NVIDIA Team Enables Programming Agent to Take Over Real Robot Experiments, Achieves 99% Success Rate

marsbit2026-06-18 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-06-18 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

NVIDIA's ENPIRE project demonstrates fully automated robotic research where AI agents, given only high-level goals, autonomously manage the entire loop—from literature search and code development to training, deployment, and hardware iteration—on a fleet of physical robots. The system achieves 99% success rates on dexterous real-world tasks like cable tying and peg sorting. Key insights include the discovery of a "physical scaling law" where more parallel robots speed up task resolution, and the observation that resetting an environment is often easier than the main task. The framework introduces metrics like Mean Robot Utilization (MRU) to measure efficiency, with robots often idle half the time, waiting for agent decisions. The long-term vision is a lab that runs autonomously, even without human oversight. The project will be open-sourced, allowing developers to build similar systems.

Automated research has truly stepped out of the code sandbox and into the real physical world.

Recently, Jim Fan, lead of NVIDIA's GEAR lab, introduced a new project called ENPIRE. This marks their first implementation of automated research on robot hardware.

They placed 8 Codex Agents into a robot fleet, allocated GPU computing power and ample token budgets, and gave a simple goal: solve the task as quickly as possible, keep the robots busy but safe, and avoid wasting computing power.

After that, human intervention was largely withdrawn. The Agents autonomously drove the entire closed loop, including automatic scene resetting, literature review, idea implementation and infrastructure setup, policy training and deployment, self-verification, log analysis and code improvement, iterating continuously until high-precision dexterous tasks were reliably completed on real hardware, such as fastening cable ties, organizing pins into a box, installing GPUs, etc.

They also observed a "physical scaling law": increasing the number of parallel robots (e.g., from a few to 8) significantly sped up task resolution.

Currently, part of the lab's systems can perform self-iteration overnight without human intervention, with researchers only needing to check reports in the morning.

Jim Fan stated that the future goal is to allow team members to go on vacation with peace of mind, with even NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang unaware that the lab is still running autonomously.

The ENPIRE project plans to be fully open-sourced, potentially enabling regular developers to set up similar autonomous robot research systems at home.

Project address: https://research.nvidia.com/labs/gear/enpire/

ENPIRE System Architecture: Four Modules Forming a Closed Loop

ENPIRE is a framework system designed for coding Agents, constructing a repeatable physical feedback loop through four core modules: the Environment module (EN) handles automatic resetting and verification; the Policy Improvement module (PI) initiates policy optimization; the Rollout module (R) supports policy evaluation on single or multiple robots in parallel; and the Evolution module (E) enables coding Agents to analyze logs, review literature, and improve training infrastructure and algorithm code to address failure modes.

This closed-loop system transforms real-world robot learning into an Agent-managed, controllable optimization process, thereby minimizing manual input while supporting fair ablation experiments across different training recipes and Agent variants.

Supported by ENPIRE, cutting-edge programming Agents can autonomously develop policies and achieve a 99% success rate on challenging real-world dexterous manipulation tasks like PushT, organizing pins into a pin box, and cutting cable ties with a cutter.

Key Finding: Resetting the Environment is Often Easier Than Completing the Task Itself

One key observation is: For many robot tasks, resetting the environment is often easier than completing the task itself.

Therefore, ENPIRE's approach is to first let the Agent build an automatic resetting environment via Code-as-Policy. Often, the so-called reset is essentially a pick-and-place task, solvable by Cap-X.

Subsequently, the agent writes a heuristic rule-based reward function. The research team then places this environment into a sandbox and initiates automated research by the Agent centered around scoring.

This also echoes Karpathy's definition of automated research: automated research here is not simply tuning a hyperparameter or modifying a small piece of code. The Agent explores different paradigms from the internet and rewrites anything that could potentially boost performance, including algorithms, training objectives, and even the data loader.

In the pin task, one Agent even wrote its own contact force safety controller, which proved more effective than merely adjusting several reinforcement learning parameters.

New Metrics MRU and MTU

ENPIRE's scalability depends on the size of the Agent team and computing resources, but here, the truly scarce resource is not GPUs, but robot time.

When the research team provided Agents with 8 robots instead of 1, the time needed for the pin task to achieve near-perfect performance was reduced from over 1.5 hours to about 40 minutes. These Agents coordinate via Git: sharing code, discarding suboptimal ideas, and autonomously selecting each other's best-performing runs.

This points to a larger shift: robotics research is becoming a work of environment design—building environments where coding Agents can conduct automated research; algorithmic work is shifting to a higher layer, towards constructing feedback loops that Agents can autonomously close.

And this loop compounds continuously: a skill mastered by an Agent today becomes the building block for constructing and resetting environments for more difficult tasks tomorrow. Capabilities bootstrap new capabilities.

Under this paradigm, the true hard constraint is the budget for real-world interaction.

Therefore, the research team proposed two metrics:

  • Mean Robot Utilization (MRU): The proportion of time robots are actually running experiments relative to total elapsed real-world time.
  • Mean Token Utilization (MTU): Measures the efficiency of Agents in converting tokens into research progress.

In their experiments, MRU consistently remained below 50%. That means the robots were idle half the time, waiting for the Agents to think. Therefore, a better harness and faster models directly translate into tangible benefits.

PushT is a long-standing robot manipulation benchmark. Typically, completing this task requires extensive human demonstration data plus hours of behavior cloning training.

However, they observed that Codex, Claude Code, and Kimi Code all "solved" this task in under 2 hours using a rule-based heuristic approach: without neural networks, without training, and without relying on any human data.

To enable more people to experiment with automated research in the physical world at home, they developed a full-stack system based on the @LeRobotHF SO-101 kit + NVIDIA Jetson Thor. This system can perform the PushT task.

Reference Links:

https://x.com/_wenlixiao/status/2066913334994358342

https://x.com/DrJimFan/status/2066921736369766762

This article is from the WeChat public account "Machine Heart" (ID: almosthuman2014), author: Yang Wen

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the key achievement of the ENPIRE project as described in the article?

AThe ENPIRE project by NVIDIA's GEAR lab has, for the first time, successfully implemented automated research on physical robot hardware. This involved 8 Codex Agents autonomously driving a closed-loop process to solve complex, high-precision dexterous manipulation tasks like tying zip ties and organizing a pin box, achieving a success rate of 99% with minimal human intervention.

QWhat are the four core modules that make up the ENPIRE system's closed-loop architecture?

AThe four core modules are: the Environment (EN) module for automatic resetting and validation, the Policy Improvement (PI) module for initiating policy optimization, the Rollout (R) module for evaluating policies on single or multiple robots, and the Evolution (E) module where coding agents analyze logs, consult literature, and improve infrastructure and code to address failure modes.

QWhat key insight regarding task difficulty did the researchers discover, and how did ENPIRE leverage it?

AA key observation was that resetting a robot environment is often easier than completing the main task itself. ENPIRE leverages this by first having agents build an automatic reset environment (often a simple pick-and-place task) using Code-as-Policy. This automated reset capability is crucial for enabling continuous, unattended experimentation.

QAccording to the article, what new metrics were proposed to measure the efficiency of this automated research paradigm, and what does a low MRU indicate?

ATwo new metrics were proposed: Mean Robot Utilization (MRU), which measures the proportion of time robots are actively running experiments, and Mean Token Utilization (MTU), which measures how efficiently agent tokens are converted into research progress. In their experiments, MRU was below 50%, indicating robots spent over half their time idle, waiting for the agents to think, highlighting a bottleneck.

QWhat future vision did Jim Fan, leader of the NVIDIA GEAR lab, describe for the ENPIRE system?

AJim Fan's stated future goal is for the lab team to be able to go on vacation comfortably, with the system running so autonomously that even NVIDIA's CEO, Jensen Huang, would be unaware that the laboratory continues to operate and conduct research on its own.

İlgili Okumalar

Polymarket's Sixth Anniversary: Bathroom, Exile, and Homecoming

Polymarket, a prediction market platform, recently celebrated its sixth anniversary. Born during New York's COVID-19 lockdown, founder Shayne Coplan built the initial product from his bathroom. The platform allows users to trade on the outcomes of real-world events, aiming to aggregate information faster than traditional media or polls. Its early years involved navigating regulatory challenges, most notably a 2022 CFTC order and penalty for offering unregistered event contracts, which led to a ban on U.S. users. Despite this "exile," the platform persisted, gaining significant traction during major news events like the 2024 U.S. presidential election, where its markets often preceded mainstream narratives. A pivotal shift occurred in 2025. Following the conclusion of a DOJ/CFTC investigation, Polymarket strategically acquired a CFTC-regulated exchange (QCX) to re-enter the U.S. market legally. It secured a massive strategic investment from Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), NYSE's parent company, and formed high-profile partnerships with sports leagues like the NHL, UFC, and MLB, as well as media outlets including Google and the Wall Street Journal. Now valued in the tens of billions, Polymarket stands at the intersection of crypto, finance, media, and sports. Its journey reflects a constant tension between innovative information aggregation and regulatory scrutiny, evolving from a fringe crypto experiment into a mainstream, albeit still contested, financial and data infrastructure.

marsbit16 dk önce

Polymarket's Sixth Anniversary: Bathroom, Exile, and Homecoming

marsbit16 dk önce

The 'Side Hustle Survival' of DAT Companies: After the Accumulation Flywheel Stops, They Begin Self-Rescue

"Metaplanet's 'Side Hustle Survival': After the 'Crypto Hoarding Flywheel' Stops, They Begin Self-Rescue" The article discusses the strategic pivot of Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies as the once-lucrative model of hoarding cryptocurrencies, pioneered by MicroStrategy, faces challenges. With the crypto bear market and the rise of ETFs offering direct, low-premium exposure, many DAT firms are abandoning the passive treasury model. Prominent examples include ETHZilla, which sold ETH to repay debt and shifted to RWA tokenization, and others like Prenetics Global exiting completely. Facing stalled growth, remaining companies are pursuing two main survival paths. The first path is transforming into institutional crypto asset management platforms and yield funds. SharpLink Gaming exemplifies this by staking 100% of its ETH and partnering with Galaxy Digital to launch a yield fund. GameSquare is taking a more aggressive approach, using AI-driven algorithms across DeFi protocols to seek higher returns. The second path involves becoming blockchain infrastructure operators, particularly in the Solana ecosystem. Companies like DeFi Development and SOL Strategies are moving beyond holding SOL to operating validator networks and launching liquid staking tokens, building fee-based revenue models from ecosystem participation. The article notes these transitions reflect a broader industry maturation, shifting from financial engineering to building operational moats through technology, network effects, and deep ecosystem integration. However, risks remain, including DeFi protocol vulnerabilities and dependence on specific blockchain networks' health. Ultimately, this collective shift signals that in crypto, sustainable value comes not from capital games but from active participation, cash flow generation, and providing real utility—a necessary, if painful, step towards industry maturity.

marsbit17 dk önce

The 'Side Hustle Survival' of DAT Companies: After the Accumulation Flywheel Stops, They Begin Self-Rescue

marsbit17 dk önce

Annual Revenue of 13 Billion, Paying 17.2 Billion to Microsoft: The Truth Behind AI's Money-Burning in OpenAI's Leaked Ledger

Leaked OpenAI financial documents from June 2026 revealed that in 2025, the company achieved $13.07 billion in revenue, a 253% growth from 2024. However, this was accompanied by an operational loss of $20.92 billion and a net loss of roughly $8 billion. Despite ChatGPT surpassing 900 million weekly active users, the "burn rate" remained high: for every $1 earned, $1.60 was spent. The cost structure shows $34 billion in total costs. R&D was the largest expense at $19.18 billion, which included $10.59 billion paid to Microsoft. Compute costs for model inference were $7.5 billion, with sales and marketing at $5.73 billion. Notably, total payments to Microsoft reached $17.2 billion, accounting for over 50% of OpenAI's total costs and exceeding its annual revenue, highlighting a significant structural burden. This high-cost, high-loss model is an industry-wide trend. xAI reported a 2025 operational loss of $6.4 billion against $3.2 billion in revenue, spending $3 for every $1 earned. Anthropic, with a reported $90 billion annualized revenue by late 2025, also faced pressure with a 40% gross margin, lower than expected due to high inference costs. Combined, these top three firms' operational losses surpassed $30 billion in 2025. OpenAI's vast user base presents a monetization challenge. With only about 50 million of its 900 million weekly users paying (a ~5.6% conversion rate), the compute cost of serving free users is substantial. This contrasts with strategies like Anthropic's, which focuses on premium pricing for enterprise clients. The industry's path to profitability hinges on dramatically reducing marginal costs, particularly for inference, through innovations in specialized chips or model efficiency. Until then, massive capital inflows—like OpenAI's $122 billion funding round in March 2026—remain essential to fund the relentless pursuit of scale and advanced capabilities.

marsbit29 dk önce

Annual Revenue of 13 Billion, Paying 17.2 Billion to Microsoft: The Truth Behind AI's Money-Burning in OpenAI's Leaked Ledger

marsbit29 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片