NVIDIA's Q1 Performance is Solid, Vera CPU Drives Future Increment

marsbit2026-05-21 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-05-21 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

NVIDIA reported solid Q1 FY2027 results and Q2 guidance, largely meeting optimistic investor expectations. Revenue reached $81.62 billion, up 85% year-over-year, with adjusted EPS of $1.87 beating estimates. The company re-segmented its business, highlighting Data Center as the core growth driver, with Hyperscale revenue surging 115%. The most significant new information was the unveiling of the Vera CPU, targeting a new $200 billion market for Agentic AI. It can be sold alongside Rubin GPUs or independently, with production starting in Q3. Management reaffirmed the $1 trillion revenue target for the Blackwell and Rubin platforms through 2027. Q2 revenue guidance of approximately $91 billion aligns with expectations. However, the announcement of a new $80 billion share buyback authorization and a raised dividend, while positive, fell slightly short of some investors' hopes for a larger repurchase plan.

Original Author: SoSoValue Research

NVIDIA released its Q1 FY2027 results. The Q1 performance and Q2 guidance basically met the optimistic expectations of buyers, but the share buyback was slightly below investor expectations. The stock price fell slightly by 1.3% after hours, as the market lacked short-term catalysts, but the long-term growth thesis remains clear.

Q1 Performance Highlights: Solid and in Line with Optimistic Expectations

NVIDIA's Q1 revenue was $81.62 billion, an 85% year-over-year increase and a 20% sequential increase, basically within the buyer's optimistic expectation range of $81-82 billion and higher than the Bloomberg consensus estimate of $78.91 billion. Adjusted gross margin was 75%, up 14.2 percentage points year-over-year, matching the Bloomberg consensus estimate of 75.1%. Adjusted net profit was $45.55 billion, up 139% year-over-year. Adjusted EPS was $1.87, higher than the Bloomberg consensus estimate of $1.77.

This quarter, NVIDIA restructured its revenue segments into Data Center and Edge Computing to better reflect the AI-driven business structure. Within Data Center, hyperscale customer orders are the core growth driver:

  • Data Center revenue was $75.2 billion, up 92% year-over-year and 21% sequentially, higher than the Bloomberg consensus estimate of $73.33 billion.
  1. Hyperscale (including public cloud and large internet companies) revenue was $37.9 billion, up 115% year-over-year, accounting for 50.4% of Data Center revenue. It is the fastest-growing segment and the most important driver of NVIDIA's revenue.
  2. ACIE (AI Cloud, Industry, and Enterprise Applications) revenue was $37.4 billion, up 74% year-over-year, accounting for 49.6%.
  • Edge Computing (Agent & Physical AI, including PC, consoles, workstations, AI-RAN base stations, robots, and automotive) revenue was $6.4 billion, up 29% year-over-year and 10% sequentially.

Earnings Call: Vera CPU is the Most Core Incremental Information

The conference call revealed that the Vera CPU opens up a new $200 billion market for NVIDIA. Designed for Agentic AI, the Vera CPU can be sold alongside the Rubin GPU or independently as a CPU, storage node, or security node. Total CPU revenue is expected to approach $200 billion this year, with mass production and shipping planned to begin in Q3; it represents a new incremental business for NVIDIA.

Management maintained the $1 trillion revenue target for the Blackwell + Rubin platforms from 2025-2027, without an upward revision for now. The Rubin platform will begin mass production in the second half of the year, starting in Q3 with ramp-up in Q4. Shipments are expected to increase significantly in Q1 next year.

Furthermore, Chinese revenue continues to be excluded from guidance. The U.S. government has approved shipments of H200 to Chinese customers, but it's uncertain whether China will allow the imports.

Q2 Guidance Basically Meets Expectations

  • Q2 revenue guidance is $91.0 billion (±2%, excluding any contribution from China), matching the buyer's optimistic expectation of $91.0 billion.
  • Adjusted gross margin is guided to be 75% (±0.5%), basically meeting expectations.

However, buyback was slightly below expectations: The company authorized an additional $80 billion for share repurchases and raised the quarterly dividend to $0.25 per share (from $0.01 previously), slightly below some investors' expectations for over $100 billion in new buyback authorization.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat were the key financial highlights for NVIDIA's Q1 FY2027 according to the article?

ANVIDIA's Q1 FY2027 revenue was $81.62 billion, an 85% year-over-year (YoY) increase and 20% quarter-over-quarter (QoQ). Adjusted gross margin was 75%. Adjusted net profit was $45.55 billion, up 139% YoY, and adjusted EPS was $1.87.

QHow is NVIDIA's business revenue now structured, and which segment showed the fastest growth in Q1?

ANVIDIA has restructured its revenue into Data Center and Edge Computing. The Data Center segment generated $75.2 billion in Q1, growing 92% YoY. Within this, Hyperscale customer revenue grew 115% YoY to $37.9 billion, representing 50.4% of Data Center revenue and was the fastest-growing segment, making it the most important driver for NVIDIA.

QWhat significant new product and market opportunity did NVIDIA announce during the earnings call, according to the article?

ADuring the earnings call, NVIDIA announced the Vera CPU. Designed for Agentic AI, it can be sold alongside Rubin GPUs or independently. It is expected to open up a new $200 billion market for NVIDIA, with total CPU revenue this year projected to be close to $20 billion. Mass production and shipment are planned to start in Q3.

QWhat was NVIDIA's Q2 FY2027 revenue guidance and how did it compare to market expectations?

ANVIDIA's revenue guidance for Q2 FY2027 is $91.0 billion (±2%, excluding any contribution from China). This figure was essentially in line with the bullish buy-side expectation of $91.0 billion.

QWhy was there some disappointment regarding NVIDIA's capital return to shareholders mentioned in the article?

AThe disappointment stemmed from NVIDIA's share repurchase announcement. While the company authorized an additional $80 billion for share buybacks and raised its quarterly dividend to $0.25 per share, this was slightly below some investors' expectations for a new buyback authorization exceeding $100 billion.

İlgili Okumalar

Warsh's First Day in Office, Markets Deliver a 'Wake-up Call': Rate Hike Expected This Year

On his first day in office, newly inaugurated Federal Reserve Chairman Warsh received a stark market warning, with expectations now fully pricing in a 25-basis-point interest rate hike this year. The shift was triggered by hawkish remarks from Fed Governor Waller, who stated that inflation is now the key policy "driver" and that the odds of a hike or cut are evenly split. This sent short-term Treasury yields higher. Waller signaled a significant pivot in his stance, citing disappointing inflation and labor data. He suggested removing "easing bias" language from Fed statements and did not rule out future rate increases if inflation fails to recede, though he noted immediate action isn't warranted without signs of unanchored inflation expectations. Chairman Warsh faces immediate pressure at his first FOMC meeting in June. With the preferred inflation gauge at a three-year high, analysts warn that failing to hike could be interpreted as an implicit easing of policy. The geopolitical situation in the Middle East is adding to existing price pressures. The market's expectation for a hike contrasts sharply with earlier forecasts for multiple cuts. While long-term Treasury yields have been contained by lower energy prices recently, analysts note they remain under structural upward pressure. Warsh's swearing-in at the White House highlights political scrutiny over Fed independence. However, the market has made it clear that inflation is the most urgent challenge, leaving the new chairman little time to settle in.

marsbit57 dk önce

Warsh's First Day in Office, Markets Deliver a 'Wake-up Call': Rate Hike Expected This Year

marsbit57 dk önce

Has Microsoft Lost Its Way in the AI Race, and Can Copilot Bring It Back on Track?

Microsoft, once seen as an early AI frontrunner due to its investment in OpenAI, is navigating a strategic shift amid increased competition. Its initial reliance on OpenAI’s GPT models has been complicated by OpenAI’s growing ambitions as a direct competitor, rapid advancements from rivals like Claude and Gemini, and the disruptive rise of AI agents, which challenge its traditional SaaS business model. These factors contributed to stock declines and slower-than-expected adoption of its flagship Copilot products. In response, CEO Satya Nadella has taken a hands-on role in product development, signaling the urgency of change. Microsoft is pivoting from a model-centric strategy to a "model-agnostic" enterprise platform approach. It aims to become the foundational layer connecting various AI models—from OpenAI, Anthropic, or its own new "Superintelligence" team—with enterprise workflows, data, security, and cloud services. Recent organizational changes merged consumer and enterprise Copilot teams to accelerate innovation, exemplified by new products like Copilot Tasks and Copilot Cowork. However, this transformation comes at a high cost. Microsoft faces massive capital expenditures, potentially reaching ~$190 billion by 2026, to support AI infrastructure. While its platform strategy shows early signs of traction with growing Azure AI revenue, it must balance startup-like agility with the reliability expected by enterprise clients. The core challenge is no longer being the sole AI winner but defending its position as the essential enterprise software entry point amidst rapid technological commoditization and the shift towards always-on AI agents.

marsbit1 saat önce

Has Microsoft Lost Its Way in the AI Race, and Can Copilot Bring It Back on Track?

marsbit1 saat önce

Why Haven't Forex Stablecoins Taken Off?

Why FX Stablecoins Never Took Off: A Path Forward via Synthetic FX Despite the explosive growth of stablecoin-powered digital banking, which has seen ~$6B in VC investment and a 24x surge in crypto card spending in under a year, a major limitation persists: these banks are essentially dollar-only accounts. This leaves 95-99% of global accounts, which are denominated in non-USD currencies, underserved. Attempts to create native foreign currency (FX) stablecoins (like EURC) have largely failed, with total FX stablecoin TVL at ~$600M compared to $400B for USD stablecoins—a 700x gap. These FX tokens face critical challenges: fragile pegs due to low liquidity, limited exchange/FinTech acceptance, poor on/off-ramps, complex regional compliance, and a chicken-and-egg adoption problem. The article argues that the solution lies not in competing with entrenched USD stablecoin networks (USDT/USDC), but in adopting a synthetic FX model inspired by traditional finance. Specifically, it advocates for Mark-to-Market Non-Deliverable Forwards (NDFs)—cash-settled FX derivatives that allow users to maintain underlying USD stablecoin holdings while having their account balance and P&L denominated in a foreign currency. This approach offers key advantages: strong oracle-based pegs, retention of deep USD stablecoin liquidity and yield, superior on/off-ramps, scalability to any currency with a reliable feed, and capital efficiency. It mirrors how modern institutional FX markets operate. Primary use cases for on-chain NDFs include: 1. **Digital Banks/Wallets:** Enabling multi-currency accounts for international users without leaving the USD stablecoin ecosystem, boosting deposits and retention. 2. **FX Carry Trade Vaults:** Offering access to sovereign interest rate differentials (e.g., earning yield on BRL) in a more stable and scalable format than crypto-native products like Ethena. 3. **Global Enterprise Payments:** Allowing merchants to receive payments in local currency equivalents while settling in USD stablecoins, similar to services offered by Stripe for fiat. The conclusion is that synthetic FX, not native FX stablecoins, is the viable path to integrating foreign exchange into the growing stablecoin digital banking landscape, potentially unlocking the next phase of institutional DeFi and multi-trillion-dollar global adoption.

链捕手2 saat önce

Why Haven't Forex Stablecoins Taken Off?

链捕手2 saat önce

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is 'Losing Blood,' How Can Practitioners Survive Better?

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is "Bleeding Out" – How Can Practitioners Survive Better? In a candid reflection, the founder of IOSG Ventures voices deep concerns about the current state of Web3, describing an ecosystem experiencing severe "blood loss." Despite the recent MuShanghai event showcasing a successful pivot towards a more diverse, global community, a somber reality persists: many crypto-native attendees were there exploring exits or new labels in biotech, AI, and robotics. The core issue is identified as a breakdown in the ecosystem's positive feedback loop. Alarmingly, underestimated "low-probability bad events" are occurring simultaneously: a significant brain drain of Chinese developers to AI, a lack of breakout applications despite massive funding, and a widening credibility gap for practitioners globally, often stigmatized as scam artists. This has created a dire接班人 (successor) problem, with the next generation seeing little professional prestige or financial upside in crypto compared to fields like AI. A significant portion of the critique focuses on Ethereum and Vitalik Buterin. While not pessimistic about Ethereum's technology, the founder worries that critical development windows were missed by focusing on niche technical narratives like ZK and L2 instead of mass-market applications. A more urgent concern is that Vitalik may be isolated in an "information bubble," shielded from the grassroots community's hardships by layers of intermediaries, preventing crucial feedback from reaching him. The call is for Vitalik to return to a founder's mindset, re-engage directly with the community, and rally efforts for the next decade. The divergence between U.S. and Chinese OG (Original Gangster) ecosystems is stark. While many U.S. builders reinvest their wealth into the ecosystem, the Chinese scene suffers from a severe lack of "造血能力" (blood-making ability), with most market-driven funds struggling and many early success stories cashing out entirely. This threatens the entire Asian Web3 ecosystem's survival. For individual practitioners, survival advice is pragmatic: find your core "why," maintain life balance beyond token prices, continuously learn new skills (like AI), form small, trusted alliances for mutual support, and practice self-compassion. The industry's greatest need is not money or tech, but lighthouses—individuals at all levels who offer mentorship, grants, referrals, and honest reflection to guide others. The piece concludes with a direct appeal: OGs must pay forward the opportunities the industry gave them; founders must not struggle alone; and builders must continue their work, ensuring it remains a viable profession. The survival of Web3's "cathedral" depends not on any single leader but on the collective responsibility of everyone who remains.

marsbit3 saat önce

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is 'Losing Blood,' How Can Practitioners Survive Better?

marsbit3 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片