Lighter DEX Introduces Native LIT Token as Part of Ecosystem Expansion

TheNewsCrypto2025-12-30 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-12-30 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Lighter, a decentralized perpetual exchange, has launched its native Light Infrastructure Token (LIT) as part of its ecosystem expansion. The token has a total supply of 1 billion, with 50% allocated to the ecosystem—including an airdrop for points program participants—and the other 50% reserved for the team and investors. LIT will be used for governance, staking to access premium trading and data services, and paying platform fees. Shortly after the announcement, Lighter activated the LIT/USDC trading pair, making the token available for trading.

Lighter, a decentralized perpetual exchange and DeFi infrastructure platform, has unveiled its native token for its crypto ecosystem, named Light Infrastructure Token (LIT). They confirmed it through their X handle by this morning in a thread post, describing its token allocation, structure, and utilities. Then, within a few hours, the lighter activated the LIT/USDC trading pair, and the token was live on the platform after the announcement.

Where this Lighter is built on Ethereum Layer 2 using Zero-knowledge rollup technology, in the post, they mentioned in the thread post that the earnings generated by their main DEX product, as well as future products and services, can be tracked openly by anyone in real time on chain and will be divided between growth and buybacks depending on market circumstances.

Token Allocation and LIT Use Cases

When it comes to token allocation, the total supply of the LIT token is 1 billion. With that, the Lighter clarified that half of the percentage is kept for the ecosystem. Then, the other 50% is reserved for the team/investors, in that 26% is vested in the team and 24% allocated to investors.

Regarding the ecosystem portion, the 2025 points season programs produced 12.5 million points, which will be distributed immediately through an airdrop. This equates to 25% of the entire token supply. The remaining 25% will be preserved for future reward schemes, with a tiny portion going toward partnerships and ecosystem growth.

With that, they have added that the LIT tokens are not only used for governance, but also have other use cases. The Lighter platform offers trading excursion and data verification services designed in different tiers, which require staking of the LIT tokens to use the features to their full potential. Also, LIT is to pay fees for all platform activities.

Lighter Introduces New Trading Pair

Then, shortly after the LIT token announcement, Lighter announced its LIT/USDC trading pair this morning through its X handle and Discord channel. As the LIT is live now and available for trading, it is drawing attention from crypto circles.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the name of the native token introduced by Lighter DEX and what does LIT stand for?

AThe native token is named Light Infrastructure Token, and LIT stands for Light Infrastructure Token.

QOn which blockchain and Layer 2 technology is Lighter built?

ALighter is built on Ethereum Layer 2 using Zero-knowledge rollup technology.

QWhat is the total supply of LIT tokens and how is it allocated between ecosystem, team, and investors?

AThe total supply is 1 billion LIT tokens. 50% is allocated to the ecosystem, 26% to the team, and 24% to investors.

QWhat are some of the use cases for the LIT token on the Lighter platform?

ALIT tokens are used for governance, staking to access trading and data verification services, and paying fees for all platform activities.

QHow did Lighter distribute a portion of the tokens to users and what was the program called?

ALighter distributed 12.5 million tokens (25% of total supply) through an airdrop as part of the 2025 points season programs.

İlgili Okumalar

Bitcoin Price Could See Another Crash, But What Is The Long-Term Prognosis?

Bitcoin recently surpassed $78,000, reigniting bullish sentiment and expectations of reaching six figures. However, analyst Behdark warns of a potential price crash before any sustained recovery. He suggests current optimism may be misleading, possibly a tactic by market makers to attract buyers before a downturn. Technical analysis indicates bearish patterns, such as a triangle or diamagnetic formation, signaling a likely decline. Key resistance levels to watch are $77,000 and $80,552, where a reversal may occur. If a correction happens, support levels are identified near $72,800, $67,885, and $67,677, with a break below possibly leading to a further 10% drop. The long-term outlook remains above the $60,000 cycle support, suggesting eventual recovery after a short-term dip.

bitcoinist44 dk önce

Bitcoin Price Could See Another Crash, But What Is The Long-Term Prognosis?

bitcoinist44 dk önce

Prediction Markets Under Bias

The article "Prediction Markets Under Bias" by Jeff Park of Bitwise argues against the common media portrayal of prediction markets as mere gambling or a social ill. It distinguishes between gambling and investment based on whether a participant's strategy has a positive expected value (+EV), not the market's structure. The author contends that prediction markets, like poker, are skill-based and can be a legitimate form of investment, offering individuals autonomy, truth discovery, and decentralized value. The piece critiques the common conflation of prediction markets with casino gambling, highlighting their role in risk hedging and capital efficiency, similar to insurance and securitization. A key differentiator is their precision and finite expiration, which makes prices directly anchor to factual outcomes, rewarding deep research and information advantage rather than punishing the uninformed. The author concludes that media opposition often stems from a structural bias, as these markets challenge traditional information gatekeepers and promote a more democratic, transparent system for pricing truth. The real debate is not about information having a price, but about who controls and profits from it.

marsbit1 saat önce

Prediction Markets Under Bias

marsbit1 saat önce

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

Why do you always lose money on Polymarket? Because you bet on news, while the pros study the rules. This article explains how top traders ("che tou") profit by meticulously analyzing market rules, not just predicting events. Polymarket, a prediction market platform, often sees disputes over event outcomes due to ambiguous rule wording. For instance, a market asking "Who will be the leader of Venezuela by the end of 2026?" was misinterpreted by many who bet on Delcy Rodríguez, assuming she held power. However, the rules specified "officially holds" as the formally appointed, sworn-in individual. Since Nicolás Maduro was still recognized as president officially, he won the market—even being in prison. To resolve such disputes, Polymarket uses a decentralized arbitration system via UMA protocol. The process involves: 1. Proposal: Anyone can propose a market outcome by staking 750 USDC, earning 5 USDC if unchallenged. 2. Dispute: A 2-hour window allows challenges with a 750 USDC stake; successful challengers earn 250 USDC. 3. Discussion: A 48-hour period on UMA Discord for evidence and debate. 4. Voting: UMA token holders vote in two 24-hour phases (blind then public). Outcomes require >65% consensus and 5M tokens voted; otherwise, four re-votes occur before Polymarket intervention. 5. Settlement: Results are final and automatic. Unlike traditional courts, Polymarket’s system lacks separation between arbitrators and stakeholders—voters often hold market positions, creating conflicts of interest. This leads to herd mentality in discussions and non-transparent outcomes without explanatory rulings, preventing precedent formation. Thus, success on Polymarket hinges on deep rule interpretation, not just event prediction, exploiting gaps between reality and contractual wording.

marsbit1 saat önce

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

marsbit1 saat önce

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

DeepSeek, a leading Chinese AI company, has initiated its first external funding round, aiming to raise at least $300 million at a valuation of no less than $10 billion. This move marks a significant shift from its founder Liang Wenfeng’s previous idealistic stance of rejecting external capital to maintain independence. Despite strong financial backing from its parent company, quantitative trading firm幻方量化 (Huanfang Quant), which provided an estimated $700 million in revenue in 2025 alone, DeepSeek faces mounting challenges. Key issues include a 15-month gap in major model updates, delays in its flagship V4 release, and the loss of several core researchers to competitors offering significantly higher compensation. The company is also undergoing a strategic pivot by migrating its infrastructure from NVIDIA’s CUDA to Huawei’s Ascend platform, a move aligned with China’s push for technological self-reliance amid U.S. export controls. However, DeepSeek lags behind rivals like智谱AI and MiniMax—both now publicly listed—in areas such as product ecosystem, multimodal capabilities, and commercialization. The funding round, though relatively small in scale, is seen as a way to establish a market-validated valuation anchor, making employee stock options more competitive and facilitating talent retention. It also signals DeepSeek’s transition from a pure research-oriented organization to a commercially-driven player in the global AI ecosystem.

marsbit1 saat önce

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

marsbit1 saat önce

Warsh, Trump's Next 'Scapegoat' at the Federal Reserve?

Kevin Warsh, a nominee for the Federal Reserve chair, faces a challenging confirmation hearing amid political pressure from former President Donald Trump to implement immediate and significant interest rate cuts. Warsh has proposed reforms including reducing the Fed’s communication frequency and shrinking its $6.7 trillion balance sheet. However, market expectations for rate cuts remain limited, creating tension with Trump’s demands. Warsh’s stance has shifted over time, from hawkish during the financial crisis to more dovish recently, citing AI-driven productivity gains. His confirmation is further complicated by Republican Senator Thom Tillis’s threat to block the nomination unless an investigation into current Chair Jerome Powell is dropped. Trump has warned of firing Powell if he doesn’t leave on time. Observers note that Warsh risks becoming a "scapegoat"—either by yielding to political pressure and fueling inflation, or by resisting and facing Trump’s backlash. His ties to Trump’s circle and Wall Street support may aid his nomination, but his ability to balance political demands with the Fed’s credibility remains uncertain. Historical precedents, like Arthur Burns’s compliance with Nixon, highlight the risks of political interference in monetary policy.

marsbit2 saat önce

Warsh, Trump's Next 'Scapegoat' at the Federal Reserve?

marsbit2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片