NVIDIA Earnings Countdown: Beating Expectations Is a Near Certainty, but Wall Street Is Most Concerned About These Five Questions

marsbit2026-05-20 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-05-20 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

NVIDIA Earnings Countdown: Beating Expectations is a Given, but Wall Street Cares Most About These Five Issues The upcoming NVIDIA Q1 earnings report is expected to easily surpass the consensus revenue estimate of ~$78.7B. However, Wall Street's focus has shifted from the numbers themselves to five key strategic questions. **1. Shareholder Returns: Will "Frugality" Change?** Despite being the S&P 500's largest company, NVIDIA's shareholder returns (dividends + buybacks) averaged only 47% of its free cash flow from 2022-2025, far below the 80% peer average and its own historical norm. Its 0.02% dividend yield also lags the peer average of 0.89%. This low cash return, partly due to investments in AI ecosystem partners, is cited as a core reason for NVIDIA's valuation discount compared to other "Magnificent 7" stocks. Increasing returns could attract long-term income funds and be a catalyst. **2. Vera Rubin: The Next-Gen Chip Timeline** Analysts expect the next-generation Vera Rubin (R200) platform to ramp in the second half of 2026, following the current Blackwell series. It will use TSMC's 3nm process and share Blackwell Ultra's "Oberon" rack architecture, suggesting a smooth transition with limited gross margin impact. The market also awaits any update on NVIDIA's $1 trillion cumulative revenue forecast for 2025-2027. **3. Gross Margin: Can the 75% Level Hold?** Gross margin, a key valuation support, is expected to stabilize in the near term due to the shared architecture...

Original Author: Long Yue

Original Source: Wall Street News

NVIDIA earnings season—the most important thing is no longer the numbers themselves.

On May 18, Bank of America Securities analyst Vivek Arya's team released a preview report for NVIDIA's Q1 earnings, which will be announced after the U.S. market close on Wednesday, May 20.

According to NVIDIA's historical pattern over the past ten quarters, actual revenue has averaged 7% to 8% above management guidance. Management previously provided F1Q27 revenue guidance of $78 billion. Based on this calculation, actual revenue is highly likely to fall in the range of $83 billion to $84 billion, while the current market consensus is only $78.7 billion.

In other words, 'beating expectations' is almost a foregone conclusion. But analysts believe what will truly move the market's nerve after the earnings release are the following five questions.

Cash Return: Can NVIDIA Change Its 'Stinginess'?

This is the most discussed topic in the report and is considered by them to be the core reason for NVIDIA's long-term valuation discount.

NVIDIA is currently the largest company by market cap in the S&P 500, accounting for a high weight of 8.3% in the index, exceeding the historical peaks of Apple (7.9%) and Microsoft (7.2%). However, the problem is that NVIDIA's shareholder return efforts are severely mismatched with its size.

The data is straightforward: from 2022 to 2025, NVIDIA's free cash flow payout ratio (dividends + buybacks) averaged only 47%, while the average for comparable peers in the same period was 80%. Even NVIDIA's own average over the previous ten years was 80%.

Meanwhile, NVIDIA's current dividend yield is only 0.02%, while the peer average is 0.89%. Among equity income funds, NVIDIA is held by only 16% of funds, while Microsoft is held by 57% and Apple by 32%.

Where is the money going? Analysts point out that NVIDIA is investing heavily in the ecosystem—OpenAI, Anthropic, technology partners. These investments are seen as controversial by some outsiders, with voices suggesting it's "round-trip financing"—NVIDIA lends money to customers, who then use that money to buy NVIDIA's chips.

How large is the valuation discount? Data shows that NVIDIA's forward P/E ratio for 2026/2027 is 26x/19x, while the mean for other 'Magnificent Seven' members is 49x/42x, representing a discount of nearly 50%.

A more specific comparison: analysts predict NVIDIA's combined free cash flow for 2026+2027 will exceed $430 billion, higher than the combined ~$375 billion for Apple and Microsoft. However, NVIDIA's market cap is approximately $5.46 trillion, about 28% lower than the combined $7.5 trillion for Apple and Microsoft.

Analysts believe that if NVIDIA increases its dividend and buyback efforts, it could attract more long-term funds that prefer income, narrowing the valuation discount while also dispelling concerns about "round-trip financing." They list this change as a "potential catalyst for the second half of the year."

Vera Rubin: When Will the Next-Generation Chip Arrive?

NVIDIA's current main products are the Blackwell series. The market is concerned: when will the next-generation Vera Rubin platform officially ramp up?

The bank's judgment is the second half of 2026. Vera Rubin (codenamed R200) uses TSMC's 3nm process and shares the "Oberon" rack architecture with Blackwell Ultra, making the product transition relatively smooth, with limited expected impact on gross margins.

Looking further ahead, Vera Rubin Ultra (codenamed VR300) will be launched in the second half of 2027, featuring a completely new "Kyber" rack architecture, while the cost proportion of High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) will also further increase.

The market also wants to hear NVIDIA's latest stance on the "trillion-dollar revenue forecast" during the earnings call—NVIDIA previously gave an outlook for cumulative revenue of $1 trillion from 2025 to 2027, but contributions from LPU (Language Processing Unit) racks, CPUs, and Vera Rubin Ultra have not yet been included. Will this be updated this time?

Gross Margin: Can the 75% Defense Line Hold?

Gross margin is one of the core supports of NVIDIA's valuation.

Analysts judge: in the short term, because Vera Rubin reuses Blackwell's rack architecture, gross margins are relatively stable during the product transition period. However, in the medium to long term, the rising proportion of HBM memory costs is a persistent pressure source.

Market consensus shows NVIDIA's gross margin fluctuating within the 74% to 75% range. The bank has no disagreement with this but emphasizes that any better-than-expected gross margin performance will be a positive catalyst.

How Will the AI Accelerator Market Size Forecast Be Updated?

Bank of America previously provided NVIDIA's "trillion-dollar" prediction framework for the AI market from 2025 to 2027. This earnings report, the market is focused on whether NVIDIA will update this forecast, especially by incorporating three new growth drivers previously not counted:

  1. LPU (Language Processing Unit) racks
  2. Vera CPU (NVIDIA's self-developed server CPU)
  3. Vera Rubin Ultra

The bank expects that by 2030, the overall AI accelerator market size will reach approximately $1.17 trillion, with NVIDIA maintaining about 68% to 70% market share.

Specifically, NVIDIA's AI accelerator revenue is expected to grow from $102.2 billion in 2024 to $800 billion in 2030, AMD from $5 billion to $80.1 billion over the same period, and Broadcom from $9.3 billion to $181.9 billion.

Is the Competitive Threat from Google TPU and CPU Exaggerated?

A narrative has been circulating in the market recently: as AI enters the "Agentic AI" era, the importance of CPUs will surpass that of GPUs, thus threatening NVIDIA's moat.

The bank clearly disagrees with this, providing two reasons:

First, NVIDIA's self-developed "Vera CPU" will have new progress disclosed at the upcoming Computex conference, and its competitiveness in the standalone CPU market should not be underestimated.

Second, in already large-scale deployments of Blackwell and TPU clusters, the CPU-to-GPU ratio is already 1:2, which does not align with the narrative that "Agentic AI requires more CPUs."

The conclusion is: while the CPU market is large, there are many competitors (with strong contenders in both x86 and ARM architectures). NVIDIA's dominant position in the GPU/AI accelerator field is difficult to shake in the short term. It is estimated that by 2030, NVIDIA will maintain approximately 70% revenue share in a total addressable AI market exceeding $1.7 trillion.

Valuation: A 'Tech Leader' at a 50% Discount

Finally, back to valuation. The report uses a set of data to directly highlight NVIDIA's current valuation paradox.

Based on CY26/27 forward P/E ratios, NVIDIA is at 26x/19x, while the "Magnificent Seven" (Mag-7) average is 49x/42x—NVIDIA is at a nearly 50% discount.

Based on EV/FCF (Enterprise Value/Free Cash Flow), NVIDIA is at 28x/20x, while the Mag-7 average is 83x/59x—a discount exceeding 66%.

Based on PEG (Price/Earnings to Growth ratio), NVIDIA is at 0.41x, while the Mag-7 average is 2.61x, and the S&P 500 overall is above 1.3x.

Bank of America maintains a "Buy" rating with a price target of $320, based on a CY27 forward P/E ratio of 28x (excluding cash), which is at the mid-to-low end of NVIDIA's historical valuation range of 25x to 56x.

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the report, what is the core reason for NVIDIA's valuation discount relative to its 'Magnificent 7' peers?

AThe core reason is NVIDIA's relatively low shareholder return rate (dividends + buybacks). Its average free cash flow return rate from 2022-2025 is only 47%, compared to an industry average and its own ten-year historical average of 80%. Its low dividend yield of 0.02% (vs. peer avg. 0.89%) means fewer income-focused funds hold its stock, contributing to the valuation gap.

QWhen does Bank of America's analyst team expect NVIDIA's next-generation Vera Rubin platform to ramp up in volume?

AThe analyst team expects the Vera Rubin platform (code R200) to ramp up in volume in the second half of 2026.

QWhat are the three new growth areas that could be included in an update to NVIDIA's 'trillion-dollar revenue' forecast?

AThe three new growth areas are: 1) LPU (Language Processing Unit) racks, 2) Vera CPU (NVIDIA's self-developed server CPU), and 3) Vera Rubin Ultra.

QWhat two reasons does the report give for downplaying the competitive threat from CPUs (like Google's TPU) to NVIDIA?

A1) NVIDIA's self-developed 'Vera CPU' is a competitive contender in the standalone CPU market, with new details expected at Computex. 2) In already deployed large-scale Blackwell and TPU clusters, the CPU-to-GPU ratio is already 1:2, which doesn't support the narrative that 'Agentic AI' requires significantly more CPUs.

QWhat is Bank of America's price target for NVIDIA and what is the valuation metric used to derive it?

ABank of America maintains a 'Buy' rating with a $320 price target. This target is based on a CY27 estimated P/E of 28x (excluding cash), which is at the low-to-mid range of NVIDIA's historical valuation range of 25x to 56x.

İlgili Okumalar

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbit5 saat önce

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbit5 saat önce

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbit6 saat önce

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbit6 saat önce

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbit6 saat önce

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbit6 saat önce

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbit6 saat önce

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbit6 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片