Mastercard Snags BVNK After Failed $2 Billion Coinbase Deal

bitcoinist2026-03-18 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-18 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Mastercard has acquired stablecoin infrastructure firm BVNK for up to $1.8 billion, including $300 million in contingent payments. This follows BVNK’s earlier failed $2 billion merger talks with Coinbase. The acquisition aims to expand Mastercard’s capabilities in digital assets and on-chain payments, integrating fiat rails with blockchain-based transactions. BVNK operates in over 130 countries and previously partnered with Visa to enable stablecoin payments. The deal, pending regulatory approval, is expected to close by year-end. Meanwhile, the stablecoin market has seen slowed growth recently but remains resilient despite broader crypto market volatility. Bitcoin is trading around $74,700, up 7% over the past week.

Mastercard has announced an acquisition of stablecoins infrastructure firm BVNK, which was previously in talks with Coinbase over a $2 billion deal.

Mastercard Will Be Acquiring BVNK For Up To $1.8 Billion

As announced in a press release, Mastercard has reached a definitive agreement to acquire BVNK for up to $1.8 billion, including $300 million in contingent payments.

BVNK is an enterprise stablecoins infrastructure solutions provider that operates across more than 130 countries. Last year, the company was in discussion with cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase over a merger, but in November, the deal fell through.

Now, it would appear that Mastercard has been successful in obtaining a signature from the stablecoins infrastructure firm. “The deal further expands Mastercard’s end-to-end support of digital assets and value movement across currencies, rails and regions,” noted the press release.

In January, another major payments card provider, Visa, also formed a partnership with BVNK, seeking its expertise to enable stablecoin payments on the Visa Direct platform.

Mastercard is also eyeing an integration of its fiat rails with on-chain payments in this acquisition. Jorn Lambert, Mastercard Chief Product Officer, said:

This acquisition reinforces what we have always done, using innovation and technology to power economies and empower people. Adding on-chain rails to our network will support speed and programmability for virtually every type of transaction.

Stablecoins, which are cryptocurrencies tied to fiat currencies, have been gaining adoption around the world in recent years, owing to positive regulation like the United States’ GENIUS Act. “We expect that most financial institutions and fintechs will in time provide digital currency services, be it with stablecoins or tokenized deposits,” noted Lambert.

Mastercard’s transaction with BVNK is expected to close before the end of the year, but according to the statement, it’s subject to regulatory review and other customary closing conditions.

Jesse Hemson-Struthers, BVNK co-founder and CEO, said:

This deal brings together complementary capabilities to define and deliver the future of money. Together, we’re able to deliver an unprecedented infrastructure for digital currency-based financial services.

During 2024 and most of 2025, the stablecoin sector enjoyed a notable uptrend, with the combined market cap of these tokens ballooning in size. Since October, however, the slowdown in the wider cryptocurrency market has also affected the fiat-pegged coins, as data from DefiLlama shows.

The value of the metric seems to have been moving sideways over the last few months | Source: DefiLlama

From the chart, it’s visible that the stablecoin market cap has seen its growth stall in recent months. However, unlike the rest of the sector, these assets haven’t actually faced any drawdown, at least not yet. As such, stablecoins have still been holding up relatively well in the wider context.

Bitcoin Price

At the time of writing, Bitcoin is trading around $74,700, up nearly 7% over the past week.

Looks like the price of the coin has shot up in the last couple of days | Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView

İlgili Sorular

QWhat company did Mastercard announce the acquisition of, and for how much?

AMastercard announced the acquisition of stablecoins infrastructure firm BVNK for up to $1.8 billion, including $300 million in contingent payments.

QWhy did the previous deal between BVNK and Coinbase not go through?

AThe previous merger deal between BVNK and cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase fell through in November of last year, though the specific reasons were not detailed in the article.

QHow does Mastercard's Chief Product Officer, Jorn Lambert, believe this acquisition will benefit their network?

AJorn Lambert stated that adding on-chain rails to Mastercard's network will support speed and programmability for virtually every type of transaction.

QWhat recent partnership did Visa, another major payments provider, form with BVNK?

AIn January, Visa formed a partnership with BVNK to leverage its expertise to enable stablecoin payments on the Visa Direct platform.

QWhat is the current trend in the stablecoin market cap according to data from DefiLlama?

AAccording to DefiLlama, the stablecoin market cap has seen its growth stall and has been moving sideways in recent months, though it has not faced a significant drawdown.

İlgili Okumalar

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit12 dk önce

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit12 dk önce

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit27 dk önce

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit27 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片