My 24 Hours Under Bombardment in Dubai

marsbit2026-03-01 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-01 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Author Brother Bing recounts 24 hours in Dubai during missile attacks following US-Israel joint declaration of war against Iran. Initially dismissing the conflict due to Dubai's reputation as a safe haven, the author continues daily routines until hearing blasts in the afternoon. Despite explosions nearby, public life remains normal with cafes full and people outdoors. At midnight, intense bombardments prompt evacuation to the garage with neighbors. Rumors spread about leaders' deaths and airport destruction, though authorities later advise returning home. Attacks continue the next morning with reports of Burj Al Arab being hit but minimal casualties. The author analyzes impacts: Dubai's "safe hub" narrative is shattered, potentially affecting tourism, property speculation, and foreign migration. While ground invasion remains unlikely, the psychological blow to stability could divert capital and expatriates to alternatives like Singapore. The author concludes by noting the UAE's efficiency and wealth may mitigate long-term damage, while humorously requesting a bomb shelter for future incidents.

Author: brother bing / Bing Xiong

8:00am: Woke up to a phone notification with news of the United States and Israel jointly declaring war on Iran.

Perhaps I've been in Dubai for too long; I've become somewhat indifferent to the conflicts in this region. Although Dubai is located in a powder keg, the UAE has always been, in my mind, a neutral and safe "Little Switzerland of the Middle East."

After all, money from both legitimate and illegitimate sources flows here. I thought to myself, Iran wouldn't destroy its own little treasury.

  • 9:30am: A colleague came to discuss some matters, so we went downstairs for coffee and brunch. He was flying back to the UK from Abu Dhabi today; his flight wasn't canceled, and there were no changes to his ticket. Everything seemed completely normal.

  • 12:00pm: I went home at noon to start working. Then I saw that Iran had decided to attack the surrounding Gulf countries. I still didn't take it seriously. It wasn't until I saw photos of missiles posted by a friend in Abu Dhabi on Instagram that I realized the situation might be more serious than I thought.

  • 1-3:00pm: Throughout the afternoon, there were constant posts on X from people living near me saying they heard the sound of missile explosions. Since I didn't hear anything myself, I assumed these accounts were spreading false information.

  • 4:30pm: While I was working intently at my computer, a relatively strong explosion suddenly erupted overhead, causing my half-open balcony door to vibrate. I went out to the balcony and, sure enough, the air was filled with the smell of gunpowder.

Because I had a 5:00 pm Pilates class scheduled, or perhaps my brain hadn't fully processed it yet, I closed the balcony door and went downstairs to class. Out on the street, it was still a scene of peace and tranquility. People were walking their babies as usual, walking their dogs as usual.

The café next to the yoga studio was packed. Influencers were still happily taking selfies.

  • 6:00pm: After exercising and returning home, the explosive sounds became more frequent. I saw online that a hotel on the Palm Jumeirah had been hit, and smoke was rising over City Walk.

The funny thing was, I was in the middle of discussing company matters with my co-founder on the phone while hearing explosions outside. I found myself wondering: are those missiles or Ramadan fireworks? A few times, I interrupted the call to go to the balcony and check if anything was falling from the sky.

  • 7:30pm: After finishing the work call, I went downstairs for a walk. The street lights were on, shops were open, and there was no obvious panic among the crowds. Except for the delivery times being a bit longer.

I thought the night would pass quietly, waiting for Khamenei to be captured, the Iranian people to be liberated, and everyone to go home.

But then...

  • 12:30am: I was eating Japanese ramen delivery at home in the middle of the night when I received alerts on all my phones and computers about missile attacks. At that moment, loud, rumbling explosions erupted outside my window. I quickly grabbed my passport, cards, and phone, rushed out the door, took the elevator down to the parking garage. In the elevator were a Ukrainian man and an Indian couple holding their sleeping child.

  • 1:30am: I stayed in the garage for over an hour. During this time, I saw on X that Khamenei had died, but also that Dubai Airport had been completely destroyed. While I was trying to figure it out, building staff came over and told us to go back upstairs to our homes.

When I got home, I saw a message from a friend saying Iran was unlikely to bomb the UAE for now and had turned to attack Israel instead.

  • The next morning, 8:00am: 24 hours have passed. Apart from the Burj Al Arab hotel being hit last night, there don't seem to be mass casualties. In my area, explosive sounds can be heard intermittently.

Iran says it will continue attacks on the Gulf today to pressure the US to stop its attacks on Iran.

Finally, let's talk about the impact of this attack on Dubai and the UAE.

Many people are comparing this event to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which is utterly absurd and shows a lack of thought. Aerial bombardment is one thing; ground warfare is another. The possibility of the UAE's mainland being occupied is extremely low. It's highly unlikely this country will descend into prolonged war.

The real impact is that it violently tears apart the narrative of Dubai as the "gold rush dream" and the "successful case of Middle Eastern reform and opening up." As a global node for tourism and capital flow, Dubai will undoubtedly face short-term shocks. The first to feel the pressure will be the tourism industry. The second will likely be the short-term property speculators.

More long-term, and more dangerous, is a significant reduction in foreign immigration. An economy reliant on foreign population and capital inflow is extremely dependent on a sense of "stability." Many Europeans come to Dubai for job opportunities or tax avoidance; after a few missiles, they might turn to Singapore or other Asian countries.

Of course, the UAE is a highly efficient monarchy. Plus, it's not poor. This black swan event also came at a rather timely moment, serving as a wake-up call for everyone. Next time, please build a bomb shelter in my building.

Enough talk, I'm going downstairs for a coffee.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat was the author's initial reaction to the news of the US and Israel declaring war on Iran?

AThe author felt indifferent and unconcerned, believing Dubai was a safe, neutral 'Middle Eastern Switzerland' and that Iran wouldn't target its own financial hub.

QWhat was the first physical sign of the conflict that the author personally experienced?

AAt around 4:30 pm, the author heard a strong explosion overhead that caused their half-open balcony door to vibrate and smelled gunpowder in the air.

QHow did the author and other residents react to the missile attacks around 12:30 am?

AThe author grabbed their passport, cards, and phone and rushed to the building's garage for shelter, where they were joined by a Ukrainian man and an Indian couple with their sleeping child.

QAccording to the author, what are the two main short-term economic impacts of the attacks on Dubai?

AThe two main short-term impacts are a blow to the tourism industry and pressure on short-term real estate speculators.

QWhat does the author identify as the more dangerous long-term consequence for Dubai's economy?

AThe more dangerous long-term consequence is a significant reduction in foreign immigration, as the economy relies heavily on an influx of people and capital, which depends on a sense of stability.

İlgili Okumalar

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit1 saat önce

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit1 saat önce

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit1 saat önce

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit1 saat önce

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit2 saat önce

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit2 saat önce

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit2 saat önce

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片