Musk Creates Another Capital Myth? SpaceX IPO Approaches, Stock Volatility May Be More Intense Than Tesla

marsbit2026-03-04 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-04 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

SpaceX, the aerospace giant founded by Elon Musk, is reportedly preparing for a potential IPO as early as this month, with a target valuation exceeding $1.75 trillion. Analysts predict the stock could experience even greater volatility than Tesla (TSLA.O) post-listing. Key growth is expected from its Starlink satellite internet business, projected to generate significant future revenue and profits. However, the company faces challenges typical of Musk-led ventures, including ambitious timelines that often face delays, such as the Starship rocket and Mars mission goals. The stock’s performance is likely to be heavily influenced by Musk’s leadership and public persona, with a low public float of around 3.3% potentially amplifying price swings. Negative news affecting Tesla or Musk could also impact SpaceX, highlighting concentrated risk. Despite delays, investor focus remains on long-term vision over short-term setbacks.

Source: Jinshi Data

Over the past few years, as SpaceX has gradually transformed into a giant in the aerospace field, market interest in it has grown exponentially. However, investors should expect that after its public listing, the stock price may experience significant volatility.

According to Bloomberg, SpaceX may file a confidential IPO application as early as this month, seeking a valuation of over $1.75 trillion. The company plans to conduct the IPO in June, potentially coinciding with Musk's birthday or a rare planetary alignment event. Headquartered in Starbase, Texas, USA, SpaceX, after absorbing Musk's artificial intelligence company xAI, is estimated to be valued at approximately $1.25 trillion.

PitchBook analyst Franco Granda wrote in a report on Tuesday that the stock performance of SpaceX after its listing would resemble that of Tesla (TSLA.O) but "with even greater volatility."

Future Growth Expectations: Starlink to Contribute Major Revenue

PitchBook predicts that by 2040, SpaceX's revenue will reach $150 billion, with adjusted profits of $95 billion.

In comparison, the company's revenue last year was approximately $16 billion at most, with profits around $8 billion. About $42 billion in annual revenue in the future may come from the Starlink satellite internet business, which currently contributes the majority of SpaceX's cash flow.

This forecast does not include the xAI business. xAI is currently burning cash rapidly but may secure more projects from the U.S. Department of Defense in the future. The forecast also assumes that Tesla and SpaceX will not merge, although Musk and some analysts have suggested this possibility in the past.

Musk wrote on the X platform in November last year: "My companies, somewhat surprisingly, are moving in the direction of integration."

Musk Effect: Vision-Driven but Timelines Often Delayed

Granda stated that many lessons investors learned from Tesla may also apply to SpaceX. For example, both companies are influenced by Musk's famous public optimism.

Granda cited an example where Tesla promised to produce 5,000 cars per week by the end of 2017 but subsequently fell into "production hell" and failed to meet the target. However, when the company finally achieved this milestone in mid-2018, its stock price surged significantly.

SpaceX has also experienced similar delays. The development of its Starship super rocket has faced multiple setbacks, and other spacecraft projects in the company's history have had similar experiences. Musk once set 2022 as the "ideal target" for sending an unmanned mission to Mars, but by 2026, this mission is still years away from realization.

However, investors have gradually grown accustomed to Musk's timelines having a certain degree of "flexibility."

Therefore, when the December deadline for the autonomous taxi project passed, investors did not panic excessively. Later, when Musk achieved the set goal slightly later, the stock price rose accordingly. Granda refers to this phenomenon as the "credibility ledger," where investors automatically factor in delays but focus more on the overall vision.

This could be advantageous for SpaceX. The company recently delayed its Mars colonization plan while also applying to regulators to launch up to 1 million space data centers into orbit, a plan that relies on the progress of the Starship project. SpaceX has also stated plans to build a city on the moon.

Post-IPO Challenges: Higher Volatility and High Dependence on Musk

However, as a publicly listed company, SpaceX must achieve these goals while facing Wall Street investors and making continuous progress in the xAI and Starlink businesses. Therefore, market reactions could be very intense.

Granda predicts that if certain major events typically cause only a 10% to 15% fluctuation in Tesla's stock price, they could trigger a 20% to 30% fluctuation in SpaceX's stock. This is partly because SpaceX's publicly traded shares are expected to account for only about 3.3%.

SpaceX stock may also benefit from the so-called "Musk premium." Even as Tesla's core electric vehicle business declines, this premium has helped keep its stock price at a high level. However, this光环 also means that Musk's companies are highly dependent on him.

Cantor Fitzgerald analyst Andres Sheppard previously stated:

"Today, over 50% of shareholders would say that Tesla is Elon, and Elon is Tesla. Many people, perhaps even the majority, directly link Tesla's success to Elon's tenure."

Tesla also mentioned the company's dependence on Musk in its annual report, warning that if Musk is forced to sell some of his shares, the stock price could fall. SpaceX was founded by Musk over twenty years ago, and he currently holds about 44% of the company's shares. Its dependence on the CEO is likely similarly high.

Granda stated that negative news from Tesla would likely put pressure on SpaceX's stock price, and vice versa. At the same time, Musk's political stance has also sparked controversy and affected Tesla's sales. Granda concluded:

"The combination of lower float, earlier-stage technology, and highly concentrated Musk exposure means its volatility could exceed the already significant volatility pattern seen in Tesla's history."

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the expected valuation of SpaceX for its upcoming listing, and how does it compare to its previous valuation after absorbing xAI?

ASpaceX is seeking a valuation of over $1.75 trillion for its IPO, which is significantly higher than its previous valuation of approximately $1.25 trillion after absorbing Elon Musk's artificial intelligence company, xAI.

QAccording to PitchBook analyst Franco Granda, how will SpaceX's stock performance compare to Tesla's after it goes public?

APitchBook analyst Franco Granda stated that SpaceX's stock performance after its public listing is expected to be similar to Tesla's stock but with even stronger volatility.

QWhat is the primary source of cash flow for SpaceX currently, and what is its projected contribution to future revenue by 2040?

AThe Starlink satellite internet business is currently the primary source of cash flow for SpaceX. It is projected to contribute approximately $42 billion in annual revenue by 2040.

QWhat phenomenon does the analyst refer to as the 'credibility ledger' in the context of Elon Musk's companies?

AThe 'credibility ledger' refers to the phenomenon where investors automatically factor in delays to Elon Musk's ambitious timelines but remain focused on the overall vision, leading to stock price increases when the goals are eventually met, even if later than initially promised.

QWhat are the key factors cited by the analyst that could lead to SpaceX's stock having higher volatility than Tesla's?

AThe key factors leading to potentially higher volatility for SpaceX's stock are: a lower public float of only about 3.3%, the earlier stage of its core technology, and a highly concentrated exposure to 'Key Man Risk' associated with Elon Musk himself.

İlgili Okumalar

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

The market's expectation for a September Fed rate hike surged dramatically in early August, jumping from under 50% to over 80% within a week. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting, where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed growing dissent from hawkish members advocating for an immediate hike to combat persistent inflation. The primary catalyst for this repricing is rising oil prices, driven by renewed geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, which threaten global supply. Energy costs directly influence inflation metrics, making the upcoming July CPI report (due August 12th) a critical data point. If it shows inflation reaccelerating, the probability of a September hike will solidify. For Bitcoin and crypto assets, this is typically bearish news. Bitcoin continues to behave as a high-beta, liquidity-sensitive risk asset. A rate hike raises the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets and could drive capital toward money markets, pressuring crypto prices in the short term. However, historical patterns suggest that if a hike is perceived as the end of a tightening cycle rather than the start, any negative price impact may be brief. U.S. stocks, particularly crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and growth-oriented tech stocks, are also vulnerable. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, putting pressure on high-multiple companies. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditure to tangible revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flow and weak growth narratives could face heightened volatility if borrowing costs rise in September. In summary, a September Fed hike has evolved into a mainstream market scenario. Key factors to watch are oil prices, the July CPI report, and Fed communications, which will determine the final decision and its impact on volatile crypto and equity markets.

marsbit4 dk önce

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

marsbit4 dk önce

A 'Overlooked' Market Event: Joint US-Japan-South Korea Intervention, Rare US Treasury Involvement, and Bessent's Quiet 'Market Rescue'?

Summary: The United States, Japan, and South Korea executed their largest coordinated foreign exchange intervention in nearly 30 years. The action targeted depreciation pressure on the Japanese yen and South Korean won. This move is seen as a significant effort by the US to stabilize the financial markets of its key allies and prevent the spillover of risks. Key details: * Japan reportedly intervened on July 30 using approximately 8.45 trillion yen (about $52.8 billion). South Korean authorities also intervened that day, selling dollars to support the won. * Notably, the US Treasury Department intervened directly in yen markets for the first time in roughly 30 years. The New York Fed, reportedly acting on behalf of the Treasury, sold euros to buy yen via Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley on July 31. Analysts view the use of the euro-yen pair as a way to alleviate yen pressure without adding selling pressure to the US dollar. * Prior to the action, the New York Fed conducted "rate checks" on both USD/JPY and EUR/JPY, a newer signaling tool that falls between verbal and physical intervention. The intervention is interpreted as going beyond traditional currency stabilization. Analysts, such as Michael Hartnett of Bank of America, suggest it resembles a "Price Keeping Operation" for the AI era. The core US objectives are perceived to be: 1. Preventing rapid yen depreciation from triggering a sharp rise in Japanese government bond yields. 2. Containing financial stress from spreading across Asian markets like South Korea and Japan. 3. Reducing the risk of disorderly capital flows impacting the US bond market. This coordinated action underscores the importance of Japan and South Korea as critical partners in the US semiconductor and AI supply chain. Stabilizing their financial markets is seen as vital to mitigating risks to the broader tech industry and the US market itself. The intervention coincides with market pressures, including the KOSDAQ index hitting a low since October 2022. While seen as a move to control volatility, some analysts caution it may not fundamentally reverse existing market trends.

marsbit7 dk önce

A 'Overlooked' Market Event: Joint US-Japan-South Korea Intervention, Rare US Treasury Involvement, and Bessent's Quiet 'Market Rescue'?

marsbit7 dk önce

Will the Federal Reserve Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Cryptocurrencies and US Stocks Bear the Pressure?

In early August 2024, market expectations for a September Federal Reserve rate hike surged dramatically, from below 50% to over 80%, driven by renewed inflation concerns. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed a growing hawkish faction advocating for an immediate hike, citing prolonged above-target inflation. The key catalyst is escalating conflict near the Strait of Hormuz, which has pushed oil prices up approximately 20% in July, threatening to reignite inflation. The next critical data point is the July CPI report on August 12th; a hot reading could solidify hike expectations. For crypto assets, particularly Bitcoin, this represents near-term pressure. Bitcoin continues to exhibit high-beta, risk-on characteristics, making it sensitive to tightening liquidity and higher opportunity costs. However, historical precedent suggests that if a hike is perceived as the cycle's end rather than its start, the negative impact may be brief, with markets quickly pivoting to anticipate future rate cuts. U.S. stocks, especially crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and high-valuation tech stocks, face amplified volatility. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, pressuring growth stocks. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditures to demonstrable revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flows and weak growth narratives could see severe pressure if a September hike materializes, as financing costs would rise. Key indicators to watch include oil prices, upcoming inflation data, and Fed commentary at events like the Jackson Hole symposium.

Odaily星球日报7 dk önce

Will the Federal Reserve Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Cryptocurrencies and US Stocks Bear the Pressure?

Odaily星球日报7 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片