JPMorgan Closes the 'Financial Backdoor': Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Face Compliance Reshuffle

比推2025-12-29 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-12-29 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

JPMorgan Chase has recently frozen accounts linked to at least two fast-growing stablecoin startups, Blindpay and Kontigo, highlighting the risks cryptocurrency transactions pose to banks. These startups, backed by Y Combinator, primarily served Latin American markets, including Venezuela—a region under U.S. sanctions. The bank’s a surge in disputed transactions, such as chargebacks and fraud claims, triggered the freezes. Checkbook, a payments partner that provided these firms virtual account access to JPMorgan, noted that the startups failed to adequately verify their end customers' identities or ensure transaction legitimacy. While JPMorgan stated the action wasn’t due to the nature of stablecoin businesses, the incident underscores broader regulatory concerns. U.S. and global authorities have warned that stablecoins are being used for money laundering, terrorism financing, and other illicit activities. Both affected startups abruptly tightened compliance measures or terminated high-risk clients after the account closures.

Written by: Michael Roddan, Yueqi Yang

Compiled by: Block Unicorn

Original Title: Stablecoin Startups Bring Trouble to JPMorgan


JPMorgan has recently frozen accounts used by at least two fast-growing stablecoin startups in recent months, highlighting the risks that cryptocurrency transactions pose to banks, which must understand the customers they do business with and the sources of their funds.

These stablecoin startups operate in Venezuela and other regions where sanctions or other restrictions pose legal risks to banks. One of the stablecoin startups once claimed that customers did not need identity verification before transactions. Another startup, after JPMorgan froze its account, suddenly terminated all customers from high-risk countries, according to the company's communication records with customers.

Stablecoins have surged in popularity overseas, especially in countries with unstable economies and currencies. Last summer, the U.S. passed a stablecoin bill, giving this type of cryptocurrency pegged to the U.S. dollar legal status.

Individuals and businesses use stablecoins to obtain U.S. dollars and make overseas remittances. They need to establish connections with U.S. banks to convert cryptocurrencies into U.S. dollars. However, banks are cautious, fearing penalties from regulators even during the Trump administration, which supported cryptocurrencies. Global and U.S. regulators and law enforcement agencies have stated that stablecoins have been used to fund terrorist organizations, launder money, and engage in other criminal activities.

JPMorgan froze the accounts of two startups invested in by venture capital firm Y Combinator—Blindpay and Kontigo—both primarily focused on the Latin American market. These two companies connected with JPMorgan through the digital payment company Checkbook, which is also supported by JPMorgan and other institutions.

Blindpay has processed over $100 million in transactions. In August of this year, the company began offering an account through JPMorgan aimed at helping customers overcome barriers to entering the U.S. financial system. Blindpay stated in a blog post at the time that obtaining loans from U.S. banks was 'much harder than imagined.'

Later that day, JPMorgan and Checkbook froze Blindpay's account. According to a series of now-deleted blog posts on the company's website, the stablecoin company quickly began strengthening anti-money laundering measures and customer verification. Blindpay did not respond to requests for comment.

Last year, Checkbook joined JPMorgan's payment partner network, enabling Checkbook to process payments for its customers through JPMorgan. For this purpose, Checkbook creates virtual accounts for its customers at JPMorgan.

Virtual accounts allow fintech companies like Checkbook to quickly open U.S. dollar-denominated accounts for overseas customers and business clients, avoiding situations where they cannot access the U.S. banking system for various reasons. Under U.S. law, businesses opening bank accounts in the U.S. must provide proof of their operations in the U.S. and a physical U.S. address.

Virtual accounts have become a popular service offered by stablecoin companies like Blindpay. Checkbook's accounts have opened a backdoor for these small stablecoin companies to enter the U.S. financial system. Soon after, JPMorgan noticed a sharp increase in the number of disputed transactions (i.e., refunds and chargebacks). Chargebacks can arise from fraud, unauthorized use, and billing errors, especially when cardholders report identity theft or dispute purchases. It is unclear why these companies experienced a surge in disputed transactions. JPMorgan has contacted Checkbook for an explanation.

Checkbook CEO PJ Gupta stated that companies like Blindpay and Kontigo were among the reasons for the rise in chargeback rates. Gupta pointed out that these companies need to ensure that transactions processed through their systems are legitimate and valid and verify the identities of remitting customers. Gupta also mentioned that while Checkbook conducts customer due diligence on the stablecoin companies themselves, due diligence on the customers is the responsibility of these companies.

Gupta stated that when disputed transactions exceed a certain threshold, Checkbook and JPMorgan freeze customer accounts. 'In such cases, we suspend operations and conduct an analysis until we obtain assurances. We send the assurances to the bank, and if both the bank and we agree that the issue will not recur, we can reopen the account. If we cannot reach an agreement, we will not reopen the account,' Gupta said.

Gupta mentioned that transactions from stablecoin companies account for only a small portion of Checkbook's total transaction volume, which exceeds $1 billion per month. He stated that the disputed transactions that prompted JPMorgan's action were due to a large influx of customers using the services provided by stablecoin companies. 'It was entirely because they opened the floodgates, and a large number of people rushed in through the internet,' Gupta said, referring to the disputed transactions of these startups.

Venezuela Sanctions

JPMorgan stated that freezing the accounts of these stablecoin companies was not due to the nature of their business. 'This has nothing to do with stablecoin companies,' a JPMorgan spokesperson said. 'We provide banking services to stablecoin issuers and related businesses, and we recently facilitated the listing of a stablecoin issuer.' Beyond this, the bank declined to comment further.

Kontigo, which raised $20 million from several venture capital firms including Y Combinator and Founders Inc., is one of two cryptocurrency platforms authorized by Venezuelan regulators to operate in the country. Kontigo focuses on serving Venezuelan customers, and its founders claim the company has processed over $1 billion in transactions. Over the past two decades, the U.S. has imposed sanctions on certain sectors of Venezuela's economy, the government, and individuals, and President Donald Trump has been increasing pressure on Venezuela's ruling authorities.

In a promotional video released by Kontigo this month, the company claimed: 'In just 30 seconds, individuals and businesses worldwide can transact using USDC and USDT stablecoins without KYC (Know Your Customer). Users can link bank accounts and instantly transfer funds globally without limits.' Kontigo co-founder Jesus Castillo stated that customers do not need to submit identity verification for cryptocurrency transactions, but identity verification is required for transactions involving fiat currency.

According to Kontigo's communication records with customers, JPMorgan suddenly froze the company's account in November. Checkbook CEO Gupta stated that the account freeze was due to a significant increase in the number of disputed transactions. Castillo, however, said that his startup and other similar companies are facing issues caused by Checkbook.

The role Kontigo plays in transferring funds out of Venezuela was highlighted in a recent report by Transparencia Venezuela, the Venezuelan chapter of Transparency International. The report stated that users could deposit up to $100,000 into Kontigo's digital wallet through private banks in Venezuela without any identity checks on the depositor. Castillo called these claims false and stated that the company has filed a lawsuit against the nonprofit. Transparencia Venezuela did not comment.

He mentioned that Kontigo also uses Bridge, owned by Stripe, to provide virtual accounts for some of its users in the U.S. and Europe. Castillo did not respond to questions about Kontigo's compliance controls. Bridge declined to comment.

After JPMorgan froze Blindpay's account, the stablecoin company's CEO and co-founder Simon Moura and co-founder João Borges flew to San Francisco to meet with an investor from Y Combinator and search for a new payment processor or bank willing to work with them.

'Unfortunately, we were rejected by this promising payment processor because they are still reluctant to work with stablecoin companies,' Moura wrote in a now-deleted blog post. Moura also visited JPMorgan's office to explain how Blindpay operates.

Due to issues with due diligence, Blindpay's potential customer base appears to have significantly shrunk. First, the company stated in a later-deleted blog post that customers from 'high-risk countries' would need to 'undergo stricter KYC processes,' referring to the 'Know Your Customer' regulatory system applicable to banks. A few days later, Blindpay announced that, after a round of due diligence, all its virtual accounts and related crypto wallets had been closed.


Twitter: https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

BitPush TG Discussion Group: https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

BitPush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link: https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7598958

İlgili Sorular

QWhy did JPMorgan freeze the accounts of stablecoin startups like Blindpay and Kontigo?

AJPMorgan froze the accounts due to a significant increase in disputed transactions, such as chargebacks and refunds, which raised concerns about compliance and potential risks, including fraud and unauthorized use.

QWhat role did Checkbook play in the relationship between JPMorgan and the stablecoin startups?

ACheckbook, a digital payments company, acted as an intermediary by providing virtual accounts through JPMorgan, allowing stablecoin startups to access the U.S. financial system. However, Checkbook relied on the startups to conduct their own customer due diligence.

QHow did the stablecoin startups like Kontigo and Blindpay initially attract customers, and what compliance issues arose?

AKontigo initially advertised no KYC (Know Your Customer) requirements for cryptocurrency transactions, while Blindpay faced issues with inadequate identity verification. This led to compliance risks, including potential money laundering and violations of sanctions, especially in high-risk regions like Venezuela.

QWhat impact did the U.S. sanctions on Venezuela have on Kontigo's operations?

AKontigo, which focused on serving Venezuelan customers, faced challenges due to U.S. sanctions on Venezuela. Its role in facilitating fund transfers out of Venezuela drew scrutiny, as it was accused of allowing large deposits without proper identity verification, though the company denied these claims.

QWhat broader concerns do regulators and law enforcement agencies have regarding stablecoins?

ARegulators and law enforcement agencies worry that stablecoins are being used for illicit activities, such as funding terrorist organizations, money laundering, and other criminal endeavors, due to potential loopholes in compliance and verification processes.

İlgili Okumalar

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit2 saat önce

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit2 saat önce

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit2 saat önce

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit2 saat önce

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit3 saat önce

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit3 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片