Musk: I Work 90 Hours a Week; Beware of Crayfish 'Going Crazy'...

比推2026-03-12 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-12 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

In a roundup of discussions from the crypto community on X, Elon Musk claimed he works 90 hours per week, sparking mixed reactions. Some users questioned whether he was subtly criticizing public figures like Biden or Gates, while others sarcastically commented on his wealth accumulation. Separately, there were observations about increased solidarity among Silicon Valley’s Chinese community. Another topic involved unusual use cases for crayfish, described as "crazy." The post also featured a discussion on ideal work environments. The article includes multiple embedded images and ends with links to related social channels and news sources.

Dear readers, hello~

What have the KOLs in the crypto circle been talking about in the past 24 hours?

Note: The following content is compiled from the X platform and represents personal opinions, not the stance of this platform, and does not constitute investment advice.

Musk: I Work 90 Hours a Week

Popular Replies:

Who is he subtly criticizing? Old Biden or Gates?

Musk: You 8 billion people, put all your money in my pocket;

Work hard, everyone, to help Musk reach 1 trillion as soon as possible.

Silicon Valley Chinese Have Become Very United

Crayfish Application Scenarios

Ideal Work Environment Discussion

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7618943

İlgili Sorular

QHow many hours per week does Elon Musk claim to work?

AElon Musk claims to work 90 hours per week.

QWhat is the main topic of the section 'Silicon Valley Chinese have become very united'?

AThe section discusses the increased unity among Chinese professionals in Silicon Valley.

QWhat is the warning given about crayfish in the article?

AThe article warns that crayfish are 'too crazy', though the exact context is not detailed in the provided text.

QWhich social media platform is the source for the discussions mentioned in the article?

AThe discussions are sourced from the X platform (formerly known as Twitter).

QWhat is the disclaimer provided about the opinions expressed in the article?

AThe disclaimer states that the content consists of personal opinions from the X platform, does not represent the platform's stance, and is not investment advice.

İlgili Okumalar

Prediction Markets Cannot Exist Without Insider Trading, But Insider Trading Is Killing Them

Prediction markets face a fundamental contradiction: they rely on insider trading to generate accurate prices, yet this same activity erodes public trust and threatens their survival. Recent scandals, such as a U.S. special forces member making $400,000 on Polymarket using classified information about a raid, highlight the severity of the issue. While platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi market themselves as venues where "everyone is an expert" and encourage informed trading, they also enforce policies against illegal insider trading. The core dilemma is that these markets depend on informed insiders for price efficiency but require uninformed retail participants to provide liquidity. If insider trading is too rampant, retail traders leave, perceiving the market as unfair. If restrictions are too strict, valuable information flow dries up, reducing the market’s predictive utility. The challenge is finding a balance that maintains both accuracy and perceived fairness—a task complicated by regulatory pressures and recurring scandals.

marsbit8 dk önce

Prediction Markets Cannot Exist Without Insider Trading, But Insider Trading Is Killing Them

marsbit8 dk önce

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

Iran has announced a comprehensive plan to assert control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil shipping chokepoint. The proposed measures include requiring all vessels to obtain Iranian permission for passage, imposing fees for security, environmental protection, and navigation management—preferably paid in Iranian rials—and absolutely banning Israeli ships. Vessels from countries deemed hostile by Iran’s top security bodies may also be barred. Analysts suggest Iran’s motives are multifaceted: increasing pressure on the U.S. and Israel by leveraging control over oil transit to influence global prices and inflation; creating a new revenue stream, potentially exceeding $7.7 billion annually, to counter Western sanctions and support postwar reconstruction; and using transit permissions as bargaining chips in future negotiations, notably with the U.S. However, the plan faces significant practical and diplomatic challenges. Enforcing comprehensive interception and fee collection in the busy waterway, patrolled by international military forces, would be difficult. The U.S. has already countering with a blockade of Iranian ports and threats to intercept any ship paying fees, potentially strangling Iran’s oil exports and fee revenue. Broad international opposition, led by European and Gulf states, and legal controversies further complicate implementation. The proposal may ultimately serve more as a negotiating tactic than a feasible policy, with its execution remaining highly uncertain.

marsbit1 saat önce

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

marsbit1 saat önce

Vertically Integrated Capital Aggregators: How Does Web3 Build an Impregnable Moat?

"Vertical Integration Capital Aggregators: How Web3 Builds Unbreachable Moats" explores how leading Web3 protocols create competitive advantages by vertically integrating multiple ecosystem components. Unlike Web2 aggregators that focus on user demand or supplier commoditization, successful Web3 entities like Hyperliquid aggregate capital, liquidity, users, and distribution into a unified financial ecosystem. This integration allows for efficient capital deployment—Hyperliquid generates $0.30 in fees per $1 of TVL annually, compared to Aave's $0.05—while creating a defensible moat that is difficult to replicate across six simultaneous fronts. However, this model comes with risks: DeFi loses $0.50 to hacks for every $1 earned, pushing protocols toward partial centralization and closed systems for security and scalability. The token serves as a shared incentive layer, aligning stakeholders and driving value through mechanisms like buybacks. The article concludes that vertical integration, not capital itself, is the true moat, and that the industry is evolving toward pragmatic, partially centralized models to ensure economic growth and sustainability.

marsbit1 saat önce

Vertically Integrated Capital Aggregators: How Does Web3 Build an Impregnable Moat?

marsbit1 saat önce

Falsely Accused by AI and Jailed for 160 Days: American Woman Steps into the Execution Zone

Summary: Angela Lipps, a woman from Tennessee, was wrongfully imprisoned for 160 days after a facial recognition AI incorrectly identified her as a suspect in a bank fraud case in North Dakota. Despite her insistence that she had never been to the state, she was arrested in July 2025 and held without bail. She spent 108 days in a local jail before being transferred to North Dakota in October, where she was eventually cleared after her lawyer provided bank records proving she was buying pizza in Tennessee at the time of the crime. Her ordeal highlights a growing issue with AI-driven law enforcement errors. Similar cases include Robert Williams, detained for 30 hours in 2020, and Chris Gatlin, jailed for 17 months based on flawed AI matches. Systems like Clearview AI, used by over 3,000 U.S. law enforcement agencies, often rely on low-quality images and can produce inaccurate results. Human oversight failures exacerbate the problem, as officers sometimes skip verification steps, leading to wrongful arrests. While AI has improved policing efficiency, its errors have serious consequences, emphasizing the need for stricter regulations and human accountability in its use.

marsbit2 saat önce

Falsely Accused by AI and Jailed for 160 Days: American Woman Steps into the Execution Zone

marsbit2 saat önce

Bitcoin Derivatives Buying Pressure Continues To Rise — Is $80K Inevitable?

Bitcoin's price has been experiencing significant bullish momentum, with recent gains primarily driven by strong demand in the perpetual futures market rather than spot trading. On-chain analysis reveals sustained buying pressure in Bitcoin derivatives, as indicated by the Net Taker Volume metric, which has remained positive at around $145 million since March 7. This metric, which measures the difference between long and short orders, suggests continued dominance of buyers and reflects bullish sentiment among traders. Historically, such a shift from selling to buying pressure has consistently led to upward price movements. Analysts expecting the trend to continue, potentially pushing Bitcoin toward the $80,000 mark, though that level remains a key resistance zone. Currently, BTC is around $77,508 with little change over the past day.

bitcoinist2 saat önce

Bitcoin Derivatives Buying Pressure Continues To Rise — Is $80K Inevitable?

bitcoinist2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片