Kraken snaps up $60B token platform Magna – IPO next?

ambcrypto2026-02-19 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-19 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Kraken's parent company, Payward, has acquired tokenization platform Magna for an undisclosed sum as it prepares for a potential IPO. Magna, which recorded a peak TVL of $60 billion in 2025, will operate as a standalone platform supported by Kraken's liquidity and resources. The deal enhances Kraken's capabilities in token issuance, vesting, staking, custody, and escrow services. This move aligns with Payward's confidential IPO filing with the SEC in November, following its reported $2.2 billion in adjusted revenue for 2025. Despite a challenging crypto market where Bitcoin has declined and newly listed firms trade below debut prices, Kraken aims to proceed with its public listing alongside other industry players like Ledger, Copper, Securitize, and Consensys.

Kraken’s parent company, Payward, has acquired tokenization platform Magna as it prepares for a potential IPO. The paperwork was confidentially filed with the SEC.

Kraken expands, IPO plans underway

The exchange has so far stated that Magna will operate as a standalone platform. They’ll be supported by the exchange’s liquidity, resources and know-how.

Payward and Kraken Co-CEO Arjun Sethi made collective intent known with this deal. He noted that they’d want to “help projects move from idea to execution,” without “locking them into one stack.”

This deal will increase Kraken’s ability to handle token issuance, vesting, staking, custody and escrow services. These are tools increasingly in demand as more projects move on-chain.

Magna CEO Bruno Faviero said joining Kraken will give the platform more resources and global reach. Expressing happiness at the development, he stated,

“I couldn’t be more excited about our shared vision to support token ecosystems and the builders behind them across formation, launch, and growth.”

Magna currently serves more than 160 clients and recorded a peak TVL of $60 billion in 2025. The acquisition is in line with Payward filing for an IPO in November. They reported $2.2 billion in adjusted revenue for 2025.

They’re not the only ones...

Hardware wallet maker Ledger and digital asset custodian Copper have both explored US listings.

Tokenization firm Securitize recently reported revenue growth of more than 840% ahead of its own IPO plans. Consensys, the parent company of MetaMask, is also reportedly preparing for a debut.

Optimism was high at the start of 2025, as Bitcoin [BTC] surged to around $126,000 in October from under $94,000 at the end of 2024. Several crypto firms went public during that rally, many posting strong first-day gains.

But things went sour quickly.

Since October, BTC has fallen below $63,000, and newly listed crypto stocks have struggled. Bullish, eToro and Gemini are all trading well below their debut prices, with some down more than half.

Even Circle, which has held up better than its peers, remains below its opening level.


Final Summary

  • Kraken’s Magna acquisition will speed up IPO plans in a less than ideal crypto market.
  • The real test will be whether Kraken can go public as rivals struggle post-listing.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the parent company of Kraken and what significant acquisition did it make?

AKraken's parent company is Payward, and it has acquired the tokenization platform Magna.

QHow much was Magna's peak TVL in 2025 and how many clients does it serve?

AMagna recorded a peak TVL of $60 billion in 2025 and currently serves more than 160 clients.

QWhat are some of the services that Kraken's acquisition of Magna will enhance?

AThe acquisition will increase Kraken's ability to handle token issuance, vesting, staking, custody, and escrow services.

QWhat was Payward's adjusted revenue for 2025 as mentioned in the article?

APayward reported $2.2 billion in adjusted revenue for 2025.

QAccording to the article, how has the performance of newly listed crypto stocks been since Bitcoin's price decline from its October high?

ASince Bitcoin fell from its October high, newly listed crypto stocks have struggled, with Bullish, eToro, and Gemini all trading well below their debut prices, some down more than half.

İlgili Okumalar

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbit32 dk önce

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbit32 dk önce

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手42 dk önce

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手42 dk önce

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbit1 saat önce

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbit1 saat önce

AI Bubble Is Bursting

The AI Bubble is Bursting: A Necessary Purge on the Path to Ubiquitous Intelligence Market volatility has reignited debates about an AI bubble, with figures like Ray Dalio pointing to high valuations. However, this parallels the dot-com bubble, which, despite its crash, laid the physical infrastructure for today's internet era. The current AI investment frenzy, with tech giants planning trillions in infrastructure spending far outstripping current AI application revenues, appears similarly imbalanced. This 'bubble' is seen as an inevitable phase for a disruptive technology, paying the "innovation tax." Critically, AI inference costs have plummeted over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence nearly free at the margin. This hasn't reduced spending but has instead unlocked massive new demand, as seen in enterprise AI cloud expenditure tripling. This follows the Jevons Paradox: efficiency gains lead to greater total consumption. The market is now entering a cleansing phase, weeding out speculative ventures lacking real moats. The deeper shift is a move from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to value creation in operational expenditure (OpEx) through AI applications that solve real industry problems. While infrastructure valuations are high, rapid earnings growth from widespread AI adoption across sectors—from manufacturing and finance to law and healthcare—may digest these valuations over time. Ultimately, this creative destruction will leave behind robust infrastructure and optimized models, cheaply powering an AI-augmented future for all industries, much as the internet became indispensable after its own bubble burst. The core productive potential remains undiminished.

链捕手1 saat önce

AI Bubble Is Bursting

链捕手1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片