Japan Launches Historic Crypto Regulatory Overhaul: Crypto Assets to Be Formally Included in Securities Law, Fully Departing from the 'Payment Tool Era'

marsbit2025-12-10 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-12-10 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Japan's Financial Services Agency (FSA) is advancing a historic regulatory reform to shift cryptocurrency regulation from the Payment Services Act (PSA) to the stricter Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA). This reclassification officially recognizes crypto assets as investment products, similar to stocks and bonds, and subjects them to securities-level investor protection and disclosure standards. The reform, based on a finalized report from an expert panel, aims to enhance investor safeguards, combat fraud, and align with international frameworks like the EU's MiCA. Key measures include stricter disclosure requirements for Initial Exchange Offerings (IEOs), stronger enforcement against unregistered platforms—including overseas and decentralized exchanges—and a ban on insider trading and market manipulation. Additionally, Japan is considering reducing the crypto tax rate from up to 55% (miscellaneous income) to 20% (capital gains), matching stock taxation, to encourage institutional and retail investment. The changes are expected to be enacted by 2026.

Japan's Financial Services Agency (FSA) is promoting a historic regulatory reform, planning to shift the regulatory framework for crypto assets from the Payment Services Act (PSA), which originally positioned them as 'payment tools,' entirely to the stricter Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA).

This change signifies that Japan officially recognizes crypto assets are no longer just a means of payment but are 'investment products' on par with stocks and bonds. They will henceforth be subject to securities-level investor protection and information disclosure standards. Analysts point out that Japan's move not only significantly enhances investor protection but also aims to combat fraud and align with mainstream international regulatory frameworks, such as the EU's MiCA.

Regulatory Framework Adapts to Actual Conditions

On December 10, the FSA officially released the final research report from the 'Financial System Research Council · Study Group on Transactions Involving Crypto Assets, etc.' The report straightforwardly states, 'Both domestically and internationally, people are increasingly treating crypto assets as investment targets.' Therefore, the current Payment Services Act framework can no longer accommodate the actual usage scenarios. It must be managed in line with the core securities market law, the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, to provide more appropriate protection.

The report has already been unanimously approved by the expert group. It is expected to be submitted to the Diet for legislative amendment and officially implemented as early as 2026.

Key Points of the Reform

The content of this reform includes three core focal points:

First, a significant strengthening of information disclosure requirements for 'Initial Exchange Offerings' (IEOs, new token sales reviewed and conducted by exchanges). In the future, exchanges must provide detailed issuer identity, project whitepaper, token economic model, and third-party code audit reports before an IEO sale begins, along with mandatory risk warnings. Even if a project claims to be 'decentralized,' the issuing team cannot evade these requirements through anonymity. This is seen as the strongest measure to end the past chaos of 'worthless tokens.'

Second, adopting stronger enforcement actions against unregistered platforms. The FSA will gain greater investigative and punitive powers, allowing it to directly penalize overseas platforms, decentralized exchanges (DEXs), or underground trading groups, and even issue business suspension orders. The report also explicitly prohibits insider trading and market manipulation, fully aligning with the EU's MiCA and South Korea's latest regulations.

Third, simultaneous tax relaxation. In sync with the regulatory shift, the Japanese government is considering changing the tax classification of crypto asset gains from the current 'miscellaneous income' with a top rate of 55% to a 'capital gains tax of 20%,' the same as for stocks. This is expected to significantly stimulate institutional and retail investment interest. This reform is viewed as a major turning point for Japan, moving from 'preventing malpractice' to 'promoting benefit.'

İlgili Sorular

QWhat major regulatory change is Japan's Financial Services Agency (FSA) implementing for crypto assets?

AJapan's FSA is shifting the regulatory framework for crypto assets from the Payment Services Act (PSA) to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA), treating them as investment products similar to stocks and bonds.

QWhat are the three key focuses of Japan's crypto asset regulatory reform?

AThe three key focuses are: 1) Strengthening information disclosure requirements for Initial Exchange Offerings (IEOs), 2) Implementing stricter enforcement against unregistered platforms including offshore and decentralized exchanges, and 3) Revising the tax system to lower crypto asset profit taxes from up to 55% to a 20% capital gains tax rate.

QWhy is Japan moving crypto asset regulation from the Payment Services Act to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act?

ABecause both domestically and internationally, people are increasingly using crypto assets as investment products rather than just payment methods, and the FIEA provides more appropriate investor protection and disclosure standards for this purpose.

QHow does the reform aim to address the problem of 'air coins' or fraudulent token offerings?

AIt requires exchanges to provide detailed pre-sale information for IEOs, including issuer identity, project whitepaper, token economic model, third-party code audit reports, and mandatory risk warnings, making it difficult for teams to remain anonymous.

QWhat is the expected timeline for Japan's new crypto asset regulations to come into effect?

AThe final report has been approved by the expert panel, and the amended law is expected to be submitted to the Diet (Japan's parliament) by 2026 for enactment.

İlgili Okumalar

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit57 dk önce

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit57 dk önce

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit1 saat önce

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures

Popüler Makaleler

ERA Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! Caldera (ERA) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında Caldera (ERA) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: Caldera (ERA) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınCaldera (ERA) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: Caldera (ERA) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında Caldera (ERA) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

378 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2025.07.17Güncellenme 2025.07.17

ERA Nasıl Satın Alınır

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların ERA (ERA) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.

活动图片