L1 Native Tokens' Final 'Monetary Premium' Is Collapsing!

比推2025-12-08 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-12-08 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The monetary premium on Layer 1 (L1) native tokens is rapidly fading as stablecoins increasingly dominate as the preferred medium of exchange (MoE) in on-chain economies. While L1 valuations historically incorporated a monetary premium derived from their use as a store of value (SoV) or MoE, data shows a clear shift. On Ethereum, ETH is no longer the primary MoE; stablecoins like USDC and USDT now lead in on-chain transaction volume and top Uniswap pools. A similar trend is observed on L2s like Arbitrum. On Solana, SOL remains the primary MoE due to platforms like Pumpfun and Raydium using it as a quote currency, but USDC is gaining significant traction, especially with new launchpads like MetaDAO adopting it as the default pairing asset. On BNB Chain, USDT has overtaken BNB in trading volume, which had previously been the dominant MoE. The author argues that the market has chosen stablecoins as the superior on-chain MoE. Attempts by ecosystems to enforce their native token as a quote currency add friction and costs for users with minimal price impact. Improved on-chain UX and liquidity are reducing the historical necessity of using volatile native tokens for transactions. The next wave of users will likely use stablecoins, not native tokens, for everyday exchange, further eroding this monetary premium.

Author: Silvio (@SilvioBusonero)

Original Title: The monetary premium on L1s is fading

Compiled and Edited by: BitpushNews

The valuation of L1 blockchains is a comprehensive reflection of multiple factors: including cultural narrative (Memetics), network fees, security, and the development of upper-layer applications. Among these, the most underestimated is the so-called "Monetary Premium".

The monetary premium stems from the demand of market participants to use assets as a Store of Value (SoV) or a Medium of Exchange (MoE).

Store of Value is directly related to the robustness (lindiness) and degree of decentralization of an asset, so it is not an easy market entry strategy.
In contrast, acting as a Medium of Exchange may be easier to achieve. Tokens can serve as the primary method for value exchange and measurement within the blockchain economy.

This is similar to the role of tokens in the Web2 economy:

Roblox's in-game token Robux, has strong exchange value.
When Meme coins started to grow, people bought SOL to enter and exit Meme trades. As SOL was the default currency on Pump platforms, most traders did not convert assets back to dollars but kept some SOL ready to "ape". A similar situation occurred with ETH during the 2021 NFT boom. A large number of users began using the native asset for transactions, effectively creating the utility of a Medium of Exchange (MoE).

Does the Premium Still Exist?

The answer is: No, this premium is rapidly disappearing. Users are increasingly inclined to use stablecoins for transactions.

Ethereum — Stablecoins Have Become the Medium of Exchange

Judging from the on-chain transaction volume of mainstream tokens, Ethereum's native token ETH is no longer the primary medium of exchange it once was.
ETH's dominance as an MoE is declining, while USDC and USDT are rising in popularity on transaction volume charts and in top Uniswap liquidity pools.

The situation is similar for L2s like Arbitrum.

Solana — SOL Maintains the Lead, but USDC is Catching Up

SOL remains the primary medium of exchange and the highest volume asset on Solana (but USDC is catching up). This is mainly because platforms like Pumpfun and Raydium tend to use SOL as the quote currency, while other platforms (like Meteora) have a mixed situation.
However, new launch platforms like MetaDAO are setting USDC as the default paired trading asset.

BNB and USDT Go Hand in Hand

From 2021 to 2022, BNB absolutely dominated the role of medium of exchange, but then USDT gained market share and surpassed BNB.

The Market Has Chosen the Medium of Exchange — And It's Stablecoins

There is no such thing as "Onchain Legal Tender" in the on-chain market.

Some projects use a "quote asset" strategy, making their native token the medium of exchange, such as Zora and Virtuals. But in reality, this increases transaction costs for both users and projects, while having minimal impact on the token price itself. Ecosystem tokens can attempt a similar strategy through asset issuance platforms, i.e., requiring quotes in a specific token, but this may not be worth it.

The user experience (UX) and liquidity of the on-chain market are improving: the past monetary premium was also partly due to a lack of alternatives and lower liquidity.

The next batch of billions of users will use the same medium of exchange as in real life (USDC, Euros, etc.).

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original article link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7594034

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the 'monetary premium' in the context of L1 blockchains, and what two primary needs does it stem from?

AThe 'monetary premium' refers to the portion of an L1 blockchain's valuation that comes from its use as a form of money. It stems from the market's need to use the asset as a Store of Value (SoV) and as a Medium of Exchange (MoE).

QAccording to the article, which type of asset are users increasingly preferring to use for on-chain transactions instead of native L1 tokens?

AUsers are increasingly preferring to use stablecoins, such as USDC and USDT, for on-chain transactions instead of native L1 tokens like ETH or SOL.

QOn the Solana blockchain, what is a key reason why SOL remains a primary medium of exchange, and what new trend is challenging this?

ASOL remains a primary medium of exchange on Solana largely because platforms like Pumpfun and Raydium use it as the default quote currency. However, this is being challenged by new launch platforms, such as MetaDAO, which are setting USDC as the default trading pair.

QThe article states that the monetary premium is 'fading'. What two reasons are given for the past existence of this premium?

AThe past existence of the monetary premium was partly due to a lack of other options for users and lower liquidity on-chain. The improving user experience (UX) and liquidity in on-chain markets are contributing to its decline.

QWhat does the author suggest about the next billion users entering the crypto space regarding their preferred medium of exchange?

AThe author suggests that the next billion users will use the same mediums of exchange they use in real life, such as USDC or the Euro, rather than the native tokens of L1 blockchains.

İlgili Okumalar

Is AI Creating a New Class of 'Information Poor'?

AI is generating a new kind of "information poverty." The core issue isn't that AI denies answers to the poor; it's that it provides abundant, cheap, and plausible-sounding answers to everyone. This availability shifts the true scarcity from obtaining answers to possessing the **judgment to evaluate them** and the access to turn them into real-world opportunities. New information poverty thus describes those who have AI tools and outputs, but lack the complementary skills, authorization, and contextual experience to critically assess and act on them. Research reveals a multi-layered divide: access to AI is stratified by income and platform design (e.g., premium vs. free, embedded tools). In workplaces, usage heavily favors higher-paid, more experienced, or formally trained employees, with AI often automating entry-level tasks that were traditional stepping stones. Crucially, the heaviest users are often mid-career professionals whose existing expertise allows them to effectively judge and leverage AI outputs, while novices risk over-relying on them without building judgment. While controlled experiments show AI can significantly boost low-skilled workers' performance, real-world adoption and benefit are constrained by unequal social and organizational structures. Historically, general-purpose technologies first reward those with existing complementary capital. AI, by affecting judgment-based work, may accelerate and deepen this initial inequality gap, even if it narrows over decades. The danger lies in the illusion of competence it creates, potentially stunting the very critical thinking needed in an era where judgment is paramount.

marsbit3 dk önce

Is AI Creating a New Class of 'Information Poor'?

marsbit3 dk önce

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

On June 5th, South Korea's stock market experienced a sharp decline, with major chipmakers like Samsung and SK Hynix dropping nearly 10%. Amidst the turmoil, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's visit to Seoul played a dramatic role in boosting market sentiment. Following a dinner meeting with SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won and SK Hynix CEO Kwak Noh-Jung, Huang confirmed that NVIDIA's new Vera CPU will utilize SK Hynix DRAM. The companies announced a multi-year technical partnership to co-develop next-generation memory for NVIDIA's AI infrastructure, covering products from data centers to personal AI and robotics. This collaboration extends beyond memory supply. SK Hynix is integrating NVIDIA's AI and Omniverse platform into its own semiconductor design and manufacturing processes, including computational lithography and creating digital twins of its fabrication plants for autonomous operation. While strengthening ties with SK Hynix, NVIDIA is diversifying its supply chain for the upcoming HBM4 memory, with Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron all certified as suppliers for its Vera Rubin platform. Despite this, Huang warned that the global chip shortage, driven by relentless demand from AI factory construction, is expected to persist for several years across the entire supply chain. His visit underscores NVIDIA's systematic effort to deepen integration with South Korea's broader tech industry.

marsbit55 dk önce

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

marsbit55 dk önce

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

The Nasdaq plunged 4.18% on June 5, 2026, its worst single-day drop in over a year, as a much stronger-than-expected US jobs report triggered fears of economic overheating and delayed Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. The selloff, centered on high-valuation tech and AI stocks like Nvidia and Broadcom, spread across major indices. The article examines whether this signals a market top. The strong May non-farm payrolls data, nearly double expectations, pushed bond yields higher, directly hurting rate-sensitive tech stocks. This exposed vulnerabilities in the crowded AI trade, where valuations had soared on narratives of infinite growth, despite emerging signs of slowing order momentum and corporate AI monetization challenges. Prior to the drop, market indicators flashed warning signs: historically high valuations (e.g., Shiller CAPE ratio near 39.5), extreme bullish sentiment, and high levels of leverage. Technical charts showed key support levels being breached. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears, citing risks of "stagflation" and AI bubble comparisons to the dot-com era, warn of a potential significant correction. Bulls view the drop as a healthy correction within a bull market, underpinned by a strong economy and expected corporate earnings growth of around 7% in 2026. The immediate future hinges on upcoming key events: the May CPI inflation data and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will critically shape market expectations for the Fed's rate path. The article concludes that conditions for a major market top are aligning, marking a fragile transition from narrative-driven gains to a phase demanding validation from macroeconomic data and corporate fundamentals. Caution is advised.

marsbit59 dk önce

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

marsbit59 dk önce

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

The Nasdaq Composite plummeted 4.18% on June 5, its biggest single-day drop since April 2025, triggering widespread debate over whether the U.S. stock market has peaked. The sell-off was sparked by a stronger-than-expected U.S. non-farm payrolls report, which fueled fears of economic overheating and pushed back market expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts, leading to a sharp rise in Treasury yields. The AI sector, the primary driver of the recent bull market, suffered severe losses, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index crashing over 10%. Stocks like Nvidia, Broadcom, and Micron led the decline. Concerns are mounting about the sustainability of AI capital expenditures and high valuations, with signs of order cuts for next-generation chips emerging. Analyses point to several warning signs: historically high market valuations (e.g., elevated Shiller CAPE ratio, Buffett Indicator), extreme bullish sentiment indicators, and significant insider selling. The sell-off also caused a key technical breakdown, with the S&P 500 breaking below its short-term moving average and testing its 200-day moving average. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears warn this could be the start of a bubble deflation or a "stagflation" scenario, while bulls view it as a healthy, overdue correction within a bull market driven by solid corporate earnings growth. A more moderate view suggests the easy liquidity-driven rally is over, and markets are entering a phase of fundamental stock-picking with potential for consolidation. The immediate future hinges on key upcoming events: the May CPI report and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will be critical in determining whether this is a temporary pullback or the beginning of a more significant trend reversal. The consensus is that the era of one-directional market gains may be ending, requiring increased investor caution.

Odaily星球日报1 saat önce

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

Odaily星球日报1 saat önce

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

"The First 'Agent' Ruling: What Was Decided?" On April 30, the Guangzhou Internet Court issued a ruling—China's first behavior preservation order in the intelligent agent (AI agent) field. The defendant, an open-source AI agent software, was ordered to stop downloads, cease actions that bypassed a platform's technical protection measures, and delete related tutorials and data. The core issue: the software used the operating system's "accessibility service" permissions to automate user interactions within other apps without those platforms' authorization. This mirrors a recent US case where Amazon sued Perplexity for similar reasons—bypassing Amazon's API to directly scrape and interact with its pages—and won a preliminary injunction. Both rulings establish a crucial legal boundary for the AI agent era: agents cannot operate unchecked. The article argues the fundamental legal principle emerging is one of **dual authorization**. An AI agent requires both **user consent** AND **platform consent** to operate legitimately within that platform's ecosystem. Bypassing platform rules through system-level permissions, even with user permission, undermines platform responsibilities for content moderation, data security, and user privacy, creating liability issues. The piece uses the evolution of "Doubao Phone" (an AI-integrated smartphone) as a case study. Its initial, aggressive version that bypassed platform controls faced roadblocks. Its upcoming 2.0 version is reportedly pivoting to negotiate API access and authorization deals with major platforms (like Alibaba's ecosystem), seen as a strategic adaptation to the new regulatory reality. A global trend is identified: the era of unregulated, "wild west" growth for AI agents is ending, replaced by a **compliance race**. This raises barriers to entry, as securing platform authorizations becomes a new cost. Open-source status is also not a legal shield if the code facilitates bypassing technical protections. In conclusion, these first rulings target not the largest, but the most **aggressive and representative** cases. By setting precedent with them, regulators are efficiently steering the entire industry towards a new, more regulated operating paradigm defined by dual authorization and platform cooperation.

marsbit1 saat önce

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures