New York Times Interview with Trump: 7 Key Points on the Logic of Power

Odaily星球日报2026-01-12 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-12 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

In a rare two-hour Oval Office interview, President Trump outlined his power philosophy to The New York Times, stating his authority is constrained only by his own morality, not international law. Key points include: He has chosen the next Fed Chair, demanding they support his low-interest-rate agenda. He ruled out pardons for figures like SBF, Maduro, or Sean Combs. U.S. control over Venezuela's oil may last "much longer" than expected. He defended his family's crypto and business dealings, citing public indifference. On sovereignty, he insisted owning Greenland is psychologically crucial versus leasing. He revealed a "de-naturalization" plan targeting some naturalized citizens, particularly Somali-Americans, for fraud. The interview showcased his "coercive diplomacy," using unpredictability and military threats to influence nations, as seen in a call with Colombia's president during the meeting.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | jk

In the Oval Office of the White House this week, four New York Times reporters faced President Trump for a rare, nearly two-hour long interview.

"My power is constrained by only one thing, which is my own morality," Trump said. "I don't need international law." In the interview, he discussed topics ranging from Venezuela to Greenland, from the Federal Reserve to family business, and from immigration policy to pardon lists. This interview essentially clarified the logic of power for Trump's second term.

Here are the seven key points you need to know from this interview.

Has Chosen Next Fed Chair Nominee, But Refuses to Reveal

Trump stated that he has already decided whom to nominate as the next Federal Reserve Chair but refused to reveal the choice during the interview. "I've made a decision in my mind," he said during the interview on Wednesday evening, "but I haven't discussed it with anyone yet."

When specifically asked about his chief economic advisor, Kevin A. Hassett, Trump said, "I don't want to say," but described him as "certainly one of the people I like."

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated at an event on Thursday that he expects Trump to make a decision on the Fed Chair this month, possibly around the time of the World Economic Forum in Davos. Bessent also hinted that the job was not guaranteed for Hassett, saying there were a total of four candidates.

According to the original purpose of the U.S. Congress, the Federal Reserve needs to be protected from political interference to ensure the central bank can pursue low and stable inflation and a healthy labor market unimpeded. But Trump has been outspoken in his desire to see the central bank act according to his wishes.

Trump made it clear that his choice for Fed Chair must support lowering borrowing costs, even stating outright that anyone who disagrees with his views would never get the job.

Whoever Trump chooses, the successor will take over the Fed at a critical juncture. At this moment, Trump is pressuring the Fed to significantly reduce borrowing costs. Powell will serve as Chair until his term ends in May; he has become a frequent target of Trump's attacks. It's hard to imagine what storm the next chair would face if they fail to meet the president's demands.

No Intention to Pardon SBF, Nor Other High-Profile Figures

Trump also stated he has no intention to pardon Sam Bankman-Fried. This question was raised when the New York Times asked Trump if he would pardon a series of high-profile individuals.

Other prominent figures mentioned included:

  • Nicolás Maduro: The recently captured leader of Venezuela, facing charges of narcoterrorism and conspiracy to import cocaine;
  • Robert Menendez: Former senator from New Jersey, convicted in 2024 for trading political influence for gold, cash, and a Mercedes convertible;
  • Sean Combs (aka Puff Daddy or Diddy): Reportedly wrote a letter to President Trump seeking a pardon, but Trump indicated he would not consider approving the request.

When asked if he would consider pardoning Derek Chauvin, the former Minneapolis police officer who knelt on George Floyd's neck during the 2020 arrest, Trump said, "No one has asked me that question."

Trump pardoned former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández last month, but when the New York Times asked if he would consider pardoning Maduro, who also faces drug trafficking charges, the president said, "No, I don't think so."

Maduro has pleaded not guilty to the federal charges.

U.S. Control Over Venezuela Could Last for Years

Trump indicated that U.S. oversight and oil extraction in Venezuela could last for many years. When asked if the duration would be three months, six months, a year, or even longer, he replied, "I would say much longer."

Trump expects the U.S. to operate in Venezuela for years to come and extract oil from the country's vast oil reserves. The U.S. has already announced it will receive 30 to 50 million barrels of Venezuelan heavy crude. However, Trump also acknowledged that reviving Venezuela's neglected oil industry will take years.

Trump expressed great pride in the successful operation to capture Maduro, stating he followed the training process of the operation forces throughout and revealed that the forces built a one-to-one scale model of the Caracas fortification at a military facility in Kentucky for this operation.

Trump emphasized that Maduro's allies, now the interim government, are "giving us everything we deem necessary."

Trump also sidestepped several questions: about why he recognized Maduro's vice president, Delcy Rodríguez, as the new leader of Venezuela, why he did not support opposition leader Machado, and made no mention of when elections would be held in Venezuela.

When asked how long the U.S. government would demand direct oversight of this South American country, he said, "Only time will tell."

Trump made these comments hours after government officials stated that the U.S. plans to effectively control Venezuela's oil sales indefinitely, as part of a three-phase plan outlined by Secretary of State Rubio to members of Congress.

"I Don't Need International Law," Trump Says His Power Is Constrained Only by "Own Morality"

When asked if there were any limits to his global power, Trump gave his most straightforward statement: "Yes, one thing. My own sense of morality. My own ideas. That's the only thing that stops me."

He added: "I don't need international law. I'm not out to hurt people." When the reporter pressed further on whether his administration needed to abide by international law, Trump said, "I will abide by it," but made it clear he would decide for himself when these constraints applied to the U.S. "It depends on what your definition of international law is," he said.

He made it clear that he would use his reputation for being "unpredictable" and his willingness to quickly resort to military action to coerce other countries.

Most notably, shortly after the New York Times journalists sat down with him, Trump paused the interview to take a call from Colombian President Gustavo Petro. Days earlier, Trump had threatened action against Colombia because the country is a hub for drug trafficking.

The content of the conversation was not public, but the leader was apparently concerned about the possibility of a U.S. attack on Colombia similar to the one on Venezuela.

After the call with Petro, Mr. Trump dictated a social media post to an aide, stating that the Colombian president had called "to explain the drug situation."

After the call, which lasted about an hour, the New York Times reporters noted that "the call seemed to remove any immediate threat of U.S. military action." Trump subsequently stated that he believed the collapse of the Maduro regime had intimidated other leaders in the region, "making them compliant."

The New York Times claimed they witnessed the actual operation of Trump's "coercive diplomacy" firsthand.

Greenland Sovereignty Issue: Trump Insists on "Ownership"

Trump reiterated his stance that the U.S. must own Greenland, claiming that merely reopening a military base on the land under the 1951 treaty is insufficient.

"Ownership is very important," Trump said. The New York Times commented that he discussed Greenland with a "real estate magnate's eye." The land is three times the size of Texas but has a population of less than 60,000. "I think psychologically, ownership is necessary for success. Whether you're talking about a lease or a treaty, ownership gives you something you can't get otherwise. Ownership gives you elements that signed documents cannot provide."

When asked whether Greenland or NATO was a higher priority, Trump refused to answer directly but admitted "it might be a choice." He made it clear that without the U.S. at its core, the transatlantic alliance was largely useless.

Family's Crypto Activities and Overseas Business Deals "Not a Problem"

In the interview, Trump made it clear that concerns about conflicts of interest raised by his family's global money-making activities over the past year do not bother him at all.

"I banned them from doing business in the first term, but got absolutely no credit for it," he said. "I didn't have to do that. It was really unfair to them." He added: "I found that nobody cared, and I'm allowed to do it."

Donald Trump Jr. has previously expressed similar views, but the president responded more comprehensively than in the past to concerns about his family's economic interests. The White House has repeatedly stated that Trump and his family never engage in conflicts of interest and that he always puts the interests of Americans first.

He also added that he has never accepted his presidential salary.

Trump defended his support for the cryptocurrency industry, which his family has become a major player in. "I got a lot of votes for supporting crypto, and I'm starting to like it," Trump said. "But he stated that the strong push for cryptocurrency was to make the U.S. the global leader in the industry.

Advancing "De-naturalization" Plan, Specifically Targeting Somali-Americans

Trump stated that his administration is taking steps to revoke the citizenship of some naturalized Americans, with a particular focus on people of Somali origin.

"I wouldn't hesitate to do it if they were dishonest," Trump said during the Oval Office interview. "I think many people from Somalia, they hate our country."

Trump said his administration is reviewing the criteria for denaturalization. He indicated this measure is not limited to the Somali community but refused to specify which other groups of foreign-born U.S. citizens his administration is targeting.

This would be a significant escalation of Trump's immigration crackdown, which has already begun to extend beyond targeting illegal immigrants. The New York Times reported last month that the administration issued guidance to USCIS field offices instructing them to "provide 100-200 denaturalization cases per month to the Office of Immigration Litigation in FY 2026."

Under federal law, citizenship can only be revoked if the person committed fraud on their citizenship application or in a few other specific circumstances. But activists warn that the denaturalization effort could sweep up those who made honest mistakes on their citizenship paperwork.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat did Trump say about the constraints on his power during his interview with The New York Times?

ATrump stated that his power is constrained by only one thing: his own morality. He said, 'I don't need international law,' and indicated that he would decide when such constraints apply to the United States.

QHas Trump selected the next Federal Reserve chair, and what are his criteria for the nominee?

AYes, Trump has decided on his nominee for the next Federal Reserve chair but has not revealed the name. He emphasized that the nominee must support lowering borrowing costs and that anyone who disagrees with his views would not get the job.

QDid Trump express any intention to pardon Sam Bankman-Fried or other high-profile figures like Nicolás Maduro?

ANo, Trump said he has no intention of pardoning Sam Bankman-Fried, Nicolás Maduro, or other figures like Robert Menendez and Sean Combs. He also mentioned he hasn't been asked about pardoning Derek Chauvin.

QHow long does Trump expect the U.S. to maintain control over Venezuela's oil and governance?

ATrump indicated that U.S. control over Venezuela's oil and governance could last 'much longer' than short-term estimates, potentially spanning several years. He acknowledged that revitalizing Venezuela's oil industry would take time.

QWhat is Trump's stance on Greenland, and how does he view its importance to the U.S.?

ATrump reiterated that the U.S. must own Greenland, emphasizing that 'ownership is very important' for psychological and strategic success. He believes ownership provides advantages that leases or treaties cannot, and he discussed it from a real estate perspective.

İlgili Okumalar

AI Agent Completely Transforms Web3 Gaming: From the Rugpull Bakery Bot Controversy to the New 2026 Agent Paradigm

This article explores how the AI Agent paradigm is fundamentally transforming Web3 gaming, moving from a disruptive force to a core, legitimized element. It begins with the controversy in the competitive baking game Rugpull Bakery, where automated scripts caused fairness issues. Instead of banning them, the developers integrated AI Agents into the official gameplay by providing technical documentation (skill.md, agent.json), marking a shift towards "Agentic Gaming." The piece outlines three primary implementation models for AI Agents in Web3 games by 2026: 1. **Autonomous Competitors & Economic Entities:** AI Agents act as independent players with unique strategies. Examples include TEN Protocol's poker agents, AI Arena's trainable NFT fighters, and Satoshi Strike Force's "Digital Athletes" trained on player data. The Somnia blockchain is highlighted as a dedicated "Agentic L1" infrastructure supporting this model at scale. 2. **Modular Infrastructure & Programmable Environments:** This model, exemplified by EVE Frontier, allows AI Agents to program game world logic itself. Using "Smart Assemblies" (e.g., Smart Turrets, Smart Gates), Agents can modify shared economic and physical rules on-chain, creating dynamic, player/AI-built worlds. The ERC-8183 standard further enables these automated entities to hire other AI services for complex tasks. 3. **Hybrid Companions & Dynamic Adaptation:** Here, AI serves as a collaborative partner. In Parallel Colony, highly autonomous AI Avatars work alongside human players who provide high-level guidance. Illuvium plans to use AI to make NPCs dynamic and responsive, creating personalized, emergent narratives for each player. The conclusion posits that Web3 gaming has reached a "post-human" inflection point. Blockchains' transparency and programmability, combined with new standards and infrastructure like Somnia, make integrating and governing AI Agents not just viable but essential. The future lies in a symbiotic digital order where players transition from manual laborers to commanders and partners of algorithmic intelligence.

marsbit4 dk önce

AI Agent Completely Transforms Web3 Gaming: From the Rugpull Bakery Bot Controversy to the New 2026 Agent Paradigm

marsbit4 dk önce

Saylor's Purchase of 1550 Bitcoin Is a Bad Trade

**Title: Saylor's Purchase of 1,550 Bitcoins Was a Bad Trade** The article critically analyzes Strategy's recent move of selling 32 bitcoins followed by a much larger purchase of 1,550 bitcoins. While appearing bullish, the author argues this trade is detrimental to MSTR shareholders. The core argument revolves around the concept of "breakeven modified Net Asset Value (mNAV)," a key metric for Strategy. To increase Bitcoin per share (BPS) for MSTR holders, Strategy must issue new shares at a premium high enough that the funds raised can buy more bitcoin than the bitcoin backing each existing share. Currently, this breakeven mNAV is estimated at 1.30. The recent trade failed on two counts: 1. The shares for the $181 million raise were issued at an mNAV *below* the 1.30 breakeven point. Selling "cheap" shares to buy bitcoin actually *reduces* BPS. 2. Only $101.3 million of the raised funds were used to buy bitcoin; the rest went to boost the company's dollar reserves. The breakeven mNAV calculation assumes *100%* of proceeds are used for bitcoin purchases. Diverting funds, even if mNAV were high, dilutes BPS. The result is an estimated 0.19% decrease in Bitcoin per share for MSTR holders. In exchange, Strategy merely extended its operational runway for its dollar reserves from ~6.3 months to 7 months. The author interprets this as Strategy prioritizing the survival and development of its STRC business over its stated core goal of increasing MSTR's BPS. This constitutes a gamble: if sacrificing MSTR value leads to improved market sentiment and a recovery in STRC's price (and thus mNAV), the whole system could work. If not, Strategy may be forced into a cycle of further diluting MSTR to stay afloat, potentially leading to deferred STRC dividends or corporate decline. The article concludes with a hope for price recovery for Bitcoin, MSTR, and STRC.

Foresight News15 dk önce

Saylor's Purchase of 1550 Bitcoin Is a Bad Trade

Foresight News15 dk önce

The AI Bear Market Lasting Two Days Is Over; Why Did Funds Buy Back Storage Stocks First?

After a severe two-day selloff in early June that erased over $1 trillion from U.S. chip stock market value, capital is flowing back first to the memory sector. The correction was not driven by a collapse in AI demand but rather a market reassessment of high expectations. Stocks like Broadcom faced selling pressure despite strong AI revenue guidance, signaling a shift in focus from who has an "AI story" to who can most rapidly translate AI demand into verifiable profits and earnings per share (EPS). Memory companies, such as Micron and SK Hynix, are leading the recovery because their EPS growth is more immediately verifiable. The AI server boom directly increases demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) and high-capacity server DRAM, tightening supply and driving up contract prices for conventional DRAM and NAND Flash. This price increase, coupled with a shift to higher-margin products, flows directly into near-term revenue and profitability, as evidenced in recent earnings reports. In contrast, other AI semiconductor segments like GPUs, ASICs, and optical modules, while central to the long-term AI infrastructure story, face longer and less certain paths to EPS validation. Their growth depends more on future product cycles, customer adoption timelines, and capital expenditure plans. The rebound in memory stocks highlights a market preference for assets with shorter, more transparent EPS conversion cycles following the recent de-risking phase. However, this does not negate the potential of other AI hardware segments should they provide clearer near-term order visibility. The episode has raised the validation bar for all AI-related investments.

marsbit15 dk önce

The AI Bear Market Lasting Two Days Is Over; Why Did Funds Buy Back Storage Stocks First?

marsbit15 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片