Lighter buybacks hit 3% of supply – But LIT holds above $1 IF…

ambcrypto2026-03-08 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-08 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

LIT faces persistent bearish pressure, trading near $1.10 with weekly losses of 23%. Despite a buyback program that repurchased 7.48M tokens (3% of supply) using protocol revenue, market sentiment remains negative. Sell volume dominates, and declining revenue and trading activity suggest continued downside risk. Key support at $1 is at risk of breaking, with further decline possible toward $0.96 unless momentum shifts above $1.30.

Lighter faced persistent bearish pressure after failing to hold above $1.50. Since then, the altcoin traded inside a descending channel and touched $1.07.

At press time, Lighter [LIT] traded near $1.10, down 2.4% daily and extending weekly losses to roughly 23%.

Amid this pressure, the Lighter team attempted to counter selling momentum through a sustained token buyback program.

Lighter buybacks reach 3% supply

Lighter launched a token buyback program in early January and steadily repurchased LIT tokens from the open market.

Since then, the protocol bought back 7.48 million LIT tokens, worth about $12.67 million. In the most recent purchase, the team acquired 812,000 LIT for $1.06 million.

According to the team’s statement, the repurchased tokens represent around 3% of the circulating supply.

Notably, the protocol funds these buybacks using revenue generated across its products.

However, the network’s Revenue declined sharply in recent months.

Daily Revenue previously reached peaks near $1.5 million, but recently fell closer to $100k–$120k levels.

Over the past day, Revenue stood near $122k, highlighting a sharp drop from earlier highs.

Even so, the team continued executing automated buybacks, signaling an ongoing commitment to stabilizing token demand.

Bearish sentiment still dominates the market

Despite the buyback efforts, market sentiment remained largely bearish. On Binance derivatives markets, sellers dominated activity through most of the past month.

On the 8th of March, LIT recorded roughly 1.7 million in Sell Volume versus 1.28 million in Buy Volume.

Over the same period, Net Buy Volume dropped to –3.5 million, reflecting persistent selling pressure.

Historically, sustained sell-side dominance often precedes further downside as bearish momentum builds.

Perpetual markets also signaled reduced participation. The Volume remained above $1 billion, but declined noticeably in recent days.

Perps Volume fell from roughly $3.1 billion to $1.1 billion within three days, marking a decline of about 64%.

This drop suggested traders reduced exposure while waiting for a clearer market direction.

Is $1 support at risk?

Lighter continued showing downside momentum amid broader risk-off conditions across crypto markets. That environment encouraged holders to sell small rebounds, pushing LIT toward repeated lower lows.

Momentum indicators also reflected weakening bullish strength.

The Stochastic RSI formed a bearish crossover inside oversold territory and remained near the lower band. That structure indicated sustained seller control.

If selling pressure persists, LIT could break the $1 support and slide toward $0.96.

However, a recovery above $1.30 may shift momentum, where the Parabolic SAR currently sits.


Final Summary

  • Lighter extended losses after failing to hold $1.50, trading near $1.10 within a persistent descending channel.
  • The protocol bought back 7.48 million LIT tokens (~$12.67M) since January, equal to about 3% of the circulating supply.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat was the price of LIT at the time of the article and how much had it fallen weekly?

AAt press time, LIT traded near $1.10, down 2.4% daily and extending weekly losses to roughly 23%.

QHow many LIT tokens has the protocol bought back since the program began and what percentage of the supply does this represent?

AThe protocol has bought back 7.48 million LIT tokens, worth about $12.67 million, which represents around 3% of the circulating supply.

QWhat was the recent daily revenue for the Lighter protocol and how does it compare to previous highs?

AOver the past day, the revenue stood near $122k, which is a sharp drop from previous peaks near $1.5 million.

QWhat did the market data on Binance on March 8th indicate about trading sentiment for LIT?

AOn March 8th, LIT recorded roughly 1.7 million in Sell Volume versus 1.28 million in Buy Volume, with a Net Buy Volume of -3.5 million, reflecting persistent selling pressure and bearish sentiment.

QAccording to the technical analysis, what are the potential price targets if the $1 support level breaks?

AIf the $1 support level breaks, LIT could slide toward $0.96. A recovery above $1.30 may shift momentum.

İlgili Okumalar

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

**Summary: A Conversation with Jia Hang on Two Decades of China's Payment Globalization** Jia Hang, a veteran with over twenty years in payments, reflects on China's attempts to build a global payment network through three key phases: UnionPay (card networks), Alipay+ (digital wallets), and now, stablecoins. His journey began at UnionPay International, aiming to establish China's card network abroad. While successful in following Chinese tourists ("where Chinese go, UnionPay goes"), it struggled to achieve true global scale. The core lesson: card networks like Visa/Mastercard's unassailable advantage isn't just technical standards, but their deeply entrenched **governance and profit-sharing models** that create powerful network effects. Competing as the "same species" is nearly impossible. At Ant Group, he led Alipay+, a strategy to bypass card networks by interconnecting local e-wallets worldwide. While innovative, it faced a similar ceiling. Mobile QR payments and card swipes were essentially **the same species competing for the same pie**, lacking a disruptive value proposition for users or a sustainable new incentive model to replace the card networks' established flywheel. Today, at Singapore's DCS, Jia focuses on stablecoin-based payments. He argues stablecoins represent a fundamental shift. They are not competing with Visa for consumer payments but challenging the **traditional banking and account system for value movement**. Products like "U Cards" (stablecoin-linked payment cards) are transitional, leveraging existing card networks for acceptance while building new rails. The real potential lies in stablecoins enabling seamless, low-cost global value transfer, potentially reorganizing the financial infrastructure around **accounts rather than cards**. Jia believes stablecoin adoption for local retail payments, cross-border transactions, and as high-yield savings vehicles is becoming irreversible. This could gradually reduce reliance on traditional fiat channels, especially in regions with weak currencies or capital controls. The quest for the "next global payment network" continues, now centered on whether stablecoins can successfully bridge Web2 and Web3, establish new governance, and create compelling user value beyond mere cost reduction.

marsbit24 dk önce

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

marsbit24 dk önce

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

Circle's stock price has plunged approximately 76% from its 2023 peak, reflecting a major market revaluation. Despite this, Circle President Heath Tarbert emphasized the company's focus on long-term execution and its dominant position with USDC's $73 billion circulation across 34 blockchains. The competitive landscape is intensifying. A new consortium-backed stablecoin, Open USD, is attempting to challenge incumbents by sharing reserve yields with partners. More significantly, Visa's new stablecoin platform, initially supporting Open USD while also being compatible with USDC, could erode Circle's network effects. In response, Circle is expanding into real-world payments through partnerships like the one with Japan's JCB. Separately, Tether (USDT) faces a two-year compliance window under new U.S. regulations, requiring it to adjust its reserve composition away from assets like Bitcoin and loans towards cash and U.S. Treasuries. Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, Standard Chartered-backed fintech firm Dian Dian is poised to launch a licensed HKD-pegged stablecoin (HKDAP), moving the industry into a phase where the real test is integrating licensed stablecoins into actual payment flows and corporate treasury systems. The sharp decline in Circle's stock underscores a broader shift: the stablecoin market is moving from a winner-takes-all dynamic to a multi-player competitive arena where execution, compliance, and real-world utility are becoming paramount.

marsbit25 dk önce

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

marsbit25 dk önce

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight News35 dk önce

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight News35 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片