Is CRCL Expensive Now? Calculating Circle's Stock Price Using the DCF Valuation Model

marsbit2026-02-03 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-03 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

**Title: Is CRCL Expensive Now? A DCF Valuation Analysis of Circle's Stock** **Summary:** This analysis uses a discounted cash flow (DCF) model to estimate the fair value of Circle (CRCL) stock, focusing on its USDC stablecoin business. Key assumptions include: USDC circulation of $70 billion by end-2025, growing at an average annual rate of 15% from 2026 to 2035; a 2.5% average benchmark interest rate; 38% gross margin; fixed operating costs of $500 million in 2025, increasing 10% annually; 24% effective tax rate; 10% discount rate; and a terminal PE multiple of 20. The fully diluted share count is 275 million. The model calculates EBITDA as interest income (USDC circulation × interest rate × margin) minus fixed costs. Free cash flow (FCF) is derived after taxes. The present value of explicit FCF (2026–2035) is $2.282 billion, and the terminal value (2035 FCF × 20) discounted to 2026 is $7.138 billion. The total enterprise value (EV) is $9.42 billion, implying a fair stock price of $34.25 per share as of January 2026. Sensitivity analysis shows that if USDC growth averages 20% annually, the fair value rises to ~$62 per share, suggesting potential margin of safety at current prices (around $62 in early February 2026). However, short-term volatility, forced sellers, and leverage risks are highlighted. The model is conservative, excluding other revenue streams (e.g., Circle’s emerging products like Arc chain) and emphasizing USDC’s growth and competitive sustainability...

Author: @lufeieth

Preface

This is merely a thought experiment for reference only. Welcome to exchange and clash of views. Not investment advice. Profit or loss is your own responsibility.

Valuing Circle (CRCL) is not easy, especially using the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model. Key parameters can vary significantly with slight changes. We can only attempt to find some vague correctness under a relatively conservative approach.

Sending the following prompt to ChatGPT and Gemini yields the same numbers.

Prompt:

According to:Circle's EBITDA ≈ USDC Issuance Scale * USD Benchmark Interest Rate * 38% Gross Margin - Annual Fixed Operating Costs.

Specific numbers:

As of December 31, 2025, USDC issuance is calculated based on 70 billion.

If from January 2026, over 10-year period (2026-2035), USDC issuance is assumed to grow at an average annual rate of 15%.

Use the average annual USDC issuance (not the year-end issuance) to calculate interest and EBITDA.

Annual USD benchmark interest rate is assumed to be 2.5%.

Annual fixed operating costs: $500 million for 2025, assumed to increase by 10% annually from 2026 onwards.

Effective tax rate is assumed to be 24%.

PE multiple is assumed to be 20x.

Fully diluted share count is assumed to be 275 million shares.

Discount rate is assumed to be 10%.

Calculate CRCL's free cash flow, enterprise value, and reasonable stock price discounted back to January 2026.

I. Explanation of Parameters Used in the Valuation Model

1. Gross Margin:

Circle's Q3 2025 financial report showed a gross margin of 39.5%. We use 38% for calculation.

Circle names its key operating metric as RLDC in its performance materials. RLDC is defined as Total Revenue and Reserve Income minus Total Distribution, Transaction, and Other Costs.

RLDC Margin is defined as RLDC divided by Total Revenue and Reserve Income.

2. Benchmark Interest Rate:

As of February 2026, the federal funds rate is 3.5-3.75%. The future path is unknown. We assume an average of 2.5% for the next 10 years.

3. Fixed Operating Costs:

The company's 2025 fixed cost guidance is $495-$510 million. We use $500 million, growing at 10% annually. (Reference: VISA, MA fixed cost growth around 10% in 2025).

4.PE

Multiple:

For CRCL, we use a 10-year average PE of 20x. (Reference: VISA, MA average 10-year PE valuation is 27-35x).

5. USDC Issuance:

As of December 31, 2025, USDC issuance was 75.3 billion, but as of February 1, 2026, it was 70.2 billion. We use 70 billion as the base for calculation.

6. Average Annual Growth Rate of USDC Issuance:

This is the largest variable. First calculated at 15%. Later there is a table showing different valuations corresponding to growth rates from 10% to 40%.

7. Effective Tax Rate:

"Income tax expense or benefit" divided by "pre-tax profit", reflecting the comprehensive tax burden level under the current profit structure. Circle's Q2, Q3 2025 reports showed negative values due to tax credits and exemptions, making it un-referenceable. Temporarily use 24%.

8. Fully Diluted Share Count:

Basic Shares: Refers to the "number of issued and outstanding common shares", the total number of shares actually held by shareholders and existing at a specific disclosure point.

As of November 6, 2025, Circle had issued and outstanding Class A: 216,487,160 shares, Class B: 18,988,431 shares, totaling 235,475,591 shares.

Fully Diluted Shares: Based on basic shares, plus currently existing potential dilutive items, a more commonly used metric for per-share valuation, accounting for currently existing potential dilutive instruments. Includes:

1 Shares corresponding to the granted portion of equity incentives: 35,413,000 shares.

2 Shares issuable related to M&A, subject to service period conditions, etc.: 1,744,000 shares.

3 Potential shares from convertible notes: 1,125,000 shares.

4 Potential shares related to warrants: 1,248,000 shares.

Total approximately 275,005,591 shares, or about 275 million shares.

There is also a Maximum Fully Diluted Share Count (stress test口径, including future un-granted incentive pool):

On top of the 275 million shares, add the "future equity incentive pool available for grant" of 31,348,000 shares. Total approximately 306,353,591 shares, or about 306 million shares.

Our model uses the fully diluted share count of 275 million.

Sections II, III, and IV below are the calculation results:

II. Units and Definitions

1. Unit Explanation

(1) All amounts in the table below are in "Hundreds of Millions of USD".

(2) USDC issuance scale uses "Average Balance for the Year", unit is "Hundreds of Millions of USD".

(3) Stock price unit is "USD per share".

2. Calculation Chain

(1) Annual Interest Benchmark Income = Average USDC Balance for the Year × 2.5%

(2) Retained Gross Profit = Interest Benchmark Income × 38%

(3) EBITDA ≈ Retained Gross Profit − Annual Fixed Operating Costs

(4) Taxes = max(EBITDA, 0) × 24%

(5) FCF ≈ EBITDA − Taxes

(6) Discount rate 10%, discounting annual year-end cash flows back to January 2026

(7) Terminal Value at end of 2035 = 2035 FCF × PE 20x

(8) Fully Diluted Shares = 275 million shares

III. Annual Free Cash Flow from 2026 to 2035 (Hundreds of Millions of USD)

Total Present Value of Explicit Period FCF (2026 to 2035) approximately $2.282 Billion.

IV. Enterprise Value and Reasonable Stock Price as of January 2026 (Based on Fully Diluted 275M Shares)

1、Terminal Value at end of 2035

(1) 2035 FCF = $926 Million

(2) Terminal Value = 9.26 × 20 = $18.513 Billion

(3) Present Value of Terminal Value = 185.13 ÷ 1.1^10 = $7.138 Billion

2、Enterprise Value EV (Discounted to January 2026)

(1) EV = Explicit Period PV 2.282 + Terminal Value PV 7.138 = $9.420 Billion

3、Reasonable Stock Price Discounted to January 2026

(1) Per Share Value = $9.420 Billion ÷ 275 million shares = $34.25 per share

4、A Checkpoint

(1) The present value of the terminal value accounts for approximately 75.8%, which means the valuation is highly sensitive to the 38% retention rate, fixed cost path, and terminal multiple.

V. Summary of Results under Different USDC Average Annual Growth Rates (2026–2035 Explicit Period, 2035 Terminal Value at PE=20, 10% Discount)

Explanation:

(1) Under different scenarios of USDC average annual growth rate from 10% to 40% (increasing by 1%), calculate the enterprise value (EV) and reasonable stock price discounted to January 2026.

(2) EV in the table below is the enterprise value discounted to January 2026, Stock Price = EV ÷ 275 million shares (fully diluted shares).

(3) Units: 2035 year-end USDC scale and EV are in Billions USD (B USD), stock price is in USD/share.

In the table above, 20% is highlighted in red. This means: under conservative estimates, if you believe the future average annual growth rate of USDC can reach 20%, then the current CRCL price of $62 (as of 22:00, February 2, 2026, half an hour before opening) might have a slight margin of safety.

Note: Even if there might be a slight margin of safety, it does not mean it won't fall further. And I also hope it will fall further. It might still fall a lot. Because many factors affect short-term stock price fluctuations, such as the

forced sellers' forced selling behavior

. If you use on-exchange leverage, you might even get liquidated to zero. Remember:

"Preserve principal, don't go to zero."

Do not use leverage. Otherwise, the future has nothing to do with you.

VI. Some Explanations

1. The parameters used in the model are relatively conservative,只是想看看在保守估算下合理的估值是多少。大家可以修改具体的数字,发给chatGPT或Gemini直接计算。

2. The model only considers USDC's reserve interest income and does not include other income items. Circle's Q3 2025 financial report showed other income items as $29 million. Because it's difficult to estimate growth, for conservative estimation, the model did not include them.

3. Products mentioned in Circle's 2026 product vision

, such as the Arc chain, CPN network, xReserve, StableFX, etc., and their potential future income are not included in the model and can be regarded as unvalued upside options.

4. The biggest variable and core question affecting the model's valuation becomes:

  • How large do you think the scale of stablecoins, USDC, will be in 5, 10 years? Can the average annual growth rate of USDC reach 20%?

  • Will Circle still be the leading compliant stablecoin? And maintain its share in an environment of increasing regulation and competition?

5. Although the market generally believes that trends like cross-border payments, "dollarization" in the third world, tokenized stocks, on-chain treasuries, RWA, prediction markets, and even AI Agent payments will benefit stablecoins, for investors who need to put real money on the line, cognition and logic are just the starting point.

What truly determines position sizing and the ability to hold on during volatility is the continuous emergence of trackable, verifiable facts and evidence. Conclusions need to be sought and verified by each individual. Only by holding the chain of evidence in your own hands can you have the capability and determination to resist the fluctuations and noise that will inevitably appear in the future.

VII. Appendix Reference: USDC vs USDT Growth Table Past 6 Years (2020–2025)

Explanation

1. Issuance caliber: Circulation量 as of December 31 each year, unit is Hundreds of Millions of USD

2. YoY Growth Rate: Current year-end ÷ Previous year-end − 1

3. Mind Decoding Content: Added according to the original text of the image you sent

4. "Average Annualized Growth Rate" calculated as CAGR (5 annual intervals) from end-2020 to end-2025

For reference only, to have an intuitive perception of the order of magnitude. Does not represent future growth rates.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the key formula used to calculate Circle's EBITDA in the DCF model?

AThe formula used is: EBITDA ≈ (USDC Issuance Size × USD Benchmark Interest Rate × 38% Gross Margin) - Annual Fixed Operating Costs.

QWhat is the assumed average annual growth rate for USDC issuance from 2026 to 2035 in the base case scenario?

AThe base case scenario assumes an average annual growth rate of 15% for USDC issuance from 2026 to 2035.

QWhat is the calculated fair value per share of CRCL as of January 2026 under the model's base assumptions?

AThe calculated fair value per share is $34.25, based on a fully diluted share count of 275 million shares.

QAccording to the analysis, at what USDC annual growth rate does the $62 share price (as of Feb 2, 2026) potentially offer a margin of safety?

AThe $62 share price is highlighted as potentially having a small margin of safety if the future average annual USDC growth rate is 20%.

QWhat are the two major uncertainties or 'core questions' identified that will ultimately determine Circle's valuation?

AThe two core questions are: 1) How large will the stablecoin and USDC market be in the next 5-10 years, and can USDC maintain a 20% average annual growth rate? 2) Will Circle remain the leading compliant stablecoin and maintain its market share amidst increasing regulation and competition?

İlgili Okumalar

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

After a prolonged decline, the Chinese A-share market staged a strong rally on July 21. The STAR 50 index surged 10.73%, its largest single-day gain in nearly a year, leading a broad-based "V-shaped" reversal. The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.79%, the Shenzhen Component Index gained 4.81%, and the ChiNext Index jumped 7.05%. Total market turnover reached 2.97 trillion yuan, an increase of 256.1 billion yuan from the previous session, with over 3,100 stocks advancing. The semiconductor sector spearheaded the rebound, with related ETFs posting significant gains. Analysts attribute the surge to three converging factors. First, coordinated capital inflows from "national team" institutions, insurance funds, listed company buybacks, and fund house self-purchases have bolstered market liquidity and confidence. Second, supportive policy signals, including commitments from regulators to ensure stable market operations, provided a favorable backdrop. Third, a stabilization and recovery in overseas markets, notably South Korea, created a positive external environment. Institutions suggest the most severe panic selling phase for the tech sector has likely passed, following a significant digestion of crowded positions and leveraged funds. While short-term volatility may persist, the medium to long-term outlook remains underpinned by enduring trends like AI computing demand expansion and semiconductor localization. The market's focus now shifts to the sustainability of supportive fund flows, earnings reports, and upcoming catalysts from the global AI industry chain.

marsbit28 dk önce

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

marsbit28 dk önce

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbit35 dk önce

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbit35 dk önce

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手38 dk önce

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手38 dk önce

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手54 dk önce

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手54 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片