Japan Launches Historic Crypto Regulatory Overhaul: Crypto Assets to Be Formally Included in Securities Law, Fully Departing from the 'Payment Tool Era'

marsbit2025-12-10 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-12-10 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Japan's Financial Services Agency (FSA) is advancing a historic regulatory reform to shift cryptocurrency regulation from the Payment Services Act (PSA) to the stricter Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA). This reclassification officially recognizes crypto assets as investment products, similar to stocks and bonds, and subjects them to securities-level investor protection and disclosure standards. The reform, based on a finalized report from an expert panel, aims to enhance investor safeguards, combat fraud, and align with international frameworks like the EU's MiCA. Key measures include stricter disclosure requirements for Initial Exchange Offerings (IEOs), stronger enforcement against unregistered platforms—including overseas and decentralized exchanges—and a ban on insider trading and market manipulation. Additionally, Japan is considering reducing the crypto tax rate from up to 55% (miscellaneous income) to 20% (capital gains), matching stock taxation, to encourage institutional and retail investment. The changes are expected to be enacted by 2026.

Japan's Financial Services Agency (FSA) is promoting a historic regulatory reform, planning to shift the regulatory framework for crypto assets from the Payment Services Act (PSA), which originally positioned them as 'payment tools,' entirely to the stricter Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA).

This change signifies that Japan officially recognizes crypto assets are no longer just a means of payment but are 'investment products' on par with stocks and bonds. They will henceforth be subject to securities-level investor protection and information disclosure standards. Analysts point out that Japan's move not only significantly enhances investor protection but also aims to combat fraud and align with mainstream international regulatory frameworks, such as the EU's MiCA.

Regulatory Framework Adapts to Actual Conditions

On December 10, the FSA officially released the final research report from the 'Financial System Research Council · Study Group on Transactions Involving Crypto Assets, etc.' The report straightforwardly states, 'Both domestically and internationally, people are increasingly treating crypto assets as investment targets.' Therefore, the current Payment Services Act framework can no longer accommodate the actual usage scenarios. It must be managed in line with the core securities market law, the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, to provide more appropriate protection.

The report has already been unanimously approved by the expert group. It is expected to be submitted to the Diet for legislative amendment and officially implemented as early as 2026.

Key Points of the Reform

The content of this reform includes three core focal points:

First, a significant strengthening of information disclosure requirements for 'Initial Exchange Offerings' (IEOs, new token sales reviewed and conducted by exchanges). In the future, exchanges must provide detailed issuer identity, project whitepaper, token economic model, and third-party code audit reports before an IEO sale begins, along with mandatory risk warnings. Even if a project claims to be 'decentralized,' the issuing team cannot evade these requirements through anonymity. This is seen as the strongest measure to end the past chaos of 'worthless tokens.'

Second, adopting stronger enforcement actions against unregistered platforms. The FSA will gain greater investigative and punitive powers, allowing it to directly penalize overseas platforms, decentralized exchanges (DEXs), or underground trading groups, and even issue business suspension orders. The report also explicitly prohibits insider trading and market manipulation, fully aligning with the EU's MiCA and South Korea's latest regulations.

Third, simultaneous tax relaxation. In sync with the regulatory shift, the Japanese government is considering changing the tax classification of crypto asset gains from the current 'miscellaneous income' with a top rate of 55% to a 'capital gains tax of 20%,' the same as for stocks. This is expected to significantly stimulate institutional and retail investment interest. This reform is viewed as a major turning point for Japan, moving from 'preventing malpractice' to 'promoting benefit.'

İlgili Sorular

QWhat major regulatory change is Japan's Financial Services Agency (FSA) implementing for crypto assets?

AJapan's FSA is shifting the regulatory framework for crypto assets from the Payment Services Act (PSA) to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA), treating them as investment products similar to stocks and bonds.

QWhat are the three key focuses of Japan's crypto asset regulatory reform?

AThe three key focuses are: 1) Strengthening information disclosure requirements for Initial Exchange Offerings (IEOs), 2) Implementing stricter enforcement against unregistered platforms including offshore and decentralized exchanges, and 3) Revising the tax system to lower crypto asset profit taxes from up to 55% to a 20% capital gains tax rate.

QWhy is Japan moving crypto asset regulation from the Payment Services Act to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act?

ABecause both domestically and internationally, people are increasingly using crypto assets as investment products rather than just payment methods, and the FIEA provides more appropriate investor protection and disclosure standards for this purpose.

QHow does the reform aim to address the problem of 'air coins' or fraudulent token offerings?

AIt requires exchanges to provide detailed pre-sale information for IEOs, including issuer identity, project whitepaper, token economic model, third-party code audit reports, and mandatory risk warnings, making it difficult for teams to remain anonymous.

QWhat is the expected timeline for Japan's new crypto asset regulations to come into effect?

AThe final report has been approved by the expert panel, and the amended law is expected to be submitted to the Diet (Japan's parliament) by 2026 for enactment.

İlgili Okumalar

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

Tech giants like Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft are undergoing a radical financial transformation due to AI. Their traditional "light-asset, high-free-cash-flow" model is being dismantled by staggering capital expenditures on AI infrastructure—data centers, GPUs, and power. Combined 2026 guidance exceeds $700 billion, a 4.5x increase from 2022, causing free cash flow to plummet (e.g., Amazon's fell 95%). To fund this, they are borrowing unprecedented sums through long-dated, multi-currency bonds (e.g., Alphabet's 100-year bond). The world's most conservative capital—pensions, insurers—is now funding Silicon Valley's most speculative bet. This shift makes these companies resemble heavy-asset industrials (railroads, utilities) rather than software firms, threatening their premium valuations. Historically, such infrastructure booms (railroads, fiber optics) followed a pattern: genuine technology, overbuilding fueled by competitive frenzy, aggressive debt financing, and a crash triggered by financial conditions—not technology failure. The infrastructure remained, but many original builders and financiers did not survive. The core gamble is a "time arbitrage": using cheap debt today to build scale and lock in customers before AI capabilities commoditize. They are betting that AI revenue will materialize before debt comes due. Their positions vary: Amazon is under immediate cash pressure; Meta's path to monetization is unclear; Alphabet has a robust core business buffer; Microsoft has the shortest path from infrastructure to revenue. The contract is set: the most risk-averse global capital has lent its time to Silicon Valley, awaiting a future that is promised but uncertain.

marsbit8 dk önce

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

marsbit8 dk önce

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

"The article explores the 'VVV' concept as the new AI-focused narrative within the Base ecosystem, centered around the token $VVV of the privacy-focused, uncensored generative AI platform Venice, led by crypto veteran Erik Voorhees. Venice has seen significant growth in 2026, with its API users surging, partly attributed to exposure from OpenClaw. The platform now boasts over 2 million total users and 55,000 paid subscribers. Correspondingly, the $VVV token price has risen over 9x this year. Key to its performance are tokenomics designed for value accrual: reduced annual emissions, subscription revenue used for buyback-and-burn, and a unique staking mechanism. Staking $VVV yields $sVVV, which can be used to mint $DIEM tokens. Each staked $DIEM provides a daily $1 credit for using Venice's API services, creating tangible utility. The article also highlights other tokens associated with the 'VVV' narrative. $POD, the token of distributed AI network Dolphin (which co-developed Venice's default AI model), saw a massive price surge. $cyb3rwr3n, a project for a Venice credit auction market, gained attention due to perceived connections to Venice's team despite official denials. Finally, $SR of robotics platform STRIKEROBOT.AI rose after announcing a partnership with Venice for robot vision-language model development. Overall, the 'VVV' ecosystem combines AI platform growth, deflationary tokenomics, and innovative utility mechanisms, driving significant investor interest and price action in related tokens."

marsbit17 dk önce

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

marsbit17 dk önce

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbit1 saat önce

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbit1 saat önce

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

The pre-IPO token market has been rocked by strong statements from Anthropic and OpenAI. Both AI giants have updated official warnings, declaring that any sale or transfer of their company shares without explicit board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized on their corporate records. This directly targets Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the common legal structure used by pre-IPO token platforms. These platforms typically use an SPV to acquire shares from employees or early investors, then issue blockchain-based tokens representing a claim on the SPV's economic benefits. Anthropic and OpenAI's position means that if an SPV's share purchase lacked authorization, the underlying asset could be deemed worthless, nullifying the token's value. Anthropic explicitly warned that any third party selling its shares—via direct sales, forwards, or tokens—is likely fraudulent or offering a valueless investment. The crackdown highlights risks in the popular SPV model, including complex multi-layered "Russian doll" SPV structures that obscure legal ownership, add fees, and concentrate risk. If one layer is invalidated, the entire chain could collapse. Following the announcements, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). In contrast, purely speculative pre-IPO prediction contracts remained stable, as they involve no actual share ownership. The move is seen as a corrective measure amid a market frenzy where some pre-IPO token valuations (e.g., Anthropic's token hitting a $1.4 trillion implied valuation) far exceeded recent official funding rounds. Opinions are split: some believe this undermines the core logic of pre-IPO token trading if top companies reject SPVs, while others argue buyers always assumed this legal risk when accessing unofficial channels. The statements serve as a stark warning and a potential catalyst for market de-leveraging and clearer boundaries.

Odaily星球日报1 saat önce

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

Odaily星球日报1 saat önce

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

"AI Membership: The Hidden Cost Pushing Workers Toward 'Poverty'" The widespread corporate push for AI adoption is creating a hidden financial burden for employees. Companies, from giants like Alibaba to small firms, are mandating AI use, often tying token consumption to KPIs, but frequently refuse to cover the costs. Workers are forced to pay for subscriptions out of pocket to stay competitive and avoid being replaced. Front-end developer Long Shen spends up to 2000 RMB monthly on tools like Cursor and ChatGPT Plus, seeing it as a necessary 3% salary investment to handle 90% of his coding tasks. While it boosted his performance and led to promotions, he now faces idle time at work, pretending to be busy. Designer Peng Peng navigates strict company firewalls by using personal devices and accounts for AI image generation tools like Midjourney, spending hundreds monthly without reimbursement, while her boss demands faster, more numerous revisions. The pressure creates workplace anxiety and suspicion. Programmer Li Huahua, after a friend's experience of raised KPIs following AI success, fears being branded a "traitor" for using it yet worries about falling behind if she doesn't. The dynamic allows management to demand results without understanding the tools or covering expenses, treating employees like AI "agents." While some, like entrepreneur Jin Tu, find high value in paid AI, building entire systems and winning competitions, for most, it's a trap. Free tools like Kimi and Doubao are introducing fees, closing off alternatives. The initial efficiency gains individual advantage, but as AI becomes ubiquitous, the personal edge disappears, workloads increase, and a cycle of dependency begins. Workers like Long Shen realize they cannot maintain AI-generated code without AI, making stopping harder than continuing to pay. The tool promising liberation is instead becoming a compulsory, costly chain in the modern workplace.

marsbit2 saat önce

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

marsbit2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures

Popüler Makaleler

ERA Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! Caldera (ERA) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında Caldera (ERA) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: Caldera (ERA) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınCaldera (ERA) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: Caldera (ERA) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında Caldera (ERA) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

412 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2025.07.17Güncellenme 2025.07.17

ERA Nasıl Satın Alınır

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların ERA (ERA) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.

活动图片