scale can Polymarket's liquidity support? 3) Once the strategy is public, the Alpha disappears. To truly verify sustainability, at least 3 months of backtesting + maximum drawdown is needed;

  • Is this AI just survivor bias? Most losing AIs are too ashamed to show up;

Over 11,000 High-Quality Image Generation Prompts for Nano Banana Pro

Resource self-service: https://github.com/YouMind-OpenLab/awesome-nano-banana-pro-prompts


Venus is Either Being Hacked or on the Way to Being Hacked

Recap on how to profit from the Venus THE attack: https://x.com/hklst4r/status/2033182792029294736

Who Can Save the Crypto World?

Crypto KOL @BTCdayu wrote: Only SBF Can Save the Crypto World.

The author believes that although SBF's misappropriation of funds is a serious crime deserving of a 25-year sentence, the crypto world urgently needs his genius mind to save it from the current crisis: VC altcoins scamming retail, BTC mining farms transitioning to AI, token economics becoming a joke, and a lack of new narratives. SBF, from Jane Street, innovated the FTX trading system, heavily invested in AI projects like Anthropic (potential trillion-dollar returns), and understands the integration of AI and Crypto. If pardoned, he could reconstruct computing power, build an AI Agent settlement layer, inject new capital energy, and push BTC to $1 million. His core view: Forgiveness is not forgetting, but allowing genius to create value under regulation and rules.

The article sparked heated discussion:

Popular Replies:

  • Even if SBF is pardoned, he might not work in crypto anymore, as his business acumen in AI is even higher.

  • He cannot be pardoned. First, he backed the wrong side back then. Second, if you're going the political donation route, you绝对不能中途跳船 (absolutely cannot jump ship midway).

  • Remembering SBF is actually remembering the crypto era of "capital, narrative, and imagination expanding uncontrollably." In that cycle, VC money flooded in like liquidity, "effective altruism" could coexist with high leverage, and big fools holding onto a belief coin could see hundred or thousand-fold gains... So it's about time to wash up and sleep.

  • Staying sober in a bear market is more precious than幻想暴富 (fantasizing about getting rich quick).

  • Surviving > Making money


Twitter: https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group: https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link: https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7620287

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the main argument presented in the article regarding who can save the crypto circle?

AThe article presents the argument that only SBF (Sam Bankman-Fried), despite his criminal conviction, can save the crypto circle with his genius mind, innovative capabilities from his Jane Street background, and his foresight in AI and crypto fusion.

QWhat are the key criticisms or concerns raised about the AI arbitrage bot story mentioned in the article?

AThe key criticisms include potential survivorship bias (only profitable bots are publicized), questions about the scalability given Polymarket's liquidity, and the concern that the trading alpha would disappear once the strategy is made public.

QAccording to the article, what was the Venus protocol incident about?

AThe Venus protocol was reportedly exploited, and the article includes a link to a复盘 (post-mortem analysis) on how to profit from the Venus THE attack, indicating it was a security incident or hack.

QWhat is the Nano Banana Pro mentioned in the article, and what resource is provided for it?

ANano Banana Pro appears to be an AI image generation tool or model. The article provides a link to a GitHub repository containing over 11,000 high-quality image generation prompts for it.

QWhat is the general sentiment among commentators regarding the 'Only SBF can save crypto' proposal?

AThe sentiment is largely skeptical and critical. Commentators point out that SBF is unlikely to be pardoned, that he might not return to crypto even if he was, and that the piece is more a nostalgic reflection on a past era of crypto excess rather than a practical solution.

İlgili Okumalar

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

Tech giants like Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft are undergoing a radical financial transformation due to AI. Their traditional "light-asset, high-free-cash-flow" model is being dismantled by staggering capital expenditures on AI infrastructure—data centers, GPUs, and power. Combined 2026 guidance exceeds $700 billion, a 4.5x increase from 2022, causing free cash flow to plummet (e.g., Amazon's fell 95%). To fund this, they are borrowing unprecedented sums through long-dated, multi-currency bonds (e.g., Alphabet's 100-year bond). The world's most conservative capital—pensions, insurers—is now funding Silicon Valley's most speculative bet. This shift makes these companies resemble heavy-asset industrials (railroads, utilities) rather than software firms, threatening their premium valuations. Historically, such infrastructure booms (railroads, fiber optics) followed a pattern: genuine technology, overbuilding fueled by competitive frenzy, aggressive debt financing, and a crash triggered by financial conditions—not technology failure. The infrastructure remained, but many original builders and financiers did not survive. The core gamble is a "time arbitrage": using cheap debt today to build scale and lock in customers before AI capabilities commoditize. They are betting that AI revenue will materialize before debt comes due. Their positions vary: Amazon is under immediate cash pressure; Meta's path to monetization is unclear; Alphabet has a robust core business buffer; Microsoft has the shortest path from infrastructure to revenue. The contract is set: the most risk-averse global capital has lent its time to Silicon Valley, awaiting a future that is promised but uncertain.

marsbit30 dk önce

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

marsbit30 dk önce

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

"The article explores the 'VVV' concept as the new AI-focused narrative within the Base ecosystem, centered around the token $VVV of the privacy-focused, uncensored generative AI platform Venice, led by crypto veteran Erik Voorhees. Venice has seen significant growth in 2026, with its API users surging, partly attributed to exposure from OpenClaw. The platform now boasts over 2 million total users and 55,000 paid subscribers. Correspondingly, the $VVV token price has risen over 9x this year. Key to its performance are tokenomics designed for value accrual: reduced annual emissions, subscription revenue used for buyback-and-burn, and a unique staking mechanism. Staking $VVV yields $sVVV, which can be used to mint $DIEM tokens. Each staked $DIEM provides a daily $1 credit for using Venice's API services, creating tangible utility. The article also highlights other tokens associated with the 'VVV' narrative. $POD, the token of distributed AI network Dolphin (which co-developed Venice's default AI model), saw a massive price surge. $cyb3rwr3n, a project for a Venice credit auction market, gained attention due to perceived connections to Venice's team despite official denials. Finally, $SR of robotics platform STRIKEROBOT.AI rose after announcing a partnership with Venice for robot vision-language model development. Overall, the 'VVV' ecosystem combines AI platform growth, deflationary tokenomics, and innovative utility mechanisms, driving significant investor interest and price action in related tokens."

marsbit39 dk önce

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

marsbit39 dk önce

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbit1 saat önce

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbit1 saat önce

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

The pre-IPO token market has been rocked by strong statements from Anthropic and OpenAI. Both AI giants have updated official warnings, declaring that any sale or transfer of their company shares without explicit board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized on their corporate records. This directly targets Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the common legal structure used by pre-IPO token platforms. These platforms typically use an SPV to acquire shares from employees or early investors, then issue blockchain-based tokens representing a claim on the SPV's economic benefits. Anthropic and OpenAI's position means that if an SPV's share purchase lacked authorization, the underlying asset could be deemed worthless, nullifying the token's value. Anthropic explicitly warned that any third party selling its shares—via direct sales, forwards, or tokens—is likely fraudulent or offering a valueless investment. The crackdown highlights risks in the popular SPV model, including complex multi-layered "Russian doll" SPV structures that obscure legal ownership, add fees, and concentrate risk. If one layer is invalidated, the entire chain could collapse. Following the announcements, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). In contrast, purely speculative pre-IPO prediction contracts remained stable, as they involve no actual share ownership. The move is seen as a corrective measure amid a market frenzy where some pre-IPO token valuations (e.g., Anthropic's token hitting a $1.4 trillion implied valuation) far exceeded recent official funding rounds. Opinions are split: some believe this undermines the core logic of pre-IPO token trading if top companies reject SPVs, while others argue buyers always assumed this legal risk when accessing unofficial channels. The statements serve as a stark warning and a potential catalyst for market de-leveraging and clearer boundaries.

Odaily星球日报1 saat önce

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

Odaily星球日报1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片