Matrixport Research: Why Is the Altcoin Bull Market Absent? Supply Pressure and Token Unlocks Become Key Variables

Matrixport2026-03-06 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-06 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Matrixport Research: Why the Altcoin Bull Market is Absent? Supply Pressure and Token Unlocks Emerge as Key Variables The anticipated altcoin rally has not materialized over the past year. Historically, Bitcoin's rise leads to capital overflow into altcoins, but this transmission mechanism has significantly weakened in the current cycle. Retail participation remains low, and many projects lack compelling narratives or real-world utility to drive market momentum. Persistent supply pressure is a primary constraint. Early investors continue to divest, and new token unlocks are constantly adding to the circulating supply. Since August 2024, approximately $99 billion worth of tokens have been unlocked, creating sustained selling pressure. This explains why altcoins have underperformed Bitcoin and failed to reach previous cycle highs. Despite the overall bearish sentiment, historical patterns suggest that large-scale unlocks can sometimes improve short-term liquidity and spark temporary rebounds. An upcoming $4.7 billion unlock, the third largest since August 2024, is expected next week. However, the current rebound appears to have started only about a week in advance, indicating its influence may be weaker than previous cycles. A key market indicator is the altcoin total market cap's deviation from its 90-day moving average. The market is potentially approaching an oversold zone, which could set the stage for a tactical rebound. In summary, the altcoin market faces a structur...

"Sustained supply pressure continues to be released, and the altcoin market is shifting from a structural bull market to cyclical trading opportunities."

Over the past year, the anticipated altcoin rally has failed to materialize as expected. In previous cycles, Bitcoin's rise typically drove capital overflow, gradually transmitting to altcoin sectors. However, in this cycle, this transmission mechanism has significantly weakened. Retail participation remains consistently low, with many projects lacking compelling new narratives to drive the market or providing solutions with real-world application value. At the same time, continuous selling by early investors and the new supply brought by token unlocks are constantly putting pressure on the market. Against this backdrop, altcoins have continued to underperform, and investor sentiment is generally dampened. However, the market still features some periodically strong performers, and such opportunities can often be identified through certain market structure signals.

Sustained Supply Pressure: Altcoin Rally Momentum is Limited

Since October 2025, although Bitcoin has experienced periodic pullbacks, the market dominance has not significantly declined and has recently rebounded to new highs. This round of market action seems more like it is led by Bitcoin, driving altcoins to follow with periodic gains. At the same time, more and more companies adopting treasury allocation strategies continue to accumulate Bitcoin, keeping its structural demand stable.

In comparison, altcoins face more obvious supply pressure. Early investors continue to release their holdings, coupled with the new circulating supply brought by token unlocks, frequently limiting the market's upside during rebounds. Since August 2024, approximately $99 billion worth of tokens have been unlocked and entered circulation, bringing sustained supply shock to the market.

As retail participation enthusiasm cools, the supply side's impact has gradually become the key variable dominating price trends. This also explains why in this bull market from 2024 to 2025, altcoins have not only underperformed Bitcoin, but their overall market capitalization has even failed to reach the highs of this cycle.

Unlock Windows and Market Structure: Periodic Rebounds Are Still Possible

Historical experience shows that large-scale token unlocks often improve market liquidity in the short term and drive a rebound in trading activity. In many cases, altcoins experience periodic rebounds around unlock windows. This is due to both the improved承接 capacity brought by increased trading volume and the reallocation of capital within the sector.

Next week is expected to see about $4.7 billion in token unlocks, making it the third largest unlock week since August 2024. Historical data shows that in unlock windows of similar scale, the crypto market often rebounds in the weeks before the unlock, while the overall market capitalization tends to peak shortly after the unlock.

However, this rebound seems to have started only about a week in advance, indicating its influence may be weaker than previous instances. This round of unlocks is mainly concentrated in a few protocols, the vast majority of which come from the platform token WhiteBIT Coin from the European crypto exchange WhiteBIT. Although the token's fully diluted valuation (FDV) is about $16.6 billion, its average daily trading volume is only about $74 million, meaning a relatively limited trading scale, which could also lead to disproportionate price volatility.

Based on comprehensive historical experience, a more practical market indicator is the degree of deviation of the total altcoin market capitalization relative to its 90-day moving average. When the total market cap is more than 50% above the 90-day average, the market usually enters a period of阶段性过热区间; when it is about 30% below the 90-day average, tactical rebounds are more likely to occur. The current market structure suggests that the selling pressure on altcoins may be gradually approaching an over-released zone.

Overall, the altcoin market is at a critical juncture. Structurally, this sector still faces a dual pressure: on one hand, overall retail demand is weak; on the other hand, token unlocks and early investor selling continue to pressure the supply side. This structural characteristic has significantly weakened the traditional transmission path of "Bitcoin's rise driving altcoin gains" in this cycle.

The above views are from Matrix on Target, contact us to get the full Matrix on Target report.

Disclaimer: The market is risky, investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset trading may carry significant risks and instability. Investment decisions should be made after carefully considering personal circumstances and consulting financial professionals. Matrixport is not responsible for any investment decisions based on the information provided herein.

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the Matrixport report, why has the altcoin bull market been absent despite Bitcoin's rise?

AThe altcoin bull market has been absent primarily due to persistent supply pressures from continuous token unlocks and early investors' sustained selling, which have created structural headwinds. Additionally, the traditional mechanism where Bitcoin's rise leads to capital overflow into altcoins has significantly weakened in this cycle.

QWhat is the estimated amount of tokens that have been unlocked and entered circulation since August 2024, as mentioned in the report?

ASince August 2024, approximately $99 billion worth of tokens have been unlocked and entered circulation, creating a persistent supply shock for the market.

QWhat historical pattern is often observed around large-scale token unlock events for altcoins?

AHistorically, altcoins often experience a阶段性反弹 (phase-specific rebound) around large-scale unlock windows. Trading activity and liquidity often improve in the short term, with altcoin prices tending to反弹 (rebound) in the weeks before the unlock and the total market cap often reaching a short-term peak shortly after the unlock.

QWhat key market indicator does the report suggest is practical for identifying potential tactical rebounds in the altcoin market?

AA practical market indicator is the degree of deviation of the total altcoin market capitalization from its 90-day moving average. The market is more likely to see a tactical rebound when the total market cap is about 30% below this 90-day average.

QWhat is the primary reason the traditional 'Bitcoin rise leads to altcoin catch-up' transmission path has weakened in the current cycle?

AThis traditional transmission path has weakened due to a combination of persistently weak retail participation and sustained selling pressure on the supply side from token unlocks and early investor distributions, creating a structural characteristic that limits altcoin performance.

İlgili Okumalar

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit32 dk önce

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit32 dk önce

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbit40 dk önce

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbit40 dk önce

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight News44 dk önce

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight News44 dk önce

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit51 dk önce

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit51 dk önce

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit1 saat önce

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片