It's 2026, DAOs Should Have Matured by Now

marsbit2026-01-29 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-29 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The year 2025 marked a pivotal turning point for DAOs, shifting from idealistic experiments to a more mature hybrid model that balances decentralized oversight with operational efficiency. Key trends include a move away from pure community governance towards structures with clearer operational control, as seen with Arbitrum's OpCo and Uniswap's DUNI framework. While voter participation declined, voting power became more concentrated among active delegates. A major development was the focus on value accumulation for token holders through mechanisms like buybacks, fee switches, and burns, addressing a critical flaw in previous tokenomics. Significant conflicts, such as those at Gnosis and Aave, forced DAOs to confront issues of accountability and structural flaws. Looking ahead to 2026, key trends will include: the formalization of legal structures becoming necessary; governance evolving into risk management infrastructure; the decline of purely governance-focused tokens in favor of those with value capture; increased professional delegation; and the growing role of privacy, AI for decision fatigue, and futarchy markets. This evolution represents a maturation of the space, moving towards more effective and accountable organizations where growth benefits token holders and all participants are held responsible.

Author: Pink Brains

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Intro: 2025 was a critical inflection point for decentralized governance (DAO). After years of idealistic experimentation, mainstream protocols began to seriously address core pain points such as power distribution, accountability mechanisms, and sustainability. This article, written by seasoned DAO delegate Pink Brains, draws from the practical experience of casting 725 votes within top protocols like Aave, Lido, and Gnosis, offering an in-depth analysis of the shift in DAOs from 'community autonomy' to a 'hybrid operation' model.

The author points out that governance tokens alone are no longer sustainable. The future of DAOs will evolve towards economic alignment, legal entity formation, and AI-assisted decision-making. This is not just a review of governance but also a prophecy for the evolution of Web3 organizational structures in 2026.

Full Text Below:

2025 marked a turning point for decentralized governance.

After years of experimentation, major protocols began to confront fundamental questions about power distribution, accountability, and sustainability.

The answers weren't always pleasant, but they were necessary.

What We Achieved in 2025

2025 was also the first year of our operation as an active DAO Delegate.

Cast 725 votes across 18 protocols
Held voting power exceeding 8 million
Top 10 delegate in Aave and Lido
Top 3 delegate in Velodrome
Top 6 delegate in Gnosis

This perspective, grounded in practical governance work, allowed us to clearly observe the patterns reshaping DAOs in 2025 and define their trajectory entering 2026.

Changes in DAOs in 2025

Shift in Operational Model: From Pure Community Governance to Hybrid Control

The most significant change in 2025 was the shift from purely community governance towards hybrid models with clearer operational control.

@arbitrum introduced an Operating Company (OpCo), channeling all DAO operations through a unified structure.
@JupiterExchange completely paused governance for nearly six months to reassess its approach.
@Uniswap launched the DUNI framework, centralizing operational authority.
The @Gnosis DAO executed a hard fork amidst reduced community engagement. Scroll transitioned to a CEO-led structure.
@Scroll_ZKP paused its DAO, shifting focus to centralized governance.
Recently, the Celo Foundation merged with @cLabs into a unified core contributor organization.

The motivation for this shift was DAOs hitting scaling limits. Execution became the bottleneck. Community-wide votes were often too slow for operations, too noisy for technical nuances, and too vulnerable for security-sensitive actions.

Consequently, governance power is concentrating towards smaller, high-context groups, while the broader community shifts towards an oversight role, as reflected in the next section.

Fewer Voters, But More Concentrated Power

In 2025, the number of proposals and voter participation dropped significantly across major DAOs. However, the voting power behind each proposal remained strong.

Lido saw an increase in participation after adopting a dual governance framework.
Arbitrum and Uniswap still had the highest overall participation, but the number of voters decreased for both.

Caption: From DeFiLlama's State of DeFi 2025 Report

This does not signal the failure of governance. Instead, governance is becoming more bundled, more operationally abstract, and less frequent.

Governance influence migrated to a small number of highly active Delegates and large capital participants.

Value Accrual for Token Holders

"Token buyback", "buyback and burn", and "fee switch" became central themes in 2025.

For years, token utility revolved around voting rights and incentive distribution, but offered minimal economic value to token holders. 2025 changed this equation.

Lido adopted a buyback framework.
Uniswap DAO activated the long-awaited fee switch, pledging to burn nearly $600 million worth of UNI tokens.
Aave implemented a token buyback mechanism. Optimism launched a buyback program.
CoW Protocol increased solver profitability in a way that benefits token holders.

This trend addresses a key challenge in tokenomics. Buybacks and burns reduce circulating supply, making the token more scarce. If demand remains stable, the price strengthens. When token holders can truly benefit from the protocol's success, they are more incentivized to buy, hold, and participate in governance decisions long-term.

Who Really Owns the DAO?

Two major controversies forced DAOs to confront structural flaws.

Gnosis voted to terminate Karpatkey's treasury mandate due to fee disputes, underperformance, and a ~$700k loss related to liquidity issues.
Tensions flared between Aave DAO and Aave Labs when it was discovered that approximately $10 million annually in swap fees from the CoW Swap integration were flowing to Aave Labs instead of the DAO. A vote on brand ownership failed, and the controversy left a harder question: what does "DAO-owned" really mean when the core team controls development and distribution?

These conflicts forced protocols to patch holes in accountability and governance structures.

Legal Infrastructure is Adapting to DAOs

Despite DeFi's growth, most DAOs still lack clear legal structures, creating increasing liability and regulatory risks as protocols scale.

While jurisdictions like Wyoming have introduced DAO LLC frameworks, and Switzerland offers mature legal pathways, most DAOs remain in a legal gray area.

2026 Trend Predictions

Centralized DAO as a New Practice

Protocols will develop clear frameworks to delineate "community decisions" from "operational decisions," moving beyond the false binary of "fully decentralized" or "fully centralized."

Operational Execution: Will be handled by Labs teams, not foundations.
Community Oversight: DAO delegates and the community will be responsible for treasury strategy, long-term direction, and major structural decisions.

Governance Shifts to Risk Management Infrastructure

The DAO of the future will look less like a forum full of chatter. More teams will bifurcate decisions into concave decisions and convex decisions.

Concave problems require:

Pre-approved guardrails and automated execution.
Professional oversight (risk services, auditors, security teams).
Rapid response frameworks for emergencies and market shocks.
Fewer proposals, but each decision carries higher economic impact.

Convex problems (like product direction) require decisive leadership, where the DAO acts as a "brake" or "checkpoint," not the "steering wheel."

By 2026, this will be standard for lending, stablecoins, perps, and any protocol where financial risk can compound quickly.

The End of Governance Tokens? Value Capture Must Be Built

Continuing into 2026, tokens with only governance functions will struggle to maintain long-term engagement.

Delegates, whales, and strategic holders will not consistently protect the system without a visible upside. Protocols will increasingly adopt at least one value accrual path:

Token buyback frameworks.
Fee diversion or revenue sharing.
Staking tied to protocol cash flows.
Treasury strategies aimed at supporting the token's value.

When holders gain economically from the protocol's success, they are incentivized to stay attentive, participate, and protect the system.

Legal Structures Shift from Optional to Necessary

Regulatory pressure and real-world legal challenges will push DAOs towards formal entity formation, seeking a balance between decentralized governance and legal clarity.

Professional Delegation

As governance complexity increases, token holders will increasingly delegate to full-time professional delegates. While this concentrates voting power, it may improve decision quality. Meanwhile, weaker delegate institutions that cannot financially sustain themselves will fold, as governance work becomes more professional, political, and costly.

Privacy, AI & Futarchy

Public governance is a social game. When every vote is public, decisions are influenced by reputation, pressure, and alliances, not purely the protocol's best interest. Therefore, governance privacy will become more important in the future.

AI will address decision fatigue. It can assist in analyzing proposals and auto-voting on routine upgrades based on user-defined preferences, requiring human intervention only for disputes or significant impact.

Futarchy markets will also play a larger role in DAOs. They let market signals predict which option might create value. Gnosis is testing this model, using retail prediction markets to reflect sentiment on proposals.

Crypto is Maturing, and So Are DAOs

The shifts we see in DAO operations, economic alignment, accountability conflicts, and professionalization represent maturation, not the end of DAOs.

DAOs are evolving from ideological experiments into organizational structures that balance "decentralized oversight" with "proven operational efficiency." We believe DAO governance becomes more meaningful if teams can align with community interests: moving fast when action is needed, letting growth benefit token holders, and holding all participants—core teams and delegates alike—accountable.

As Vitalik said: We need more DAOs, but different and better ones.

If you believe in the value of DAOs, we can be your voice.

Effective delegation is more than just casting a vote; it means doing the actual work: reading proposals, staying active on forums, understanding risks, and voting against bad decisions even when it's not popular.

This is how we operate as delegates: through clear communication and educational content, helping protocols grow while staying aligned with community incentives.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat was the most significant shift in DAO operational models in 2025 according to the article?

AThe most significant shift was the transition from pure community governance to hybrid models with clearer operational control, where governance power was concentrated into smaller, high-context groups while the broader community shifted to a supervisory role.

QHow did the trend of 'value accumulation for token holders' manifest in major protocols in 2025?

AIt manifested through mechanisms like token buybacks, burns, and fee switches. For example, Lido adopted a buyback framework, Uniswap DAO activated its fee switch to burn nearly $600 million worth of UNI, and Aave and Optimism implemented token buyback programs.

QWhat two major controversies forced DAOs to confront their structural flaws in 2025?

AThe first was Gnosis voting to terminate Karpatkey's treasury mandate due to fee disputes, underperformance, and a $700,000 loss. The second was the conflict between Aave DAO and Aave Labs over approximately $10 million in annual swap fees from a CoW Swap integration that went to the Labs instead of the DAO.

QWhat is one key prediction for DAO governance in 2026 regarding decision-making?

AGovernance will shift towards risk management infrastructure, where decisions are split into 'concave decisions' (requiring pre-approved guardrails, professional oversight, and fast response frameworks) and 'convex decisions' (requiring decisive leadership with the DAO acting as a brake or checkpoint).

QWhy does the article suggest that 'governance privacy' will become more important in the future?

ABecause public governance is a social game where decisions can be influenced by reputation, pressure, and alliances rather than the protocol's best interest. Privacy in governance can help mitigate these influences and lead to more objective decision-making.

İlgili Okumalar

MSX US Stock Daily Insight: Amazon 2026 Q2 Earnings: AWS Records Fastest Growth in Five Years

**MSX Daily US Stock Observation: Amazon's Q2 2026 Earnings: AWS Achieves Fastest Growth in Five Years** Amazon's latest quarterly results exceeded expectations, driven by a strong performance from its cloud computing unit. The company reported revenue of $200.66 billion, surpassing estimates of approximately $197 billion. The key highlight was Amazon Web Services (AWS), which generated $42.232 billion in revenue, surging 37% year-over-year. This marked the segment's fastest growth pace in 18 quarters, indicating robust demand for cloud services. Reported Earnings Per Share (EPS) of $5.75 significantly exceeded the $1.84 forecast. However, this figure included a substantial one-time, non-operating gain of $53.4 billion, primarily from the revaluation of Amazon's investment in AI company Anthropic. Excluding this item, core operating profit was $27.461 billion, a strong increase of 43% compared to the same period last year. Despite the positive results, Amazon provided guidance for the upcoming third quarter that fell short of market expectations. The company's revenue guidance midpoint is $199.5 billion, below the consensus estimate of around $204 billion. Operating profit guidance of $24.5 billion also slightly missed expectations of approximately $247.9 billion. Furthermore, Amazon raised its forecast for full-year capital expenditures to $220 billion, citing rising memory chip costs, which weighed on investor sentiment regarding future profitability. In summary, Amazon's quarter showcased accelerating momentum in its core AWS business. The underlying operational profit growth remains solid. However, cautious forward guidance and increased investment spending present key areas for monitoring in the coming quarters, as the market assesses whether the current growth phase will translate into sustained profit margin expansion.

Odaily星球日报7 dk önce

MSX US Stock Daily Insight: Amazon 2026 Q2 Earnings: AWS Records Fastest Growth in Five Years

Odaily星球日报7 dk önce

Cyclical Stock or Growth Stock? Coinbase Q2 Earnings Report Reveals 'Valuation Divide'

Coinbase's Q2 2026 results revealed a mixed picture, sparking debate over whether the company is a cyclical stock tied to crypto markets or a future growth stock. Total revenue of $1.22 billion missed expectations, declining 19% year-over-year. Retail trading revenue, still the largest income source, fell 30% to $452 million, reflecting a drop in spot crypto trading activity. While the company highlighted a record 10.3% overall crypto trading market share, this figure includes newer segments like derivatives and prediction markets. Net loss widened to $359 million, marking a third consecutive quarterly loss. However, the report showed diversification efforts. Subscription and service revenue reached $555 million, nearly matching transaction revenue. Stablecoin revenue, at $292 million, remained a strong second pillar. The company emphasized its future potential in stablecoins (notably USDC) and on-chain agent economies. Over 90% of agent stablecoin transactions occur on Base, its layer-2 network, positioning it as a leader in the emerging AI-agent finance (AIFi) sector. CEO Brian Armstrong expressed confidence in bitcoin's cyclical recovery but stressed the need for diversified revenue. The valuation divergence hinges on whether investors focus on current cyclical weakness or future growth from these new business lines.

marsbit23 dk önce

Cyclical Stock or Growth Stock? Coinbase Q2 Earnings Report Reveals 'Valuation Divide'

marsbit23 dk önce

Cyclical Stock or Growth Stock? Coinbase's Q2 Earnings Report Reveals 'Valuation Disagreement'

Coinbase's Q2 2026 financial results revealed a mixed performance, reigniting debate over whether the company should be valued as a cyclical stock tied to crypto markets or a growth stock with future potential. Total revenue missed expectations at $1.22 billion, down 19% year-over-year. Transaction revenue fell to $599 million, with retail crypto spot trading revenue dropping 30% to $452 million, back to 2023 levels. The company reported a net loss of $359 million, marking its third consecutive quarterly loss. Despite CEO Brian Armstrong's positive commentary on metrics like a 10.3% overall crypto trading market share and 106% growth in prediction markets, the market reacted negatively, with shares dropping over 5% after-hours. A key issue is the decline in core retail trading. While Coinbase touted record market share, this figure includes derivatives and new products. Its traditional crypto spot trading share is likely shrinking. New ventures like prediction markets, while growing, contributed less than $30 million, insufficient to offset the core revenue decline. The valuation debate hinges on perspective. As a cyclical stock, Coinbase remains deeply tied to the crypto bear market, with user attrition and competitive pressures justifying a lower valuation. The company's strategy appears focused on surviving until the next bull cycle. Viewed as a growth stock, however, Coinbase shows promising diversification. Subscription and service revenue reached $555 million, nearly matching transaction revenue. Stablecoin revenue, its second-largest source at $292 million, remains strong through its partnership with Circle. Critically, Coinbase is positioning itself as a leader in the emerging on-chain "agent economy." Over 90% of agent-based stablecoin transactions occur on its Base network, which it believes could handle trillions in future agent transactions. The recent acquisition of Deribit also aims to boost its international derivatives offering. In summary, Coinbase's present struggles are clear, but its future hinges on whether its investments in revenue diversification, stablecoins, and the agent economy can ultimately transform its business model and justify a growth premium.

Odaily星球日报27 dk önce

Cyclical Stock or Growth Stock? Coinbase's Q2 Earnings Report Reveals 'Valuation Disagreement'

Odaily星球日报27 dk önce

Wall Street Morning Report: Microsoft Eases 'AI Cash Burn' Concerns, Tech Stocks Stage Strong Rebound, Storage ETF DRAM and Philadelphia Semiconductor Index Soar 17% and 8%

Wall Street rebounds sharply after Microsoft's strong earnings alleviate "AI cash burn" concerns. The Nasdaq 100 surges 3.36%, its third-biggest gain this year, and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index soars 8.19%. Microsoft's stock jumps 15.51%, adding $450 billion in market value, driven by Azure cloud revenue growth of 43% and a pledge for positive free cash flow in FY2027. This reignites confidence in AI investments. The memory sector rallies, with the Roundhill Memory ETF surging nearly 17%. However, market breadth is weak, with over 70% of S&P 500 stocks declining, creating a rare divergence from the index's gain. In currencies, the US dollar tumbles 0.9% amid suspected coordinated intervention by Japan and South Korea. Oil prices dip ahead of an OPEC+ meeting where a modest output increase is expected. Key earnings saw Amazon rise on strong AWS results, while Apple fell due to a disappointing revenue forecast and Meta dropped on capital expenditure worries. Upcoming focuses include the US AI regulatory framework deadline, OPEC+ decisions, and key economic data from South Korea.

marsbit33 dk önce

Wall Street Morning Report: Microsoft Eases 'AI Cash Burn' Concerns, Tech Stocks Stage Strong Rebound, Storage ETF DRAM and Philadelphia Semiconductor Index Soar 17% and 8%

marsbit33 dk önce

Global Market Share Survey: Japanese Firms Lead in Semiconductor Materials

Global Market Share Survey: Japanese Firms Lead in Semiconductor Materials According to the 2025 "Major Goods and Services Market Share Survey" by Nikkei, Japanese companies maintain strong positions in semiconductor-related materials. In silicon wafers, Shin-Etsu Chemical ranks first with a 26.3% share, followed by SUMCO at 17.8%. Together, they hold 44.1% of the market, widening their lead over competitors from Taiwan, Germany, and South Korea. In photoresists, Tokyo Ohka Kogyo, JSR, and Shin-Etsu Chemical occupy the top three spots, with a combined share of 60.5%. Despite their strength in materials, Japanese firms have a weaker presence in core semiconductor segments like DRAM and NAND flash memory, where South Korean and U.S. companies dominate. For instance, SK Hynix and Samsung lead in DRAM, while China’s CXMT doubled its share to 6% in 2025. The semiconductor market is projected to grow rapidly, with WSTS forecasting a 90% increase to $1.5112 trillion by 2026. Major players like Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron are making massive investments to expand capacity. To maintain their edge in materials, Japanese companies must similarly commit to large-scale, risk-taking investments. In contrast, Japan’s automotive sector shows stagnation. Toyota remains the global leader but with only a slight share increase to 12.3%, while Japanese brands are absent from the top five in the EV market. In shipbuilding, Imabari Shipbuilding rose to third place globally with a 7.2% share, benefiting from large container ship deliveries. However, Chinese and South Korean firms dominate the sector, holding the top two positions. Japan aims to revitalize its shipbuilding industry through government and corporate efforts, targeting a near doubling of output by 2035. Addressing labor shortages and adopting advanced technologies like physical AI will be critical for competitiveness.

marsbit52 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot