National Trust Charters For Crypto Under Fire—Senator Warren Says It Goes Beyond The Law

bitcoinist2026-05-19 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-05-19 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Senator Elizabeth Warren is challenging the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency's (OCC) approval of national trust bank charters for crypto companies. She argues that approvals for firms like Ripple, Circle, BitGo, Fidelity, Paxos, and Coinbase appear to go beyond the limited activities permitted by law, potentially violating the National Bank Act. Warren warns that allowing crypto firms to engage in bank-like activities—such as lending and payments—without equivalent regulations could threaten consumer protection and financial system stability. Traditional banks have also objected to the OCC's approach. In defense, OCC Comptroller Jonathan Gould stated that including new entrants promotes competition, modernization, and benefits consumers and the broader industry.

Senator Elizabeth Warren is taking a new aim at the crypto industry, now challenging how the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has handled national trust bank charters for digital asset firms.

Her latest concern centers on the OCC’s approvals—some granted on a conditional basis over recent months—at a time when the conventional banking sector has already been raising objections throughout the year.

Warren Challenges OCC On Crypto Charters

Bloomberg reports that Warren’s argument is that at least some of the companies appear to be “seemingly ineligible” for the type of charter they are receiving.

In her letter to Jonathan Gould, the head of the OCC, the Senator said the regulator has approved at least nine national trust charters for crypto companies that, in her view, “appear to go far beyond the narrow set of activities permitted by law.” Warren went further, describing what she sees as an “apparent violation of the National Bank Act.”

Among the approvals mentioned are those granted to crypto giants such as Ripple, Circle (CRCL), BitGo, Fidelity, and Paxos in December of last year.

Others, such as Coinbase (COIN), received conditional approval from the OCC to establish Coinbase National Trust Company. Around the same timeframe, Kraken’s parent company, Payward, also filed an application seeking approval for a National Trust Company charter.

Those approvals would allow these companies to manage and hold assets on behalf of customers—an arrangement that could speed up payment settlement compared with older processing timelines.

However, Warren’s critique is not only about what the trust charters allow today, but also about where she believes some firms may be headed next.

OCC’s Defense

Per the report, the Massachusetts Democrat argued that some companies are trying to move past traditional custody and into business areas that look more like banking operations. That includes activities such as lending, payments, and running trading platform-type services.

In her view, easing rules for trust companies this year could effectively enable crypto firms to broaden their financial activities too far, without the same level of constraints and oversight that typically apply to banks.

Warren framed the concern as follows: if crypto firms are permitted to engage in bank-like businesses without “the same regulations and safeguards,” it could create problems for consumer protection and for overall stability in the financial system.

Yet, the Senator is not the only critic of the OCC’s approach. Traditional banks have voiced their own apprehension throughout the year, arguing that the OCC’s approvals stretch the historical intent behind the national trust bank charter.

The OCC, through Comptroller of the Currency Jonathan Gould, has defended its actions. Last year, Gould emphasized that bringing new entrants into the federal banking system could improve competition and deliver additional products and services.

From his perspective, the OCC’s approach is beneficial for both consumers and the broader banking industry, and it supports modernization rather than regulatory dilution.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap dropping to $2.5 trillion on Tuesday. Source: TOTAL on Tradingview

Featured image created with OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is Senator Elizabeth Warren's main criticism regarding the OCC's approval of national trust bank charters for crypto firms?

ASenator Elizabeth Warren's main criticism is that the OCC has approved at least nine national trust charters for crypto companies that, in her view, appear to go far beyond the narrow set of activities permitted by law, describing it as an 'apparent violation of the National Bank Act'. She is concerned these firms may be moving into bank-like operations without the same regulations and safeguards, posing risks to consumer protection and financial stability.

QWhich major crypto companies received national trust charter approvals from the OCC as mentioned in the article?

AThe article mentions that approvals were granted to crypto giants such as Ripple, Circle (CRCL), BitGo, Fidelity, and Paxos in December of last year. Additionally, Coinbase (COIN) received conditional approval, and Kraken's parent company, Payward, filed an application for a similar charter.

QWhat activities, according to Senator Warren, are some crypto companies with trust charters trying to expand into that resemble traditional banking?

AAccording to Senator Warren, some crypto companies are trying to move beyond traditional custody services and expand into business areas that look more like banking operations. These include activities such as lending, payments, and running trading platform-type services.

QHow has the OCC, specifically Comptroller Jonathan Gould, defended its decision to grant trust charters to crypto firms?

AThe OCC, through Comptroller Jonathan Gould, has defended its actions by emphasizing that bringing new entrants into the federal banking system could improve competition and deliver additional products and services. Gould believes the approach is beneficial for consumers and the broader banking industry, supporting modernization rather than regulatory dilution.

QWhat is a key concern shared by both Senator Warren and traditional banks regarding the OCC's crypto trust charters?

AA key concern shared by both Senator Warren and traditional banks is that the OCC's approvals for crypto firms stretch the historical intent behind the national trust bank charter. They argue it could allow these firms to engage in bank-like businesses without being subject to the same level of constraints, oversight, and safeguards that typically apply to banks, potentially creating systemic risks.

İlgili Okumalar

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

"World Models" has become a widely used yet confusing term in AI. To address this, a team led by Fei-Fei Li and World Labs proposed a functional taxonomy based on the Partially Observable Markov Decision Process framework. This taxonomy categorizes systems called "world models" into three distinct projections: Renderers, Simulators, and Planners. Renderers, like OpenAI's Sora and other video generation models, focus on producing photorealistic visual outputs for human perception. They prioritize visual fidelity over physical accuracy. Simulators, such as NVIDIA Omniverse, aim to compute precise future environmental states for computational tasks like engineering analysis or digital twins. Planners, like Vision-Language-Action models, take in observations and goals to output executable actions for robots or agents. The article clarifies that most current "world models," including Sora, are primarily Renderers. They generate convincing visuals but lack the core ability to simulate state transitions based on actions, a key requirement for a true world model in classic reinforcement learning definitions. This conceptual confusion has practical implications, leading to potential misalignment in technology selection, investment, and public understanding of AI capabilities. Clear categorization is crucial. It helps enterprises avoid costly mistakes (e.g., using a renderer for robot training), allows investors to accurately assess markets, and enables researchers to build comparable benchmarks. While future systems may integrate these functions, recognizing current boundaries is essential for honest assessment and progress.

marsbit20 dk önce

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

marsbit20 dk önce

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

**Summary: How Wealthy Chinese Circumvent $50,000 Annual Foreign Exchange Limits** Despite China's strict capital controls, including an annual $50,000 per person foreign exchange quota, an estimated $150 billion in funds still leaves the country annually via various gray and underground channels. This report outlines the evolution of China's "capital wall" and the methods used to bypass it. **The Evolving Capital Controls:** * **Foundation (1994):** The system of "current account convertibility with strict capital account controls" was established. * **Quota Set (2007):** The $50,000 individual annual forex purchase limit was formalized. * **Crackdown Begins (2015-2017):** Following market volatility, enforcement tightened. Banks were required to scrutinize transactions, and channels like using UnionPay cards for Hong Kong insurance premiums or buying overseas property were blocked. * **Digital & Legal Upgrades (2024-2026):** Enhanced algorithms now flag suspicious patterns (e.g., "smurfing"). The Common Reporting Standard (CRS) provides Chinese tax authorities with data on citizens' offshore accounts. Unlicensed cross-border brokers have been targeted. **Five Primary Methods for Moving Capital:** 1. **Underground Banking / "Hawala" (Duiqiao):** The largest-scale method. No money crosses borders. Clients pay RMB to a domestic account; an overseas associate deposits equivalent foreign currency into the client's offshore account. Risks include high fees, account freezes, and legal penalties. 2. **"Smurfing" or "Ant Moving":** Using multiple individuals' $50,000 quotas to pool funds for one offshore recipient. Increasingly detected by anti-money laundering algorithms. 3. **Trade Invoice Manipulation:** Businesses over-invoice imports or under-invoice exports via offshore shell companies, creating a pretext to transfer excess funds abroad under the guise of trade. 4. **Channel Migration:** After a crackdown on internet brokers, funds flow toward more compliant but costly channels like major banks' cross-border wealth management services or Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) quotas. 5. **Structural Arrangements:** High-net-worth individuals use complex, high-cost legal structures involving offshore trusts, insurance, and investment migration programs to transfer asset ownership. **Regulatory Response: Focusing on People, Not Just Money** The current strategy extends oversight from enterprises to **individual residents**. Tools like CRS allow retroactive visibility into offshore assets. Cryptocurrencies, once seen as a potential loophole, are now actively monitored and prosecuted as an illegal channel. The underlying driver remains: with significant wealth concentrated among millions of affluent households seeking diversification amid domestic economic shifts, the incentive to move assets offshore persists despite regulatory barriers.

marsbit40 dk önce

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

marsbit40 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片