Market Expert Updates XRP Roadmap To $300 With New Data

bitcoinist2026-05-19 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-05-19 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Market expert CharuSan has updated his roadmap for XRP, predicting a rally to $300, driven by the potential enactment of the CLARITY Act and subsequent adoption by banks via Ripple's On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) service. He argues that for large-scale, global banking transactions, XRP's current price and circulating supply are insufficient. CharuSan explains that executing multi-billion dollar transfers for thousands of banks simultaneously would create a bottleneck and cause slippage unless the token's price is significantly higher to provide the necessary liquidity depth. He cites partnerships with major infrastructure providers as a foundation for swift adoption. Currently, XRP is trading around $1.38.

Market expert CharuSan has provided an updated roadmap on how XRP will rally to $300 once the CLARITY Act boosts its utility. He cited how banks will begin to adopt the altcoin via Ripple’s On-Demand Liquidity (ODL), which will, in turn, boost its price.

Pundit Provides Updated Roadmap Of How XRP Will Rally To $300

In an X post, the pundit stated that XRP will reach $300 because the price used by banks for transfers is calculated via ODL, and that the circulating supply does not reflect the amount of the altcoin available at that exact moment. Therefore, CharuSan declared that the price is not calculated based on the circulating supply.

He further explained that if a bank’s transfer amount is $200 billion and the XRP price is $20, then it would require 10 billion XRP to execute the payment. The pundit added that single transfers of 3, 5, or 10 billion would create a bottleneck in a coin with a circulating supply of 61 billion, especially given that it would be the global banking network using XRP. As such, he believes the token’s price will need to be much higher.

CharuSan noted that one wouldn’t be able to conduct the transfers of 13,000 banks with small values like $10 or $20. He also alluded to the DTCC and many other institutional firms that will be adopting the altcoin for global transactions. The pundit had earlier predicted that banks would start using it shortly after the CLARITY Act was enacted. He suggested that the rally would happen swiftly as Ripple has already partnered with giant infrastructure providers such as Volante, ACI Worldwide, and FINASTRA.

Why A Higher Price Is Needed

CharuSan further explained why XRP’s price needed to be higher for this level of adoption, noting that the token velocity doesn’t replace liquidity depth. He explained that one needs to consider the simultaneous volume of global transactions and how, with trillions in value, they could be locked even with a 3- to 5-second settlement across thousands of banks. He added that if the transaction volume exceeds the pool’s depth, slippage is inevitable.

He gave an example of the token as a super-fast car, and that if 300 cars are moving at the same wavelength into a tunnel that can only accommodate 20 cars, there is likely to be a bottleneck, as an accident occurs at the tunnel entrance. As such, the tunnel has to be large enough to accommodate 300 cars without causing friction. Similarly, CharuSan suggested that XRP’s price needs to be higher to accommodate all these global transactions simultaneously.

At the time of writing, the altcoin’s price is trading at around $1.38, down in the last 24 hours, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

XRP trading at $1.38 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the article, what is the main reason the market expert CharuSan believes XRP's price needs to reach $300?

ACharuSan believes XRP's price needs to reach $300 to accommodate the massive, simultaneous global transaction volume from thousands of banks without causing bottlenecks, slippage, or liquidity issues in the network.

QWhat specific piece of legislation does CharuSan credit for boosting XRP's utility and starting the adoption by banks?

ACharuSan credits the CLARITY Act for boosting XRP's utility and starting its adoption by banks.

QHow does Ripple's On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) relate to the calculation of XRP's price according to the expert's view?

AAccording to the expert, the price used by banks for transfers is calculated via Ripple's On-Demand Liquidity (ODL), and he argues this price is not calculated based on XRP's circulating supply.

QWhat analogy does CharuSan use to explain why XRP's price needs to be higher to handle global transactions?

ACharuSan uses the analogy of 300 super-fast cars trying to enter a tunnel that can only fit 20 cars, which would cause a bottleneck or 'accident.' The tunnel (representing XRP's liquidity depth and price) needs to be large enough to accommodate all cars (transactions) without friction.

QWhat was the price of XRP at the time the article was written, according to the data cited?

AAt the time of writing, the price of XRP was trading at around $1.38.

İlgili Okumalar

After Marvell's 32% Surge, the Chinese Chip Family Behind It Emerges

The stock price of Marvell Technology surged 32.5% on June 2nd, driven by NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang highlighting its custom ASICs and optical interconnects as core to AI data center architecture. This event brought attention to the Chinese semiconductor family behind Marvell: the Dai siblings. The story centers on three siblings, all UC Berkeley graduates, whose three-decade entrepreneurial journey aligns with major semiconductor industry shifts. In 1995, youngest sister Dai Wei Li co-founded Marvell with her husband Sehat Sutardja and his brother, focusing on storage controllers. Eldest brother Dai Wei Min founded EDA company Ultima, later sold to Cadence, and later founded VeriSilicon (芯原) in China, becoming a leading semiconductor IP provider. Second brother Dai Wei Jin co-founded EDA firm Silicon Perspective (sold to Cadence) and GPU IP company Vivante, later acquired by VeriSilicon. The combined "Dai-Sutardja" family network extends beyond Marvell. Their ventures and investments form a comprehensive ecosystem for the post-Moore's Law, chiplet era. Key holdings include: Dream Big Semiconductor (AI SuperNICs, acquired by Arm), Alphawave (high-speed SerDes IP, acquired by Qualcomm), and Silicon Box (a chiplet advanced packaging foundry). VeriSilicon itself thrives on the AI ASIC and IP boom in China. Collectively, the family's AI infrastructure-related portfolio is estimated at over $22 billion. Their strategy represents a distinct path: building critical components for open standards and key manufacturing capacity in the chiplet era, rather than pursuing standalone AI chip dominance. While this path may not create the next NVIDIA, it has enabled repeated successful exits and sustained influence within the global semiconductor industry.

marsbit1 saat önce

After Marvell's 32% Surge, the Chinese Chip Family Behind It Emerges

marsbit1 saat önce

Microsoft is Afraid of Being Marginalized by AI Giants

Microsoft, once the defining force of the PC era, now faces a familiar challenge in the AI age: the risk of being relegated to a profitable but invisible infrastructure provider. This anxiety was laid bare at Build 2026, where CEO Satya Nadella unveiled a major strategic pivot. The catalyst was a quiet April agreement that dissolved Microsoft's exclusive licensing and cloud-hosting deal with OpenAI, its once-vital partner. This erased Microsoft's key AI moat. With OpenAI and Anthropic defining AI applications and gaining enterprise traction—even within Microsoft's own ranks—Nadella had to answer: without exclusivity, what is Microsoft's role? The answer was a suite of seven in-house AI models, a developer-focused AI workstation (Surface RTX Spark Dev Box), and, most crucially, the Agent 365 platform for enterprise AI governance. The models, notably targeting Anthropic's strengths in coding and enterprise, signal a defensive move. However, the broader strategy is to make the models themselves less decisive. Financially, Microsoft's AI revenue is strong, driven largely by Azure running others' models. Yet its user-facing products like Copilot show weak penetration and engagement. Microsoft earns infrastructure money but lacks direct user mindshare. Nadella's core fear is being "hollowed out." As OpenAI and Anthropic prepare for IPOs and gain financial independence, they may build their own infrastructure, threatening Azure's lucrative AI revenue stream. Microsoft's window is to entrench itself deeper: not as the model creator, but as the indispensable platform for securely deploying, managing, and governing all AI models within the enterprise through Agent 365. Build 2026 revealed Microsoft's bet: in the AI era, the ultimate power lies not in any single model, but in the enterprise "operating system" that controls them. Nadella is determined to ensure Microsoft is the driver of this new era, not just a passenger.

marsbit1 saat önce

Microsoft is Afraid of Being Marginalized by AI Giants

marsbit1 saat önce

CPU, Quietly Returning to the Center of the AI Computing Power Stage

Over the past three years, AI computing power narratives have been dominated by GPUs. However, starting in 2026, this story began to shift. While training large models remains GPU-intensive, the rapid growth of inference and AI agent workloads, which require high levels of task orchestration, concurrency, and data flow management, has highlighted a renewed critical role for CPUs. These are tasks GPUs are not designed to handle. Intel's recent launch of the Xeon 6+ processor, built on its Intel 18A process and featuring up to 288 efficiency cores (E-cores), exemplifies this strategic pivot. It is positioned not as a mere companion to GPUs but as the essential "control plane" for AI infrastructure, optimized for high-density, energy-efficient, and high-throughput workloads characteristic of AI agents and inference. This "CPU resurgence" is not about CPUs outperforming GPUs in raw computation. It reflects a systemic bottleneck: as AI scales from training single models to deploying countless intelligent agents, the demand for coordination and data handling surges. Major cloud providers are also developing their own high-density ARM-based server CPUs for similar workloads. However, Intel's success with this strategy faces significant challenges. Competition includes NVIDIA's integrated CPU-GPU solutions, the expanding adoption of cloud vendors' in-house ARM CPUs, and the crucial market test of Intel's 18A manufacturing process against rivals like TSMC's N2. In conclusion, CPUs are indeed reclaiming a central, though redefined, role in AI compute—managing the complex orchestration that enables massive-scale AI deployment. While the trend is clear, which company will ultimately lead this CPU resurgence remains an open question to be decided in the data centers of 2027 and beyond.

marsbit1 saat önce

CPU, Quietly Returning to the Center of the AI Computing Power Stage

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片