‘Just the beginning’: Paul Atkins signals SEC’s new crypto rule changes

ambcrypto2026-03-20 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-20 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

SEC Chair Paul Atkins announced the agency will soon issue formal proposed rules to codify its recent interpretive guidance, which classifies most crypto assets as non-securities and categorizes them into five groups: digital commodities, collectibles, tools, stablecoins, and securities. The SEC also plans to create a regulatory sandbox for experimentation. Atkins noted that while this is a significant step, courts could still deviate from the SEC’s interpretation. He described the move as a "bridge" as Congress progresses on the CLARITY Act. Senator Cynthia Lummis reported that stablecoin yield issues are "99% resolved" in the bill negotiations. Market optimism for the bill has improved slightly despite earlier setbacks.

Paul Atkins, the chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), has said the agency will soon issue formally proposed rules for the recent crypto asset classification guidance.

In the latest interpretive guidance, the SEC designated most crypto assets as non-securities. Additionally, the framework classified digital assets into five categories, including digital commodities, collectibles, tools, stablecoins, and securities. It also explained how they fit into the current U.S. law.

To codify the framework, Atkins said the agency will formalize it alongside creating a sandbox for experimenting with different crypto products. But he warned the court could still ‘deviate’ from its interpretation.

This is just an interpretation, and the courts can deviate from that if they don’t like our rationale.

He added,

We’ll shortly follow up with a proposed rule to put much more of this framework into effect. And construct a series of exemptions, equivalent of sandbox for people to experiment and develop proof-of-concept for their products.

SEC’s plans and CLARITY Act progress

For Atkins, SEC’s interpretation of crypto laws is ‘just a beginning,’ and the move would be a ‘bridge’ as the Congress works its way through the CLARITY Act. In fact, most of the guidance issued in the past few days and months covers key topics being discussed in the CLARITY Act. For others, the SEC’s proposed rulemaking on key issues would be sufficient for the market, even if the CLARITY Act’s momentum stalls.

That said, the stablecoin yield issue has been the key deal breaker dragging the crypto bill.

Even so, after the recent Senate Republican meeting on the bill, Senator Cynthia Lummis was ‘positive,’ terming it ‘productive,’ and added,

We’re 99% of the way there on stablecoin yield, and negotiations on the digital asset portions of the bill are in a good place.

Source: Polymarket

As expected, market optimism on the bill’s passage improved slightly following the recent meetings and updates.

In early March, the chance of the CLARITY Act becoming law dropped to nearly 50% as the White House and the banking industry hit a snag over stablecoin yields.

Whatever the outcome, however, the crypto industry may still be in a better position for clear rules for the road if the SEC continues to issue and codify them.


Final Summary

  • SEC Chair reiterated plans to formalize rulemaking for its recent interpretive guidance on crypto asset classification and how current U.S. law applies to them.
  • According to Senator Lummis, the stablecoin yield issue was ‘99% resolved’ in CLARITY Act talks.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat did SEC Chairman Paul Atkins announce regarding crypto asset classification?

APaul Atkins announced that the SEC will soon issue formally proposed rules to codify its recent interpretive guidance on crypto asset classification, which designates most crypto assets as non-securities and categorizes them into five groups.

QHow did the SEC classify digital assets in its latest guidance?

AThe SEC classified digital assets into five categories: digital commodities, collectibles, tools, stablecoins, and securities, explaining how they fit under current U.S. law.

QWhat did Paul Atkins say about the role of courts in relation to the SEC's interpretation?

AAtkins warned that courts could deviate from the SEC's interpretation if they disagree with the rationale, emphasizing that the guidance is just an interpretation.

QWhat is the CLARITY Act, and how does it relate to the SEC's actions?

AThe CLARITY Act is a congressional bill addressing crypto regulation. The SEC's interpretive guidance covers key topics in the bill and is seen as a 'bridge' while Congress works on the legislation.

QAccording to Senator Cynthia Lummis, what progress has been made on the stablecoin yield issue in the CLARITY Act negotiations?

ASenator Lummis stated that the stablecoin yield issue is '99% resolved' and that negotiations on the digital asset portions of the bill are in a good place.

İlgili Okumalar

North Korean Hackers Loot $500 Million in a Single Month, Becoming the Top Threat to Crypto Security

North Korean hackers, particularly the notorious Lazarus Group and its subgroup TraderTraitor, have stolen over $500 million from cryptocurrency DeFi platforms in less than three weeks, bringing their total theft for the year to over $700 million. Recent major attacks on Drift Protocol and KelpDAO, resulting in losses of approximately $286 million and $290 million respectively, highlight a strategic shift: instead of targeting core smart contracts, attackers are now exploiting vulnerabilities in peripheral infrastructure. For instance, the KelpDAO attack involved compromising downstream RPC infrastructure used by LayerZero's decentralized validation network (DVN), allowing manipulation without breaching core cryptography. This sophisticated approach mirrors advanced corporate cyber-espionage. Additionally, North Korea has systematically infiltrated the global crypto workforce, with an estimated 100 operatives using fake identities to gain employment at blockchain companies, enabling long-term access to sensitive systems and facilitating large-scale thefts. According to Chainalysis, North Korean-linked hackers stole a record $2 billion in 2025, accounting for 60% of all global crypto theft that year. Their total historical crypto theft has reached $6.75 billion. Post-theft, they employ specialized money laundering methods, heavily relying on Chinese OTC brokers and cross-chain mixing services rather than standard decentralized exchanges. Security experts, while acknowledging the increased sophistication, emphasize that many attacks still exploit fundamental weaknesses like poor access controls and centralized operational risks. Strengthening private key management, limiting privileged access, and enhancing coordination among exchanges, analysts, and law enforcement immediately after an attack are critical to improving defense and fund recovery chances. The industry's challenge now extends beyond secure smart contracts to safeguarding operational security at the infrastructure level.

marsbit36 dk önce

North Korean Hackers Loot $500 Million in a Single Month, Becoming the Top Threat to Crypto Security

marsbit36 dk önce

Circle CEO's Seoul Visit: No Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance, But Met All Major Korean Banks

Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire's recent activities in Seoul indicate a strategic shift for the company, moving away from issuing a Korean won-backed stablecoin and instead focusing on embedding itself as a key infrastructure provider within Korea’s financial and crypto ecosystem. Despite Korea accounting for nearly 30% of global crypto trading volume—with a market characterized by high retail participation and altcoin dominance—Circle has chosen not to compete for the role of stablecoin issuer. Instead, Allaire met with major Korean banks (including Shinhan, KB, and Woori), financial groups, leading exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone), and tech firms like Kakao. This approach reflects a broader industry transition: the core of stablecoin competition is shifting from issuance rights to systemic positioning. With Korean regulators still debating whether banks or tech companies should issue stablecoins, Circle is avoiding regulatory uncertainty by strengthening its role as a service and technology partner. The company is deepening integration with trading platforms, building connections, and promoting stablecoin infrastructure. This positions Circle to benefit regardless of which entity eventually issues a won stablecoin. Allaire also noted the potential for a Chinese yuan stablecoin in the next 3–5 years, underscoring a regional trend of stablecoins becoming more regulated and integrated with traditional finance. Ultimately, Circle’s strategy highlights that future influence in the stablecoin market will belong not necessarily to the issuers, but to the foundational infrastructure layers that enable cross-system transactions.

marsbit1 saat önce

Circle CEO's Seoul Visit: No Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance, But Met All Major Korean Banks

marsbit1 saat önce

SpaceX Ties Up with Cursor: A High-Stakes AI Gambit of 'Lock First, Acquire Later'

SpaceX has secured an option to acquire AI programming company Cursor for $60 billion, with an alternative clause requiring a $10 billion collaboration fee if the acquisition does not proceed. This structure is not merely a potential acquisition but a strategic move to control core access points in the AI era. The deal is designed as a flexible, dual-path arrangement, allowing SpaceX to either fully acquire Cursor or maintain a binding partnership through high-cost collaboration. This "option-style" approach minimizes immediate regulatory and integration risks while ensuring long-term alignment between the two companies. At its core, the transaction exchanges critical AI-era resources: SpaceX provides its Colossus supercomputing cluster—one of the world’s most powerful AI training infrastructures—while Cursor contributes its AI-native developer environment and strong product adoption. This synergy connects compute power, models, and application layers, forming a closed-loop AI capability stack. Cursor, founded in 2022, has achieved rapid growth with over $1 billion in annual revenue and widespread enterprise adoption. Its value lies in transforming software development through AI agents capable of coding, debugging, and system design—positioning it as a gateway to future software production. For SpaceX, this move is part of a broader strategy to evolve from a aerospace company into an AI infrastructure empire, integrating xAI, supercomputing, and chip manufacturing. Controlling Cursor fills a gap in its developer tooling layer, strengthening its AI narrative ahead of a potential IPO. The deal reflects a shift in AI competition from model superiority to ecosystem and entry-point control. With programming tools as a key battleground, securing developer loyalty becomes crucial for dominating the software production landscape. Risks include questions around Cursor’s valuation, technical integration challenges, and potential regulatory scrutiny. Nevertheless, the deal underscores a strategic bet: controlling both compute and software development access may redefine power dynamics in the AI-driven future.

marsbit1 saat önce

SpaceX Ties Up with Cursor: A High-Stakes AI Gambit of 'Lock First, Acquire Later'

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片