Online vs. Offline CBDCs — The Privacy Battle Dividing the EU

ccn.com2025-12-25 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-12-25 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The EU is divided over the design of its proposed digital euro, with a key conflict emerging between online and offline functionality. The Council of the EU supports a hybrid model that includes both online and offline capabilities. In contrast, privacy-focused members of the European Parliament advocate for an offline-only version, arguing it offers stronger, cash-like privacy by enabling peer-to-peer transactions without centralized tracking. They warn that an online system could allow excessive surveillance of consumer spending. The European Central Bank and European Commission favor the hybrid approach but face opposition from data protection authorities concerned about data minimization. With negotiations set for 2026, the outcome will determine the balance between privacy and functionality in the EU's digital currency.

Key Takeaways

The Council of the EU has adopted a digital euro negotiating position that favors online and offline functionality.
However, privacy hawks in the European Parliament are pushing for an offline-only digital currency.
As the two sides prepare for negotiations in 2026, privacy has emerged as the key battle line.

As the EU’s digital euro inches closer to realization, policymakers are split between two camps with competing visions for the central bank digital currency.

In one model, offline CBDCs behave like digital cash, with strong privacy built in by design.

However, another, more ambitious approach envisions the digital euro as a comprehensive online payment instrument that offers the same functionality as cards and digital wallets.

New Trending Crypto Wallet Offers

Tangem

promotions

Trusted & Secure

Coins

Claim Offer

BitBox

promotions

Trusted, Secure & Crypto Friendly

Coins

–

Claim Offer

Blockstream

promotions

Trusted, Secure & Crypto Friendly

Coins

–

Claim Offer

The Two Digital Euros: Online Accounts vs. Offline Tokens

The distinction between online and offline versions of the CBDC emerged early on in discussions over the digital euro, with a string of EU policy documents exploring the pros and cons of each model since 2020.

An online digital euro would function like today’s electronic payments, with accounts tied to individual consumers and businesses, and transactions validated through infrastructure operated by banks and other regulated Eurosystem participants.

Meanwhile, offline CBDCs more closely resemble traditional cryptocurrencies, with tokens that move between wallets on a peer-to-peer basis, eliminating the need to update balances on a centralized ledger.

Privacy Hawks Favor Offline-Only CBDC

In the debate over online versus offline digital euros, privacy is a central political constraint.

The European Central Bank (ECB) has repeatedly framed privacy as “by design,” arguing that it wants the digital euro to meet very high privacy standards compared with existing electronic payment rails.

But that prospect holds much more weight with an offline CBDC, which promises a cash-like degree of anonymity, at least for small payments.

Alongside the European Commission, the ECB favors a hybrid system, with larger payments requiring online validation, but some offline functionality for low-value payments.

However, after the Commission outlined a proposal for online and offline functionality in 2023, privacy hawks in the European Parliament pushed back, arguing that online CBDCs could grant centralized authorities unprecedented visibility into consumers’ daily spending.

They argued that the proposal’s privacy guarantees for online CBDCs lacked legal grounding and would require users to simply trust that their payment data wouldn’t be accessed by centralized authorities.

That view is backed by the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) and the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS), which have warned that the systematic logging of online payments risks violating EU data-minimization principles.

Council vs. Parliament

Since 2023, Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) have increasingly rallied around an offline-first, or even offline-only, digital euro.

But on Dec. 19, the EU Council representing Member States backed a negotiating position that more closely aligns with the European Commission’s 2023 proposal.

Now, the EU’s two decision-making branches are on a collision course.

With negotiations set to take place throughout 2026, the future of the digital euro project rests on whether or not the Council can convince enough MEPs to back online CBDCs.

Critics of online digital euro payments can be found across the political spectrum.

With diverse parliamentary alliances expected to push for strong privacy protections for any online functionality, the Council will likely need to offer legal guarantees that have been absent from the discussion so far.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat are the two competing models for the digital euro being debated in the EU?

AThe two competing models are an online digital euro, which functions like electronic payments with accounts tied to individuals and validated through bank infrastructure, and an offline digital euro, which operates like digital cash with peer-to-peer transactions and no need for a centralized ledger.

QWhy do privacy advocates in the European Parliament favor an offline-only digital euro?

APrivacy advocates favor an offline-only digital euro because it offers cash-like anonymity for transactions, especially for small payments, and prevents centralized authorities from having unprecedented visibility into consumers' daily spending, which they argue is a risk with online CBDCs.

QWhat is the position of the EU Council regarding the digital euro's functionality?

AThe EU Council adopted a negotiating position on December 19 that favors a hybrid system with both online and offline functionality, aligning closely with the European Commission's 2023 proposal.

QWhat concerns have data protection authorities raised about the online digital euro model?

AThe European Data Protection Board (EDPB) and the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) have warned that the systematic logging of online payments risks violating EU data-minimization principles and lacks strong legal grounding for privacy guarantees.

QWhen are negotiations between the EU Council and the European Parliament on the digital euro expected to take place?

ANegotiations between the EU Council and the European Parliament are set to take place throughout 2026 to resolve the differences in their positions on the digital euro's design and functionality.

İlgili Okumalar

List of Most Popular Altcoins by Recent Hourly Searches Published!

Cryptocurrency data platform CoinGecko released a list of the most popular altcoins based on user searches over the last three hours. Pudgy Penguins ($PENGU) leads the trending list, followed by Catecoin (CATE) and Bless ($BLESS) in the top three. According to CoinGecko, $PENGU's price increased by 3.9% in the last 24 hours. CATE, ranked second, surged 126.2% over the same period, while $BLESS saw a 24-hour gain of 86.1%. What IF (IF) also stands out with a 41.9% daily increase. The list of most searched cryptocurrencies and their total market capitalization over the past three hours is as follows: 1. Pudgy Penguins ($PENGU) – $389.13 million 2. Catecoin (CATE) – $19.62 million 3. Bless ($BLESS) – $32.72 million 4. Aerodrome Finance (AERO) – $385.03 million 5. Hyperliquid (HYPE) – $11.43 billion 6. Ethereum (ETH) – $224.17 billion 7. Chainlink (LINK) – $6.17 billion 8. Aave (AAVE) – $1.42 billion 9. What IF (IF) – $31.24 million 10. Polkadot (DOT) – $1.34 billion 11. Bitcoin (BTC) – $1.27 trillion 12. Virtual Protocol (VIRTUAL) – $366.19 million 13. Algorand (ALGO) – $758.15 million 14. Cash Cat (CASHCAT) – $41.81 million 15. Solana (SOL) – $42.38 billion *This is not investment advice.

cryptonews.ru2 saat önce

List of Most Popular Altcoins by Recent Hourly Searches Published!

cryptonews.ru2 saat önce

For $100,000 a Month: Truth Social Sells Access to Trump's Posts to Investment Firms

In August 2026, Trump Media and Technology Group (TMTG) launched Truth API, a paid data service offering real-time access to posts from influential Truth Social accounts, including Donald Trump's, for institutional and algorithmic trading firms. Subscriptions reportedly cost up to $100,000 monthly, with discounts for long-term contracts. TMTG's CEO framed it as a strategy to monetize platform assets and create shareholder value. The move drew criticism from lawmakers, including Democrats Elizabeth Warren and Adam Schiff, who called for an SEC investigation, and Republican Bill Cassidy, who criticized the "sale" of privileged access. An AI analysis notes this creates a market risk architecture similar to past incidents where algorithms rapidly traded on unverified social media posts, raising questions about accountability for potential misinformation or manipulation.

cryptonews.ru2 saat önce

For $100,000 a Month: Truth Social Sells Access to Trump's Posts to Investment Firms

cryptonews.ru2 saat önce

Strategy leaves preferred STRC dividend at 12% as price still below par

Strategy's preferred STRC shares remain priced significantly below their $100 par value, closing July at $89.46 despite a monthly gain. The company confirmed its August dividend will hold at the recently increased 12% annual rate, paid semi-monthly. Management's stated objective is for the shares to trade at $99-$100, though no timeline was given. The firm reported a large Q2 net loss due to unrealized losses on its Bitcoin holdings but has built a $3.75 billion cash reserve to support preferred dividend payments for over two years. It has also begun repurchasing STRC shares while they trade below par.

cointelegraph4 saat önce

Strategy leaves preferred STRC dividend at 12% as price still below par

cointelegraph4 saat önce

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: Losses Mount Due to Vulnerable Seed Generation A critical vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets has led to a continued wave of fund thefts. According to Galaxy Research, the total stolen has reached 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $88.6 million) from 4,585 addresses, a significant increase from the initial 594.5 BTC reported on July 30, 2026. Most of the stolen funds remain on the attackers' addresses. The issue is not with the current firmware, which Coinkite has updated, but with seed phrases generated on vulnerable devices between March 2021 and the release of fixed firmware versions. Due to a programmer error, devices switched from using a hardware random number generator to the software-based Yasmarang generator, which was initialized with publicly accessible data like the chip's serial number. This made the seed phrases predictable through offline brute-force attacks, meaning wallets remain at risk until funds are moved to a new wallet generated with the patched firmware. Affected devices include Mk2/Mk3 with firmware 4.0.1–4.1.9 (and up to 5.0.3), Mk4/Mk5 up to version 5.6.0, and Q models up to 1.5.0Q. The only exceptions are seeds created with a high-entropy method like at least 50 independent dice rolls or a strong unique BIP-39 passphrase. All other owners must generate a new seed on the fixed firmware and transfer their assets. A case highlighting the human impact involves a 39-year-old long-term investor who lost 2 BTC (approx. $130,000) in minutes. He had accumulated the Bitcoin over eight years through physical labor, viewing it as a financial lifeline and a retirement plan in a country suffering from hyperinflation. His story underscores that even conservative "buy and hold in cold storage" strategies can be compromised by such underlying technical flaws. From a technical perspective, this incident echoes historical failures where weak random number generators undermined cryptographic security, challenging the assumption that offline storage is automatically foolproof.

cryptonews.ru4 saat önce

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

cryptonews.ru4 saat önce

Explosive Growth in Trading Volumes of 15 Altcoins Observed in South Korea!

Major South Korean cryptocurrency exchanges Upbit and Bithumb have reported a significant surge in trading volumes for several altcoins. Over the past 24 hours, the total trading volume for the most popular altcoins reached approximately $347.7 million. MetaDAO (META) led the rankings with a trading volume of $65.84 million on Upbit alone, accounting for 12.39% of the exchange's total spot volume. Euler (EUL) followed in second place with a total volume of $47.65 million across both exchanges. XRP, which consistently attracts substantial interest from Korean investors, achieved a total volume of $38.11 million. Other notable altcoins in the top 15 by trading volume include ThunderCore (TT) at $35.64 million, Babylon (BABY) at $25.15 million, and Shiba Inu (SHIB) at $10.55 million.

cryptonews.ru5 saat önce

Explosive Growth in Trading Volumes of 15 Altcoins Observed in South Korea!

cryptonews.ru5 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot