‘No deposit flight’: Galaxy disputes Standard Chartered’s $500B stablecoin risk

ambcrypto2026-01-28 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-28 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Standard Chartered Bank warns that U.S. banks, particularly regional ones, could lose $500 billion in deposits by 2028 due to growing adoption of stablecoins, which they see as a structural risk. The bank also projects the stablecoin market could grow to $2 trillion in the same period. However, Galaxy’s head of research, Alex Thorn, disputes the idea of "deposit flight," arguing that funds would merely "migrate" rather than leave the banking system entirely. He compares it to money market funds, where cash ultimately returns to banks through treasury purchases. The debate highlights ongoing tensions between the crypto and banking industries.

Crypto leaders continue to downplay the perceived risk of stablecoin adoption to traditional banks.

In a recent report, Standard Chartered Bank warned that U.S. banks risk losing $500 billion in deposit outflows by 2028, citing growing stablecoin adoption as a structural risk.

According to the Standard Chartered head of digital asset research, Geoffrey Kendrick, the risk has become more apparent as payments and other core banking activities continue to migrate to on-chain alternatives.

Previously, Kendrick projected that stablecoins could attract $1 trillion from emerging markets over the same period.

Additionally, the bank estimated that the overall stablecoin market could grow to $2 trillion over the same period, suggesting that nearly three-quarters of the boom may come from emerging markets and U.S. banks.

Currently, the stablecoin market cap is above $300 billion.

Galaxy downplays bank fears

However, Galaxy’s head of research, Alex Thorn, dismissed the projection, saying that,

“There is no such thing as deposit flight.”

Drawing parallels to savings accounts and money market funds (MMF), Thorn said,

“Investors have been pulling cash from their ‘savings’ accounts and putting the cash in money market funds for years. But when you invest in an MMF, the fund buys treasuries... where do they buy treasuries? from a seller who takes the cash and... puts it in their bank.”

Similarly, for stablecoins, users’ bank account dollars will end up with the stablecoin issuer, which will eventually buy treasury bonds. The seller of the bonds will then park the cash proceeds in the bank, Thorn added.

He reframed that there won’t be a deposit ‘flight,’ but a ‘migration.’

“There could be some ‘deposit migration,’ if there are banks that do not offer competitive enough services.”

Regional banks at highest risk

According to Kendrick, however, stablecoin adoption will likely impact regional banks that heavily depend on a deposit-funded lending model for interest income (orange).

But diversified (green) and investment banks (yellow) had moderate to low risk to the ‘deposit flight’ fears due to low dependence on interest income.

This was part of the simmering tensions behind the scenes over stablecoin yield that have pitted the crypto and banking industries and threatened to derail the crypto market structure bill.

Although the White House had instructed the parties to reach a ‘compromise’ on the issue to let the bill advance out of the committee vote, progress on this has not yet been made public, as of writing.


Final Thoughts

  • Standard Chartered projected that U.S. regional banks may lose $500 billion in deposits due to the stablecoin boom by 2028.
  • But Galaxy’s Thorn has pushed back against the ‘deposit flight’ framing, claiming that money will just ‘migrate’ to competitive alternatives.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the main risk to U.S. banks identified by Standard Chartered in its recent report?

AStandard Chartered warned that U.S. banks risk losing $500 billion in deposit outflows by 2028 due to growing stablecoin adoption, which it cited as a structural risk.

QHow does Galaxy's head of research, Alex Thorn, characterize the movement of deposits from banks to stablecoins?

AAlex Thorn reframes the concept, stating there won't be a deposit 'flight' but rather a 'migration,' arguing that the money ultimately cycles back into the banking system when stablecoin issuers buy treasury bonds.

QAccording to the article, which type of banks are at the highest risk from stablecoin adoption?

ARegional banks that heavily rely on a deposit-funded lending model for interest income are identified as being at the highest risk from stablecoin adoption.

QWhat was Geoffrey Kendrick's previous projection regarding stablecoins and emerging markets?

APreviously, Geoffrey Kendrick projected that stablecoins could attract $1 trillion from emerging markets by 2028.

QWhat is the current estimated size of the stablecoin market, and what is its projected growth by 2028 according to the report?

AThe current stablecoin market cap is above $300 billion, and Standard Chartered estimated it could grow to $2 trillion by 2028.

İlgili Okumalar

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

This article, "From Companies to DAOs: How DUNA Could Become the Next Organizational Form," traces the 500-year evolution of business collaboration. It begins with medieval structures like the *commenda* and Florentine *compagnia*, which exposed partners to personal risk. The modern corporation, exemplified by the Dutch East India Company (VOC), was a revolutionary leap, enabling large-scale, capital-intensive ventures by offering limited liability and reducing coordination costs. However, corporations introduced new challenges like principal-agent problems and bureaucratic overhead. The piece argues that software and internet-native protocols are now reducing these traditional overheads. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) emerged as a new model for coordination without centralized management. Yet, DAOs face a significant legal vacuum: they lack legal recognition, leaving members exposed to unlimited personal liability, and their tokens are vulnerable to being classified as securities under unclear regulations (e.g., the Howey Test). This has forced projects into suboptimal workarounds like offshore foundations. The article identifies the Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association (DUNA) as a potential solution. Recently legalized in states like Wyoming, the DUNA provides a legal wrapper for decentralized networks. It grants key protections—legal personality, limited liability, and perpetual existence—to a group without imposing a traditional hierarchical management structure. This allows token-holder communities to govern, hold assets, and contract as a single legal entity, aligning with their decentralized nature. While DUNA doesn't solve all governance challenges or magically resolve securities law questions, it represents a crucial step. It fills the legal recognition gap, offering a native legal form for internet-scale, decentralized collaboration and extending the separation of personal risk from organizational venture into a new domain.

marsbit1 dk önce

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

marsbit1 dk önce

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

The 2026 Mid-Year Report on On-Chain RWA highlights a significant growth in tokenized stock market capitalization, which nearly doubled from $951 million in March to $1.89 billion by July. However, the report reveals a fundamental contradiction in this "layer 2.5" ecosystem: products with the strongest legal foundation (like regulated U.S. infrastructure) lack liquidity and distribution, while freely tradable offshored wrapper products often lack substantive ownership rights. The increase is driven largely by a few products (SECZ, FGRS, STRCx) and platforms (Ondo, xStocks, Securitize collectively hold over 85% share). While distributed value across networks like Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain has grown, the market remains fragmented. Products referencing the same underlying asset (e.g., Apple stock) are distinct legal liabilities with different intermediaries and jurisdictional rules, offering varying degrees of legal claim. The report cautions that headline numbers are misleading, as they reflect changes in distributed token value—driven by issuance, conversions, and price movements—not pure investor inflows. True "canonical shares" with legal ownership, wide wallet distribution, institutional liquidity, and independent on-chain price discovery do not yet exist at scale. Tokenized treasuries show stronger product-market fit, and ETFs may be easier to scale than single stocks. The core takeaway is a trade-off: legal certainty versus liquidity and composability.

marsbit50 dk önce

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

marsbit50 dk önce

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: 594 Bitcoin Withdrawn in 25 Minutes

The Coldcard hardware wallet has been compromised, with hackers stealing approximately 594.5 Bitcoin (~$40 million) from 500 addresses in just 25 minutes. The root cause was a critical software bug, undetected for five years, which disabled the device's secure chip for generating true random numbers. This led to the creation of private keys based on predictable data like the processor's serial number, drastically reducing cryptographic security. The attackers exploited this offline by brute-forcing possible seed phrases, finding active addresses on the public ledger, and signing transactions. Initially, Coinkite (Coldcard's maker) claimed only older models were at risk but later admitted all devices running the compromised firmware were vulnerable. CEO Rodolphe Novak (NVK) apologized but ruled out financial compensation for affected users. To secure funds, owners must urgently update their firmware to specific safe versions, generate a completely new seed phrase on the updated device, and transfer all assets to new addresses created with that new seed. While a BIP-39 passphrase can help, it does not replace this migration process. Other Coinkite products like TAPSIGNER were not affected. This incident underscores that even specialized hardware requires rigorous, independent code audits, especially for cryptographic functions. It parallels past failures, like a 2006 OpenSSL bug in Debian, and raises questions about whether automated code analysis can ever fully replace human scrutiny in critical security areas.

cryptonews.ru3 saat önce

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: 594 Bitcoin Withdrawn in 25 Minutes

cryptonews.ru3 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片